| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Amazon DynamoDB | Score7.9 out of 10 | N/A | Amazon DynamoDB is a cloud-native, NoSQL, serverless database service. | $0 capacity unit per hour |
 IBM Cloud Databases | Score8 out of 10 | N/A | IBM Cloud Databases are open source data stores for enterprise application development. Built on a Kubernetes foundation, they offer a database platform for serverless applications. They are designed to scale storage and compute resources seamlessly without being constrained by the limits of a single server. Natively integrated and available in the IBM Cloud console, these databases are now available through a consistent consumption, pricing, and interaction model. They aim to provide a cohesive… | N/A |
 MongoDB | Score8.8 out of 10 | N/A | MongoDB is an open source document-oriented database system. It is part of the NoSQL family of database systems. Instead of storing data in tables as is done in a "classical" relational database, MongoDB stores structured data as JSON-like documents with dynamic schemas (MongoDB calls the format BSON), making the integration of data in certain types of applications easier and faster. | $0.10 million reads |
| Amazon DynamoDB | IBM Cloud Databases | MongoDB | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | Fully managed, global cloud database on AWS, Azure, and GCP | |||||||||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amazon DynamoDB | IBM Cloud Databases | MongoDB | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Considered Multiple Products | Chose Amazon DynamoDB Both are Nosql db but when it comes to scalability i think, MongoDB is no where close to Amazon DynamoDB Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Amazon DynamoDB We are always assembling our solutions on AWS and DynamoDB is a better fit for us because of its simplicity. DynamoDB has its ow sets of triggers that make this an integrated solution on AWS. Besides, we wanted to use a key-value solution for our simple edge DB, and we didn't … Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Amazon DynamoDB Incentivized Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Amazon DynamoDB Performance at high scales is better and the cost at high scales is less. If one has a ton of data generated and has to work their way through it, I think Amazon DynamoDB should the go-to database. There are no compromises when it comes to performance at a huge scale. With any … Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Amazon DynamoDB The Amazon Web Services managed Amazon DynamoDB has excellent features which makes it stand out from all the others in market right now. The management ease it offers is far superior than its competitors and on top of that the on-demand pricing model is an advantage which works … Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Amazon DynamoDB high scalability #single-digit latency. #so much flexile. #very easy to use. # low maintenance.#GLobal Access Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Amazon DynamoDB Haven't had a chance to use this up to an extent to be compared to DynamoDB. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Amazon DynamoDB The automation is much more subtle and it performs way better for internet-scale applications. No matter the number of connections, the performance doesn't dip even a bit. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Amazon DynamoDB Amazon DynamoDB is less costly compared to Amazon DocumentDB. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Amazon DynamoDB Performance, Scalability, durability , fully managed Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info | Chose IBM Cloud Databases IBM cloud database has a lot of features than Amazon DynamoDB. This is my personal opinion. But I can't say Amazon DynamoDB is a bad one. But IBM cloud database has a lot of securities and file storage and backup features than Amazon DynamoDB. But both are good in their own … Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose IBM Cloud Databases I've tried Amazon DynamoDB and Heroku Postgres, but Compose was much much easier and faster to set up, and also has more DB alternatives. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose IBM Cloud Databases We previously hosted our own Redis and RabbitMQ cluster. Before switching to IBM Compose we evaluated Redis Lab, Scalegrid, AWS ElastiCache, CloudAMQP and others. We still host our core database (MongoDB) ourselves. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose IBM Cloud Databases We use Amazon Aurora as our primary datastore and use IBM Compose Mongo as an alternative only when Aurora does not cover the use case well. Amazon DynamoDB looks good but doesn't have the same wealth of libraries and support which makes MongoDB easy to use and therefore was … Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose IBM Cloud Databases Incentivized Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose IBM Cloud Databases Incentivized Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose IBM Cloud Databases I have used Amazon DynamoDm and compared to IBM Compose, I would say IBM Compose is affordable, easy to use and very fast as well. I would opt IBM Cloud Databases given the two choices Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose IBM Cloud Databases UI/UX was much better with ibm compose. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose IBM Cloud Databases Well for MySQL we had to use Amazon because of the pricing structure. We are using Mongo on Compose and it has been pretty good to us for the past 2 years. We are moving all of our databases to Amazon for the customer support and pricing structure that is competitive to Compose, Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose IBM Cloud Databases We evaluated several DBaaS providers, the thing that won out for Compose was its GUI which makes working with the database very easy. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose IBM Cloud Databases I use Watson's cognitive services. I had no IBM database IBM before. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose IBM Cloud Databases Other options are lower priced, however IBM Compose has by far the best interface for managing and editing data within the database. It also has many forms of databases for us to deploy, beyond what we are currently using. So, in the event we need to add other services, we can … Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose IBM Cloud Databases IBM Compose pricing is far more clear than Azure and Amazon. The web user interface is also very clear and simple. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose IBM Cloud Databases It feels very similar but Compose was there first. I haven't used MongoDB Atlas in anger yet but it does seem to be more comprehensive. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose IBM Cloud Databases
Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose IBM Cloud Databases It has been a very long time, but at the time, Compose's customer support was incredible compared to MongoLab. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose IBM Cloud Databases Compose has a better web interface which is why I originally chose them. But now, I'm glad they also offer Redis and other DB's I need for my stack. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info | Chose MongoDB Incentivized Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose MongoDB Incentivized Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose MongoDB Your default choice should not be MongoDB in my opinion. Most user-facing systems are relational by nature so a well known and reliable SQL database would be easier to maintain and simpler to develop long term. If you highly value speed of development go with Firebase. If you … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose MongoDB MongoDB was the most full-featured NoSQL database we evaluated - that offered atomic transactions at a document level, built-in HA & DR, open source, robust queries, and enterprise level support. Other platforms had specific parts of what we were looking for - MongoDB had it all. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info |
| Key User Insights | |||
| Would buy again | |||
100% Would buy again 47 Answers | 94% Would buy again 15 Answers | 100% Would buy again 12 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | |||
98% Delivers good value for the price 44 Answers | 80% Delivers good value for the price 12 Answers | 100% Delivers good value for the price 12 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | |||
98% Happy with the feature set 46 Answers | 100% Happy with the feature set 16 Answers | 100% Happy with the feature set 12 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | |||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 39 Answers | 93% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 14 Answers | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 9 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | |||
93% Implementation went as expected 40 Answers | 93% Implementation went as expected 14 Answers | 100% Implementation went as expected 12 Answers | |
| Amazon DynamoDB | IBM Cloud Databases | MongoDB | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NoSQL Databases |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Database-as-a-Service |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amazon DynamoDB | IBM Cloud Databases | MongoDB | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | IBM Cloudant Score7.4 out of 10 |  MongoDB Atlas Score7.8 out of 10 | IBM Cloudant Score7.4 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | IBM Cloudant Score7.4 out of 10 |  Azure Database Score8.8 out of 10 | IBM Cloudant Score7.4 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | IBM Cloudant Score7.4 out of 10 |  Google Cloud SQL Score8.7 out of 10 | IBM Cloudant Score7.4 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Amazon DynamoDB | IBM Cloud Databases | MongoDB | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.9 | 8.0 | 10.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 10.0 | 8.0 | 10.0 |
| Usability | 9.1 | 8.0 | 10.0 |
| Availability | - | - | 9.0 |
| Performance | 9.1 | - | - |
| Support Rating | 5.2 | 1.0 | 9.6 |
| Implementation Rating | - | - | 8.4 |
| Product Scalability | 9.1 | - | - |
| Amazon DynamoDB | IBM Cloud Databases | MongoDB | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
|
|
|
| Usability |
|
|
|
| Performance |
| No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
|
|
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
|
| Scalability |
| No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
|
|
|
| ScreenShots | Amazon DynamoDB Screenshots | MongoDB Screenshots      |
