Carbonite by OpenText vs. Unitrends

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Carbonite by OpenText
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
Carbonite by OpenText (also replacing the former EVault products acquired from Seagate in 2016) is a cloud backup solution for small business. Designed to recover anything from a single file to an entire system with the click of a button, Carbonite users can protect virtually any type of file.N/A
Unitrends
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
The Unitrends Recovery Series Backup Appliances are hardware developed for data backup and management. They cover enterprise backup, ransomware detection, recovery assurance, proactive monitoring, and cloud continuity into a single platform for organizations of all sizes.N/A
Pricing
Carbonite by OpenTextUnitrends
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Carbonite by OpenTextUnitrends
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Carbonite by OpenTextUnitrends
Considered Both Products
Carbonite by OpenText

No answer on this topic

Unitrends
Chose Unitrends
Worked with Sungard Availability Services a few years back and they were much more flexible with managing archived data.

We selected the Unitrends Data Center [Backup and Recovery] because it integrated well with the Appliance and we can count on Unitrends support should issues …
Chose Unitrends
Compared Unitrends amongst other vendors. We liked their sales presentation and the product seemed to provide more Return on Investment as compared with other vendors.
Chose Unitrends
Unitrends appliance works well it has recovery verification, can be backed up to multiple destinations. Can be differential or always incremental. Can be backed up to the cloud from the same console. Snapshots can be taken of the VM and the backups are compressed using …
Chose Unitrends
In the past I have used Symantec Backup Exec, Windows Server backup and also Windows System Center. Unitrends is easier to use and I don't have to worry about licensing. Unitrends prices based on disk size not the number of units being backed up.
Chose Unitrends
I have not used or evaluated any other products similar for more than 4 years because I've been completely happy with the Unitrends solution. It has met and exceeded my needs and continues to perform well in our mixed environment. The addition of cloud backup to the appliance …
Chose Unitrends
Unitrends was a complete system. It did not require additional devices or licenses. Therefore it is faster and costs less.
Chose Unitrends
We are currently migrating to Veeam for our production environment, as the costs for the software and hardware are far less than Unitrends, and the software offers the same protection that we currently enjoy. When comparing the two products, I could not see a reason to continue …
Chose Unitrends
The biggest difference between the Unitrends Recovery Series Backup Appliance and the other two options we used, Veeam and Windows Server Backup was the physical appliance. The other two were software based and were not giving our organization a fully unified backup strategy or …
Chose Unitrends
Unitrends gives you a better backup configuration of applications than Acronis. Veeam is a great backup solution but Unitrends out beats [them] by giving you reliable local backups.
Chose Unitrends
At the time we purchased, Unitrends was the only company I would have considered. Our very knowledgeable (hardware-agnostic) hardware consultant suggested Unitrends, and at the price we paid for the functionality, we didn't need to look further.

That said, as much as we love …
Chose Unitrends
Each seems to have a niche and a great following but for effectiveness, managability, and value we had no question about going with Unitrends.
Features
Carbonite by OpenTextUnitrends
Data Center Backup
Comparison of Data Center Backup features of Product A and Product B
Carbonite by OpenText
8.8
24 Ratings
2% above category average
Unitrends
7.6
360 Ratings
11% below category average
Universal recovery10.09 Ratings7.0302 Ratings
Instant recovery3.511 Ratings8.7290 Ratings
Recovery verification9.79 Ratings7.3288 Ratings
Business application protection9.015 Ratings6.7262 Ratings
Multiple backup destinations10.016 Ratings8.0268 Ratings
Incremental backup identification9.721 Ratings8.3338 Ratings
Backup to the cloud9.523 Ratings6.7213 Ratings
Deduplication and file compression9.013 Ratings8.0326 Ratings
Snapshots10.011 Ratings7.3243 Ratings
Flexible deployment8.812 Ratings7.37 Ratings
Management dashboard8.812 Ratings6.47 Ratings
Platform support8.813 Ratings9.07 Ratings
Retention options6.214 Ratings7.77 Ratings
Encryption9.914 Ratings8.36 Ratings
Enterprise Backup
Comparison of Enterprise Backup features of Product A and Product B
Carbonite by OpenText
8.5
3 Ratings
0% below category average
Unitrends
-
Ratings
Continuous data protection8.43 Ratings00 Ratings
Replication8.42 Ratings00 Ratings
Operational reporting and analytics7.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Malware protection9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-location capabilities8.22 Ratings00 Ratings
Ransomware Recovery10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Carbonite by OpenTextUnitrends
Small Businesses
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.1 out of 10
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.4 out of 10
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 9.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.4 out of 10
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 9.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Carbonite by OpenTextUnitrends
Likelihood to Recommend
8.9
(49 ratings)
8.0
(372 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
5.0
(8 ratings)
8.9
(25 ratings)
Usability
8.8
(3 ratings)
8.3
(16 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
6.2
(2 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
5.6
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
8.2
(3 ratings)
7.9
(23 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.1
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
6.4
(1 ratings)
8.7
(12 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
7.1
(2 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
3.8
(2 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(2 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Carbonite by OpenTextUnitrends
Likelihood to Recommend
OpenText
More than enough for small companies with several on-prem servers. In 2021, it wouldn't be wise to pit all important data to a single backup service. Carbonite Server is solid, but it's not 100% reliable so I'd definitely recommend having multiple backup services either on the cloud in conjunction with other backup services so the user has multiple safety nets in case of disaster and failed granular restorations.
Read full review
Kaseya
We have a traditional stack and pretty typical needs as a manufacturer. I have used and evaluated everything out there, but the Unitrends solution fits very well and was competitively priced. I would think if it fits us, it could fit anyone like us with a similar stack.
Read full review
Pros
OpenText
  • Simple administrative web interface - It's easy to provision users, look at data usage stats, disable users, and update policies to control what folders users are allowed to backup, and what options they can access
  • Easy client installation - Installing and updating clients was very simple. The client would notify the user when a new update was approved by the site admins, and they typically went very smoothly.
  • Good performance - Backups went fairly fast, and were generally invisible to the user, other than the icon updating on files to indicate whether the current version of a file was backed up or not.
Read full review
Kaseya
  • It has fully automated and customizable dashboards that can run with less administrative attention.
  • It should be able to run on virtual machines or be deployed as a virtual machine within MS Azure or AWS.
  • It's AI-based ransomware detection helps to understand data characteristics and alerts for ransomware attacks.
Read full review
Cons
OpenText
  • While overall file restoration is easy to do, obtaining earlier versions is not as user friendly as it could be. You need to enter a date and click search to bring up the latest versions as of the date entered. That’s fine, but what is missing is the ability to see all versions of an individual file. If I am looking for a past file version I want to be able to view the file history as a subset of that file (in other words I should be able to click a + sign and expand to see past versions of the file). Otherwise I am just guessing which dates the file was changed in the past. Sometimes that’s OK, but Mozy needs to build in this enhanced, but necessary feature.
  • A couple of years ago, for non enterprise users, Mozy made radical storage and pricing changes forcing myself and many users off their system, as the price for the same storage was going up significantly. So be careful when using Mozy as past experience has shown they are willing to make major changes regardless of the negative impact on their users.
Read full review
Kaseya
  • Errors on backup jobs could be more clearly explained. As the administrator of the device for my company, I often don't know what caused an error, and can't tell from the error information what happened or caused the error.
  • Updates of the devices should have an automatic option. It takes to much time to do an update to the devices if updates haven't been maintained.
  • Shutdown and restarting the device should be available from the main UI screen to eliminate some time when doing updates or if you're doing some maintenance on the device.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
OpenText
Carbonite Server Backup does not integrate or support any reporting; it is not good at it. We required monthly and quarterly reports for audit. If we fail in that we get fined or we have to pay a certain amount of money to customer. It does not support cloud instances and we are using N2WS for the cloud instances. This is an additional burden for customers.
Read full review
Kaseya
We have grown very attached to the Unitrends appliances and their use for recovery and other file restoration needs as well as data archival, data replication to other appliance and data migration to other servers or long term storage requirements. The appliances work well and the support for them is very good as well.
Read full review
Usability
OpenText
Out of all the vendor we deal with they are one of the best when it comes to customers service. Reliable,you can reach them by telephone easily, Great overall can not say anything to the contrary. Usibility is excellent. I recommend them highly whether you need a simple backup ofr more complex for servers etc.
Read full review
Kaseya
I have never used such an easy product that is stable and scalable like Unitrends. I have been running backups for MANY years. On premise, tape, disk, cloud, you name it. Unitrends is very flexible, stable and has incredible reporting features. It's nice when management requests a report and it takes you 5 minutes to run it and dump it to PDF. How can you beat that?
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Kaseya
The appliances have been there when we need them and have rarely if ever gone down. Hardware issues have been resolved quickly.
Read full review
Performance
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Kaseya
The hardware is adequate and speedy. The user interface responds quickly. Backups complete quickly.
Read full review
Support Rating
OpenText
I usually find what I need to know by looking in the Carbonite knowledge base online. We haven't had any major problems, usually we just need clarification on a point or more details about a feature so we look it up. We haven't had to call in for help in quite awhile.
Read full review
Kaseya
They're incredible, attentive, thorough. They make sure my issue is resolved and follow up. I'm usually behind on giving them a reply or an update. They have always gone above and beyond for me, and I'll continue to do the same for them.
Read full review
Online Training
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Kaseya
It was sufficient to get started. It was not super deep. We called support often to get going.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
OpenText
We had appliance and we just needed to setup the Director Console which was straight forward and easy.
Read full review
Kaseya
The Unitrends employees involved in the installation were very friendly and knowledgeable. A certain degree of hiccups can be expected during any installation but never shook my confidence because of the friendly and knowledgeable team that was assigned to my project.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
OpenText
Netbak is a great product but we also had a secondary issue of having to backup several PC's on site and at remote locations. Carbonite helped with both and gave us one central admin console to be able to check the progress of all our backups, where netbak would have required us to setup a tunnel or use the internet to move data back to our main office.
Read full review
Kaseya
Symantec Backup Exec was the primary tool used for backups for years. We also used Veeam for some Office 365/Exchange backups. Unitrends once configured and set up works very well against the competition. Backup Exec interface was more user friendly. The search tool for exploring backups was much better than Unitrends as well. Unitrends is much faster if you need to restore an entire VM or large file folders. Also once you have Unitrends all set up, it is very low maintenance, it just works. If something fails 9/10 it will correct itself on the next backup that is scheduled to run
Read full review
Scalability
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Kaseya
Once you exceed the capacity of the appliances, you have to forklift a new appliance. This is very expensive.
Read full review
Return on Investment
OpenText
  • We have a safety net that we didn't have before.
  • Key players are now backed up through an automated system that was easy to silently install.
  • The resources used impacted our exchange server negatively and slowed email until it was disabled.
Read full review
Kaseya
  • It has saved some deleted file server data for our business department.
  • We have lost some reports for the business department due to an overlooked setting that make the backup reports look great, but the server was not being backed up in reality.
  • Less anxiety for the IT department, we have backup plan and that is worth a lot to us.
Read full review
ScreenShots