Overall Satisfaction with Parallels Remote Application Server
We have a finance Application which requires a remote desktop connection from different branch offices. We have replaced expensive Citrix with Parallels and saved money
- Application Access
- Remote Desktop access
- File/Print on local machine and print
- Hard to navigate admin access console.
- only positive impact on ROI. We saved lot of money after implementation
- Citrix Virtual Apps (formerly XenApp)
Primary objective is save cost. Easy to configure policy and has more security
Yes, We have benefited from moving citrix to Parallels
We are able to access from browser and as well as parallels client. One feature is good like creating shortcuts for the published applications on desktop. One click access for all applications.
We did not use this feature
SSL and user access control helped us to provide a more secure solution
Do you think Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS) delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS)'s feature set?
Yes
Did Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS) live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS) go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS) again?
Yes
Using Parallels Remote Application Server
45 - Finance
2 - Desktop Support skills are enough for supporting users
- Finance application access,
- Remote Desktop
- File sharing
- Innovative way to use parallels is to publish applications for finance
- we will be using for more applicatiions
Evaluating Parallels Remote Application Server and Competitors
Yes - Citrix secure desktop
- Price
- Product Features
Price
No change