CD2 Learning is a core HR software solution built around features such as learning management, content management, social collaboration, and gamification.
N/A
DigitalChalk, by Sciolytix
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
The DigitalChalk LMS, from Sciolytix gives users the tools and control to launch engaging, interactive, online courses. Users can create courses featuring animated PowerPoint, SCORM content, HD videos, audio, quizzes, exams and more.
$35
per month
PeopleFluent
Score 7.9 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
PeopleFluent includes modules for recruiting, performance management, compensation, learning, succession, and vendor management, as well as workforce planning and diversity. These modules can be purchased separately or bundled, and integrate with other HR systems.
N/A
Pricing
CD2 Learning
DigitalChalk, by Sciolytix
PeopleFluent
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Essential
$35.00
per month
Professional
$79.00
per month
Premier
$189.00
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CD2 Learning
DigitalChalk, by Sciolytix
PeopleFluent
Free Trial
No
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
$399
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CD2 Learning
DigitalChalk, by Sciolytix
PeopleFluent
Features
CD2 Learning
DigitalChalk, by Sciolytix
PeopleFluent
Learning Management
Comparison of Learning Management features of Product A and Product B
CD2 Learning
-
Ratings
DigitalChalk, by Sciolytix
9.5
1 Ratings
15% above category average
PeopleFluent
5.8
2 Ratings
19% below category average
Course authoring
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Course catalog or library
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Player/Portal
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Learning content
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Mobile friendly
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Progress tracking & certifications
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Assignments
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
5.02 Ratings
Compliance management
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
5.02 Ratings
Learning administration
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
5.02 Ratings
Learning reporting & analytics
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Social learning
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Product A and Product B
CD2 Learning
-
Ratings
DigitalChalk, by Sciolytix
-
Ratings
PeopleFluent
8.0
11 Ratings
10% above category average
New hire portal
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.07 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.011 Ratings
Compliance tracking and reporting
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.08 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Product A and Product B
CD2 Learning
-
Ratings
DigitalChalk, by Sciolytix
-
Ratings
PeopleFluent
8.2
11 Ratings
11% above category average
Corporate goal setting
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.07 Ratings
Subordinate goal setting
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.06 Ratings
Individual goal setting
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.09 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.09 Ratings
Performance tracking
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.09 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
CD2 Learning
-
Ratings
DigitalChalk, by Sciolytix
-
Ratings
PeopleFluent
6.5
11 Ratings
5% below category average
Performance plans
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.07 Ratings
Plan weighting
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
4.06 Ratings
Manager note taking
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.04 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.05 Ratings
Review status tracking
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.07 Ratings
Rater nomination workflow
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.05 Ratings
Review reminders
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.05 Ratings
Workflow restrictions
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
5.06 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.07 Ratings
Reporting
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.08 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Product A and Product B
CD2 Learning
-
Ratings
DigitalChalk, by Sciolytix
-
Ratings
PeopleFluent
6.3
8 Ratings
7% below category average
Create succession plans/pools
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.05 Ratings
Candidate ranking
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
6.05 Ratings
Candidate search
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
6.08 Ratings
Candidate development
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
6.06 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
CD2 Learning is a great fit for any organization wanting to help develop online training resources as well as online assessment and data analytics. CD2 Learning would not be a great fit for an organization wanting to do a lot of custom development to create a platform from scratch.
Digital Chalk is perfect for organizations who are looking for an easy to use Learning Management System and don't need all the bells, whistles, and bulk of the LMS giants, like Cornerstone or SuccessFactors. Digital Chalk doesn't require an administrative specialist to learn a whole new language and environment with endless options and settings. It's very easy to use for both learners and administrators, and yet at the same time provides the exact functions you need.
PeopleFluent has eliminated the use of paper reviews. It is also eliminated the use of scanning, emailing or interoffice mail. It is a great tool for communication and I highly recommend it. However, in some ways, the product can be improved. Some processes are tied to each other and could function in tandem. For example, while completing the self-review, the employee has to capture multi-raters. If self-review is submitted without listing multi-rater names then multi-rater review has to be captured separately on paper. In my opinion, these two processes can be different. Multi-raters should be added/removed/modified after submitting self-review.
While I used the platform, it improved its integrations with PowerPoint, making it easy to convert slides to the DigitalChalk format.
The editing layers for audio underneath the slides is very user-friendly and easy to use.
While we didn't use the quiz randomization, I liked how there was a structure built to it so that those who had more robust usage situations than ours would be able to improve engagement and assess learning at a higher level.
It was very easy to go through resumes, choose the people you wanted to interview and set up the interviews.
It is great at keeping track of people that have come through hiring process in the past so you do not waste time on those that have already been declined or are sent in by multiple vendors.
The handling of time sheets and expense reports is very easy to manage.
There are times we wish CD2 Learning had additional resources to help address any issues that pop up within our platform in a more timely manner.
CD2 Learning does not do a lot of custom development for each client. There are times we wish we could more easily alter aspects of the CD2 Learning platform to better fit our needs.
CD2 Learning works in "sprints". Therefore, if an issue does not get included in the sprint, it can take some time before it is addressed.
The administration of Digital Chalk is very easy. The function I think may be missing is an easy way to add revisions and assign them to the students who need them. For example, when you update a piece of a course it would have an indication that it is version xxx and would ask who would like to assign it to - everyone who has taken it before or just new students.
It would nice to have the system recognize when a student has already completed an element of a course that may be used in another course. For example, if video A is part of courses 1 and 2, and the student already watched it in course 1, it would ask the administrator if they should get automated credit for it in course 2, as well.
The interface is a little confusing. I'm not sure if it's something that can be fixed in implementations, or if it's inherent to PeopleFluent, but there are almost too many tabs asking for too much information. A lot of it can be repetitive as well.
Changing your password/resetting your password seems to be nightmarish. It requires an organization ID as well as security questions, and forces you to reset your password far too often. I really dislike that feature.
Honestly, PeopleFluent itself looks pretty outdated. I feel as though the entire application really needs a facelift to be more current.
PeopleFluent continues to develop an already high quality product and works to continually improve the user experience. The different modules integrate well, and the administrative functions are easy to understand and perform resulting in less time spent with KTLO functions. They provide world class customer service and work hard to keep you engaged as a customer.
PeopleFluent seems to have all the functionality one would need, but it can be a bit overwhelming. Depending on the client implementation, it can be downright confusing and not intuitive. My 6 rating comes from the fact that it seems like the system can be configured to actually be confusing and not make sense. I think a VMS should be set up not to allow a customer to configure it in such a way as to not really work, or to allow users to circumvent steps. I also really don't like the "organization key" that needs to be entered every time you log in. Why is a login and password good enough for 99% of the systems out there, but PeopleFluent requires an extra field?
As I mentioned previously, Digital Chalk's customer support is excellent. I also got a reply back within an hour, and it was usually the same person. So, they were familiar with our needs and how we were using the system. Honestly, most of the time we had to contact their support, it was an issue on the user's side, not in the software. Yet, they still helped identify the issue and consulted on how to fix it.
I would rate this ATS system a 9 as there's some room for improvement as mentioned prior. I really love the design and its functionality buttons and the way I can integrate it with other systems. I would really love to see a more detailed reporting metrics long with super candidate filters when searching profiles.
Before going with CD2 Learning, we looked at using Cornerstone for our services. We found Cornerstone was considerably more expensive than CD2 Learning. Additionally, we were always very impressed with the people at CD2 Learning, which continues to be a great strength for them. Their people are wonderfully caring, supportive, and collaborative.
DigitalChalk gave the organization the hands-on ownership of content creation and delivery while meeting our usage case of hands-off course management on a daily basis and extending the reach of the course content and certificate to as many people as possible. It's easy to use, very cost-effective to implement, and the overall experience means that the course participants get what they need out of the course without a lot of effort on their part.
Its great, its very versatile and stacks up very well against the competition. In terms of usability and ease of use, anyone can quickly learn how to use PeopleFluent. Again, the faults against the system would be when a client who is running the tool customizes it to their liking. Not to mention it's a very popular tool that i have had the pleasure of working in twice now with two different organizations.
DigtialChalk's ROI is positive - the cost model of low up-front costs to get started, then paying a small amount per course participant means that organizations implementing DigitalChalk as their platform get more than their money's worth from it. It returns profit quickly and on a consistent basis.
The asynchronous nature of the platform, combined with the targeted usage situation of hands-off course delivery and management, means that resources to create, deliver, and maintain courses can be held with either one person (like an instructional designer) or even an outside contractor. This means that there's little impact to the fixed operating costs involved with hiring someone else to manage it.
I do believe that goal setting and the workflow of following up, going through the process yearly is as good as you make it. If you set good goals, or help your team make good goals then the experience can go well. Otherwise it's just another thing that an employee is doing to make their manager happy.
I am not sure the cost of the product, but if it is really expensive I am not sure that we are getting fully what we should be for what the product offers. Make sure you are using what is offered.