Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Celoxis
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Celoxis is a Enterprise online project management solution for midsize to large businesses to help them plan and manage complex and diverse project portfolios. The collective suite includes modules for resource management, budgeting, revenue forecasting, time and expense tracking, reporting and team collaboration. Celoxis includes features such as advanced scheduling, which combines real-world conditions, such as resource time off, multi-time zone, part-time resources, working weekends etc.,…N/A
Kantata PS Cloud
Score 8.5 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Kantata Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble) provides project management and collaboration software for small to mid-sized professional services companies. Features include resource management, project dependencies, time and expense tracking, file sharing, versatile user permissions, private messaging, planning and reporting.N/A
Planview ChangePoint
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Planview Changepoint is a platform that marries professional services automation (PSA), project portfolio management (PPM) and business analytics to provide managers broad operational visibility and control over their strategic business portfolios.N/A
Pricing
CeloxisKantata PS CloudPlanview ChangePoint
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Premier
Contact Sales Team
per month per seat
Enterprise
Contact Sales Team
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CeloxisKantata PS CloudPlanview ChangePoint
Free Trial
YesNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeRequiredNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CeloxisKantata PS CloudPlanview ChangePoint
Considered Multiple Products
Celoxis

No answer on this topic

Kantata PS Cloud
Chose Kantata PS Cloud
We have evaluated about 15 different project management platforms and narrowed down our list to only five (Celoxis, Sciforma, Podio, Mavenlink, and Teamwork). Other solutions we evaluated were not able either to meet our vendor security requirements or were not flexible in …
Planview ChangePoint

No answer on this topic

Features
CeloxisKantata PS CloudPlanview ChangePoint
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Celoxis
8.3
4 Ratings
7% above category average
Kantata PS Cloud
-
Ratings
Planview ChangePoint
-
Ratings
Task Management9.34 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Resource Management7.74 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Gantt Charts7.74 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Scheduling8.53 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow Automation7.53 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Team Collaboration7.44 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology9.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology10.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Document Management8.02 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Email integration9.02 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Access6.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking8.53 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Change request and Case Management9.02 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management8.03 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
Celoxis
8.3
4 Ratings
7% above category average
Kantata PS Cloud
-
Ratings
Planview ChangePoint
-
Ratings
Quotes/estimates8.53 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Invoicing7.02 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Project & financial reporting7.53 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with accounting software10.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CeloxisKantata PS CloudPlanview ChangePoint
Small Businesses
Stackby
Stackby
Score 8.9 out of 10
Teamwork.com
Teamwork.com
Score 8.5 out of 10
Teamwork.com
Teamwork.com
Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
Planview AdaptiveWork
Planview AdaptiveWork
Score 8.2 out of 10
Teamwork.com
Teamwork.com
Score 8.5 out of 10
Enterprises
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
Planview AdaptiveWork
Planview AdaptiveWork
Score 8.2 out of 10
Planview AdaptiveWork
Planview AdaptiveWork
Score 8.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CeloxisKantata PS CloudPlanview ChangePoint
Likelihood to Recommend
8.7
(4 ratings)
9.1
(50 ratings)
7.5
(16 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(6 ratings)
7.6
(10 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(8 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(8 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
CeloxisKantata PS CloudPlanview ChangePoint
Likelihood to Recommend
Celoxis
Celoxis is a great option if you are looking for an affordable, easy to use, easy to integrate project manegement solution. It is very powerful for waterfall project management. I evaluated more than 15 platforms and could not find any with a close evaluation in terms of cost-benefit to Celoxis. Of course there are more powerfull tools, for 10 times the price. So far, for project management, there hasn't been a requirement I haven't been able to solve with some work. It really lacks features for Agile methodologies, even if it provides a Kanban view, so far it doesn't provide and additional agile artifacts. If an organization has already reached a very mature project management practice and needs to improve on program and portfolio management, Celoxis won't provide any useful feature. If the organization has the resources (skills and time mostly) to develop some workflows and customization, it might work but with a limit. Hopefully Celoxis addresses these features in the near future.
Read full review
Kantata (Kimble + Mavenlink)
It is appropriate and even exceeds expectations 90% of the time. It makes project tracking very easy and visually accessible for most cases. The only occasion where Mavenlink came slightly short was for a special project that required more interaction options among project members. I am certain there are ways to work around that issue, but we did not find them.
Read full review
Planview
Changepoint is basic and would, therefore, work for businesses with uncomplicated requests, pretty straightforward workflows and willingness to work with an unsightly solution. It is basic, from the UI to the search option and the way the information is captured, which can be frustrating and counter-intuitive at times. It is relatively robust (i.e. I have been using it for almost 2 years and have not seen it crash once) but it does log me out when the system has been inactive for about 30 minutes - and I am only notified about being logged out upon clicking the Submit button, meaning many a line of text have been typed more than once!
Read full review
Pros
Celoxis
  • Project planning
  • Time log
  • Efforts analysis vs plan
Read full review
Kantata (Kimble + Mavenlink)
  • With Mavenlink when starting to assign tasks to people, set deadlines and milestones, and add files to our projects we can look at it all from a variety of perspectives, including a task tracker view and a Gantt chart view
  • Through Mavenlink each project also includes an activity stream where we can view all project details as they come up, as well as an activity feed for all the projects it is linked to.
Read full review
Planview
  • Changepoint has significant reporting capabilities, though of course, the data that comes out is only as good as the data that goes in. I enjoy being able to use the standard reports to understand exactly how much a project has cost us and to compare it to how much we are charging. This allows us to more accurately set our prices. Though we have not used the report designer capability, I understand that custom reports can be designed with relative ease.
  • Changepoint has a versioning capability for changes made to user profiles in the system manager, which I find particularly helpful. As a non-power user, it is valuable to be able to see what changes I have made to various profiles so that I can troubleshoot a problem down the line.
  • Changepoint has significant functionality well beyond the features that we are currently using, and for this reason, I think it is affordable and a good deal. Particularly if your organization is interested in dedicating the time and resources into using all of the features around project planning, resource allocation, etc., the price is well worth the value.
Read full review
Cons
Celoxis
  • Support is at times slow to respond.
  • Not new user-friendly.
  • Not able to pull in closer or zoom the interface.
Read full review
Kantata (Kimble + Mavenlink)
  • The Gantt chart does not allow for baselines to be stored
  • There is no means to upload an excel task tracker and build a plan using an upload
  • The schedule does not allow for planning of holidays
  • The status report functionality needs to be improved
Read full review
Planview
  • We use Changepoint to manage the IS organization. I would like to see more advancement in order to do benefits management.
  • I would like to see a capability where a project manager can build a very detailed work breakdown structure, but only require project resources to charge time and provide a task status at a higher level.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Celoxis
No answers on this topic
Kantata (Kimble + Mavenlink)
Although the company I currently work for does not use the product I have recommended that we do switch to Mavenlink. We will be opening some new sites internationally this year and I can see that Mavenlink would be a great product for us to use
Read full review
Planview
Sometimes the decision to renew boils down to an old adage "if it isn't broken don't fix it". Previous to moving to Changepoint, it was obvious that we needed a better project management tool. Projects we completed on time but the time zone difference between the teams and several iterations of back and forth caused a number of communication issues with projects. The difference is night and day.
Read full review
Usability
Celoxis
No answers on this topic
Kantata (Kimble + Mavenlink)
I think Kantata is one of the most robust and best project management tools out there for an organization like ours. However, some of our staff feel like it isn't as user-friendly as it could be. From a Director point of view or a Project Manager point of view, Kantata is exceptional. From the point of view of a task-doer, it could be more visually appealing. Also, the mobile version isn't great.
Read full review
Planview
It could be more intuitive and user friendly.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Celoxis
No answers on this topic
Kantata (Kimble + Mavenlink)
Mavenlink gives advance notice for system upgrades, and they're not during our business day. Mavenlink has always been available when we needed it.
Read full review
Planview
No answers on this topic
Performance
Celoxis
No answers on this topic
Kantata (Kimble + Mavenlink)
Very good integration with Google apps. Some complexity is called however in the synchronization between Google Tasks and Maven links tasks. This can sometimes lead to duplicate records in Google Tasks. It has been dissolvable that becomes cumbersome if not properly curated.
Read full review
Planview
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Celoxis
No answers on this topic
Kantata (Kimble + Mavenlink)
Kantata support is fantastic! Any issues that arise are always handled quickly and efficiently. Granted, we haven't had many issues to report. Typically, my team tends to only reach out to support if they need assistance remembering how to do something or asking about an improvement. We had Kantata build an integration when we first started using the software, and the support team worked hard to listen and improve the integration.
Read full review
Planview
No answers on this topic
In-Person Training
Celoxis
No answers on this topic
Kantata (Kimble + Mavenlink)
We prepared questions in advance, and our trainer was an expert in what Mavenlink was and wasn't able to do. We were able to have multiple people trained at once.
Read full review
Planview
No answers on this topic
Online Training
Celoxis
No answers on this topic
Kantata (Kimble + Mavenlink)
The training was very well-organized. We were able to send questions in advance so the instructor knew what to cover, and the brought up related topics to maximize the usefulness of what they were teaching us.
Read full review
Planview
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Celoxis
No answers on this topic
Kantata (Kimble + Mavenlink)
Dedicate as much internal time to the implementation effort as possible, even if you're using a 3rd party or Mavenlink services. Your team knows your processes the best
Read full review
Planview
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Celoxis
I used an evalaution matrix built with input of several stakeholders in the company. In the end the matrix included 100 features (non of them was price related). The matrix was heavily focused on waterfall project management, agile related features were only 5 out of 100 features. Features were labeled as mandatory, required or optional. Products which lacked a mandatory feature (like providing technical support) were disqualified. Then a price vs features evaluation was made and only the products with the best combination were seleced to continue: Celoxis, ITM Platform and Mission Control. A final technical evaluation was made comparing the full evaluation but also the evaluation of only the 40 required features. Overall, Celoxis was the better evaluated (76% vs 65% of the second place), for the 40 required features, Celoxis got 91% against 78% of number 2. In the end we chose Celoxis even when it had higher licensing cost.
Read full review
Kantata (Kimble + Mavenlink)
We have since switched over to JIRA and let me tell you, it was probably the best decision we have made as a company. We chose Mavenlink based on promises from the sales team about future roadmap work that really never happened. We thought Mavenlink would easily integrate with our billing software but we couldn't have been more wrong. We ended up never utilizing Mavenlink invoices as they don't even allow you to fully customize your invoices that go out to clients!
Read full review
Planview
Planview Changepoint helps us to understand our key customers enabling us to capitalize on every financial opportunity and helps us to forecast demand against the capacities required for new opportunities, and also it automates and monitors contractual terms and conditions. It gives us visibility into our employees' skills and helps to optimize resource allocation.
Read full review
Scalability
Celoxis
No answers on this topic
Kantata (Kimble + Mavenlink)
It's very easy to add users and contractors into Mavenlink. There's also an option that let's you manage access for teams in multiple locations.
Read full review
Planview
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Celoxis
  • Positive in most cases
Read full review
Kantata (Kimble + Mavenlink)
  • Manvenlink is perfect for showing expenses and income over time and across people.
  • Manvenlink is adaptable for the integration and automation of the processes of each of our projects in order to optimize resources and improve operational performance.
  • Mavenlink allows us to determine if our projects are profitable or not, as well as save significant time by automating components such as recurring tasks and having templates, among other things.
  • Manvenlink is advantageous for our operations due to its simple portfolio management of our projects: manage several projects at once and receive a complete perspective of the development of each one at a glance.
  • Manvenlink kindly provides us with robust discussion threads, access restrictions, and built-in document management, allowing us to contextualize communications.
Read full review
Planview
  • Employee efficiency has decreased significantly within our Project MAnagement team. The main causes are lack of logical steps/not user-friendly and the slowness of the entire program.
  • Changepoint PSA has greatly improved being able to track budgets for all projects. Before this software, budgets were done manually by hand and cross-referenced with Accounting. Now, we can pull a report out of the system, as long as all parties entered their time and data correctly.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Celoxis Screenshots

Screenshot of Celoxis DashboardScreenshot of Gantt chartScreenshot of WorkloadScreenshot of TimesheetScreenshot of Resource ManagementScreenshot of

Kantata PS Cloud Screenshots

Screenshot of real-time project status tracking.Screenshot of visualizations that help track resources with confidence.Screenshot of at a glance capacity and staffing monitoring.Screenshot of financials and project margin monitoring.Screenshot of revenue tracking, to scale a business with confidence.

Planview ChangePoint Screenshots

Screenshot of End-to-end view to drive financially successful customer-facing projects.Screenshot of A flexible approach to tracking elaborate contractual terms and conditions.Screenshot of Quote-to-cash success with structured processes.Screenshot of Build project rigor and standardization for services delivery.Screenshot of Improve resource utilization on the work that best meets the needs of customers.Screenshot of Ensure process adherence to drive financial success.