Automox vs. Avast CloudCare

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Automox
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Automox is an endpoint management platform built for the era of autonomous operations. It provides a cloud-native foundation that unifies automation, speed, visibility, and trust.
$1
per month per endpoint
Avast CloudCare
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Avast's CloudCare was a cloud-based security platform for IT professionals used to monitor threats and deliver layered security services to multiple offices, networks, and devices. The product is reaching EOL and is no longer sold. Avast now offers the Avast Business Hub in its place.N/A
Pricing
AutomoxAvast CloudCare
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AutomoxAvast CloudCare
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsAutomox can patch macOS, Windows, and Linux endpoints with PatchOS, an offering at $1 per endpoint/ month with an annual commitment. The Automate Essentials or Automate Enterprise packages are for scaling IT automation, endpoint configuration, and software updates. Modules are available with Automox Assist, a one-on-one remote endpoint control and assistance for helpdesk technicians.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AutomoxAvast CloudCare
Best Alternatives
AutomoxAvast CloudCare
Small Businesses
Avast CloudCare
Avast CloudCare
Score 10.0 out of 10
Action1
Action1
Score 9.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
KACE Systems Management Appliance
KACE Systems Management Appliance
Score 8.7 out of 10
KACE Systems Management Appliance
KACE Systems Management Appliance
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
KACE Systems Management Appliance
KACE Systems Management Appliance
Score 8.7 out of 10
KACE Systems Management Appliance
KACE Systems Management Appliance
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AutomoxAvast CloudCare
Likelihood to Recommend
8.7
(150 ratings)
10.0
(4 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.2
(7 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(116 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Availability
5.5
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
1.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.7
(9 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.1
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
6.4
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AutomoxAvast CloudCare
Likelihood to Recommend
Automox
Smaller organisations such as ourselves, who have outgrown their MSP but still need to retain control of their system and have visibility of the estate. The tool enables us to have real-time visibility and deploy or remediate as needed. We have also purchased Rapid7, which integrates natively into the product, making it a more powerful tool moving forward.
Read full review
Gen (NortonLifeLock, Avast, Avira, AVG)
It's well suited for any Windows environment. It doesn't slow the PC down and it's very effective at what it does.
Read full review
Pros
Automox
  • Shows applications installed on a specific asset
  • Able to push policies and updates remotely , creating policies is easy.
  • Keep track of compliant devices and when is the last time they have connected to the servers
  • All the great information provided within one single device
Read full review
Gen (NortonLifeLock, Avast, Avira, AVG)
  • Keeps the anti-virus up to date.
  • Daily reporting.
  • Remote tools like RDP.
Read full review
Cons
Automox
  • Server patching orchestration. There is no way to patch and reboot systems in order of importance, such as database servers before application servers.
  • Worklets for patching .net core and similar.
  • Worklets for removing unwanted Java installs or other unwanted software.
  • Integration with Tenable Vulnerability Management.
  • AI script development should be included at no additional cost; GPT or Gemini can be used instead for free and pasted into Automox. Why charge when others are free?
  • Official worklets are slow to be added or updated.
Read full review
Gen (NortonLifeLock, Avast, Avira, AVG)
  • reporting on failed backup
  • duplicate reporting
  • false positives
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Automox
This is a software that just works. Once configured its a set and forget kind of tool that keeps things up to date and alerts me if something is wrong. I was able to work through an expansion project to deploy an additional 500 devices in almost no time and create a robust self-patching environment.
Read full review
Gen (NortonLifeLock, Avast, Avira, AVG)
No answers on this topic
Usability
Automox
It truly functions like a single pane of glass. While our use case is for EC2 instances in AWS, it can manage endpoints across all clouds, or even deployed hardware (laptops). We do manage instances in multiple AWS accounts and there is no set up required between orgs. This accomplishes our needs for real time tracking, and historical reporting for all of our in scope resources.
Read full review
Gen (NortonLifeLock, Avast, Avira, AVG)
It does everything that I need it to do in terms of generating income and protecting against viruses and phishing.
Read full review
Support Rating
Automox
1. Simplicity and Ease of Use 2. Cross-Platform Support 3. Powerful Automation with Worklets 4. Real-Time Visibility and Control 5. Fast and Reliable Cloud-Based Updates 6. Strong Security Focus
Read full review
Gen (NortonLifeLock, Avast, Avira, AVG)
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Automox
Implementing Automox successfully starts with a clear strategy for organizing and grouping devices based on operating systems, environments, or business criticality. This ensures that patching and configuration policies can be applied with precision. A phased rollout approach is essential—beginning with a pilot group allows teams to test patching schedules, reboot behaviors, and custom Worklets before scaling across the organization. Leveraging Worklets from the start can significantly boost automation by enforcing security baselines and performing routine system tasks. Integration with existing SOC tools, such as SIEMs, enhances visibility and response time by correlating patch compliance with threat intelligence. Additionally, aligning patching schedules with operational downtimes minimizes disruptions, and consistent monitoring and reporting helps maintain compliance and prepare for audits. Overall, Automox offers a streamlined and effective solution, but its true value is unlocked through thoughtful planning, testing, and integration with existing IT and security workflows.
Read full review
Gen (NortonLifeLock, Avast, Avira, AVG)
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Automox
All of these other products are overly complicated with user interfaces that are not very friendly.. too technical, even for IT pros. They are also expensive for smaller companies or those with limited IT budgets. I've found that these other solutions are really geared for larger enterprises more than small to midsized companies, which is fine... but then they tend to market themselves as good for everyone, when they are really not.
Read full review
Gen (NortonLifeLock, Avast, Avira, AVG)
Avast CloudCare is less of a memory hog than several other vendors like Norton or Trend. The ease of deployment for 1 or 100 computers is so simple and straightforward.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Automox
  • Patches are now fully up to date and we have no longer been dinged for it from our pen testing partners.
  • Reduced man hours spent on maintaining an update server and the hours spent looking at each machine to ensure it patched all software both windows and third party.
  • Allows for us to provide a vendor with a means to connect to our systems without the use of a VPN.
Read full review
Gen (NortonLifeLock, Avast, Avira, AVG)
  • Positive: we have our customers supported better than ever
  • Negative: But not really, we have lost billable time due to our customers having [fewer] virus infections than ever before.
  • We had one incident where we had to credit a customer because the backup failed and did not report correctly and the customer lost some data.
Read full review
ScreenShots