TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Contact about BrowserStack

Please fill out the form below to get in touch.

BrowserStack

Connect with BrowserStack

What are you interested in?

Already have an account?

You hereby consent to have TrustRadius share the information supplied on this form with BrowserStack so that BrowserStack and TrustRadius may contact you in regard to the information requested.

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    BrowserStack

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/ABrowserStack is a test platform built for developers and QAs to expand test coverage, scale and optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability. BrowserStack states it currently powers over a billion tests a year for customers who include Amazon, Paypal, Well Fargo Bank, Nvidia, MongoDB, Pfizer, GE, Discovery, React JS, Apache, JQuery and several others rely on BrowserStack to test their web and mobile apps.

    $0

    per month Unlimited users and 5000 free screenshots

    Playwright

    Score8.7 out of 10
    N/AA cross-browser testing tool, playwright supports all modern rendering engines including Chromium, WebKit, and Firefox. Users can test on Windows, Linux, and macOS, locally or on CI, headless or headed. It is also cross-language, so that the Playwright API can be used in TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, .NET, Java. Test Mobile Web. Native mobile emulation of Google Chrome for Android and Mobile Safari. The same rendering engine works on the Desktop and in the Cloud. Playright…

    $0

    Pricing
    BrowserStackPlaywright
    Editions & Modules
    Percy - Free
    $0
    per month Unlimited users and 5000 free screenshots
    App Percy - Free
    $0
    per month 5000 free screenshots and 100 minutes of infrastructure
    Test Observability - Unlimited Free
    $0
    Accessibility Testing - Free
    $0
    Test Observability - Observability Pro
    $0.01
    per month per test execution
    Percy - Desktop
    $0.02
    per month per screenshot
    App Percy - Visual Core
    $0.02
    per month per screenshot
    Percy - Desktop & Mobile
    $0.02
    per month per screenshot
    App Percy - Visual Cloud
    $0.03
    per month per screenshot
    Live - Desktop
    $39
    per month per user
    Live - Desktop & Mobile
    $49
    per month per user
    App Live - Individual
    $49
    per month per user
    Automate - Desktop
    $129
    per month 1 parallel test
    Live - Team
    $175
    per month 5 users
    App Live - Team
    $175
    per month 5 users
    Accessibility Testing - Team
    $199
    per month 5 users
    Automate - Desktop & Mobile
    $225
    per month 1 parallel test
    App Automate - Device Cloud
    $249
    per month 1 parallel test
    App Live - Team Pro
    $289
    per month 5 users
    App Automate - Device Cloud Pro
    $299
    per month 1 parallel test
    Automate - Enterprise
    Contact sales team
    Percy - Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    App Automate - Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    App Live - Enterprise
    Contact sales team
    Live - Enterprise
    Contact sales team
    App Automate - Device Cloud Pro + Visual Cloud
    Contact Sales
    App Percy - Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    Test Observability - Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    Accessibility Testing - Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    BrowserStackPlaywright
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    BrowserStackPlaywright
    Considered Both Products
    BrowserStack
    Chose BrowserStack
    I chose BrowserStack over Playwright because it was far more simpler to test test cases, builds were already set up and was just right because our web application was not as complex as others. We also used it because of the text and image validation which is what we really …
    Incentivized
    Chose BrowserStack
    BrowserStack is much compact and faster compared to Katalon studio for mobile testing and supporting a lot of emulators compared to Katalon.The licensing cost is also better compared to Katalon and the user base of BrowserStack is high with official documentation well in place …
    Incentivized
    Chose BrowserStack
    I haven't used any tool so I cannot rate any other tool. BrowserStack was the first tool we selected for our proof of concept and we liked it. We found some limitations and we reported those to BrowserStack and now they have added it in their roadmap to fix it. So overall, we …
    Incentivized
    Chose BrowserStack
    More devices , more features and easy to use
    Incentivized
    Chose BrowserStack
    easy to use, pricing, customer support and huge availability of devices
    Incentivized
    Microsoft
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    97%
    Would buy again
    273 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    97%
    Delivers good value for the price
    229 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    98%
    Happy with the feature set
    277 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    97%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    189 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    98%
    Implementation went as expected
    231 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Best Alternatives
    BrowserStackPlaywright
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    BlazeMeter
    Score8 out of 10
    TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Tricentis Tosca
    Score8.8 out of 10
    TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    Score8.9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    BrowserStackPlaywright
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.8
    (303 ratings)
    10.0
    (3 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.1
    (20 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    8.4
    (25 ratings)
    8.9
    (3 ratings)
    Availability
    8.7
    (6 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    6.2
    (79 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.1
    (26 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Online Training
    7.0
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.8
    (9 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Configurability
    8.3
    (7 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    9.0
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    8.1
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    9.2
    (7 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Professional Services
    9.0
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    9.0
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    8.1
    (5 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    BrowserStackPlaywright
    Likelihood to Recommend
    BrowserStack
    BrowserStack is very useful if you need to troubleshoot a client's reported experience from using an older device or browser version that you do not own and can not personally replicate in-house. For instance, if you are in a Windows environment and your client has a Mac, or if you have iPhones and they have Android. It's also great for ensuring that above-the-fold content is presented effectively across a variety of mobile devices and optimizing visitor experiences. If you are a small business with lower client volumes where these services are needed, then the price point may be high.
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Playwright is very well suited for any kind of frontend QA regression testing. It's perfect for ensuring that important features that are not often updated remain fully functional across updates or releases. It is not well suited for testing a feature that requires more developer updates before it is ready for end users. Playwright tests are not always simple to maintain if frequent updates are required to keep them relevant. Playwright can be used for API or database assertions as well, but it's not necessarily best suited for those scenarios. It does perform well enough to consider that use case for simplicity if Playwright is already relevant for any frontend QA regression tests that are needed.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    BrowserStack
    • Tests Android and iOS on real devices on cloud, without the need to purchase the devices.
    • Run Maestro tests and other frameworks on real devices, reporting the errors to be fixed to developers or the test workflows that failed to the QA team.
    • The quality reports at the end of the tests are really good, because they contain videos of the tests being performed on the devices. So, not only text, I can check the behavior of the application exactly how it runs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • automation
    • integrations
    • support
    • community
    • features
    • easy to use
    • documentation
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    BrowserStack
    • The documentation needs to improve for browser edge cases, such as "approving permissions automatically". There are several "solutions" posted, none of which worked. I needed to go to Discord to get the real solution.
    • Documentation in general seems to provide answers that are unclear or flaky
    • There needs to be a more reliable way to programmatically choose device, platform, and window size by being able to query a 'plan' endpoint instead of just 'failing the combination.'
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • UI
    • API
    • Performance
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    BrowserStack
    It's almost the 3rd year for us and it's renewal time for us. So yes, we are already discussing how many licenses we need to increase as users are increasing internally. So it's 100% sure that we are already planning renewal this year as well BrowserStack with live and app automate.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    BrowserStack
    So many options that it can be a little overwhelming, but the core functions are easy to find and use and it's usually not too hard to figure things out for the more complex tasks. Very easy to boot up a device and a specific browser from the dashboard to begin a manual website test.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    I find Playwright very intuitive and generally do not have any trouble using it on a daily basis. However, I do have coworkers with more limited experience in software who have struggled immensely in learning to use Playwright properly. Playwright is very well documented which helps if you plan to use AI to help you write any test automation (which I generally don't recommend, but is an option).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    BrowserStack
    I rated BrowserStack's availability a 10 because it is consistently reliable, with minimal to no downtime or unplanned outages. The platform is accessible whenever needed, ensuring uninterrupted testing. Its robust infrastructure and proactive monitoring ensure a seamless experience, allowing us to meet deadlines without delays caused by availability issues and all
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    BrowserStack
    The tests are fast considering the fact that they're Appium tests. I've seen tests reliably pass or fail when they're supposed to, with next to zero issues on the BrowserStack side of things. Tests launch only seconds after I kick off them off from my CLI.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    BrowserStack
    I've not had much direct interaction with the BrowserStack support team. The help and community are great and we've not run into any issue that has really required us to reach out. I guess having a stable and easy to use system means you may never need to contact support.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    In-Person Training
    BrowserStack
    Yes, it was online training on meet, and trainer looks like skilled and technical strong, he has covered end to end all the features and he has answers all the queries. because of this trainings we are able to implement it by our own in the organization, thank you for support and training.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Online Training
    BrowserStack
    It was a quick training from the support of browserstack, it was nice and easy to understand, thanks again for the support given by the team. and regularly I used to receive mails for training from support for any new feature they launch, I was able to spread same training to all my team and dev.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    BrowserStack
    I rated the implementation satisfaction an 8 because while it went smoothly overall, there were some challenges during the initial learning phase and integration with existing tools. Key insights include the importance of providing sufficient training upfront and ensuring seamless integration with other systems to minimize disruptions and improve adoption speed.
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    BrowserStack
    BrowserStack is simpler and more user friendly than Sauce Labs and can be easily learned by any individual who is new to it and does not require much efforts. Also, BrowserStack is more trusted by the clients that we offer services to, and is always considered the best option among others.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    We selected Playwright over the rest for several reasons. The learning curve is faster, making it easier for our team to get up to speed quickly. The setup is pretty straithtforwared, minimal configurartion needed and a great example included in the configuration which includes all the basics to start writing using that spec as a placeholder. Compared to Cypress, Playwright support multiple browsers out of the box, giving us broader testing coverage. Appium is great for mobile testing, but extremely slow.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    BrowserStack
    No Vendors were involved, directly dealt with Browserstack
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Scalability
    BrowserStack
    I may not be the best person to answer this as I am only using it for 1 department and at 1 site but will still try my best As far as Scalability for Devices for Mobile Automation is concerned, it gets a Solid 10, as the users can run cases on upto 10 device parallel and also have the best choices of devices to choose
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Professional Services
    BrowserStack
    Not used
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    BrowserStack
    • Browserstack improved our internal confidence level when it came to signing off on testing
    • Browserstack improved the confidence level of our clients by decreasing the number of bugs found during PVT and providing an entry level opportunity for our clients to perform UAT using the same tools.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Usable
    • customisable
    • extendable
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    BrowserStack Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshot