Conga CLM vs. OpenText Contract Center vs. Oracle CPQ

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Conga CLM
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Conga CLM (formerly Conga Contracts, or Novatus) is a contract management software solution built around features such as contract creation, automated notifications, and approval and workflows.N/A
OpenText Contract Center
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
OpenText Contract Center is a contract lifecycle management software solution that is designed to improve profitability and reduces risk for organizations by ensuring consistent, secure contract policies and processes from creation through fulfillment.N/A
Oracle CPQ
Score 4.5 out of 10
N/A
Oracle CPQ is a cloud-based application that helps sellers configure the right mix of products or services and create accurate, professional quotes to quickly meet their customers’ pricing needs.
$240
per month per user
Pricing
Conga CLMOpenText Contract CenterOracle CPQ
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
CPQ Pricing
$240.00
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Conga CLMOpenText Contract CenterOracle CPQ
Free Trial
NoNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsConga offers customized pricing for their CLM product. The pricing prioritizes: Business needs Commitment to partnership Flexibility Budget alignment Competitive pricing Transparency
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Conga CLMOpenText Contract CenterOracle CPQ
Features
Conga CLMOpenText Contract CenterOracle CPQ
Contract Authoring
Comparison of Contract Authoring features of Product A and Product B
Conga CLM
8.5
116 Ratings
5% above category average
OpenText Contract Center
-
Ratings
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Contract creation8.9113 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract templates8.7108 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Clause library/saved fields8.7102 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Guided logic7.689 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Collaboration
Comparison of Contract Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Conga CLM
8.2
106 Ratings
1% above category average
OpenText Contract Center
-
Ratings
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Contract sharing8.498 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract editing8.598 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Collaborating on contracts8.292 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
MS Word plug-in7.994 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Approval process8.195 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Interdepartmental workflows8.089 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Monitoring
Comparison of Contract Monitoring features of Product A and Product B
Conga CLM
8.7
105 Ratings
5% above category average
OpenText Contract Center
-
Ratings
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Contract database8.699 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract search8.499 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract milestone reminders & alerts8.395 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom contract reports8.397 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Tracking contract status8.698 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Compliance check8.580 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Management
Comparison of Contract Management features of Product A and Product B
Conga CLM
8.3
78 Ratings
5% above category average
OpenText Contract Center
-
Ratings
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Contract Storage8.776 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Advanced Search and Filtering8.471 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Customizable Contract Templates8.272 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow Acceleration7.867 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
E-Signatures8.467 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Reminders and Alerts8.170 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting8.571 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with other Systems8.067 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
CPQ
Comparison of CPQ features of Product A and Product B
Conga CLM
-
Ratings
OpenText Contract Center
-
Ratings
Oracle CPQ
6.7
18 Ratings
27% below category average
Quote sharing/sending00 Ratings00 Ratings7.017 Ratings
Product configuration00 Ratings00 Ratings8.017 Ratings
Configuration options00 Ratings00 Ratings8.017 Ratings
Pricing rules00 Ratings00 Ratings7.016 Ratings
Price adjustment00 Ratings00 Ratings5.017 Ratings
Purchase history and open contracts00 Ratings00 Ratings6.016 Ratings
Guided selling/Sales portal00 Ratings00 Ratings7.016 Ratings
CPQ reporting & analytics00 Ratings00 Ratings7.017 Ratings
CPQ-CRM integration00 Ratings00 Ratings7.015 Ratings
Attachments to quotes00 Ratings00 Ratings5.017 Ratings
Order capturing00 Ratings00 Ratings7.07 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Conga CLMOpenText Contract CenterOracle CPQ
Small Businesses
airSlate WorkFlow
airSlate WorkFlow
Score 9.9 out of 10
airSlate WorkFlow
airSlate WorkFlow
Score 9.9 out of 10
QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
PandaDoc
PandaDoc
Score 8.7 out of 10
PandaDoc
PandaDoc
Score 8.7 out of 10
QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprises
DocuSign CLM
DocuSign CLM
Score 8.2 out of 10
Conga CLM
Conga CLM
Score 8.8 out of 10
Everstage
Everstage
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Conga CLMOpenText Contract CenterOracle CPQ
Likelihood to Recommend
8.7
(76 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(45 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.8
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(26 ratings)
Usability
8.1
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
3.0
(8 ratings)
Availability
8.2
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(3 ratings)
Performance
9.1
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
9.1
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(4 ratings)
In-Person Training
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
Online Training
9.1
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.1
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
2.0
(6 ratings)
Configurability
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
3.7
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Professional Services
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Conga CLMOpenText Contract CenterOracle CPQ
Likelihood to Recommend
Conga
And I mean that wholeheartedly, only because my experience has been so wonderful, and one of the things that I was warned against moving to Conga CLM was support. "Oh, their support's not that great." Absolutely wrong. I have received nothing but top-notch service support and there have been a lot of service requests for me only because of my gap in knowledge and every single person, one person in particular, always was jumped right in, very quick to respond, didn't just throw a knowledge article at me, actually said, "Hey, let's get on a Zoom together. Let's figure out what the issue is, and let's figure out what the solution is. " And it's that game changer for me. I'm very big on customer service, and Conga's support staff is amazing. I give a 12 on that. The product itself is just easy, and the team loves it. It works great. I work directly with sales, and we're actually wanting to get more of our documents into Conga CLM. Right now, we just have our master service agreement and some of our order forms, but we have other amendments and addendums and other business lines that we're trying to get into the system. It's just finding time.
Read full review
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Oracle
I think CPQ had worked so well for our company because of the widespread nature of our associates and tracking orders that were being placed in multiple time zones. My team specifically needed a way of analyzing these orders to track our progress in real time and sort out any supply orders before they became an issue. If you are in a centralized location with a smaller team then this may not yield much use to you.
Read full review
Pros
Conga
  • Contract Management is the biggest selling point. With Conga CLM, it's easy to search, audit, and reference documents.
  • Syncs beautifully with Salesforce (and some others), so contracts and customer data stay connected. Saves time and reduces manual work.
  • Live dashboards let you track contract statuses without having to dig through emails or call someone.
Read full review
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Oracle
  • Leveraged automation to minimize headcount costs despite 10% year-over-year business growth, and enabled staff to focus on more strategic tasks.
  • Established a flexible CPQ system that scales on demand to easily accommodate the company’s multiple global locations.
  • Improved customer relations by reducing configuration time and allowing sales more time to meet with customers and close orders.
Read full review
Cons
Conga
  • X-author for Word can be improved as it does not maintain a stable connection and the org gets disconnected frequently.
  • It does not support grandparent relationship for merge field population.
  • A separate package needs to be installed for the integration of CPQ and CLM tools from Conga.
Read full review
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Oracle
  • Significant setup time, cost, and maintenance. We have to use an implementation partner
  • Does not always play well with other software, even Oracle software. While this is improved and being further improved, that it was a third party acquisition means things sometimes require a little extra care
  • Additional setup documentation and first walkthroughs would be helpful, especially if it was all in one place
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Conga
Simple and easy to use for the legal team to creates contracts in Salesforce and with the help of conga contract attaches the different clauses through the bundle and sends them for negotiation and for signature. This is the primary work they do from Conga contracts. We had solution which is build using conga contracts, conga composer and conga sign
Read full review
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Oracle
So far it is all good with BigMachines, looking for new features since Oracle acquisition has created a lot of expectations. We have outlined our limitations (out of box functionality) in our periodic customer successor advice meetings for a while, hope we get a resolution soon. Also, the BigMachines user license fee has increased a lot in the last three years.
Read full review
Usability
Conga
I would give it a 10 because it's easy. The way that we've set it up and the process, you know, when you're working with a sales team, which is what I work with, they need something easy to learn and quick because they need to concentrate on making sales. So you got to give them that. And that's exactly what Conga CLM has offered to us, a very easy platform that they can get their contracts out the door, we can get to clients and then they can move on to their next sale.
Read full review
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Oracle
The software UI can be as complex or as simple as you need it to be (depending on the business). It does require training others on quote configuration and the order in which to build out order positions prior to configuring a quote. Once users are trained;however, it is fairly straight-forward. The UI is still more static than other new wizard/drag-and-drop models, but it get's the job done
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Conga
Conga CLM’s availability has been solid in my experience as for a logistics company like ours that needs access across time zones and departments, Conga CLM is a great solution.
Read full review
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Oracle
Other than one day two years ago and an hour or two a few times since then due to data center outages, it has been very reliable
Read full review
Performance
Conga
Conga CLM performs reliably across our organization. It handles large volumes of contracts without lag, keeps workflows flowing smoothly, and processes automation tasks efficiently. The system remains responsive, even during busy days, no performance lag.
Read full review
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Oracle
It depends upon the day however there are so many failure points with online services, including our internet service, that this is probably closer to 9 with the latest version
Read full review
Support Rating
Conga
Very very difficult to get support. The support team is great for simple, general questions. If we ran into anything complex, we usually would figure it out before they could help us. We often were bounced around from rep to rep
Read full review
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Oracle
Some specific support personal was good and fixed some problems fast using proper solutions. But when one of them went to sleep when we had critical issues and they do unreported commits to our production environment which caused issues and they were hiding it?? you can not give more than a two (maybe even that is too much). They also failed to add a feature for us which also bring the grade down.
Read full review
In-Person Training
Conga
Conga University is very well made. Loved it!
Read full review
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Oracle
They have pretty good training. Our business analysts have been able to go to entry and advanced level training. They have a train the trainer model. Our business analyst attended training, then trained the rest of our staff.
Read full review
Online Training
Conga
Conga University is the best! loved it. The courses are very well designed which makes learning easy and great. I have taken courses for conga contracts, composer, conga sign, and conga batch. Courses are beneficial if you want to implement Conga products for your clients or for your organization. Highly recommended to sign up for Conga university and start learning
Read full review
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Conga
The process involved Salesforce object creation and fields with installing conga contracts and conga composer and setting up security for the users
Read full review
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Oracle
It was a much more technical implementation than we thought. It involved much more code.

Future releases have made and will make administering the tool easier.

EDL consulting had one good developer, but when he was moved off, they were horrible to work with.

The BMI sales team does a “BOA” or a “Business Operation Assessment” which is extremely valuable, not only for them to scope an implementation and get more reach within the organization, but it is also a documentation of business process that most organizations don’t have. It highlights inefficiencies and allows for correction during implementation.

Having a dedicated team (in-house) for implementation is key
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Conga
Conga CLM capabilities and speed is very good compared to other CLM solutions and also scalable and easy to configure and manage the enhancements. Conga CLm is also great for multiple verticals and users from various departments can easily adopt to the CLM applications or tool. The eas of use is also a factor
Read full review
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Oracle
Oracle engagement is ahead. They are active in the development of the tool and provide great support after implementation. They also listen to their customers and offer opportunities to feedback and provide input through activities like the customer advisory board forum.
Read full review
Scalability
Conga
Based on my experience using Conga CLM across a growing logistics operation with varied departments, I’d confidently rate its overall scalability a 9 out of 10. Provides multi site support, has proven ready for the long haul and provides a secure environment.
Read full review
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Conga
  • The time saved for our Legal team to generate and go through redlining for customers allows us to process the create the multitude of contracts that come through the system daily quickly and correctly.
  • Sales is able to get accurate information relatively quickly and get contracts in customers hands faster due to the tools available. This provides our business a much more sustainable and quick ability to grow.
Read full review
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Oracle
  • Increased Sales Rep efficiency. Being able to create multiple quotes ACCURATELY and quickly was a game changer.
  • Large implementation time. It's a little difficult to fit BMI into a SCRUM style build, with multiple working models and prototypes of all 3 simultaneously.
  • A larger fee for licensing and implementation cost. ROI wouldn't be realized in the first year.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Conga CLM Screenshots

Screenshot of Salesforce Contract CreationScreenshot of CLM DashboardScreenshot of CLM AnalyticsScreenshot of Conversation AI Agent