Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
BugTracker.net
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
Bugzilla
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
Linear
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Linear is a bug tracking software that streamlines software development projects, sprints, and tasks.N/A
Pricing
BugTracker.netBugzillaLinear App
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BugTracker.netBugzillaLinear
Free Trial
NoNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BugTracker.netBugzillaLinear App
Best Alternatives
BugTracker.netBugzillaLinear App
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BugTracker.netBugzillaLinear App
Likelihood to Recommend
6.4
(2 ratings)
7.7
(18 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.2
(2 ratings)
6.0
(10 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(3 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
5.1
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
BugTracker.netBugzillaLinear App
Likelihood to Recommend
Open Source
See above. Recommended questions: What type of feedback or tracking will we be doing? Will this need to be client-facing? How will we track content edits? How many users will be assigned to issues in a given project?
Read full review
Open Source
Buzilla is easy to use and provides basic functionality to use as a bug tracking tool. If big size attachments are allowed it would have been great. Also with Bugzilla home->Test management area is improved by allowing multiple sections it would be awesome!
Read full review
Linear
If you are a product based company, Linear is the most powerful fine-tuned platform. Their methodology really works well. It's fast, got nice UI/UX, feels modern, ability to manage projects, love how they show comments as a thread, the integrations like Figma works really well But if you are a software service company and have multiple client projects, it is hard to manage that in Linear plus you would have to pay for guests if you are inviting client stakeholders to overlook progress.
Read full review
Pros
Open Source
  • Ability to split our multiple projects and assign a user base.
  • Ability to set permissions based on user base/ roles.
  • Customization of fields on a project level.
Read full review
Open Source
  • Open source! No license fee involved, no limit to the number of licenses.
  • Easy to install and maintain. Installation is very easy and hardly needs any maintenance efforts, except when migrating from one version to other. Each project can have its own group of users.
  • Includes all the core features/fields that are needed to log a software bug/issue.
  • Multiple attachments are possible, supports various formats.
  • Good for reporting. Filtering mechanism lets you query bugs by various parameters.
Read full review
Linear
  • Managing the high level goals and roadmap of our product
  • Manage the tasks for dev, QA and design teams
  • Visualise the progress of the sprints and projects
  • Collaborate on tasks
Read full review
Cons
Open Source
  • User interface for client-facing feedback
  • Content and design updates tracking
Read full review
Open Source
  • Cloud Based. I'd like to see bugzilla be cloud based. The company I currently work with made a final decision to change db's for this specific reason. Due to the frequency of travel in this company, they need access to bugzilla from differing national / international locations.
  • Larger File Attachments. I believe the limit of a bugzilla content upload is 4 megabytes. For many of our video'd issues, this file size is simply impractical without the additional effort exertion on video compressor applications.
Read full review
Linear
  • Linear is missing documentation features like Jira Confluence. We can use Notion but it would have been great if Linear offered more comprehensive solution
  • Eventhough we can manage releases with projects, it is hard to manage them when there are multiple projects being released at the same time. The initiatives feature kind of handles this but if we can assign tasks to a release that would be awesome
  • Being able to invite guests without costing extra money. Platforms like Clickup allow you to invite a limited no of guests without costing extra money.
  • Linear is not good if you are software services company and want to manage multiple client projects. Linear is built for product teams.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Open Source
I would plan on renewing and staying with BugTracker.net simply because it is a no nonsense easy to use tool. Once you get it set up and understand the small nuances with this custom piece of software, it really is a great tool to help your organization get started with Defect Management and BugTracking without having to drop several thousands of dollars on tools that are more fluff than function.
Read full review
Open Source
For future projects I will look at something that is hosted in the cloud that I don't have to manage. I would also like something that has a more modern feel to allow my customers to use it as well as my employees.
Read full review
Linear
No answers on this topic
Usability
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Open Source
This is a pretty straightforward system. You put in the bug details, a ticket is created, the team is notified. The user interface reflects this very simple and straightforward flow. It's certainly much easier than trying to track bugs with using Excel and email.
Read full review
Linear
Linear is the most UI/UX friendly, modern and well though project management tool out there. I've used ClickUp, Jira, Monday, Asana in the past.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Open Source
I used it.
Read full review
Linear
No answers on this topic
Performance
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Open Source
I like this rating.
Read full review
Linear
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Open Source
Since it is open source, it doesn't have customer service. However, the amount of information on forums is vast. If you can wade through it, you'll get what you need
Read full review
Linear
No answers on this topic
In-Person Training
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Open Source
I know it.
Read full review
Linear
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Open Source
Implementation was pretty simple. Particularly because the product cannot be customized so there is not much to do apart from getting it up and running.
Read full review
Linear
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Open Source
I didn't choose the product or evaluate other options, but I've been satisified with it except for tracking content changes.
Read full review
Open Source
We migrated away from the whole suite of Rational tools because of their massive complexity around administration and inflexibility regarding workflows. In addition, the suite was insanely expensive, and users hated the usability of the tools. We evaluated, and liked JIRA, but because the organization was looking for cost savings, we ended up going with Bugzilla and it's FOSS model so as to avoid ongoing costs.
Read full review
Linear
Even though platforms like ClickUp are pretty flexible, Linear is fast, simple, has a lot of keyboard shortcuts, better UI/UX, modern product development concepts built into it, listens to user feedback
Read full review
Scalability
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Open Source
I used it
Read full review
Linear
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Open Source
  • Decreased turn around time for defect fixes.
  • Smoother builder deploys
  • Clearer communication from QA to Dev Team
Read full review
Open Source
  • It has made the SDLC process more efficient. Bugs were logged and tracked in emails or in Excel sheets leading to slow communication and at time version issues with multiple files. Being an online tool, Bugzilla solved those issues, improved communication, instant status updates and improved efficiency.
  • We have used Bugzilla with a lot of federal goverment agencies (DHS, CMS, SAMHSA, CDC, HHS etc). Project Directors adn Principle Investigators were at times given access to Bugzilla which provided a snapshot of open vs closed issues.
  • Some groups would resist using Bugzilla with the email reminders being the main reason. Turning off or reminding them of features where we can 'control' email notification helped a lot.
Read full review
Linear
  • Linear decreased the time we take for releases of features
  • Linear has helped us work on multiple projects saving time
  • Customer support cases are handled well through Linear which improved customer satisfaction
Read full review
ScreenShots