TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Confluence

    Score8.2 out of 10
    N/AConfluence is a collaboration and content sharing platform used primarily by customers who are already using Atlassian's Jira project tracking product. The product appeals particularly to IT users.

    $6.40

    per month per user

    Jellyfish

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/AJellyfish is an intelligence platform for AI-Integrated Engineering. According to the vendor, the solution assists over 1,000 companies—including DraftKings, Box, and Blue Yonder—in utilizing Artificial Intelligence to manage software development lifecycles. By aggregating engineering data and contextual intelligence, Jellyfish is designed to help Research and Development (R&D) organizations measure impact, adopt industry practices, and support decision-making across AI adoption, project…N/A

    Rally Software

    Score7.8 out of 10
    N/ARally Software headquartered in Boulder, Colorado developed the Rally agile software development / ALM platform which was acquired by CA Technologies and rebranded as CA Agile Central. After CA's acquisition by Broadcom the software was once again rebranded as Rally.N/A
    Pricing
    ConfluenceJellyfishRally Software
    Editions & Modules
    Free
    $0
    Free for 10 Users
    Standard
    $6.40
    per month per user
    Premium
    $12.30
    per month per user
    Data Center
    220,000.00
    40,001+ Users - Annually
    Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    ConfluenceJellyfishRally Software
    Free Trial
    YesNoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsPrices shown here reflect prices for deployments with 100 users or less. The prices decrease wien the user base surpasses 100.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    ConfluenceJellyfishRally Software
    Considered Multiple Products
    Atlassian
    No answer on this topic
    Jellyfish (Orthogonal Networks, Inc.)
    No answer on this topic
    Broadcom
    Chose Rally Software
    Rally Software and Jira are both good. Rally Software is better at handling large scale projects. It offers advanced reporting, release tracking and portfolio management. Jira is more flexible but Rally Software is definitely better for large organizations. We selected Rally …
    Incentivized
    Chose Rally Software
    I believe that it stacks up well against any other software. There are several things they do better and there are several things it doesn't do better. However, in the end it seems all of the software can get the job done.
    Incentivized
    Chose Rally Software
    Rally is very good in tracking, compared with others, and also reporting is made very helpful for our business growth, tracking the deliverables, and making sure we have the proper capacity planning for completing the project in a timely manner. really Rally made us very happy …
    Incentivized
    Chose Rally Software
    I've also evaluated the following agile solutions: ActiveCollab, Agile Bench, Agilo for Scrum, Atlassian JIRA, Pivotal Tracker, SpringGround, Targetprocess. Telerik Teamprocess, VersionOne, ZebraPlan etc.
    If it’s time to transition to software that’s specific to your Agile …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    89%
    Would buy again
    97 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    71%
    Would buy again
    5 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    94%
    Delivers good value for the price
    87 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    86%
    Delivers good value for the price
    6 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    92%
    Happy with the feature set
    100 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    57%
    Happy with the feature set
    4 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    94%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    45 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    89%
    Implementation went as expected
    54 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    ConfluenceJellyfishRally Software
    Project Management
    Comparison of Project Management features of Atlassian Confluence and Jellyfish and Rally Software
    Feature
    Atlassian Confluence
    7.1
    158 Ratings
    9% below category average
    Jellyfish
    -
    Ratings
    Rally Software
    7.8
    4 Ratings
    5% above category average
    Task Management7.2127 Ratings00 Ratings8.84 Ratings
    Gantt Charts7.912 Ratings00 Ratings7.04 Ratings
    Scheduling7.221 Ratings00 Ratings8.84 Ratings
    Workflow Automation6.591 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile Access6.9118 Ratings00 Ratings7.03 Ratings
    Search7.0157 Ratings00 Ratings7.34 Ratings
    Visual planning tools7.2127 Ratings00 Ratings8.04 Ratings
    Resource Management00 Ratings00 Ratings8.04 Ratings
    Support for Agile Methodology00 Ratings00 Ratings8.84 Ratings
    Support for Waterfall Methodology00 Ratings00 Ratings7.84 Ratings
    Document Management00 Ratings00 Ratings7.34 Ratings
    Email integration00 Ratings00 Ratings8.54 Ratings
    Timesheet Tracking00 Ratings00 Ratings7.33 Ratings
    Change request and Case Management00 Ratings00 Ratings6.73 Ratings
    Budget and Expense Management00 Ratings00 Ratings8.33 Ratings
    Communication
    Comparison of Communication features of Atlassian Confluence and Jellyfish and Rally Software
    Feature
    Atlassian Confluence
    7.9
    158 Ratings
    1% below category average
    Jellyfish
    -
    Ratings
    Rally Software
    -
    Ratings
    Chat6.415 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Notifications8.2156 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Discussions7.9149 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Surveys7.015 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Internal knowledgebase9.0150 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integrates with GoToMeeting6.03 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts9.37 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integrates with Outlook9.610 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    File Sharing & Management
    Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Atlassian Confluence and Jellyfish and Rally Software
    Feature
    Atlassian Confluence
    7.7
    157 Ratings
    4% below category average
    Jellyfish
    -
    Ratings
    Rally Software
    -
    Ratings
    Versioning8.3137 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Video files6.9105 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Audio files6.997 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Document collaboration8.4153 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Access control8.7148 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Advanced security features8.3115 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integrates with Google Drive5.947 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Device sync8.486 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Agile Development
    Comparison of Agile Development features of Atlassian Confluence and Jellyfish and Rally Software
    Feature
    Atlassian Confluence
    -
    Ratings
    Jellyfish
    -
    Ratings
    Rally Software
    7.3
    4 Ratings
    5% below category average
    DevOps Tool Integrations00 Ratings00 Ratings6.33 Ratings
    Code Review00 Ratings00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
    Code Collaboration00 Ratings00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Velocity Calculation00 Ratings00 Ratings7.84 Ratings
    Dependencies and Blockers00 Ratings00 Ratings8.34 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    ConfluenceJellyfishRally Software
    Small Businesses
    Flock
    Score9.5 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    monday dev
    Score9.2 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Troop Messenger
    Score9.8 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Planview AgilePlace
    Score7.5 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Cisco Business Edition 7000 (discontinued)
    Score9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Planview AgilePlace
    Score7.5 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    ConfluenceJellyfishRally Software
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.3
    (174 ratings)
    8.3
    (3 ratings)
    8.7
    (20 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.5
    (22 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (4 ratings)
    Usability
    8.1
    (63 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (8 ratings)
    Availability
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    8.0
    (5 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    5.4
    (25 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.7
    (5 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.8
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    Configurability
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    8.0
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    ConfluenceJellyfishRally Software
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Atlassian
    It is well suited due to the below reasons 1. Easy collaboration between teams 2. Strong integration with other applications 3. Centralized documentation among teams and within the organisation 4. Project planning and report sharing 5. Employee onboarding is easier and maintain HR policies very well. Less appropriate in below scenarios When this is being used as a main tool for communication rather than its purpose of collaboration.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Jellyfish (Orthogonal Networks, Inc.)
    Jellyfish allows us to understand the allocation of our efforts without time tracking. We are also able to integrate this platform with our existing ticket tracking system and can see analytics instantly! Jellyfish works well for our teams because it has an opinionated view. Jellyfish understands that the metrics for an engineering team should help you understand what your organization values and is actively working on. We can use Jellyfish in a strategic way compared to other tools like this.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    Rally Software is well suited for large Agile or scrum teams who do sprints and it helps managing sprints and backlogs. It is well suited for organizations who want visibility into work being done and progress. Suitable for tracking is user stories, defects and release planning. Works well with CI CD too. It would not be suitable for small teams or startups. For teams that don't use agile. Teams who want lightweight tools like Jira. Companies with a limited budget.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Atlassian
    • Cross product linking - If you use other Atlassian products then Atlassian Confluence is a no-brainer for your source of documentation, knowledge management etc. You can show previews of the linked asset natively E.g. showing a preview of a JIRA ticket in a Atlassian Confluence page.
    • Simple editing - Though the features available may not be super complex right now, this does come with the benefit of making it easy to edit and create documents. Some documentation editors can be overwhelming, Atlassian Confluence is simple and intuitive.
    • Native marketplace - If you want to install add-ons to your Atlassian Confluence space it's really easy. Admins can explore the Atlassian marketplace natively and install them to your instance in a few clicks. You can customise your Atlassian Confluence instance in many different ways using add-ons.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Jellyfish (Orthogonal Networks, Inc.)
    • Integration with JIRA.
    • Integration with GitHub.
    • Friendly UI.
    • Easy to read.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    • There are dashboards that provide friendly and useful metrics at the team, program and portfolio levels which help get an easy and quick visual representation of what's going on.
    • Story management made easier, It offers a quick way of quickly entering a number of user stories without losing the overview, by just typing the title and selecting a few attributes directly in the overview screen.
    • Sprint management is seamless in CA Agile Central . It allows you to drag stories from the backlog to the sprints and back again. When a story is dragged into an sprint, it automatically checks the velocity for that sprint and indicates how many more story points can be chipped in. No more manual checking needed by scrum master with respect to allocation and team velocity.
    • Though CA Agile Central has many inbuilt apps, but it also has an App-SDK that allows you to build free app extensions using JavaScript and HTML. So, as per their needs, teams can customize & build various apps & dashboards.
    • Dashboard is an awesome feature which allows you to select and drag panels with all kinds of graphical information about the current sprints and releases.
    • It offers tremendous support for scaled Agile & almost all scaling frameworks are supported specifically tuned to SAFe .
    • CA Agile Central includes several applications but it also integrates well with Jira, Confluence, Jenkins, Eclipse, Subversion, IBM, HP, Salesforce.com and many other products to allow users to organize projects to their specifications. So you can still use Jira at a team level & CA Agile Central at the program & portfolio level for efficient tracking & management.
    • The custom tags are very helpful in segregating the user stories based on the project needs. Even though it's a very small feature, it is very effective ( you will realize why specifically if you are using Jira).
    • CA Central Agile enables agile delivery with ease and provides comprehensive features to track time-boxes, Work In Progress items of the forecast increments.
    • Backlog management is hassle free since you can either drag and drop your user stories to the desired position on the backlog, or change a setting and manually enter priorities as a number.
    Read full review
    Cons
    Atlassian
    • UI Design is very simplistic and basic could make use of more visually interesting colour choices, layout choices, etc.
    • Under the 'Content' menu, it defaults to having a landing page for all L1 and L2 category pages. Meaning as long as the broader content category has a sub-category, it still creates a separate landing page. In my team's case, this often creates blank pages, as we only fill out the page at the lowest sub-category (L3).
    • Hyperlinks are traditionally shown as blue, however, this results into very monotonously blue pages in cases where a lot of information is being linked.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Jellyfish (Orthogonal Networks, Inc.)
    • UI and navigation aren't very intuitive and require additional research before being able to use.
    • The individual developer metrics are not very useful and make the interface feel cluttered.
    • Overall, it takes time for the end-user to truly learn how to use the platform and navigate. There is so much information/data available that although the above is a con, we felt it still made sense, despite the learning curve.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    • User management is pretty basic and could be better. For example more filters and reports and more ability to do mass updates.
    • The report generator is very, very basic and is not WYSIWYG. It has limited filters to generate reports. Often a Scrum master will need to export data to Excel or a tool like Crystal Reports to get enhanced reporting capability.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Atlassian
    I am confident that Atlassian can come with additional and innovative macros and functions to add value to Confluence. In 6 months, Atlassian transformed a good collaborative tools into a more comprehensive system that can help manage projects and processes, as well as "talk" with other Atlassian products like Jira. We are in fact learning more about Jira to evaluate a possible fit to complement our tool box.
    Read full review
    Jellyfish (Orthogonal Networks, Inc.)
    No answers on this topic
    Broadcom
    • To keep connecting my people, platform, and process for faster, smarter, better results.
    • Making the right contribution to the community. Use Agile and Lean processes to manage the work of your team.
    • Once you have tasted the positive result with Rally Software, you don't want to give up and come back to the old school of development pain any more.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Atlassian
    Atlassian Confluence is a great tool for project management, especially for internal documentation. It has a minimum governance requirement to use its full power. Also, it is a little pricy to unlock its full power as well, so it is not recommended for companies with a low budget in my opinion.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Jellyfish (Orthogonal Networks, Inc.)
    No answers on this topic
    Broadcom
    Great UI, recent refresh was terrific. Great graphs and metrics, inline editing for updates, and a multitude of views on sprint progress make for a great team collaboration experience. There is also an active community and forums so that if you do need help, it is readily available
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Atlassian
    I do not recall having outages or applications error so far, very reliable and available.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Jellyfish (Orthogonal Networks, Inc.)
    No answers on this topic
    Broadcom
    Don’t recall ever being unavailable.
    Read full review
    Performance
    Atlassian
    We never worked against the tide while using Confluence. Everything loads considerably fast, even media components like videos (hosted on the platform or embed external videos from Youtube, for example). We are not using heavy media components a lot, but in the rare occasion we happen to use one we have no problems whatsoever.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Jellyfish (Orthogonal Networks, Inc.)
    No answers on this topic
    Broadcom
    The screens render relatively quickly but many actions that you would expect to require a single click require multiple clicks and pop-up windows. The extra windows and clicks make the product feel ponderous.
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Atlassian
    This rating is specifically for Atlassian's self-help documentation on their website. Often times, it is not robust enough to cover a complex usage of one of their features. Frequently, you can find an answer on the web, but not from Atlassian. Instead, it is usually at a power user group elsewhere on the net.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Jellyfish (Orthogonal Networks, Inc.)
    No answers on this topic
    Broadcom
    I've had to use support only one time and my issue was eventually resolved but not because of my ticket--because others complained about the functionality taken away so they brought it back. My ticket was never answered or addressed. So I can't really say much for the support factor for Rally.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Online Training
    Atlassian
    No answers on this topic
    Jellyfish (Orthogonal Networks, Inc.)
    No answers on this topic
    Broadcom
    It more or less confirmed that we are using it the way they had in mind. We were hoping for a epiphany in terms of how we could use it better.

    They also want to be a go to source for agile processes and have an online resource center. It’s not that great but had a couple of nuggets. It hasn’t really helped us too much and we are not too far off from the classical interpretation of agile.

    I would recommend training, in particular for organizations that multiple on-going projects. The product seems optimized for larger, more complex teams and getting proper training on how to configure, administer and use the system would be beneficial
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Atlassian
    Overall, I am very satisfied with the initial implementation (and the subsequent upgrades and implementations made over the years).
    This product has never rose to the level of being an major issue at an executive level. It has quietly and valiantly done it's job for our company!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Jellyfish (Orthogonal Networks, Inc.)
    No answers on this topic
    Broadcom
    Implementation of RALLY services and program satisfaction among various group,... 1) Dev Outcomes: How were our resiliencies, development, learning & practitioners “make them do the work,” but that they ask you to do it “in a way like before. 2) The Ops group: Just wish to make sure any change won't break current production envirements All the stake holders has to be on the same page
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Atlassian
    We chose Atlassian Confluence over SharePoint because it's much more user-friendly and intuitive. Atlassian Confluence makes collaboration and knowledge sharing easier with its simpler interface and better search. While SharePoint can be powerful, it often feels clunky and complex, making it harder for our team to actually use it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Jellyfish (Orthogonal Networks, Inc.)
    The really cool thing about Jellyfish is the integrations that it has with the other tools, which are also very common within the software development industry. Consolidating all this data and being able to see graphs, numbers, and percentages in one place gives you a better way to analyze and define better solutions to improve your software development processes.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    Rally and Asana have comparable features and are both valuable project management tools, but Asana's user interface is well-organized and highly intuitive. It's easy to add tasks and collaborators, edit due dates, indicate progress on tasks, close out projects, etc. However, Rally's interface is somewhat cluttered and difficult to navigate. My team ended up choosing Asana over Rally due to these concerns.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Atlassian
    This tool is very adaptable. So much so we use it for three completely separate projects, in three very different ways.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Jellyfish (Orthogonal Networks, Inc.)
    No answers on this topic
    Broadcom
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Atlassian
    • We totally rely on this tool since a decade now and despite being so much transition in our company it has served us well in those transitions
    • Many times, during security audits we are asked to showcase our readiness for various compliance points and confluence helps us a lot in maintaining that
    • Talking about Confluence in front of clients and customers gives us an upper hand that we are up to date with latest trend and technologies and tools for our RnD planning and management
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Jellyfish (Orthogonal Networks, Inc.)
    • Easy setup and takes time to learn, but overall easy to use one you get the hang of it.
    • Strategic roadmapping.
    • Return on Investment increased.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    • it helped organizing many of the processes management use to communicate tasks with engineers, and provided detailed charts on the speed/blockage during any iteration
    • with time Rally became the main tool we used to track and report tasks/defects in our projects, but frequent service outages made it very hard to continue consider as a reliable solution
    • too much features is good, but for engineers a few features (User Stories section, iterations, defects, and Kanban boards) are necessary and the rest is just noise
    • Kanban board support is lacking
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots