The session recording tool in Auryc is one of its most useful features, as it allows you to filter by particular time frames and traits to find people who participated in a design experiment and see how they interact with new content.
It's worth noting that Auryc's funnel analysis makes it easy and clear for stakeholders to see where conversion rates are falling.
We can also quickly design pop-up exit questionnaires and collect your own data.
It is a little too limited for a full stack experimentation programme. Many times we required development support or tech advise but we were simply unable to get this due to it being google. This was a big problem for us. However it is quite good if you were looking to get started in experimentation and didn’t have the budgets for a wider tool
Easy to follow set up procedures. Once I walk a client through the process, it's effortless for them to emulate on subsequent tests.
Lots of geo and user attribute customization features to be able to drill down into specific targeted audiences — all based on the power of Google's immense data system.
Google Optimize is the logical choice for many people to start with since most are already familiar with and using GA.
Auryc has a lot more features than Hotjar. The screen recordings have been great which Hotjar didn't have. Hotjar didn't track the site speed spikes or the NPS score.
Google Optimize being part of the Google stack makes it great in reporting and analysis. Wish Google would add more features like dynamic tests, multi funnel tests, conversion calculator based on the total number of traffic of the page being tested instead of using the websites total traffic. Should integrate form analysis, heatmap, and page analytics.