Constant Contact vs. Epicor Kinetic

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Constant Contact
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Constant Contact is a full-featured email marketing solution with capabilities such as social media integration, drag-and-drop editing, and real-time reporting. It is a bulk email tool designed for SMB customers. Since 2019, Constant Contact also offers marketing automation features, a website and landing page builder, and other tools to support midsize businesses.
$12
per month
Epicor Kinetic
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Epicor Kinetic is a customizable, scalable, product-centric cloud ERP designed specifically for manufacturers.N/A
Pricing
Constant ContactEpicor Kinetic
Editions & Modules
Lite
Starting at $12.00
per month
Standard
Starting at $35.00
per month
Premium
Starting at $80.00
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Constant ContactEpicor Kinetic
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsThe SMS Marketing tool can be added to any Standard or Premium Constant Contact account. SMS is only available in the US for Standard and Premium paid plans. SMS can be added when logged in to an account after purchase. Plans start at $10/month for up to 500 messages.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Constant ContactEpicor Kinetic
Considered Both Products
Constant Contact
Chose Constant Contact
Constant Contact was initially cheaper than Mailchimp, which is why we switched. Once we started using Constant Contact, it was clear we made the right choice. It is so much easier to use than our old platform. I can’t see any reason why we would ever change away from this …
Chose Constant Contact
Constant Contact and Novi AMS integrate, which makes our lives very easy. Feathr is a little difficult to use, and the results are mixed on reporting. Mailchimp was a very difficult product to use. I had a hard time getting used to it, and I quickly switched to Constant Contact …
Chose Constant Contact
Constant Contact destroys Microsoft 365 when it comes to mass emailing. Microsofts max email recipients is like twenty people at once. Constant Contact you can email thousands at a time WITH dynamic content. Meaning if some clients are in New York and some in New Jersey, you …
Chose Constant Contact
The ease of use and segmentation of Constant Contact makes it superior!
You can upload images easily and it is pretty easy to walk someone through how to design and email and upload an email list for sending.
Chose Constant Contact
1. Constant Contact provides features that were well suited for us being a mid-size organization.
2. Implementation of Constant Contact with Wordpress and WooCommerce was easy as compared to Brevo.
3. Peer-recommendations, brand reputation and research by our internal team also …
Chose Constant Contact
It's been a long time since I used MailChimp. I do remember being impressed the first time I used Constant Contact after having used MailChimp exclusively for a couple of years.
Chose Constant Contact
i have not used any other products that are similar to Constant Contact
Chose Constant Contact
Mailchimp is pretty comparable in a lot of ways to Constant Contact, but Constant Contact just continues to win when it comes to deliver-ability and user-interface. It's clean, simple, and intuitive.
There are other platforms like ActiveCampaign and Klaviyo that have some …
Chose Constant Contact
Constant Contact is quite intuitive making it easy to distribute the workload such as one person creates conntent, one migrates it to the template, one edits the content, and so on. However, it is easy for any one of us to do each others work.
Chose Constant Contact
We selected Constant Contact due to pricing constraints. However, if the pricing were to increase, we may look at alternative products that offer more features. We are looking for a product that will allow us to stand out from other organizations like ours that are appealing to …
Chose Constant Contact
Constant Contact allows a more in-depth look at our audience, what they like, etc.
Chose Constant Contact
I know what CC offers (but not sure if the others offer this or Retargetting - CC automatically retargets any of our customers with abandoned carts. We also set triggers on our promotional email system, and for follow-ups. This has been very helpful in targeting and retargeting …
Chose Constant Contact
They’re both pretty similar software, however mailchimp maybe more intuitive. I think they are similar in terms of deliverability at this point. Constant Contact might be more bang for the same buck.
Chose Constant Contact
Very similar in nature. I feel it's more just what works for your organization as to what solution you are more familiar with and the pricing structure that fits your needs. For most organizations with sales departments, I would recommend a email platform that is linked with …
Chose Constant Contact
In my view, If I were made aware of Constant Contact's lack of performance, I would have never created an account. I would rather use Wix, or even just social media! It would be more effective, user-friendly, and less costly or stressful, I believe.
Chose Constant Contact
it is the youngest sibling compared to the much more competent and capable older brother that is Marketo Engage. The reports, database management, and complete control of email designs, and interaction of recipients does not compare. Constant Contact is a great entry-level …
Chose Constant Contact
We use BEE Pro to create our emails; we like their email builder. However, when sending emails, Constant Contact is much better. They allow more emails to be sent out at once and let us store more contacts within the program. Constant Contact has greater flexibility and variety …
Chose Constant Contact
Constant Contact is much more intuitive for people who are not tech-savvy. Also, while SendGrid offered more options in it's drag and drop interface, it displayed differently across different email clients, which made it very cumbersome to use. It also took much longer to …
Chose Constant Contact
Overall, Constant Contact is the easiest to use with one of the lower price points. It is a great entry-level tool for a beginner in order to graduate into more sophisticated platforms. The design features are a good start along with the subject line testing which is helpful …
Chose Constant Contact
Constant contact was perfect for our needs for many clients, it wasn’t overly robust, but powerful enough to see strong ROI. With regards to the competitor tools, amongst standard ESP there’s not a huge difference as they all essentially work the same, it’s just about pricing …
Epicor Kinetic
Chose Epicor Kinetic
A more well rounded and manufacturing focused platform
Chose Epicor Kinetic
Smaller player in ERP but meets the needs of the company
Chose Epicor Kinetic
Viewpoint is our current ERP provider, but they pushed all of their customers to the cloud (which we didn't want to do). They also pushed all customers to a single product with a corresponding significant increase in price, while not providing additional value to our company. …
Chose Epicor Kinetic
It was much easier to customize the software to what we wanted and we had more freedom to make the software exactly what we needed it to be. They gave us a lot more tools for development. They didn't restrict certain data transfer between screens or between modules. The support …
Chose Epicor Kinetic
Kinetic is a more stable platform, and the company truly cares about its customers. they treat us like family.
Chose Epicor Kinetic
More variability and reporting use case scenarios offered.
Chose Epicor Kinetic
Very different but seems just as capable for the manufacturing industry.
Chose Epicor Kinetic
NetSuite ERP, Microsoft Dynamics 365 and IBM Managed Services for SAP Applications
Chose Epicor Kinetic
More sophisticated and capable. We like the constant R&D and innovation and feel good it's going to be around for a while.
Chose Epicor Kinetic
Epicor Kinetic allowing us to have the option of on-premise OR in the cloud was a big reason why we chose Epicor Kinetic. We also found the ability to customize and enhance Epicor Kinetic's screens, business processes, BAQs, and other features much more user friendly for our …
Chose Epicor Kinetic
Our system was a homegrown system
Chose Epicor Kinetic
We have been using Epicor Kinetic since 2014, I don't have a list of other products.
Chose Epicor Kinetic
Ease of use and the ability of the system to adapt to our manufacturing processes and make our lives easier while giving us an upgrade in the system throughout the business.
Chose Epicor Kinetic
Acumatica, Plex by Rockwell Automation, Infor CloudSuite ERP and NetSuite ERP
Chose Epicor Kinetic
Although we felt Acumatica would meets our needs as well, Epicor Kinetic was more cost effective to us as a small company.
Chose Epicor Kinetic
I wasn't the decider on the purchase but I have been told that it was vetted and chosen due to the robustness of the program and the ability to add in customizations.
Chose Epicor Kinetic
In my opinion, Epicor Kinetic better with manufacturing
Chose Epicor Kinetic
Most of my histories with SAP directly. I didn't really have any negative experiences. The only thing I could say is that I always had to go to somebody else to solve the problem that I can solve first person now with Epicor Kinetic.
Chose Epicor Kinetic
Epicor Kinetic is good for complex manufacturing, but is missing some basic ERP functions like GL entry approval workflows.
Features
Constant ContactEpicor Kinetic
Email & Online Marketing
Comparison of Email & Online Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Constant Contact
8.9
Ratings
10% above category average
Epicor Kinetic
-
Ratings
WYSIWYG email editor9.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Dynamic content9.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Ability to test dynamic content8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Landing pages9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
A/B testing8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile optimization8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Email deliverability reporting9.80 Ratings00 Ratings
List management9.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Triggered drip sequences7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Constant Contact
8.5
Ratings
10% above category average
Epicor Kinetic
7.6
Ratings
3% above category average
Dashboards8.40 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Standard reports9.60 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Custom reports7.50 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Pre-Send Testing
Comparison of Pre-Send Testing features of Product A and Product B
Constant Contact
8.4
Ratings
4% above category average
Epicor Kinetic
-
Ratings
URL Validation8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Link Tracking7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Image Validation8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Inbox Display8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Email Accessibility Tools7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Spelling and Grammar Check9.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Spam Testing6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Email Previews9.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Constant Contact
-
Ratings
Epicor Kinetic
7.9
Ratings
7% above category average
Pay calculation00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Benefit plan administration00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Direct deposit files00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Constant Contact
-
Ratings
Epicor Kinetic
8.0
Ratings
6% above category average
API for custom integration00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Plug-ins00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Constant Contact
-
Ratings
Epicor Kinetic
8.4
Ratings
0% above category average
Single sign-on capability00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Role-based user permissions00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Constant Contact
-
Ratings
Epicor Kinetic
7.3
Ratings
5% below category average
Accounts payable00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Accounts receivable00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Global Financial Support00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Configurable Accounting00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Standardized Processes00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Constant Contact
-
Ratings
Epicor Kinetic
8.4
Ratings
5% above category average
Inventory tracking00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Automatic reordering00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Location management00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Constant Contact
-
Ratings
Epicor Kinetic
8.3
Ratings
5% above category average
Pricing00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Order entry00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Credit card processing00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Cost of goods sold00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Order Orchestration00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Constant Contact
-
Ratings
Epicor Kinetic
8.5
Ratings
12% above category average
Billing Management00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Period Close00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Constant Contact
-
Ratings
Epicor Kinetic
9.2
Ratings
19% above category average
Budgeting and Forecasting00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Project Costing00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Cost Capture00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Capital Project Management00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Constant Contact
-
Ratings
Epicor Kinetic
7.7
Ratings
10% above category average
Project Planning and Scheduling00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Constant Contact
-
Ratings
Epicor Kinetic
7.9
Ratings
6% above category average
Award Lifecycle Management00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Constant Contact
-
Ratings
Epicor Kinetic
8.0
Ratings
13% above category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Contract Authoring00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Contract Repository00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Supplier Management00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Constant Contact
-
Ratings
Epicor Kinetic
7.8
Ratings
15% above category average
Risk Repository00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Control Management00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Issue Detection00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Remediation and Certification00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Constant Contact
-
Ratings
Epicor Kinetic
7.6
Ratings
9% above category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Fulfillment Management00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Constant Contact
-
Ratings
Epicor Kinetic
7.9
Ratings
6% above category average
Production Process Design00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Production Management00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Configuration Management00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Work Execution00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Constant Contact
-
Ratings
Epicor Kinetic
8.1
Ratings
11% above category average
Forecasting00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Inventory Planning00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Performance Monitoring00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Constant Contact
-
Ratings
Epicor Kinetic
7.9
Ratings
7% above category average
Proposal Management00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Product Master Data Management00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Constant ContactEpicor Kinetic
Small Businesses
Mad Mimi
Mad Mimi
Score 10.0 out of 10
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
VerticalResponse
VerticalResponse
Score 10.0 out of 10
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Emma by Marigold
Emma by Marigold
Score 8.6 out of 10
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Constant ContactEpicor Kinetic
Likelihood to Recommend
9.6
(0 ratings)
8.1
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.9
(0 ratings)
8.8
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.1
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Online Training
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Configurability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.6
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Constant ContactEpicor Kinetic
Likelihood to Recommend
Constant Contact is great when trying to target specific market segments. We typically like to segment our master list by region, but also have product segments, as well. They do provide pre-made segments to start you off too. We don't usually use their email builder, we find others to be more flexible, intuitive, and have more variety. We do prefer emailing from Constant Contact, however.
Read full review
Epicor Kinetic has been a wonderful system of record that I can rely on for consistent tracking of our quote to cash transactions. I have complete confidence in the data that is being processed at the Core of the Epicor Kinetic system. Customizing Epicor Kinetic has been a true game changer for us to allow our team to maximize the unique needs of our customers, vendors and users.
Read full review
Pros
  • Constant Contact allows the users to send unlimited emails and just pay per list size.
  • The software does welcome emails pretty well and allows you to set up all sorts of automation.
  • The branded templates and starter templates are very useful and look good.
Read full review
  • When compared to the Smart Client, grids and searching are so much faster.
  • As a developer, the way that the forms are laid out in Application Studio in an easy to read way is fantastic
  • Having Epicor Kinetic forms load in a browser window is good. Being able to right click on the menu path and choose 'Open in new tab' is awesome.
Read full review
Cons
  • Sometimes some software provides outdated and useless features and functions, but this email marketing tool gives advanced kinds of functionalities with modern features.
  • I like the ease of use of this platform also appreciate its professional customer support team.
  • I am no longer desperate after getting this tool at my work.
Read full review
  • In Application Studio, there are quite a few things that you just have to know in order to really get it to work right. Such as when you are updating a dataview you have to save them refresh and then go back to the wizard to get the added fields that you may have added from a BAQ.
  • When running MRP it has a tendency to stall or not finish on occasion. This is a problem as we do not get any PO Suggestions when this happens.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
There is no doubt that we are going to renew Constant Contact. We have not just invested a lot of time in learning and creating a great looking product but we have developed a strong database of information that allows us to track how we are doing for each newsletter. This supports our goals of creating products that residents desire and are excited to receive.
Read full review
Easy to use, reliable, known product, best product configurator, Epicor continues to offer improvements every year.
Read full review
Usability
There is always room for improvement. I don't know how they test their systems, but they should invite not-so computer savvy people to test it. If I, as an expert have problems, they need to think like the technophobe. Since I've used Constant Contact in the past as part of my former employment, I have not viewed any of the tutorials and just jumped in to work on my client's newsletter. With that said, I found some areas easy and some a bit cumbersome
Read full review
There is always room for improvement! I've used Great Plains ERP/MS Dynamics and Epicor my entire career. both do some things really well. Both could learn from each other. The KInetic user interface is much better than the classic windows overall. Please keep adding more functionality to the core financials!!! You need the accountants to be on your side.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No major problems in sending out the email campaigns and accessing the analytics
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
The system seemed quite slow sometimes. Specifically, there was sometimes a delay in sends if it was during a high traffic period. There were time-outs when uploading new code for an email, and a lag in reporting analytics which was sometimes as long as 72 hours
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
I think the overall support for Constant Contact has always been incredible; I have nothing negative to say. Our customer support representative was attentive, easy to understand, and very knowledgeable. I never felt like I wasn't a priority of his and my issues, while very small, were fixed in a very short time frame.
Read full review
If the answer to your problem is not readily available in an answer book, your response or solution will take months, if you get one at all. Problems need to be sent to support and duplicated by them before they try to fix it. This is extremely frustrating because you have to prove to Epicor that you are having an issue. If by some miracle you get by this barrier, your problem is submitted to development for review. You can't speak to them or communicate in any way directly. This group appears to be completely unconcerned about user issues or customer service. Our experiences have been negative across the board.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Implementation is very easy for someone who wants to send out the “batch and blast” type newsletters. If you want to use their templates with no customizations, the product works fine. However, the more customizations you get into involving link color, etc, that’s where things can get tricky for someone who may not be familiar with coding
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
We selected Constant Contact due to pricing constraints. However, if the pricing were to increase, we may look at alternative products that offer more features. We are looking for a product that will allow us to stand out from other organizations like ours that are appealing to the same customers—a product that will set our company apart from the others.
Read full review
Viewpoint is our current ERP provider, but they pushed all of their customers to the cloud (which we didn't want to do). They also pushed all customers to a single product with a corresponding significant increase in price, while not providing additional value to our company. As a result, we considered some other options, but given that our sister company had been on Epicor for several years and we have shared IT resources, it made sense to all be on the same system.
Read full review
Scalability
Very reliable in sending email campaigns and controlling the recipients so that no contact is sent the same email more than once, even if they are on a resent list
Read full review
Using the word Scalability usually implies an increase of use, or adding the use of other features. Making the product put to good/proper use for small companies without the need for full-time support, whilst integrity is maintained it is an entirely different topic. In my view, the current company may have acquired a full truck with options, where initially a small pick-up may have been better suited.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • I can't report hard numbers, however, being able to execute sales and marketing campaigns led to a noticeable increase in brand awareness in our industry.
  • We were able to offer white-labeled email communication services to clients, which is not something that other administrators typically offer. This helped us win and retain business.
Read full review
  • We have increased our lead time of orders by about a week.
  • We have increased our output of product by 10% with the same amount of staff.
  • We were able to leverage Kinetic to optimize our business while moving two facilities.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Constant Contact Screenshots

Screenshot of the AI Content Generator that can be used to create content for emails, social posts, or SMS.Screenshot of an example automation workflow. These help to ensure a business's marketing is always on.Screenshot of some of the available pre-built email templates, that can be edited with the included drag-and-drop email editor.Screenshot of the Social Posting tool, used to plan and post social media messaging across platforms.Screenshot of the SMS Marketing feature.Screenshot of some of Constant Contact's available integrations.

Epicor Kinetic Screenshots

Screenshot of Production ManagementScreenshot of Role-Based Analytics and Business IntelligenceScreenshot of Planning and SchedulingScreenshot of Shipping and ReceivingScreenshot of the General LedgerScreenshot of Training and Development