TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Automox vs. IBM DevOps Code ClearCase vs. Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Contact about Automox

Please fill out the form below to get in touch.

Automox

Connect with Automox

What are you interested in?

Already have an account?

You hereby consent to have TrustRadius share the information supplied on this form with Automox so that Automox and TrustRadius may contact you in regard to the information requested.

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Automox

    Score8.7 out of 10
    N/AAutomox is an endpoint management platform built for the era of autonomous operations. It provides a cloud-native foundation that unifies automation, speed, visibility, and trust.

    $1

    per month per endpoint

    IBM DevOps Code ClearCase

    Score9.5 out of 10
    N/AAn enterprise-grade configuration management system that provides controlled access to software assets.N/A

    Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

    Score7.4 out of 10
    N/AIvanti Autonomous Endpoint Management (AEM) is an enterprise endpoint-operations solution built on the Ivanti Neurons platform. It combines unified endpoint management (UEM)—centralized management of desktops, mobile devices, and other endpoints—with digital employee experience monitoring, asset discovery, security controls, and automated remediation. Ivanti positions AEM as a broader solution layer that brings UEM, digital employee experience, and security capabilities together rather than as a…N/A
    Pricing
    AutomoxIBM DevOps Code ClearCaseIvanti Autonomous Endpoint Management
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    AutomoxIBM DevOps Code ClearCaseIvanti Autonomous Endpoint Management
    Free Trial
    YesNoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeRequired
    Additional DetailsAutomox can patch macOS, Windows, and Linux endpoints with PatchOS, an offering at $1 per endpoint/ month with an annual commitment. The Automate Essentials or Automate Enterprise packages are for scaling IT automation, endpoint configuration, and software updates. Modules are available with Automox Assist, a one-on-one remote endpoint control and assistance for helpdesk technicians.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    AutomoxIBM DevOps Code ClearCaseIvanti Autonomous Endpoint Management
    Considered Multiple Products
    Automox
    No answer on this topic
    IBM
    No answer on this topic
    Ivanti
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    96%
    Would buy again
    158 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    83%
    Would buy again
    29 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    97%
    Delivers good value for the price
    149 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    91%
    Delivers good value for the price
    30 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    94%
    Happy with the feature set
    155 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    83%
    Happy with the feature set
    29 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    93%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    121 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    81%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    22 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    94%
    Implementation went as expected
    145 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    79%
    Implementation went as expected
    23 Answers
    Best Alternatives
    AutomoxIBM DevOps Code ClearCaseIvanti Autonomous Endpoint Management
    Small Businesses
    Avast CloudCare
    Score10 out of 10
    GitHub
    Score9.2 out of 10
    Avast CloudCare
    Score10 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Action1
    Score9.6 out of 10
    Git
    Score10 out of 10
    Action1
    Score9.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    ManageEngine Endpoint Central
    Score9 out of 10
    Perforce P4
    Score7.5 out of 10
    ManageEngine Endpoint Central
    Score9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    AutomoxIBM DevOps Code ClearCaseIvanti Autonomous Endpoint Management
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.9
    (165 ratings)
    3.3
    (2 ratings)
    6.9
    (112 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.8
    (8 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (19 ratings)
    Usability
    9.3
    (131 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (19 ratings)
    Availability
    5.5
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.0
    (10 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.9
    (10 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    9.1
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    AutomoxIBM DevOps Code ClearCaseIvanti Autonomous Endpoint Management
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Automox
    Automox is useful when manual patching becomes daunting. For large companies, it's unrealistic to spend significant time manually patching each endpoint. IT teams gain flexibility, and Automox saves significant time that can be dedicated to more important projects. Automox helps maintain a strong security posture.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    IBM Rational ClearCase might be better suited for a smaller / simpler code base. Larger code bases really slow it down... but then again there are better alternatives out there for source control
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ivanti
    I think that Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management can be well suited to most scenarios for patch management. The different options with Ring Deployments allow for rolling out patches in any number of circumstances. Typical monthly, weekly, daily, zero day response, etc. There is some lack of control over how to wrap up a deployment. What I mean is that in a scenario where we need extremely controlled rollouts, some of the features do not align well. For our organization, we would ideally evaluate patches that come out each Patch Tuesday. Select those patches for deployment, deploy those to our test servers over 3 days, wait 2 days, then deploy to production for 3 days. While we have plenty of control over the initial deployment, we have no clean way to say "after these 3 days, no longer deploy the patch". In our specific scenario, we sacrifice process to align with the tool's capabilities.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Automox
    • Shows applications installed on a specific asset
    • Able to push policies and updates remotely , creating policies is easy.
    • Keep track of compliant devices and when is the last time they have connected to the servers
    • All the great information provided within one single device
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Rational ClearCase is excellent for handling versioning and branching. No other tool I've used has the depth that ClearCase has when it comes to handling complex branching scenarios and identifying where certain versions of particular files are within a particular configuration.
    • Rational ClearCase handles parallel development of many dependent applications really well.
    • The use of ClearCase Views to switch between projects and configurations is extremely convenient as opposed to the local workstation model of the competitors.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ivanti
    • Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management is light weight and easy to install
    • Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management allows the user to defer a required restart. Allowing them to restart their machine at a time that's more convenient for them.
    • Comparatively, Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management is a budget friendly solution.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Automox
    • There are some applications that updates to the wrong version causing Channel version issues, this then needs to be excluded from the policy and updated via a script.
    • Certain software like NET. is not updated
    • The worklet / remediation / evaluation system is not always effective, does not work all the time. Needs to be very detailed for it work.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Extremely buggy.
    • Sometimes the repository gets locked for no reason.
    • Slow.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ivanti
    • MDM has fallen a bit flat, however, with the recent acquisition of MobileIron I believe this will change but as of now there is some of this still built into the product
    • The antivirus portion of the product hasn't had much love and could use a bump. It is not bad at all but I would like to see it hit that next level.
    • Data Analytics is the most powerful tool inside this platform but it is so hard for people to figure it out that it often goes unused. It needs a good redesign.
    • API could use some work.
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Automox
    We really like Automox and have had a very positive experience using the platform. It has made managing and supporting our environment significantly easier, while giving us the visibility and control we need to manage devices effectively. It has simplified a number of operational tasks for our team, and we are very happy with the value and capabilities it provides.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Ivanti
    MobileIron is a constantly evolving platform that stays current with industry trends. iOS updates? No problem, they're supported almost immediately after a new iOS version comes out. If you are a Core (on-prem) customer there is ample support and assistance to migrate to the Cloud version of MobileIron (although I've yet to convince my department head to approve the request). The platform is very robust and extremely configurable. Management roles can be delegated effectively to other staff without compromising security. These in alone are important, but even more important is the company itself - they are great to work with, from support to sales. We have never had a situation where MobileIron left us on our own, and many times support has gone way beyond what is simply required in order to educate us or extend the usefulness of the product
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Automox
    I love the console interface; it makes taking action very simple compared to some other software I've used. There's a wealth of information at your fingertips on a user's endpoint page in Automox, and it's usually the only tool I need when troubleshooting, unless something more specific is going on.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Ivanti
    It's relatively straightforward as far as using it. We can create roles in it and have some of our junior engineers still do the patching. Also, creating rules and exclusions, once shown, can be done by most of our engineers. We also like the interface on the home page that shows the current progress of our patch deployments
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Automox
    I did not need to reach out to support often but when I did the answers were relatively correct and they were answered quickly. The only thing I might "ding" their support on was their lack of understanding of OS's different from Windows and especially Linux. Other than that I was satisfied
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Ivanti
    TRM\TAM support has been generally very good. Getting reported bug fixes, design changes, UX problems resolved has been a pain. It is often difficult to get problems escalated beyond the TRM\TAM level. Support is fantastic when you can get it, getting it can often require more work than it should, and that is probably our biggest issue.
    Read full review
    Online Training
    Automox
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Ivanti
    It is online based, after learning content you can take a test and if you don't pass you get two other chances to pass. Once you pass the test you can print out your certification or save it
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Automox
    Implementing Automox successfully starts with a clear strategy for organizing and grouping devices based on operating systems, environments, or business criticality. This ensures that patching and configuration policies can be applied with precision. A phased rollout approach is essential—beginning with a pilot group allows teams to test patching schedules, reboot behaviors, and custom Worklets before scaling across the organization. Leveraging Worklets from the start can significantly boost automation by enforcing security baselines and performing routine system tasks. Integration with existing SOC tools, such as SIEMs, enhances visibility and response time by correlating patch compliance with threat intelligence. Additionally, aligning patching schedules with operational downtimes minimizes disruptions, and consistent monitoring and reporting helps maintain compliance and prepare for audits. Overall, Automox offers a streamlined and effective solution, but its true value is unlocked through thoughtful planning, testing, and integration with existing IT and security workflows.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Ivanti
    None, implementation went great
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Automox
    We chose this tool over Automox because, before Automox, we used Intune, and at the time we were on Office 365, so Intune was almost free. Later, the board decided to move from the Microsoft 365 suite to Google Workspace, and Intune's endpoint management costs were high, so we moved to Automox.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    If development is centrallized to one location and your company releases hundreds of customized versions of your software per year, then ClearCase is the best tool for managing the complexity of multiple versions of customized software. If your company has globally distributed development, then I'd recommend Team Foundation Server over ClearCase. If your organization uses Agile Methodologies, then I'd recommend TFS with GIT.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ivanti
    Better in most all categories. On-prem was not an issue for my organization. MS SCCM was lacking features. Airwatch required increasing tiers of service in order to match [Ivanti Unified Endpoint Manager (formerly LANDESK Management Suite)] features, and lacked the robust inventory data we needed. Meraki was very simple to use, but did not meet our needs. I would say that most Airwatch customers aren't using all the features they are paying for, and could save lots of money by using Meraki instead.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Automox
    • We wanted to like the remote support software, but the experience was poor compared to a solution like BeyondTrust.
    • Development and deployment of worklets is fast for experienced coders.
    • Policy execution and reporting is fast and reliable.
    • The new analytics dashboard excels at reporting Mean Time to Remediation for executive reporting purposes.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Managed code versioning for many years.
    • Only one person can edit code at a time - slows processing down.
    • IBM is an expensive product to support.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ivanti
    • The installation of MobileIron was for security compliance so we could containerize email on BYOD devices and also control who got email on company phones (to prevent hourly workers from working on emails after hours). MobileIron met this need nicely.
    • MobileIron allowed us to utilize device certificates to prevent unauthorized devices from joining wireless networks in our company.
    • MobileIron allows our sales staff to get emails on the road and many users rely on the functionality and ease of the phone for general mail communication.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management Screenshots

    Screenshot of Asset VisibilityScreenshot of Autonomous PatchScreenshot of Predictive RemediationScreenshot of Digital Employee Experience ManagementScreenshot of Self Healing