Adobe Journey Optimizer is a customer engagement solution, enabling brands to orchestrate and deliver personalized customer engagement across all channels — including email, web, app, mobile, and more — in the moments that matter to customers.
N/A
Jotform
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Jotform Enterprise is a digital workspace productivity tool that provides a platform for organizations. The aim of Jotform Enterprise is to give companies an easy-to-navigate tool that makes reaching out to customers, collaborating with coworkers, and collecting e-signatures and data a more seamless process. Jotform Enterprise strives to enable companies to make data-driven decisions without compromising when it comes to quality and security. It doesn’t matter what type of…
$0
Pricing
Adobe Journey Optimizer
Jotform
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Free
$0.00
Bronze
$34.00
Monthly
Silver
$39.00
Monthly
Gold
$99.00
Monthly
Enterprise
Custom
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Adobe Journey Optimizer
Jotform
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Adobe Journey Optimizer
Jotform
Survey Format & Appearance
Comparison of Survey Format & Appearance features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Journey Optimizer
-
Ratings
Jotform
7.8
161 Ratings
2% below category average
Survey templates
00 Ratings
8.1138 Ratings
Themes
00 Ratings
7.4146 Ratings
Custom logo/branding
00 Ratings
7.8153 Ratings
Survey Content
Comparison of Survey Content features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Journey Optimizer
-
Ratings
Jotform
7.7
148 Ratings
9% below category average
Changes to live survey
00 Ratings
7.7125 Ratings
Question design help
00 Ratings
7.6123 Ratings
Multiple question types
00 Ratings
7.9145 Ratings
Survey Logic
Comparison of Survey Logic features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Journey Optimizer
-
Ratings
Jotform
7.3
124 Ratings
11% below category average
Survey logic flexibility
00 Ratings
7.3124 Ratings
Survey Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Survey Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Journey Optimizer
-
Ratings
Jotform
7.5
151 Ratings
7% below category average
Response tracking
00 Ratings
7.1142 Ratings
Data export
00 Ratings
8.7144 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
6.9130 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
7.3122 Ratings
Analytics
00 Ratings
7.2112 Ratings
Survey Administration & Security
Comparison of Survey Administration & Security features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Journey Optimizer
-
Ratings
Jotform
7.5
125 Ratings
14% below category average
Access controls
00 Ratings
7.4121 Ratings
Compliance
00 Ratings
7.5114 Ratings
Survey Distribution
Comparison of Survey Distribution features of Product A and Product B
AJO is best suited for advanced Martech teams who are already bought into the Adobe ecosystem through the use of RTCDP, AA, AAM, etc. Organizations that are starting their Martech journey are good candidates, as well as those who are reevaluating all of their marketing channel vendors near the same time. Success in AJO is highly dependent on the number of marketing channels added. Close coordination with database teams is essential for success. Many of the offline data requirements benefit from modeling of the data. Having dedicated resources developing AJO (RTCDP)-specific views will reduce the amount of QA required to bring the solutions to market
We use it for mostly community surveys and I absolutely prefer it over any other survey program out there. It is easy to create, easy to understand and easy to navigate. I love the QR code option it creates for you to share your form/ survey with others. It really is the best out there!
At times, Adobe Journey Optimizer offers too many options, making things less user-friendly than I would personally prefer. As mentioned earlier, there is a tendency to encounter decision paralysis with the increase in available options. While having options is excellent, in typical Adobe fashion, too many can be overwhelming for users
As a seasoned user who relies on seamless online forms for a multitude of purposes, I can confidently attest that JotForm has not only simplified the form creation process but has also elevated it to new heights.JotForm's interface is a masterpiece of intuitive design. Even if you're a newcomer to the world of online form creation, the platform's user-friendly layout will have you crafting professional-grade forms in no time.
I honestly have not used the support feature with Jotform. From what I can see when I look information up, everything I want to do something that I can't figure out myself it seems to not be a possible solution or edit that Jotform is currently capable of.
the most valuable things that Jotform give free trial, so the resistant users can get the experiences of the easiness and more handling to the digital things
They both have their pros and cons, I feel it depends on the users that the products are targetting, SFMC is has more specialized customizations, Adobe does offer similar but require a higher technical knowledge which is not something that is provided bt the other product
Typeform is better hands down [in my opinion]. It's not even a comparison as [I feel] JotForm doesn't work properly and [from my experience I think] their support is very problematic. I would suggest using Typeform or using GravityForms as an alternative to JotForm. Whatever you do, [I feel you shouldn't] depend on JotForm for something that is important to your business or research project.
Multichannel onboarding journey improving the engagement of freshmen in the business, resulting in a decrease in the dropout rate.
Separate business of anticipation of receivables from suppliers that used to be manual and now I have connected this entire operation via the S3 connector, less manual work and significant gains in conversions and payments
It saved me time. Within minutes I was able to create and share forms to collect demographic data.
While struggling to use another software, I thought of Jotform and it was able to assist me with collating the data I had to confirm results previously obtained.
I could not easily identify what new information was provided in a resubmission by a respondent.