Bynder helps brands to distribute their marketing materials, manage creations and facilitate brand consistency.
Bynder is a solution for marketing that comes with best in class digital asset management, creative project management, brand identity guidelines, product information management and web-to-publish modules.
N/A
Nuxeo
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
The Hyland Nuxeo Platform is a cloud-native,
cloud-first, scalable solution which utilizes automation technologies to
improve efficiencies, increase accuracy, and provide its capabilities. With
it’s low-code technology, organizations can implement Hyland’s Nuxeo
Platform with customizable features that allow organizations to develop a creative workflow. Employees can then create,
tag, organize, and share dynamic content, including rich media and 3D digital
assets and their metadata to be used in…
N/A
Pricing
Bynder
Nuxeo
Editions & Modules
Enterprise Brand Portal
$0
User/Storage/Modules/Add-Ons
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Bynder
Nuxeo
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
Optional
Additional Details
The cost of Bynder depends on the number of users, amount of storage, and the modules needed.
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Bynder
Nuxeo
Features
Bynder
Nuxeo
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Bynder
7.0
7 Ratings
3% below category average
Nuxeo
-
Ratings
Dashboards
7.27 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
6.85 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
6.85 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data exportability
7.75 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content analytics
6.85 Ratings
00 Ratings
DAM Features
Comparison of DAM Features features of Product A and Product B
Bynder
8.2
9 Ratings
1% below category average
Nuxeo
-
Ratings
Uploading assets
7.79 Ratings
00 Ratings
Downloading assets
9.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Categories
8.99 Ratings
00 Ratings
Asset storage
7.89 Ratings
00 Ratings
Asset sharing
8.89 Ratings
00 Ratings
Asset search
8.69 Ratings
00 Ratings
Tagging system
8.28 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content editing
7.68 Ratings
00 Ratings
Embed codes
7.55 Ratings
00 Ratings
Metadata
8.87 Ratings
00 Ratings
Collections
8.69 Ratings
00 Ratings
User access
8.59 Ratings
00 Ratings
DAM Integrations
8.15 Ratings
00 Ratings
DAM API
8.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow automations
7.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Related asset discovery
7.47 Ratings
00 Ratings
Enterprise Content Management
Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Bynder
-
Ratings
Nuxeo
8.0
23 Ratings
1% below category average
Content capture & imaging
00 Ratings
8.220 Ratings
File sync, storage & archiving
00 Ratings
8.123 Ratings
Document management
00 Ratings
8.221 Ratings
Records management
00 Ratings
8.120 Ratings
Content search & retrieval
00 Ratings
8.122 Ratings
Enterprise content collaboration
00 Ratings
7.818 Ratings
Content publishing & creation
00 Ratings
8.022 Ratings
Security, risk management & information governance
We have numerous renderings for some of our properties that are constantly being updated. It was hard to keep track of the most current rendering since it lived in multiple locations with various employees. Creating a central location where we can regularly update the renderings without having to add a new file and re-upload solved the issue of questioning whether the rendering you were looking at was correct.
Nuxeo works very well for us as a Digital Media Asset Management tool. I understand given its flexibility, it has also been used for managing insurance claims. It seems to be well suited for uses where some customization is required, yet there is a desire to leverage best practices, reusable code components.
Extracting content is where Bynder shines. My previous EverNote account reminded me of the last scene in Raiders of the Lost Ark -- warehouse full of stuff where clearly everything was lost once it was put in there. Bynder makes it easy to find and extract information especially because of the thumbnail views aided by the categorization tools. Since you can use these in combination everything is basically a complex Boolean search without needing to know how to write a complex Boolean Search.
Easy I/O. Getting information into and out of Bynder is really easy -- follows the "don't make me think" rule. visual cues and clear buttons, etc. In fact, since I use multiple systems, I find it easiest to actually do file transfer TO MYSELF via Bynder rather than download or email files between my PC and Mac for example. That's how easy it is.
Categories, tagging, last-used, most-frequent, hide/show -- there's a lot of flexibility in organizing your content. Technically, this kind of thing exists in every tool I've ever used... but it's the implementation that matters. UI design is vital to making this a valuable tool as opposed to a dreary step of "file retrieval".
Link Sharing: One thing I wish Bynder had was quick link sharing for images or collections of images to share outside of Bynder. Currently you have to create a collection and send it via email to the person you want to view it. Otherwise you can make it public and share a link but then that collection technically can be viewed or downloaded by anyone. Since I'm used to the functionality of Dropbox, this is one thing that I feel is lacking.
Public Media Center: Along the lines of the last comment about link sharing; one thing that would be helpful is a public media center. If we were able to tag what photos we would want to include there, along with downloadable logos, guidelines, PR, etc. There are workarounds but the functionality doesn't quite exist.
Automatic Translations: We opted to keep all of our metadata and tagging in English, as most of our International partners do speak some English; however, it would have been nice to have an option to automatically translate any metadata/tagging for certain languages. We did have the option of automatically translating the main menu buttons but that wasn't much help. If we wanted metadata/tagging in other languages we'd have to input it manually for thousands of assets.
I give it the rating because the filtering system is an efficient way to search and it seems like everyone regardless of age would be able to understand this function of how to locate assets. For average users they will mostly just use it to search and download assets so they don't need to learn everything about it but as long as the designers know the usability better it should not be an issue.
Nuxeo provides a WebUI that they are always improving based on customer feedback. The interface is designed with flexibility in mind - this means that it must be customized to the business's use case before it can achieve its maximum usability.
The Nuxeo Studio interface provides developers and administrators the building blocks to achieve much of this customization - they just need to put the building blocks together in ways that best meet the end users' needs. The API and SDKs allow for more advanced customization.
This is something that we have struggled with a bit. We push the boundaries of Nuxeo in this area, both with the number of assets and the size of assets. We have a lot of large, long videos, and we are continually tuning performance in this area.
When we were getting ready to switch vendors, WebDAM wasn't very responsive to my questions or my needs. They also sent me all the files on an external drive that was formatted for Mac and didn't even think to verify whether I had a PC (which I did) so the external drive was useless and I had to wait another week to get the updated external drive that was formatted for a PC that I could then use.
Nuxeo support is very willing to help whenever there is an issue. We have a weekly touchbase with someone from the Nuxeo team that we discuss any development issues with, and there is an open line of communication between our team and the Nuxeo team. They have been supporting us phenomenally, every step of the way.
I attended instructor-led trainings at a couple of points when I was first beginning to serve as project manager on Nuxeo projects. The first one that I attended was meant for business users and decision-makers. The second one was meant for system administrators. The first one provided a great introduction, through demos, of how Nuxeo could be adapted to very different business use cases. The second one, like many instructor-led trainings, was meant for users of a variety of skill levels, and so it could be a bit slow at times for students with a stronger technical background, but the instructor was able to include more advanced components as well.
Nuxeo University provides an ideal starting point for developers and system administrators who are new to the Nuxeo platform. So, in terms of online training for developers and administrators, the learning paths are definitely available. In terms of training for end users: keep in mind that Nuxeo is a foundation with building blocks - what you do with those building blocks is up to you and depends on your business's specific use cases. For this reason, end-user training is largely up to you because it will need to depend on how you've built and configured the system. That said, I've seen the companies that I've worked with configure the system based largely on end-user input, and so it has fit very closely with what those users wanted to do and how they wanted to do it. In cases where elements of the UI weren't fitting quite right with what users naturally wanted to do, based on their process flows, we've often found it easy enough to adapt the UI to the users, rather than using training to adapt the users to the UI.
The technical support team of the Nuxeo was always on the go to help us. Being an IT technician, I haven't faced any such issue, but the problem was that it took much longer than anticipated. Otherwise, we didn't need to get other implementation partners to help us in its implementation.
My team chose Bynder as it is not my role to decide these things, but it was chosen so that we would be able to send large files and packages to outside organizations like vendors. It was also a matter of storage limitations with OneDrive as we were bound to run out of space as the organization grows. Bynder allowed us to not need to worry about storage.
It is built on open-source technologies. A very small footprint is required to run it. It can be run in a cloud and utilize the power of cloud services, unlike other competitors.