Class for Web vs. GoTo Meeting

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Class for Web
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Class for Web, formerly Blackboard Collaborate, is an online, collaborative learning platform for the education industry and corporate learning needs. It includes features such as screen and application sharing, and web conferencing.
$300
per year
GoTo Meeting
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
From GoTo (formerly LogMeIn), GoToMeeting is an online meeting, desktop sharing, and video conferencing software that enables users to connect via the internet. It hosts a suite of online meeting tools, including real-time screen sharing and integrated audio.
$12
Per Organizer / Per Month for 150 Participants [billed annually]
Pricing
Class for WebGoTo Meeting
Editions & Modules
Classroom
$300.00
per year
Department
$9000.00
per year
Professional
$12.00
Per Organizer / Per Month for 150 Participants [billed annually]
Business
$16.00
Per Organizer / Per Month for 250 Participants [billed annually]
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
3,000 Participants
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Class for WebGoTo Meeting
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPricing available by monthly or annual subscription, with discounts for annual commitments.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Class for WebGoTo Meeting
Considered Both Products
Class for Web
Chose Class for Web
I believe Blackboard Collaborate is a great app/platform, but like similar products; it should be used in tandem with alternatives. Blackboard Collaborate has features that I find in other apps/platforms, yet some are easier to learn and use. Such is the case with the feature …
Chose Class for Web
Blackboard Collaborate is ideal for teaching & learning whereas Webex and Zoom are business-focused. While Collaborate may lack some user-desired features, it more than makes up those features with its focus on participant/learner engagement. For example, polling is easier, …
Chose Class for Web
Breakout rooms is the best feature of Blackboard Collaborate, and this is the reason why we are using it for project classes.
Chose Class for Web
Canvas LMS is a far more superior product, in fact, many schools switched to it from Blackboard while 0 switched from Canvas to BB. The reason is that Canvas is a Cloud-native tool and it is faster at implementing new features, fixing bugs, etc. It has a bigger advantage in the …
Chose Class for Web
As far as cost, Zoom is much more economical to us. For full features, Blackboard has a few more tools available than Zoom.
Chose Class for Web
Blackboard Collaborate is more expensive and does not perform as well with our internet connections.
Chose Class for Web
Bb Collaborate has educational tools unavailable in Skype or Google Hangouts and is available without the student needing to have an account or log-in information.
The upswing is incredible, with highly interactive video tutoring capabilities. It is also integrated with a tutor …
Chose Class for Web
Blackboard is just the most widely known software. All of them have issues and glitches, but Blackboard is well supported.
Chose Class for Web
Google Hangouts and Skype, while free and easy to use, do not provide the focus on educational settings that Collaborate Ultra does. They also do not provide the features for making a session accessible to attendees.
Chose Class for Web
While Skype for Business is nice, it takes a few times to try and get into meetings. Also, Blackboard Collaborate has more tools that allow for the user to write on the whiteboard or on uploaded PowerPoints. Finally, the ability to place people into mini groups and allowing for …
Chose Class for Web
We have used Skype for Business for meetings, however it does not have nearly the amount of features available as Collaborate and does not function as seamlessly.
Chose Class for Web
Blackboard LMS and Collaborate's integration as well as support from one vendor makes it a first choice if you are already using Blackboard as your LMS.
Chose Class for Web
Blackboard collaborate offers so many more features that help make a presentation successful. It offers the option for people to speak or chat at specific times, therefore keeping interruptions at a minimum during classes, but still lets people "raise their hand" should …
Chose Class for Web
Blackboard Collaborate is the only program of this kind that I have used so far, therefore I cannot compare against other programs that are alike. But, I would say that I will be using this tool for a long time, because it offers me almost everything that I need as of right now.
Chose Class for Web
I've other webinar tools like Go to Meeting and Adobe...I would say they are all comparable.
Chose Class for Web
Blackboard Collaborate meets the needs of a conferencing tool. It is especially great used in sync with other Blackboard products.
Chose Class for Web
When Collaborate was chosen, other products investigated included Wimba (a predecessor), Big Blue Button, TinyChat, and others. Collaborate, though requiring a greater financial investment, was superior to other options in essentially all respects. Its integration into our …
Chose Class for Web
Nearpod does not allow for the same type of synchronous environment that Blackboard collaborate does. Further, Nearpod, as the name suggests is best suited for a face-to-face classroom that is, preferably, one-to-one. While it has some of the same functions as Nearpod, …
Chose Class for Web
Blackboard Collaborate is a great fit for an academic setting compared to some of the other products. Its layout is intuitive and user friendly, while providing many advanced features that other tools do not offer.
Chose Class for Web
While other products can handle more active participants in a meeting at one time, Blackboard Collaborate has a much simpler and easy-to-use interface that makes it an ideal product for one to many presentations. It integrates fully with multiple learning management systems to …
GoTo Meeting
Chose GoTo Meeting
It is easy to use and works well for small meetings. Zoom has more features, but GoTo Meeting is simpler and cheaper. We chose it because it’s a good fit for our needs.
Chose GoTo Meeting
GoTo Meeting is very similar to DialPad. GoTo Meeting and Dialpad are both cloud-based communication but are very different from one another. Theres less guess work in how to use GoTo Meeting, whereas the Dialpad app took a while getting used to. While I have enjoyed both, …
Chose GoTo Meeting
GoTo Meeting is a simpler product and easier to use than teams however it is lacking is some of the features that teams has mainly integration with the rest for the office 365 suite.
Chose GoTo Meeting
Very basic and will require you to likely user other software. I think this is why people prefer to use teams because they can do so much in one place. It is way more than just conferencing.
Chose GoTo Meeting
GoTo Meeting is more cross-platform compatible as compared to most of the other alternatives, the interface is more User friendly as compared to most of the other alternatives, it is more affordable as compared to most of the other alternatives, the process of accessing it is …
Chose GoTo Meeting
I find GoTo Meeting sleeker and more professional in it's interface, the connection seems more stable as well.
Chose GoTo Meeting
GoTo Meeting is cheaper but in general, both systems are comparable. Webex is also intuitive and offers good audio and video quality as well as basic online meeting features like screen sharing, whiteboard etc. We used GoTo Meeting with some external companies who find Webex …
Chose GoTo Meeting
GoTo Meeting was more affordable and easier to implement than these options.
Chose GoTo Meeting
Microsoft Teams and Skype are really costly than GoTo Meeting. Only GoTo Meeting is best for online weekly or daily review calls.
Chose GoTo Meeting
It was highly recommend and proven to have great quality and easy features for all age employees that I have. Also can be useful on the go and on your cellphone
Chose GoTo Meeting
GoTo Meeting is easier to use, with a focus on streamlined controls. The clean and less cluttered meeting environment makes it easier to get things done. The pricing of GoTo Meeting is more competitive than Zoom making it a better option for small businesses like mine. All in …
Chose GoTo Meeting
We find that Google Meet doesn't integrate well externally and you can't managed attendee lists, keep them private, manage follow ups with a record on Google Meet. It's a great service to use for meeting locally with internal collogues but just doesn't meet our needs as our …
Chose GoTo Meeting
At first, I never thought that this platform is existing because I have been exposed to different platform before, not until I was employed in my current company and I can say that it helps me to communicate with my colleague . If there's an urgent concern regarding the task, I …
Chose GoTo Meeting
Skype doesn't allow as many integration as in GoTo Meeting e.g
Calendar Integration with emails
Auto email to participants
Chose GoTo Meeting
GoTo Meeting is good for small organizations. For my personal use I prefer google meet but for professional use I like to use GoTo Meeting. It gives a good quality video and audio which is something that make you compare the product with other similar products. The free …
Chose GoTo Meeting
GoTo Meeting is substantially better. Much more reliable and easier for participants to join. We have never had a "zoombomb" with GoTo Meeting but we did with Zoom working with a prospective investor. It was hard to come back from what the client saw! Zoom is not an option for …
Chose GoTo Meeting
GoTo Meetings has no time limit for sessions with more than x attendees. GoTo Meetings provides an easy way to allow attendees to share their screens. GoTo Meeting does not require membership/license/registration attendees; they are not required to download the desktop …
Chose GoTo Meeting
For meetings, it stacks reasonably well, although pricey for larger firms.
Chose GoTo Meeting
Many times, it seems like GoTo Meeting requires less bandwidth to run. We noticed with a few test machines that if you have over twenty video streams, this product could handle the load better than if we used Microsoft Teams and had many video streams.
Chose GoTo Meeting
Our CIO made the decision - all the products work well. He travels a lot and preferred the GoTo Meeting mobile app over the other applications' mobile capability. The cost basis was similar to both Zoom and Microsoft Teams. Our users had familiarity with GoTo Meeting which …
Chose GoTo Meeting
I also love that GoTo Meeting has a mobile app for working on the go. If your WiFi isn't working well, you can also dial in to listen to the meeting. Additionally, if you are not able to join at all, there is a recording feature to ensure you are not missing out.
Chose GoTo Meeting
We evaluated both Zoom workplace and GoTo Meeting, but then we decided to go with GoTo Meeting due to it's attractive price offering.
Features
Class for WebGoTo Meeting
Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software
Comparison of Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software features of Product A and Product B
Class for Web
-
Ratings
GoTo Meeting
8.1
Ratings
3% above category average
High quality audio00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
High quality video00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Low bandwidth requirements00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Mobile support00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Screen Sharing
Comparison of Screen Sharing features of Product A and Product B
Class for Web
-
Ratings
GoTo Meeting
8.2
Ratings
4% above category average
Desktop sharing00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Whiteboards00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Online Meetings / Events
Comparison of Online Meetings / Events features of Product A and Product B
Class for Web
-
Ratings
GoTo Meeting
8.1
Ratings
1% below category average
Calendar integration00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Meeting initiation00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Integrates with social media00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Record meetings / events00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Slideshows00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Online Events Collaboration
Comparison of Online Events Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Class for Web
-
Ratings
GoTo Meeting
8.2
Ratings
2% above category average
Live chat00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Audience polling00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Q&A00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Online Events Security
Comparison of Online Events Security features of Product A and Product B
Class for Web
-
Ratings
GoTo Meeting
8.1
Ratings
0% above category average
User authentication00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Participant roles & permissions00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Confidential attendee list00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Class for WebGoTo Meeting
Small Businesses
Zoom Workplace
Zoom Workplace
Score 8.5 out of 10
Intermedia AnyMeeting Pro
Intermedia AnyMeeting Pro
Score 7.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Schoology Learning
Schoology Learning
Score 8.0 out of 10
JioMeet
JioMeet
Score 9.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Schoology Learning
Schoology Learning
Score 8.0 out of 10
Webex Meetings
Webex Meetings
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Class for WebGoTo Meeting
Likelihood to Recommend
8.5
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(0 ratings)
7.5
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.5
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.9
(0 ratings)
7.6
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
4.5
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
3.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
4.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Class for WebGoTo Meeting
Likelihood to Recommend
Blackboard Collaborate is well suited for teaching and learning, especially online classes. When used with learning management, Collaborate allows for seamless sign-on between the users' course sites and the web conferencing platform. Collaborate is ideal for launching virtual discussions, lectures, office hours, and more. Users can easily upload files to display or share their desktop/specific applications, which is great for demonstrating course principles and meeting learning objectives. Collaborate is really good for breakout rooms, where users join or are assigned to small groups for discussions or team-based learning activities.
Read full review
Microsoft Teams has always given us issues if we run an extensive meeting with more than 30 participants. Often, HR would train many people at once, and call quality would degrade or crash. This provides a good alternative when Teams is not working correctly, but we must continue orientation or training. It is inappropriate for all meetings since we are embedded in the Microsoft ecosystem, and Teams integrates well with SharePoint.
Read full review
Pros
  • The ability to host a number of people in a meeting and manage their participation via text and audio.
  • The screen sharing features allows presenters to demonstrate procedures exactly as instructed on the screen. This also allows the presenter to permit others to share their screens if they need clarification of something or to share further ideas.
  • The software gives you the freedom to use a whiteboard to draw/demonstrate concepts to students and other employees.
Read full review
  • Calendar Scheduling: It prepares us for all meetings, automatically sends reminders, and ensures we never miss a meeting.
  • Ease of Scheduling: Scheduling a meeting is straightforward and saves us a lot of time.
  • The screen-sharing feature allows us to present documents and plans effortlessly during client calls.
  • We use the recording feature extensively for training purposes, especially for the onboarding of new members.
Read full review
Cons
  • Currently, the audio and video features are enabled separately from each other. You could end up in a situation where 6 people in a 12-person classroom have their cameras enabled and 6 different people have their microphones enabled. It would be ideal if one "Talk" button turned on that person's audio and video simultaneously.
  • The number of active participants able to turn on their microphone or camera is still limited compared to other products on the market. Competing products allow dozens of participants to enable their audio and video during the entire session without having to switch back and forth as Blackboard Collaborate requires with larger sessions.
  • Blackboard Collaborate still relies on Java to function. As such, it has to bundle a Java launcher application in order to open sessions. Similar products can function using HTML5 entirely within modern browsers.
  • Desktop sharing is not visible on mobile apps although the chat, whiteboard, and audio is fully functional.
Read full review
  • Lack of security updates (Not sure if they are taking care of but they should make users aware of it frequently)
  • Brand recognition improvement (Specifically in the US market where many customers still prefer Zoom)
  • Many prospects still consider GoTo as a legacy platform compared to Meet, Teams, Zoom. This is not a missing feature but GoTo team should really position themselves as innovative rather than pre-existing perceived notion of being legacy.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
It is a tool that faculty likes to use. It has so much flexibility to allow students to see a class even if they happen to not be available in the classroom.
Read full review
We used other software like goto meetings but found it best because of its user friendly interface and easy interfacing. It helped us in COVID and now we can say we are depending on it and love it. We recommend it to our friends company and they are also using it. It is very affordable and easy to integrate with system
Read full review
Usability
I feel that Blackboard Collaborate does a lot of things right. It’s great for educational purposes and may be better for some age levels than others. I feel that they may benefit from making features that distinguish the types of learning environments there are. Primary schools won’t be operating the same as high schools or universities and may need completely different options and features. As well as private schools and public schools. As they continue to improve and add more features the platform will be even better and more tailored to each of the end users.
Read full review
The simplicity of GoToMeetings desktop, mobile, and web-based applications make it a very robust and user-friendly meeting solution. At times, it may be more complex than needed, but it is nice to have so many features that can be used if needed. Once installed, it is very easy to use and navigate.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
The availability of the software is quite impressive. You can access it at any time that you want and from anywhere that you want, but that depends on how the software is set up by the University. There might be sudden outages due to not having enough space on your database, which we had that very issue happen recently here at our University. During that time, you could not access their blackboard at all until it was brought up online again.
Read full review
This application has always been available. Never an issue
Read full review
Performance
The performance of the software is remarkable. The loading speed of the pages is more than satisfying, it all depends on the users internet package. So far, there wasn't any issue of Blackboard slowing down other software or systems when integrated with them
Read full review
This application is fast. Loads fast, no stall
Read full review
Support Rating
The support has been very good. We integrate Blackboard into our learning management system so everything is seamless for users. Most issues arise from the user's browser configuration, cookies, and other privacy settings, not from the tool itself. Collaborate is pretty reliable with strong audio and video quality. Support has been helpful when we've had the occasional quirk, again more likely due to a user-side challenge than the platform itself.
Read full review
When we have issues, they seem to respond quickly and do everything they can to help us. They have even tried to find other ways we could get more use out of their product, or improve the way we are currently using it. Overall, their support has been fairly good for us.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
It was very easy and self-explanatory.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
I believe Blackboard Collaborate is a great app/platform, but like similar products; it should be used in tandem with alternatives. Blackboard Collaborate has features that I find in other apps/platforms, yet some are easier to learn and use. Such is the case with the feature to work in different groups, and switching between groups. Similarly, using the chat whilst sharing screen is a lot easier than with alternative platforms. I do believe it could benefit from certain features such as Miro's participation tracking software, when using the whiteboard app, and maybe some improvement to video/sound quality; yet Blackboard Collaborate is most definitely a useful platform for meetings, workshops, and classes.
Read full review
GoTo Meetings has no time limit for sessions with more than x attendees. GoTo Meetings provides an easy way to allow attendees to share their screens. GoTo Meeting does not require membership/license/registration attendees; they are not required to download the desktop application. They can attend from the web if they choose to do so.
Read full review
Scalability
The reason for this rating is that the software is a pretty good tool that can be utilized for use in all of the Universities around the world. It has the capability to fulfill the needs of various different education systems. Although, there are slight improvements that are needed, therefore the rating is at 8.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Our implementation has been gradual over the last 2 semesters. Students who have used it to access live academic support despite being unable to drive in for face to face sessions have been extremely happy. It is gradually boosting student morale for offsite students, who have long felt they were unable to access services that were paid through fees with their tuition.
  • Multiple support services who have wanted to provide online support but were unsure how they could are more empowered to do so now. The current mood is "what else can we offer online through this, workshops, advising, live broadcast of student org meetings"?
Read full review
  • It has improved the efficiency of our sales meetings, allowing us to close deals faster and with greater clarity.
  • There has been a 15% increase in our sales conversion rates.
  • The ability to effectively conduct in-house training has improved team productivity and reduced costs associated with in-person training.
Read full review
ScreenShots

GoTo Meeting Screenshots

Screenshot of GoTo App - Create Meeting (Out of Session)Screenshot of GoTo App - Join Meeting (Out of Session)Screenshot of GoTo App - Meeting (In Session)Screenshot of GoTo App - Mobile Meetings (Out of Session)Screenshot of GoTo App - Screen Share Meeting (In Session)