TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Make

    Score9.3 out of 10
    N/AMake (formerly Integromat) automates integration between applications. It features data transformation capabilities within a no-code graphic interface. The former Integromat was acquired by Celonis in 2020, and the current product Make is a Celonis brand.

    $9

    per month

    ProcessMaker

    Score8.8 out of 10
    N/AProcessMaker is a process automation platform that helps organizations optimize and scale their business operations. By combining workflow automation, AI-driven decision-making, and advanced analytics, ProcessMaker empowers businesses to streamline complex processes, improve efficiency, and enhance customer experiences.N/A
    Pricing
    MakeProcessMaker
    Editions & Modules
    Free
    $0
    per month
    Core
    $9
    per month
    Pro
    $16
    per month
    Teams
    $29
    per month
    Enterprise
    Contact
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    MakeProcessMaker
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    MakeProcessMaker
    Considered Both Products
    Celonis
    No answer on this topic
    ProcessMaker Inc.
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    6 Answers
    60%
    Would buy again
    3 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    6 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    6 Answers
    60%
    Happy with the feature set
    3 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    6 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    6 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    MakeProcessMaker
    Cloud Data Integration
    Comparison of Cloud Data Integration features of Make and ProcessMaker
    Feature
    Make
    7.9
    6 Ratings
    2% below category average
    ProcessMaker
    -
    Ratings
    Pre-built connectors9.06 Ratings00 Ratings
    Connector modification8.46 Ratings00 Ratings
    Support for real-time and batch integration8.45 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data quality services7.66 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data security features7.95 Ratings00 Ratings
    Monitoring console6.16 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customization
    Comparison of Customization features of Make and ProcessMaker
    Feature
    Make
    -
    Ratings
    ProcessMaker
    7.9
    3 Ratings
    8% above category average
    API for custom integration00 Ratings7.93 Ratings
    Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Make and ProcessMaker
    Feature
    Make
    -
    Ratings
    ProcessMaker
    8.6
    11 Ratings
    10% above category average
    Dashboards00 Ratings8.811 Ratings
    Standard reports00 Ratings8.811 Ratings
    Custom reports00 Ratings8.09 Ratings
    Process Engine
    Comparison of Process Engine features of Make and ProcessMaker
    Feature
    Make
    -
    Ratings
    ProcessMaker
    8.8
    10 Ratings
    19% above category average
    Process designer00 Ratings9.99 Ratings
    Process simulation00 Ratings8.18 Ratings
    Business rules engine00 Ratings9.99 Ratings
    SOA support00 Ratings9.910 Ratings
    Process player00 Ratings7.98 Ratings
    Form builder00 Ratings7.88 Ratings
    Model execution00 Ratings8.18 Ratings
    Business Process Automation
    Comparison of Business Process Automation features of Make and ProcessMaker
    Feature
    Make
    -
    Ratings
    ProcessMaker
    8.0
    3 Ratings
    16% above category average
    Business Process Modeling00 Ratings8.13 Ratings
    Decision Modeling00 Ratings8.13 Ratings
    Code-Based Automation00 Ratings8.03 Ratings
    No-Code Automation00 Ratings7.63 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    MakeProcessMaker
    Small Businesses
    Zapier
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Bizagi
    Score8.3 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    IBM App Connect
    Score9 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
    Score9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Workato
    Score9.3 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
    Score9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    MakeProcessMaker
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.6
    (6 ratings)
    8.9
    (11 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (4 ratings)
    6.6
    (5 ratings)
    Support Rating
    2.0
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.6
    (5 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    MakeProcessMaker
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Celonis
    Integromat is the best tool for business automation in my opinion because unlike Zapier it allows us to integrate with any API even if the app is not available which allows us to create automation even with the less known apps that we use or the ones that we built internally for our own company.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ProcessMaker Inc.
    The task mining component is well suited for processes where there are a lot of steps performed in a variety of systems, particularly by a single individual on a team. It also requires a robust activity ID to be able to track an activity. It is not well suited when trying to track a process where the content is in an email.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Celonis
    • UI/UX Simplicity and Features
    • Workflows are explained in details and even people without IT background can use the tool.
    • Consumption is nicely tracked.
    • Myriad of existing templates, solutions, and readymade connectors.
    Read full review
    ProcessMaker Inc.
    • User interface. It is clean and easy to understand. You won't get overwhelmed the second you log in.
    • The workflow maker. With a drag and drop interface, you can easily visualize and implement what you want on the screen. Out of all the programs we tested, this one had the easiest process maker and designer.
    • Ease of understanding. My biggest recommendation would be that this program is easy to access for anyone. There are complications (see negatives) but this program can be implemented quickly and efficiently, and nearly anyone can learn to use it. You will not feel like you are in the dark with it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Celonis
    • There are always new platforms and connections that we'd like to see
    • More flexibility in paying for operations (tasks) on a sliding scale, instead of by tier
    • More thorough support documentation on connecting various platforms and troubleshooting errors
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ProcessMaker Inc.
    • Complications when you get to the more advanced pieces. When trialing, I found that the more advanced a process got, the more complicated it got for me in coding. When you begin using the more advanced features, you will find that you need to have a basic knowledge of coding - otherwise you won't go any further. This was my sole issue. Unfortunately, it was one that would have brought the school to a grinding halt if they were to ever get more complicated than they were.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Celonis
    At this point, it is firmly embedded in the DNA of the business and to give up the ability to automate workflows and create integrations on the fly would be a terrible idea.
    Read full review
    ProcessMaker Inc.
    We are happy with this product
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Celonis
    Make's easy to understand user interface helps you to visualize what's happening at all times. Could use some tweaks around the navigation from a scenario specifically in the folders and back navigations. I can't tell you the amount of time wasted in that area. When you branch, you can't bring a branch back together in the same scenario which is kind of a bummer as well.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ProcessMaker Inc.
    I gave this overall rating for ProcessMaker due to its overall flexibility, design and ease of use for most. Examples of this from us include it being an excellent and trustworthy tool for automating processes, the abilities and capabilities for real-time process tracking and the web-based accessibility and implementation which allows for easy access and management of the tool.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Celonis
    The pricing schema is very attractive, almost 50% lower than the competition. You could start from free and then grow. It has a pretty big library of connections to other apps and services, which really helps you when everything is a mess. Integromat has a really easy-to-use interface. You could do almost everything with fewer than 5 clicks. Scenarios (automation steps to complete a routine) have graphics so you can configure them more easily.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ProcessMaker Inc.
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Celonis
    Integromat allows us to do everything we used to do on Zapier but it doesn't limit us to only the popular apps, with Integromat we're integrating custom APIs and we get data from different servers through GET requests and it's exactly what we needed and Zapier couldn't provide it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ProcessMaker Inc.
    Before making the decision to get ProcessMaker, we assessed different and best options in the market, which are also quite competitive. KiSSFLOW, Blueworks Live, and Bizagi, being the most relevant and ADONIS, to mention the ones we consider the most relevant and capable of meeting our needs. In the end, we went for ProcessMaker because of mainly three things as described before: 1. Real-time process status tracking. 2. Metrics and dashboards. 3. Ease of use for constructing diagrams.
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Celonis
    No answers on this topic
    ProcessMaker Inc.
    The capability is robust and quite industry agnostic. It would benefit significantly with some out of the box models - e.g. procure to pay on SAP and similar. They could also develop industry specific examples which could kickstart the implementation for organizations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Celonis
    • We used too many credits multiple times and had to buy them additionally, there are no prevention systems to setup to alert before it happens.
    • Some consumption is difficult to understand and requires time and digging.
    • It requires heavy internal effort to simplify things in Make in order for it to operate cheaper.
    • Initial IT setup is paramount and determines a lot.
    Read full review
    ProcessMaker Inc.
    • I'm using Communication edition to introduce BPMN in my organization. I can build the first process in a short time, make my boss more confident with my job.
    • But, with ProcessMaker, we need more time to design code to handle the process, and without PHP/Javascript Programmer, it seems hard to work with more and more processes online.
    • However, IE Browser is not well supported, somewhat let the user confuse.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots