3CX Phone System vs Sangoma Asterisk

• Simplicity: Using a single 3CX interface we can manage every phone and extension used throughout our company.
• Flexibility: There are a wide variety of options to configure each extension and phone. Changing anything after the hardware is deployed is very easy.
• Portability: Phones with 3CX can be easily moved or repurposed within an office or at remote locations, including users' homes. The mobile app allows users to use their office extension anywhere without exposing their cell number.

Read full review

• Call forwarding that I can trust stays on even if my phone "refreshes."
• Ability to setup various call rules and save them to use as needed.

Read full review

• The webmeeting function is clumsy compared to Zoom or Google Meets (Hangouts).
• There is no support offered without paying for it, but the web forum that is offered for free does allow you to throw out questions and have them answered by someone in the community of 3CX user administrators.

Read full review

• Documentation is scarce, so you have to learn by trial and error.
• Not cloud-based, and there's no mobile app.
• The ability to email voicemail messages would be great.

Read full review

• 3CX has a lot to offer for a very low cost as its business model is based on simultaneous calls and not per device. It's very cost effective and very affordable.
• As the 3CX server does not require a high-performance server to run, with the Public Cloud option, it might allow even further savings.

Read full review

• being zero cost, we saved at least 3 million on what a legacy pbx would have cost
• the savings and speed means lower cost on our service making us more competitive
• stability

Read full review