Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points vs. Cisco Meraki MX

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Cisco's Meraki MR Series is a wireless LAN solution.N/A
Cisco Meraki MX
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Cisco Meraki MX Firewalls is a combined UTM and Software-Defined WAN solution. Meraki is managed via the cloud, and provides core firewall services, including site-to-site VPN, plus network monitoring.
$595
per appliance
Pricing
Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access PointsCisco Meraki MX
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
MX64
$595
per appliance
MX67
$695
per appliance
MX68
$995
per appliance
MX84
$1,995
per appliance
MX100
$4,995
per appliance
MX250
$9,995
per appliance
MX450
$19,995
per appliance
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access PointsCisco Meraki MX
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access PointsCisco Meraki MX
Considered Both Products
Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
Chose Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
First benefit in Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points is the easiest manageability
Chose Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points are very easy to install, configure, and manage. Centralized management offers excellent features, and especially if you have multiple locations where the access points are installed, they're very easy to manage, saving you a lot of time. …
Chose Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
I believe others dashboards are more complex, not so simplified compared to Meraki. This user-friendly aspect of Meraki really sets it apart for many businesses looking for a straightforward and efficient way to manage their network. Compared to the price range Meraki has and …
Chose Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
Cisco Aironet or Catalyst series require controllers. For certain networks, Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points is just easy and simple, and meets the requirements.
Chose Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
The decision to move to Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points was primarily due to a reluctance to upgrade many Cisco WLC around the world. Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points was chosen due to its simplicity, flexibility and the ability to stage the rollout. Could do a …
Chose Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
Aruba was far more difficult to manage and troubleshoot.
Chose Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
good value for the money, reliable, lifetime warranty
Chose Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
I am definitely highlighting the same themes of reliability, ease of management, and scalability. Everything Cisco Meraki MR puts out is what I would consider to be industry standard. With a team that isn't as networking savvy as others, we have been able to grow comfortably …
Chose Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
We chose this Meraki firewall for the same reasons as our other equipment, for its ease of implementation, but also to have all our Meraki products visible on the same console. Its use is identical to that of switches or Wi-Fi kiosks; all you have to do is set it up via the …
Chose Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
I would personally always recommend Meraki over the above for ease of deployment and management. My only reservation is you feel like you never really own the equipment... its more like you're leasing it and that the end it all just stops working. Where with the above products, …
Chose Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
The Cradlepoints can also serve as wireless access point devices, but can have phone provider SIM cards added to them for internet connectivity, which is good as a backup route or for mobile vehicles. However, for office locations we use the Meraki access points, because of how …
Chose Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
Meraki is in a different class, much more expensive and a better UI and large scale manageability
Chose Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
Meraki for the easier choice. Lately Meraki have climbed up the ladder with the new MS390 widening the offer. For me I see Meraki for the small/mid market customer and Cisco Classic more for the bigger customer with more specific needs. But security must follow along with the …
Chose Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
The Meraki MX is more of a firewall than a wireless access point, though some models do provide wireless capabilities. Can be useful as a gateway for the MRs or in a location where a single device is needed but additional ports, VPN, or other firewall-like functionality is …
Chose Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
[Cisco] Meraki [MR] costs more but generally seems to work better for us. Our older Ubiquiti kit seemed to struggle with people roaming across the building, especially with Macbooks. We have had no such issues with [Cisco[ Meraki [MR].
Cisco Meraki MX
Chose Cisco Meraki MX
Z4 Teleworker Gateway is a suitable alternative for very small offices or homework stations. It offers the possibility of SD-WAN, LAN and WLAN capabilities. Functionality is of course slightly limited compared to a full stack Meraki environment, but is still a very viable …
Chose Cisco Meraki MX
Cisco Meraki is cheaper that other next gen firewall and having almost every feature which is required.Apart from that it is fully cloud managed and others are such that we need to have console access or access through ssh to do any changes required in network.cost is major …
Chose Cisco Meraki MX
Cisco Meraki MX provides simplicity and scalability while cutting costs. With Meraki MX, you get a Security appliance, router, and Firewall in one appliance and managed with one GUI. These features enable the network engineers to maintain large-scale enterprises with a single …
Chose Cisco Meraki MX
The web UI is a game changer between the two products, plus the SD-WAN is much easier to configure and manage.
Chose Cisco Meraki MX
The reliability of Cisco Meraki MX devices plays a huge role in this; customer support and the ability to resolve problems quickly put Cisco Meraki above the rest. The manageability through the dashboard is unmatched.
Chose Cisco Meraki MX
Fortinet was too complicated for our needs.
Chose Cisco Meraki MX
No comparison, Cisco Meraki MX is better.
Chose Cisco Meraki MX
Meraki is just easier to use and deploy. It’s not the cheapest option, nor is it the most feature rich or performant firewall platform. But when you need something that works and meets PCI/HIPAA compliance, with very little effort to use, this is the ideal platform for you. …
Chose Cisco Meraki MX
The Meraki Dashboard has been a lot more intuitive than CradlePoint NetCloud. We switched from CradlePoint to Cisco Meraki MX because we were already familiar with the interface which allowed us to be familiar with a single dashboard.
Chose Cisco Meraki MX
Overall, for a new network admin or a non-IT person, the Cisco Meraki MX is much easier to configure for a single site than the Cisco ASA Firewalls. ASA can be quicker for those with a background in Cisco command line OS.
Chose Cisco Meraki MX
The Meraki may have slightly fewer features, but it does have all the core features and executes them with flying colors.
Chose Cisco Meraki MX
Cisco Meraki MX is good and easy to setup. But only drawback we see is that it can take more than 2 active wan links.
Chose Cisco Meraki MX
For a small remote office, Cisco Meraki MX was compared to the PaloAlto next gen firewall.

Whilst the company prefers the use of PaloAlto for internet destined traffic, the office features and simplicity of management meant the Cisco Meraki MX was an easy choice for a small …
Chose Cisco Meraki MX
Meraki camera is another great feature in the same portal
Chose Cisco Meraki MX
Cisco Meraki MX is easy if you don't need multi-tenancy solutions and if the routing in the network is not so complex. But Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN solution is more powerful and has more features compared to Meraki.
Chose Cisco Meraki MX
Cisco Meraki has the smart switch and MX firewalls down. I think in order it would go Cisco Meraki, Netgear, Linksys than Sonic Wall. Cisco just stacks up against the other well because their UI is amazing and their knowledge base is vas. Also, Cisco's support lines are …
Chose Cisco Meraki MX
Compared to the regular Cisco devices, the greatest thing will always be the ease of configuration that the Cisco Meraki MX gives by having a dashboard to eliminate a command line that can be difficult for some beginners, it is easier to identify if you make mistakes and fix …
Chose Cisco Meraki MX
It is easier to implement and affordable. If you like Cisco products and you believe in their ecosystem and future, you will not be wrong selecting Cisco Meraki MX or Viptela from their portfolio.
Features
Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access PointsCisco Meraki MX
Firewall
Comparison of Firewall features of Product A and Product B
Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
-
Ratings
Cisco Meraki MX
7.9
138 Ratings
9% below category average
Identification Technologies00 Ratings8.1133 Ratings
Visualization Tools00 Ratings8.4130 Ratings
Content Inspection00 Ratings8.0128 Ratings
Policy-based Controls00 Ratings7.8128 Ratings
Active Directory and LDAP00 Ratings7.8112 Ratings
Firewall Management Console00 Ratings7.1130 Ratings
Reporting and Logging00 Ratings7.3135 Ratings
VPN00 Ratings8.9129 Ratings
High Availability00 Ratings8.8131 Ratings
Stateful Inspection00 Ratings7.5124 Ratings
Proxy Server00 Ratings6.874 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access PointsCisco Meraki MX
Small Businesses
WatchGuard Secure Wi-Fi Cloud
WatchGuard Secure Wi-Fi Cloud
Score 9.2 out of 10
pfSense
pfSense
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cisco Aironet 1800 Series Access Points (discontinued)
Cisco Aironet 1800 Series Access Points (discontinued)
Score 9.8 out of 10
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Cisco Catalyst 9100 Access Points
Cisco Catalyst 9100 Access Points
Score 9.2 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Virtualized Next-Generation Firewalls - VM Series
Palo Alto Networks Virtualized Next-Generation Firewalls - VM Series
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access PointsCisco Meraki MX
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(144 ratings)
9.2
(181 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
6.4
(5 ratings)
8.6
(16 ratings)
Usability
8.8
(8 ratings)
8.1
(10 ratings)
Availability
7.7
(2 ratings)
9.0
(3 ratings)
Performance
8.2
(2 ratings)
9.0
(3 ratings)
Support Rating
8.2
(26 ratings)
8.3
(19 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.2
(3 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Configurability
7.1
(2 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
7.1
(2 ratings)
7.0
(3 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.0
(83 ratings)
9.0
(148 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
7.7
(2 ratings)
9.5
(2 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
7.1
(2 ratings)
9.3
(3 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access PointsCisco Meraki MX
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco
It's ideal if the company frequently uses mobile devices that need to work on Wi-Fi. It's also ideal if a company has multiple locations. Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points can then be easily deployed and managed via a central Meraki Dashboard. It also offers a powerful content filtering feature within the Cisco Meraki environment. This can be particularly useful for guest networks and in locations where certain content cannot be downloaded, such as a school.It's less suitable if a company has a limited IT budget and the network needs to be continuously expanded. In those cases, the associated license costs can quickly add up. In factories or other robustly built environments, RF tuning isn't feasible. As a result, the signal quality can sometimes be somewhat reduced.
Read full review
Cisco
The Meraki MX lineup is well suited for organizations that need centralized management of multiple locations, as it allows for both quick deployment and simple/easy remote administration all from a single pane of glass. It also works very well for providing VPN access for remote workers and helps monitor end-device uptime. It does, however, fall a bit short in its firewall's customization, compared to traditional appliances (like our WatchGuard Firebox), so perhaps less suited for organizations that need more customization, as the Meraki MX lineup is primarily designed for simplicity and straightforward cloud-based management.
Read full review
Pros
Cisco
  • It's cloud based, so as long as we have an internet connection, we can access it. Whenever we push a change, it's one stop like a single pane of glass to manage all our equipment. And so that's what I liked about it.
Read full review
Cisco
  • The Cisco Meraki MX series is phenomenal at allowing us to remotely manage networks. So the devices usually act as the brain behind our client's networks, which makes it really, really easy for our team to take a look at what's going on in those client network environments, resolve any issues, and make sure that our client's networks are staying secure.
Read full review
Cons
Cisco
  • It can expand its radio range in terms of distance reach
  • It can improve it's design as it looks like a plain flat brick
  • I would like to see more integration with security
  • Better solution in segmenting and authentication like clearpass
Read full review
Cisco
  • Layer seven firewall rules. Just making them more granular. We've been in meetings with Cisco SES where I've said feature requests many times and that's one of the big ones where it's just a little cumbersome to implement layer seven rules right now.
  • Just making them more granular. We've been in meetings with Cisco SES where I've said feature requests many times and that's one of the big ones where it's just a little cumbersome to implement layer seven rules right now.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Cisco
It is a solution that works very well. It is almost like setup and forget, since the solution works. When issues occur, documentation is available with detailed steps on how to solve this problems you are facing, of course Technical Support is always ready to help. We have had instances where an Access Point fails and within 2 days we have the replacement
Read full review
Cisco
The simplicity and ease of use for the Meraki Dashboard make it an easy choice for our organization to renew our Meraki Enterprise Agreement. We will likely continue using the Meraki MC67-C, MX450, and other MX models in their catalog until we shift away from Meraki completely
Read full review
Usability
Cisco
To get basic functionality doesn't take long. Set up a new Meraki Dashboard activate the licenses and get internet connection for the APs and you are more or less done. The Dashboard will find your items and you're good to go.
Read full review
Cisco
Some features simply aren't there, but the ones that are there are pretty easy to use. Sometimes it is easy to get lost when trying to find the specific device you want to work on, but that's mostly due to how rarely we have to go into the interface.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Cisco
We have been deploying Meraki since last 8 years and even the first one deployed seems to be working fine till now!
Read full review
Cisco
Meraki MX devices support high availability (HA) configurations, which ensures minimal downtime if one device goes offline. This feature has helped us maintain a stable and reliable network, even in cases of hardware failures. ince Meraki is cloud-managed, we've noticed that the cloud infrastructure is generally highly reliable, with minimal service interruptions or downtime. This makes it easier to manage the network remotely without significant availability concerns. Meraki automatically pushes firmware updates and patches, which helps maintain system stability without requiring manual intervention. These updates are rolled out in a manner that ensures minimal disruption to service.
Read full review
Performance
Cisco
No answers on this topic
Cisco
The interface is pretty responsive. The lower end devices are easy to overwhelm if you have a lot of throughput. Be sure the model you get is rated for the amount of traffic you will have. Overbuild if possible, otherwise you won't be fully leveraging the connection from your ISP.
Read full review
Support Rating
Cisco
We have not had any issues with the Meraki WiFi Access Point hardware but we did encounter a problem with a Meraki LAN switch that failed to power up. Upon a email into the Meraki Support, they promptly called back and we went over some quick tests to determine a power supply problem. A replacement LAN switch was sent to me the next day.
Read full review
Cisco
I haven't ever had a bad experience with Meraki support. On the few occasions where I wasn't understanding the UI or needed some clarification about what a setting actually would do, I contacted them and they were very quickly able to provide help. Returns are simple and fast, too. We had to return a defective device one time and they shipped the replacement before we had even un-racked the one that was faulty. Unlike many other vendors, they didn't ask use to a do long list of scripted diagnostics, they just took my word for it that the device was broken and sent out a replacement immediately
Read full review
In-Person Training
Cisco
No answers on this topic
Cisco
great when they offered it, really tested your knowledge with hands on and see what your peers from other orgs know. glad to see that we were ahead of the curve of what our peers knew
Read full review
Online Training
Cisco
No answers on this topic
Cisco
it was okay as it was moderated but still better than nothing and done via semi self paced webex meeting
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Cisco
There were documents that detailed how the WiFi Access Point was to be installed and mounted. The only issue was to cable the device, we use a third party for this type of work and typically has to be performed after normal business hours. Other than that, the installation was easy.
Read full review
Cisco
Implementing Meraki MX devices in phases—starting with a pilot group or select branch offices—was invaluable. This allowed us to identify potential configuration issues, troubleshoot problems, and refine our setup before rolling it out company-wide. It also helped to get feedback from early users and adjust the deployment strategy accordingly. The SD-WAN capabilities in Meraki MX were essential for optimizing our WAN traffic and ensuring better application performance across various locations.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Cisco
We were more on a Cisco Wireless Controller set up, which takes a lot longer to control and that's why we've actually gone through a cloud-based product, which is very easy compared with the old traditional way that we used to have. It's more ease of software. They've got very similar features, but it's easy to set up and maintain into the future.
Read full review
Cisco
Cisco Meraki MX provides simplicity and scalability while cutting costs. With Meraki MX, you get a Security appliance, router, and Firewall in one appliance and managed with one GUI. These features enable the network engineers to maintain large-scale enterprises with a single dashboard from a remote site or anywhere with internet, all thanks to the Meraki cloud dashboard
Read full review
Scalability
Cisco
As far as I know, it's 10. I mean, because like I said, I manage stuff in the south. I have coworkers that manage it in the north. And so the scalability of it to be able to be go in and see the configurations of the ones in the north as well as they can see in the south. So across the board, it works really well for how widespread out it is.
Read full review
Cisco
When I first started with my company we had various infrastructure and a mix of tech. Since going to Cisco Meraki MX we have noticed better network performance and our new sites are much easier to bring online. Users have noticed an improvement in VPN connection and getting into all our systems.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Cisco
  • Uptime has improved significantly. The dashboard automatically keeps devices up to date by scheduling upgrades at remote times (say 2am on a Sunday)
  • Swapping to Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points has reduced the management overhead. No more long controller software hardware upgrades and obviously no more need for beefy central controllers.
Read full review
Cisco
  • From a positive impact? Basically it allows us to set up shop very quickly. It allowed us to add sites to our network very quickly. From a negative perspective, I think the only thing is that I can see from a negative perspective is I have a preference to working with ACLI in terms of how I engage with the youth tool At the moment, the only way to actually engage with a tool is on a gui and sometimes what I'd actually like is more detailed information in terms of actual configuration that you'll actually get out of ACLI.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points Screenshots

Screenshot of MR57 Cisco Meraki Access Point