Centage vs. Prophix vs. Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
Centage delivers FP&A software that helps finance teams automate budgeting, forecasting, and reporting. Offered to teams that have outgrown Excel, Centage aims to replace fragile spreadsheets and version chaos with a faster, more reliable planning process. Centage’s built-in financial and business logic allows users to create and update their budgets and forecasts and never worry about formulas, functions, links, or any custom programming. It offers synchronized P&L, balance sheet,…
$1,750
per month
Prophix
Score 8.5 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Prophix One, a Financial Performance Platform, is used to improve the speed and accuracy of decision-making within a harmonized user experience. To reduce complexity and uncertainty, the software offers automated insights and planning, budgeting, forecasting, reporting, and consolidation functionalities.N/A
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Tagetik is a corporate performance management solution that unifies budgeting, financial planning, consolidation and management reporting. Tagetik is offered as SaaS, on a private cloud, or on-premise, and can migrate between deployments as needed.N/A
Pricing
CentageProphixWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Editions & Modules
Core
1,750
per month
Performance
2,500
per month
Strategic
3,500
per month
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CentageProphixWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Free Trial
NoYesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYesYes
Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CentageProphixWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Considered Multiple Products
Centage

No answer on this topic

Prophix
Chose Prophix
Before Prophix we used on premise Budget Maestro, we did not have good results from their software, it was buggy and its processes were antiquated. We chose Prophix for its consolidated reporting capabilities and to get all of our companies that are on 3 different ERP systems …
Chose Prophix
Budget Maestro was awful experience. We bailed 80% of the way through implementation because it became abundantly clear that we were going to have to fit into their mold which didn't work for us. When their implementation team started to use the word work-around I knew we were …
Chose Prophix
At the end of the day we felt like all three could probably do what we wanted - one was considerably more expensive than where Prophix came in at, so we eliminated it. The other would've been a cheaper solution, but we felt like it was a bit of a downgrade, and we liked the …
Chose Prophix
We have also used Budget Maestro for budgeting and forecasting and we prefer Prophix's flexibility. In addition, the customer service at Prophix blows the competition out of the water.
Chose Prophix
Budget Maestro was too basic, Anaplan was too complex and Host Analytics didn't understand our industry or our ERP. Prophix is a partner with Viewpoint which meant there was much more knowledge on how our structure worked.
Chose Prophix
Prophix has a much more modern feel. Budget Meastro was not able to create an automated integration to our database. Budget Maestro's consultants did not have enough time in their budget to effectively train the accounting team. Reporting features in Prophix are much more …
Chose Prophix
Hyperion was cost prohibitive for a company our size, and was eliminated early in the process. We evaluated Budget Maestro and Adaptive Planning prior to purchasing Prophix, but decided on Prophix due to combination of lowest cost to implement/maintain, most intuitive …
Chose Prophix

Compared to Host Analytics and Adaptive, Prophix provides more value for the dollar, especially when we deploy multiple models. Solution set is also comparably built out, so we are not missing any critical functionality. Self-maintenance by finance is also comparable to Host …

Chose Prophix
We liked Prophix's user-friendly appearance. The prices were similar, so for us, it was about the interface or how we perceive how easy it would be to use across the college. We brought together a variety of users from across campus to view a demonstration by Prophix and people …
Chose Prophix
Prophix is deficient to other budgeting software I've reviewed such as Budget Maestro and Adaptive Insights as they are windows based and feature drop down menus and copy and paste feature. The also offer better auditing trail and vendor level budgeting. I was sold on Prophix …
Chose Prophix
In terms of budgeting programs, Prophix is far and away the best. Its capabilities go way beyond what programs like Budget Maestro can do. In my searches, I haven't been able to find any other system with Prophix's capabilities that's also at their fairly low price point.
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
CCH Tagetik has excellent multi-currency support and it enables us to plan at a low-level of detail, which is very important to us.
Features
CentageProphixWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Centage
4.4
3 Ratings
53% below category average
Prophix
8.5
67 Ratings
12% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.1
10 Ratings
7% above category average
Customizable dashboards4.43 Ratings8.460 Ratings8.58 Ratings
Pixel Perfect reports00 Ratings8.829 Ratings8.07 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates00 Ratings8.463 Ratings8.09 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Centage
6.9
9 Ratings
12% below category average
Prophix
8.5
184 Ratings
9% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
7.3
24 Ratings
6% below category average
Drill-down analysis6.89 Ratings8.9181 Ratings6.523 Ratings
Formatting capabilities6.67 Ratings7.7175 Ratings7.023 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration7.46 Ratings8.9167 Ratings8.516 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages00 Ratings00 Ratings7.17 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Centage
7.4
5 Ratings
8% below category average
Prophix
8.7
163 Ratings
8% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
9.3
15 Ratings
15% above category average
Publish to Web5.51 Ratings00 Ratings9.810 Ratings
Publish to PDF8.33 Ratings8.9154 Ratings9.813 Ratings
Report Versioning8.55 Ratings8.5123 Ratings7.712 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling7.31 Ratings8.7140 Ratings9.811 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Centage
8.3
4 Ratings
11% above category average
Prophix
8.5
73 Ratings
13% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.5
8 Ratings
13% above category average
Predictive Analytics8.34 Ratings8.573 Ratings9.06 Ratings
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings00 Ratings8.07 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization00 Ratings00 Ratings8.04 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining00 Ratings00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
Centage
8.8
10 Ratings
5% above category average
Prophix
8.9
173 Ratings
7% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
9.7
23 Ratings
15% above category average
Multi-User Support (named login)8.810 Ratings8.8164 Ratings9.923 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model9.010 Ratings8.7165 Ratings9.822 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)9.010 Ratings8.9170 Ratings9.823 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control8.99 Ratings9.0111 Ratings9.84 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)8.44 Ratings00 Ratings9.316 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
Centage
8.6
11 Ratings
6% above category average
Prophix
8.5
299 Ratings
5% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.4
49 Ratings
4% above category average
Long-term financial planning8.48 Ratings8.6250 Ratings8.235 Ratings
Financial budgeting9.711 Ratings8.8285 Ratings8.143 Ratings
Forecasting8.710 Ratings8.5267 Ratings8.340 Ratings
Scenario modeling8.09 Ratings8.1221 Ratings8.534 Ratings
Management reporting8.511 Ratings8.4277 Ratings8.946 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
Centage
8.5
7 Ratings
9% above category average
Prophix
8.9
225 Ratings
14% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.8
46 Ratings
13% above category average
Financial data consolidation8.66 Ratings8.9185 Ratings8.840 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting8.37 Ratings9.2156 Ratings9.944 Ratings
Journal entries and reports00 Ratings8.9120 Ratings8.337 Ratings
Multi-currency management00 Ratings9.095 Ratings8.334 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations00 Ratings8.6114 Ratings9.337 Ratings
Minority Ownership00 Ratings8.851 Ratings8.530 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails00 Ratings8.6143 Ratings8.336 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
Centage
8.1
11 Ratings
3% above category average
Prophix
9.1
271 Ratings
15% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
9.0
50 Ratings
13% above category average
Financial Statement Reporting7.79 Ratings9.1252 Ratings9.042 Ratings
Management Reporting8.210 Ratings9.2260 Ratings8.947 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting8.810 Ratings8.8234 Ratings8.250 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting7.66 Ratings8.7208 Ratings8.935 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing00 Ratings9.625 Ratings9.820 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Centage
7.5
4 Ratings
7% below category average
Prophix
8.5
245 Ratings
5% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.2
31 Ratings
2% above category average
Personalized dashboards7.53 Ratings8.4229 Ratings8.426 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis7.64 Ratings8.4173 Ratings8.322 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting7.53 Ratings8.6147 Ratings8.022 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards00 Ratings8.6163 Ratings8.020 Ratings
KPIs00 Ratings8.2179 Ratings8.624 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data00 Ratings8.6106 Ratings8.014 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
Centage
7.7
9 Ratings
5% below category average
Prophix
8.6
264 Ratings
6% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
9.2
47 Ratings
12% above category average
Flat file integration7.56 Ratings8.7213 Ratings9.239 Ratings
Excel data integration8.57 Ratings8.7229 Ratings9.145 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources7.15 Ratings8.5203 Ratings9.231 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Centage
-
Ratings
Prophix
9.2
85 Ratings
20% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
6.1
9 Ratings
21% below category average
Responsive Design for Web Access00 Ratings9.285 Ratings5.08 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile00 Ratings00 Ratings7.16 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CentageProphixWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Cube
Cube
Score 9.8 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CentageProphixWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Likelihood to Recommend
9.4
(12 ratings)
8.6
(322 ratings)
8.9
(50 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(16 ratings)
9.1
(11 ratings)
Usability
8.9
(3 ratings)
8.4
(140 ratings)
8.7
(18 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.4
(31 ratings)
7.3
(2 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(30 ratings)
9.1
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
9.4
(3 ratings)
8.0
(123 ratings)
9.1
(6 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(12 ratings)
9.0
(3 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.4
(15 ratings)
9.1
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
4.0
(20 ratings)
5.5
(3 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(11 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(31 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.4
(28 ratings)
9.1
(2 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.6
(25 ratings)
7.3
(2 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.8
(22 ratings)
8.2
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
CentageProphixWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Likelihood to Recommend
Centage
Centage is suited for all types of business. This is what makes this tool so great. It requires some expertise in setting it up and depending on how complex the business is, it may take longer than expected. It's a complex system and if you are not involved in the implementtion it might be hard to learn what is does.
Read full review
Prophix Software
Prophix is best suited if you have a very extensive budgeting process that currently relies on multiple Excel spreadsheets. It is also great if you have on-prem tools that may no longer be supported for reporting. It may not be appropriate if you require an unlimited number of mid-tier users, as it can be very expensive annually. It's definitely not a cheap tool, but the cost can at least be optimized based on users' use cases. In both organizations I've worked for that use it, cost has been mentioned.
Read full review
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Scenarios where CCH Tagetik is suitable is when a company have large amounts of data and want to transform, consolidate, store and produce reporting in different year, period etc with complex calculations and allocation. Tagetik is the tool for you in this case and it's very flexible in terms of creating your own business rule, calculation and reporting options with a user friendly interface. I have not thought about scenarios where it is not appropriate to use tagetik yet as the tool covers small and large business financial needs
Read full review
Pros
Centage
  • Planning personnel with all the related benefit expenses is very accurate and we are able to forecast increases as well.
  • Storing separate versions of the budget allows us to finalize for the year and have access to the data while we update the default plan with any changes.
  • I ilke the way you can add intelligence see the detail of calculations below th eline item.
  • I like writing Planning Maestro reports to see drill downs of any item and tie them to our ERP Budget
Read full review
Prophix Software
  • Reporting - single report that can be opened by multiple users, each will see only aspect specific to them based on their security access.
  • Budgeting - workflow driven budget data collection, visibility of its current status, ability to take action to ensure timely completion. Ability to snapshot budget data at a point in time. Ability to perform what-if scenarios.
  • Forecasting - as above with added benefit of either reusing budget level of grain or forecasting at high level.
  • Granular planning - ability to create unlimited number of subsidiary models to assist with the planning process. Non-financial data collected during budget/forecast process help with operation planning and variance analysis.
Read full review
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
  • Processes are clearly described in CCH Tagetik ; users can easily find where they are and which action they have to make
  • Interaction with Excel is really fluid ; the Excel add-in is easy to deploy and to updgrade, in the hand of users. It is reliable provided the internet connection is fast.
  • Managing hierachies is obvious in CCH Tagetik. Hierarchies are fundamental for a good reporting ; CCH Tagetik has obviously a deep experience of this feature.
  • SaaS : our experience with CCH Tagetik is of only 1 year, but it technically performs well, the system is reponsive, no shut-down, and updates (every quarter) do not disturb production.
  • AIH seems to be able to manage very large quantity of data, and to provide advanced analysis functionalities. We did not have time to explore them.
Read full review
Cons
Centage
  • Head count is a bit strange as each period is considered one Headcount for a total of 12 per year, so we have to adjust when running reports
  • would love to be able to attach related expenses in payroll to a kind of employee instead of doing each individually. It's time consuming.
  • Have the help more available instead of having to log into separate place
Read full review
Prophix Software
  • Ability to filter report views for report binder without creating duplicate reports.
  • More extensive documentation and examples in the ProCalc library.
  • More ProCalc functions that deal with the time dimension and allow functions that can utilize the system date. So if it is day 8 of the month.
  • Ability to save company color scheme for use in reporting.
  • Would like to create a link between the account dimension and another dimension so I can easily report on account properties. For example, an account property could be columns in a report.
  • Would like to see the ability to have a report view on a dashboard. The tables are poorly formatted, and I’d like more formatting ability.
Read full review
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
  • Online help and manual is a bonus but could be improved e.g. the clarity of English explanations.
  • Improved Excel compatibility e.g. formula driven reporting and dash boarding.
  • Mobile phone connectivity e.g. launching a consolidation from a Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik app.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Centage
No answers on this topic
Prophix Software
The system works well for us, and meets all of our needs. All of our future plans can and will be achieved within Prophix, so there is no need to pursue another product. Prophix has continuously proven to improve their product over the years, which provides an even higher level of confidence in this tool, and future developments
Read full review
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Because in my oppinion Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik is one of the most usable tools for consolidation, planning (controlling) and reporting. Its usability is quite easy and innovative. I like the data entry method for the customers with its workflow and tasks, quite easy way to implement a co pilot. And i like the reporting tool, with a lot of customization opportunities.
Read full review
Usability
Centage
I've lived through the changes over the years, and I have found that most financially-minded professionals should have no problems using this system.
Read full review
Prophix Software
I don't rate anybody a 10 because I believe there's always room for improvement, so I'll go with an 8. And I'm giving 8 because it has helped us do more than we were doing before, and I believe there's still room for improvement.
Read full review
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Surprisingly, this platform is a powerhouse ERP system. However, given time, when more and more organization is able to identify how powerful this tool can be, CCH Tagetik is able to stand as a competitive advantage to many of the Financial industry of today. Although, it needs time to understand the logic behind how CCH Tagetik is formed and setup, once it is known to the user, it is an easy day to day operations with minimal maintenance.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Centage
No answers on this topic
Prophix Software
There have been very few times that Prophix has not been available and we have been informed ahead of time. The only issue that we have is when we update cubes or import information and run processes during working hours which stops access for a short period of time but this is more about our processes than Prophix.
Read full review
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
CCH Tagetik has alwyas been there in case we need help. In almost 20 years of commercial relationship, I have no evidence of times in which they were not available to answer a question or to solve an issue linked to their products, timely and efficiently.
Read full review
Performance
Centage
No answers on this topic
Prophix Software
Prophix has always performed consistently. We are using on-premise so many factors can contribute to slower than desired performance, most having nothing to do with Prophix itself. If we move to the web-client cloud based solution I believe performance will even be better.
Read full review
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
As you can see, speed depends on the applications but also on the hardware that runs them. As far as CCH Tagetik improved, we saw the benefit of a cloud-based solution which could solve many speed performance issues.
Read full review
Support Rating
Centage
The team makes sure that you get what you need out of the software. They will do whatever is in their power to make sure you're happy and are getting back your investment (time and money).
Read full review
Prophix Software
We’ve gotten moved around a lot and so we don’t always know our pod people. Also when we book sessions with a random person it seems like we have to take the first 15-20 minutes explaining our system and process.
Read full review
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
I got very quick respons. After very little mail iterations, they decided to have online meeting to look together with me to the issue. They tried to solve it during the meeting. I had the impression that the customer care person really knew the system and was able to ask help from other colleagues when needed
Read full review
In-Person Training
Centage
No answers on this topic
Prophix Software
Training is essential for this software to be successful for any company. We unfortunately had a bad implementation and training manager so I can say with confidence that if we had the CSM we have now - we would be light years ahead of our knowledge of the system. I highly suggest taking all training opportunities and not rushing the implementation training
Read full review
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
At the official deployment of the original product Controlling and Accounting teams went to Lucca and were walked through the product, Excel usage, Design, ETL run
Read full review
Online Training
Centage
No answers on this topic
Prophix Software
We used our system and created a test cube to work with our own data. We ran through the different functions of Prophix and covered alot of material. We did two sessions a week, with homework tasks assigned. We were able to ask questions and cover any questions during the followup sessions.
Read full review
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
several times since the deployment of the product in 2013 we got on-line training on new functions or on very specific questions/issues (e.g. ETL customisation), followed by the usage of the Learning Hub since 2025
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Centage
No answers on this topic
Prophix Software
Prophix Consulting should bring, in house, chargeable expertise in Oracle EBS table access for Drill Across and provide reasonable limits on dimension member combinations so there are no unreasonable expectations about the application of multi dimensional cubes to detail, such as revenue by product and customer.
Read full review
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
we did it in a coaching model. This allowed us to have 2 key advantages: we got to know the system very well and managed to save on the implementation cost. This worked well, was maybe a bit slower since we had to do this in our spare time. Nevertheless I strongly recommand
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Centage
I used to use an older consolidating product call FRX or something like that, very manual where accounts were adding line the reporting lines one by one.... Centage is far superior, the ability to create custom Dimension hierarchies as improved our reporting 100 fold
Read full review
Prophix Software
Prophix is so much easier to use that other platforms or products. It can be customized so much easier than other larger, more expensive products. I work for a small university where we have a small finance team and Prophix allows us to tailor reporting to emerging needs in real time without having to reconfigure clunky systems with expensive modifications
Read full review
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
I found the Excel piece of IBM Cognos TM1 to be easier to use than CCH Tagetik. It was much easier to customize the data being pulled and the feel of the reports because of that. Other than that, CCH Tagetik has been more user friendly than IBM Cognos TM1. Navigating within the application is much easier. IBM Cognos TM1 had a lot of issues with certain modules that could not be open concurrently; this would often lead to phantom data being entered in the system. I have not had these issues with CCH Tagetik.
Read full review
Scalability
Centage
No answers on this topic
Prophix Software
Prophix is a capable tool of growing with an organization and the uses for different items in the software. Our organization was able to scale the product to lots of different end users and the needs of the departments. There are plenty of updates and features to grow and bring in new data.
Read full review
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
A good and performing scalability both on a geographical and a legal entity scale. The link with MS Office suite allows an easy deployment of the application, especially for contributors.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Centage
  • We were a very small company growing by acquisition so it worked well during these phases of our company growth.
  • The return for our cost was tremendous especially in comparison to peers in the market.
  • Analytics Maestro allowed us to grow without adding headcount by building efficient reports that can easily be mass-produced for all branches within our organization.
Read full review
Prophix Software
  • Prophix has made it possible to move away from some Excel reporting we were doing, which allows for 50% quicker reporting on a monthly basis.
  • Although it has saved us time, an improved PowerPoint feature that automatically updates our decks would save an additional 75% on top of what we already do.
  • Our Board Reporting has improved by 10 hours by moving our reports fully into Prophix.
Read full review
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
  • Gave us a tool that can absolutely grow with us to help multi phase implementations.
  • A significant time savings in terms of the amount of time we used to spend running reports vs. the time we spend now. Unbelievable improvement.
  • Gives us the option to use CCH Tagetik to solve business problems that perhaps we didn't have when we implemented CCH Tagetik. It gives us options without the possibility of implementing a whole other software package.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Centage Screenshots

Screenshot of Centage DashboardScreenshot of ReportingScreenshot of Operating expensesScreenshot of Revenue Planning

Prophix Screenshots

Screenshot of Prophix One Portal: One single point of entry into Prophix One through its portal simplifies access and authentication but also allows seamless movement between applications.Screenshot of Chart Insights, one of the AI Insights capabilities that utilizes Artificial Intelligence and Natural Language Processing to provide enhanced business awareness.  Chart Insights extends the important details contained within dashboards, and analyzes the complete dataset behind the dashboard, automatically surfacing the data relationships not obvious in dashboard visualizations alone. It then provides a summary of key performance metrics found buried within Prophix charts.  It also summarizes the important insights in plain English.Screenshot of Prophix One Financial Planning & Analysis: Prophix's self-serve dashboards and visualizations are directly integrated with data, workflow tasks, announcements, and external URLs and databases. Dashboard Studio helps users to be informed and make better business decisions.Screenshot of Detailed interactive charts and graphs that Prophix offers to uncover insights. Prophix’s visual analytics are linked directly to data with transaction details.  There is no need to input the numbers.  Prophix does this tedious work, automatically.Screenshot of Prophix’s Workflow Manager, used to assign tasks to users and facilitate approvals across the business.  Stakeholder input can be captured directly with the ability to add comments and notes in a single unified database.Screenshot of Cell Comments, that allow users to add supporting details like notes and attachments to data.  Since comments are stored with the data, they can be viewed in any template along with their trailing history. Cell Comment Reports can also be generated to show all comments from any data view in one convenient report.

Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik Screenshots

Screenshot of Homepage