Atlassian Jira vs. Quali CloudShell

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Atlassian Jira
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Atlassian Jira is a project management tool, featuring an interactive timeline for mapping work items, dependencies, and releases, Scrum boards for agile teams, and out-of-the-box reports and dashboards.
$81.85
per month 10 users
Quali CloudShell
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
CloudShell, from Quali headquartered in Austin, is an infrastructure automation solution for cloud, on-premise, or hybrid environments.N/A
Pricing
Atlassian JiraQuali CloudShell
Editions & Modules
Standard
$8.15
per month per user (minimum 10)
Premium
$16
per month per user (minimum 10)
Data Center
$44,000
per year 500 users
Enterprise
Contact Sales
per year
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Atlassian JiraQuali CloudShell
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Atlassian JiraQuali CloudShell
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Atlassian JiraQuali CloudShell
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Jira
7.1
14 Ratings
6% below category average
Quali CloudShell
-
Ratings
Task Management8.414 Ratings00 Ratings
Resource Management6.914 Ratings00 Ratings
Gantt Charts5.910 Ratings00 Ratings
Scheduling6.511 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow Automation7.613 Ratings00 Ratings
Team Collaboration7.713 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology8.414 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology7.611 Ratings00 Ratings
Document Management5.712 Ratings00 Ratings
Email integration7.414 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Access6.311 Ratings00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking6.78 Ratings00 Ratings
Change request and Case Management7.510 Ratings00 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management6.56 Ratings00 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Jira
6.6
7 Ratings
12% below category average
Quali CloudShell
-
Ratings
Quotes/estimates6.37 Ratings00 Ratings
Invoicing6.65 Ratings00 Ratings
Project & financial reporting7.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with accounting software6.76 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Atlassian JiraQuali CloudShell
Small Businesses
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.2 out of 10
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 9.5 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 9.5 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Atlassian JiraQuali CloudShell
Likelihood to Recommend
8.2
(201 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(35 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.5
(42 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
5.3
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.8
(23 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Online Training
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
7.7
(8 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Atlassian JiraQuali CloudShell
Likelihood to Recommend
Atlassian
I would suggest Atlassian Jira for large-scale enterprise project management. Atlassian Jira is great for technical teams because Atlassian Jira provides seamless integration with Bitbucket, Jenkins, GitHub, and more. Atlassian Jira automatically updates the issue status and build failures trigger alerts. I think Atlassian Jira is less appropriate for small teams with simple task management needs since they don't require complex workflows or reporting. I believe the Atlassian Jira interface is not user-friendly for non-technical teams.
Read full review
Quali (QualiSystems Ltd)
  • LaaS
  • IaaS
  • PaaS
  • CRaaS
  • Training
  • DevOps
  • DevSecOps
  • Demo Portals
  • TaaS
Almost any workflow and any infrastructure are supported.
Read full review
Pros
Atlassian
  • Running sprints and tracking progress of roadmap, epics, story, task and subtask
  • The user interface is great. It allows tables inside details, have common shortcuts and clean design.
  • Can create custom dashboards and can view data in multiple ways
  • Advanced access rights based on role
Read full review
Quali (QualiSystems Ltd)
  • Self service single pane of glass for any workflow and infrastructure
  • Complete lifecycle management of your workflow and infrastructure
  • Vendor agnostic cloud, service, application, appliance support
Read full review
Cons
Atlassian
  • allowing to show multiple people collaborating on a single story
  • epics sidebar should stay static when sometimes dragging stories from backlog to a particular epic, the list of epics can jump and can be difficult to get back to the epic you wanted to drag and drop a story into that epic
  • can be difficult to use a template without impacting other teams you share the same program with
Read full review
Quali (QualiSystems Ltd)
  • Requires SME to get the full ROI first year
  • Requires a culture change for Agile Automation
  • Price could be less (not cheap)
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Atlassian
This is because Jira Software generates a huge profit for an affordable price. Having a tool that makes team management transparent and effective is very valuable.
In addition, the renewal of Jira Software and all Atlassian tools is predictable and clear, as the prices are published on the Atlassian website and there is no pyramid of intermediaries.
Read full review
Quali (QualiSystems Ltd)
No answers on this topic
Usability
Atlassian
Atlassian Jira is relatively easy to use, but there are several ways to configure it, which can make it more complicated if you configure it incorrectly. Keeping the customizations and complexity limited to being the project would be suggested to ensure you don't lose in-built Atlassian Jira features, then change the configuration as you find things aren't meeting your exact needs.
Read full review
Quali (QualiSystems Ltd)
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Atlassian
I have not had a chance to contact JIRA's customer support. It does offer extensive documentation, although it often feels too technical for me. There is also a JIRA training app that lets you take little lessons and quizzes on different areas (e.g., JIRA basics, agile). I did find it a helpful way to teach myself.
Read full review
Quali (QualiSystems Ltd)
The tool can automate almost any workflow and infrastructure consumption. It has state of the art develop and support with great online training, online full manual set, and a comprehensive support team and network of SIs/VARS that are very qualified.
Read full review
Online Training
Atlassian
One of their strong points i stheir documentation. Almost all of the basic set up needed within JIRA is available online through atlassian and its easy to find and very precise. The more critical issues need to be addressed as well and hence the rating of 8 instead of a 9.
Read full review
Quali (QualiSystems Ltd)
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Atlassian
Take your time implementing Jira. Make sure you understand how you want to handle your projects and workflows. Investing more time in the implementation can pay off in a long run. It basically took us 5 days to define and implement correctly, but that meant smooth sailing later on.
Read full review
Quali (QualiSystems Ltd)
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Atlassian
I have majorly used Atlassian Jira and not Asana as i have only worked it for like a month or two. The vast support with Confluence and Bitbucket makes Atlassian Jira my first choice among all other major player who are competing against each other. I absolutely love using Atlassian Jira and it is my go to application
Read full review
Quali (QualiSystems Ltd)
VMware is too hard to use, too expensive to support, and not a full lifecycle tool for workflows and Infrastructure (no support of physical either). AWS or Azure or Google solutions are good if you are only in the cloud and only using their tools. Not good if you have on-prem or non-Cloud based tools/infrastructure. Build it yourself automation frameworks can be good for people with unlimited funds, but they are not the best way to go and missing many capabilities typically.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Atlassian
  • Atlassian Jira's robust workflow automation has boosted team efficiency, shortening delivery cycles and driving a positive ROI through improved project management.
  • Its advanced reporting and integration capabilities have enabled data-driven decisions, aligning operations with key business objectives.
  • However, the steep learning curve can delay adoption, potentially hindering short-term ROI.
Read full review
Quali (QualiSystems Ltd)
  • Our customers have an average ROI of less than 6 months.
  • Our customers renew their maintenance almost 100% of the time.
  • It has allowed us to build specific solutions across many use cases enabling us to profit.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Quali CloudShell Screenshots

Screenshot of MODEL INFRASTRUCTURE AND APPLICATIONS |
Model complex infrastructure and application
environments. Users drag and drop modules to
combine physical and virtual infrastructure, network
connectivity, applications, and cloud interfacesScreenshot of SELF-SERVICE DEPLOYMENT |
One click deployment into sandbox environments.
Publish environment blueprints to a shared self-service
catalog for on-demand access by all your teams
wherever they are.Screenshot of LAB AUTOMATION AS A SERVICE (LAAS) |
Use built-in lab automation and management features like
inventory, reservations, scheduling, role-based access control, conflict resolution, and business intelligence. Easily automate
multiple labs and share them among hundreds or thousands of engineers.