AB Tasty vs. Wyng

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
AB Tasty
Score 8.7 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
AB Tasty is a SAAS application created for e-marketers that enables them to optimize their website and conversion rate without technical knowledge. They can test several versions of their pages to identify which one has the biggest impact on their business objectives, e.g. click-through rate on a call to action button, add-to-cart rate, global conversion rate of their website.N/A
Wyng
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Wyng is used to build interactive digital experiences that engage customers at the right moments, collect their preferences and other zero-party data, and personalize their website experiences in real time. Whether the experience is a product finder quiz, promotion, or preference center, Wyng experiences are designed to be well-timed and user-friendly while offering genuine value to consumers.N/A
Pricing
AB TastyWyng
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AB TastyWyng
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AB TastyWyng
Considered Both Products
AB Tasty
Chose AB Tasty
I think AB Tasty is more advanced, has less limitations and helps you get your experimentation programme up and running. It is also very cost efficient in comparison too, making it an ideal choice if a business doesn't have a large amount of budget or is on the start of their …
Chose AB Tasty
AB Tasty is the king when it comes to cost/benefit. It is not the cheapest but not the most expensive. It is a very advanced tool and we like the fact of not having to pay extra fees for more advanced features that we may only use for one test. Also, the chat support …
Chose AB Tasty
We selected AB Tasty as the support is way better than the WYSIWYG editor. We will still work with AB Tasty as in the addition to the solution because a lot of support is provided (roadmap, workshops, evangelization, etc).
Chose AB Tasty
AB Tasty is more of a marketer's tool. It's much better when it comes to QA, handly and reliable. There is a great customer support chat available in 5 minutes.
Chose AB Tasty
We decided on AB Tasty as there were numerous features at this time that other providers did not offer and we felt like being on the right track for the upcoming years and challenges. Also, the price was for sure one of the criteria. AB Tasty offered an attractive package …
Chose AB Tasty
Privy showed our websites down and was very limited. It's great to be able to use ab tests and have more options without loss of speed
Chose AB Tasty
The product roadmap is interesting. Support is quite professional. Features are very useful.
Chose AB Tasty
AB Tasty is great, probably the best optimizing tool you can use. Easy, loads of features, great support from CSM. Great variation editor whereas Monetate and VWO don't have a lot of features/widgets. Optimizely is good but again not a lot of capability without a dev. Whereas …
Chose AB Tasty
We did test couple of platforms before decision, but A/B Tasty support alreasy on Proof of Concept phase was exceptional and price was reasonable, so the decision was fairly easy.
Chose AB Tasty
AB Tasty is much more affordable and provides very similar results. We are happy we made the switch and have seen the same success we had with other platforms on AB Tasty.
Chose AB Tasty
VWO & Optimizely, in my opinion, are for large corporations. They're expensive and very limiting.
Chose AB Tasty
We have not used the AB Tasty heat maps or user recording feature so I'm not too sure how they stack up. As for SiteSpect it is a more intricate testing platform that uses the cloud to run tests, however, it's much more expensive and I think AB Tasty gives more bang for your …
Chose AB Tasty
AB Tasty has very aggressive pricing and a simple-to-use toolset. We feel that AB Tasty gives us what we need and the other vendors don't provide additional value to justify the cost.
Chose AB Tasty
We selected AB Tasty mostly because we got a sense that their dev and customer service teams were going to go above and beyond to help us out. We were right! The cost was also a factor as they came in a small bit lower, but cost wasn't the only factor.
Chose AB Tasty
AB Tasty is far more affordable than most of them, but with the same functionality and better reporting (reporting looks similar to Optimizely). Monetate requires an agency or a dedicated CRO team to manage and run tests, and is best for large companies with a lot of traffic …
Chose AB Tasty
Optimize does not support SPAs, it was a deal breaker for us. AB Tasty supports it very well.
Chose AB Tasty
AB Tasty isn't as sophisticated or advanced as Monetate. The analytics section in Monetate is fabulous. But AB Tasty is great for smaller companies with a smaller budget. And the AB Tasty support has been better.
Chose AB Tasty
We selected AB Tasty over other leading A/B Testing platforms due to its huge list of features, dedicated account support and competitive licensing model.
Chose AB Tasty
AB Tasty has a good price/quality ratio. They are the European leader and have a good reputation. We were satisfied with them so we kept them.
Chose AB Tasty
AB Tasty shares data with many analytics solutions as Google Analytics or At Internet solutions
Chose AB Tasty
Crazy Egg was mainly only used for heat mapping, which it does really well. I haven't used Google Optimize too much yet but it has most of the same functionality as A/B Tasty. Google Analytics is more used for reporting and a deeper look into data. AB Tasty by far has the best …
Chose AB Tasty
It's a different tool - and could probably borrow some of the UI and ease of use from the other tools, but excels in providing prebuilt functionality and more detailed targeting. It also needs a lot more learning - when the other tools are pretty much pick up and go.
Wyng
Chose Wyng
I selected Offerpop because of the cost. I was never going to get the cost of Olapic or Bazaarvoice Curations approved for UGC. However, I really feel that UGC needs to be on the product detail page in order to see a lift in conversions on a particular product.
Chose Wyng
Offerpop is much more user friendly than other products we've used. It allows us to quickly develop campaigns by offering a variety of templates where with others, our agency had to put in much more development time. However, Offerpop isn't quite as advanced as others when it …
Chose Wyng
It's fairly competitive, pricing is higher but since I'm a developer I have been able to customize the app to fit out needs.
Chose Wyng
We really haven't explored many other options. We've been so pleased with Offerpop!
Chose Wyng
At the time, Offerpop was the most affordable products on the market. Wildfire had sleek designs, but that wasn't enough to compensate for the higher cost. Other competitors have since entered the market at a lower price point so do your homework. Also, Facebook has relaxed …
Chose Wyng
While Rafflecopter was free to use, I didn't like the bulky box that sat in the middle of our web pages. Wildfire rates were just too high to justify continuing to use them, especially as OfferPop interface was so simple and streamlined.
Features
AB TastyWyng
Testing and Experimentation
Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Product A and Product B
AB Tasty
8.3
Ratings
1% below category average
Wyng
-
Ratings
a/b experiment testing8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Split URL testing8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Multivariate testing8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-page/funnel testing7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile app testing6.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Test significance7.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Visual / WYSIWYG editor10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Advanced code editor8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Page surveys7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Preview mode7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Test duration calculator10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Experiment scheduler9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Client-side tests9.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Server-side tests7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Mutually exclusive tests8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Product A and Product B
AB Tasty
8.5
Ratings
3% below category average
Wyng
-
Ratings
Standard visitor segmentation9.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Traffic allocation control9.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Website personalization8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Product A and Product B
AB Tasty
8.5
Ratings
2% below category average
Wyng
-
Ratings
Heatmap tool7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Click analytics9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Scroll maps9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Conversion tracking8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Goal tracking9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Test reporting8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Results segmentation8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Experiments results dashboard9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AB TastyWyng
Small Businesses
Convert Experiences
Convert Experiences
Score 9.9 out of 10
Bloomreach
Bloomreach
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 9.0 out of 10
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 9.0 out of 10
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AB TastyWyng
Likelihood to Recommend
9.5
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.7
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AB TastyWyng
Likelihood to Recommend
A/B Tasty tool allows us do easy testing without burdening our limited developer resources all the time. Reports are simple enough to interpret. Support has been excellent and proactive, also the onboarding was successful. It is also an advantage that we have the possibility to drive all our traffic to the test versions rather than being limited to specific user amount per month. We can recommend A/B Tasty for testing purposes, as the platform keeps it’s promises, doesn’t require too much technical knowledge and the support is excellent.
Read full review
Even though the price of Offerpop was affordable, I still couldn't justify it. Our engagement on contests went down and no visited the UGC page. I can see if you had thousands of entries for a contest, you would definitely have to go to a solution like Offerpop.
Read full review
Pros
  • Easy setup - Simple script insertion into site header.
  • Intuitive interface - It took very little training for our team to understand how to start running A/B tests. The reporting is much more comprehensive, yet easily digestible than other platforms we have used or considered. Confidence scores, flexible KPI inclusions/tracking allow us to understand the results or non-result quickly and with clarity to make decisions on next steps.
  • Customer support - Our CSM and tech support are always helpful and proactive when a question or issue arise. Our CSM keeps us on track when an idea might have dropped off the map due to other priorities, and brings great ideas to the table. We enjoy our monthly touchbases with her when we get to see new functionalities, how other clients successfully used them, and brainstorm ways we can use them for our experience.
Read full review
  • Uploading creative assets
  • Publishing to facebook and to our site using an iFrame
  • Access to update/modify CSS
  • Easy to use dashboard
Read full review
Cons
  • Sometimes when you're preparing a test the editor "crashes" and you need to re open it. It's just a matter of having to go back to the main dashboard a few times during your preparation.
  • Maybe to have the option to have pre-build templates of pages, buttons and assets that we can use to test experiments.
Read full review
  • The entry forms can become a little overwhelming especially if you add your review to the page at the bottom. It would be nice if users could click on a "rules" link and then have those details scroll down.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
AB Tasty's tool as well as the support team completely met my goals on A/B Testing. Editing a test is really easy and AB Tasty made the marketing team free to launch nearly any test. Reporting is also easy to set up and give us the information needed to keep improving transformation on landing pages and forms
Read full review
We are very familiar with the tool, it's easy to use, and we rarely experience any issues with the functionality
Read full review
Usability
The tool’s usability is excellent, with a smooth and intuitive interface. It is continuously updated with new features and improvements aimed at enhancing the user experience. Setting up experiments and personalizations is straightforward, thanks to a well-structured process that even less experienced users can easily follow. There are sometimes small issues with the QA section which slows the QA process but it is so much better now compared to 2024.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Support is good, but it would be better if it was quicker or if AB Tasty provided a quicker SLA. At times, you require stuff urgently but AB Tasty support isn't as quick as I personally like it to be.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
There is a vast amount of training available on their online platform, including their university area of which you can get certified for (and then share this with your connections on platforms such as Linkedin). There is also specific hand created training which can be provided by your customer success manager if that is requested by yourself.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
We selected AB Tasty mostly because we got a sense that their dev and customer service teams were going to go above and beyond to help us out. We were right! The cost was also a factor as they came in a small bit lower, but cost wasn't the only factor.
Read full review
At the time, Offerpop was the most affordable products on the market. Wildfire had sleek designs, but that wasn't enough to compensate for the higher cost. Other competitors have since entered the market at a lower price point so do your homework. Also, Facebook has relaxed rules for timeline promotions. It doesn't completely negate the need for Offerpop's services, but now you can conduct quick and easy contests without 3rd party apps.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • This past year we improved our new visitor conversion rates by 73% with very little increases in our ad spend. We've been able to test quickly and infer how those experiments impacted lead generation. Experimentation is all about continually learning and testing.
Read full review
  • We've been able to execute more campaigns internally because of the cost saving.
  • Increased fan acquisition.
  • Engaging experiences for our current customers.
Read full review
ScreenShots

AB Tasty Screenshots

Screenshot of the reporting interface.Screenshot of the dynamic widget library.Screenshot of AB Tasty's WYSIWYG editorScreenshot of the campaign management dashboardScreenshot of targeting criteria, available so users can target specific user segments

Wyng Screenshots

Screenshot of Wyng's interface to build digital experiences that collect customer preferences and other zero-party data.Screenshot of Zero-party data collected to deliver highly-relevant experiences across all channels.Screenshot of The Customer preference center that puts customers in control of their data.