Great for analytics and email formatting, sometimes bad for importing large lists
Updated October 24, 2017
Great for analytics and email formatting, sometimes bad for importing large lists

Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Constant Contact
We us Constant Contact to manage our contact database and to send out email updates. It is great for segmenting our list -- from general interest to communications to fundraising. The automated features are great, especially that it will not allow the same email to appear in the same inbox twice. It also merges duplicate contacts. We use it across the entire organization.
Pros
- Merging duplicate contacts
- Updating your address book
- Giving a reliable open rate and thorough reports
- Allowing you to segment large email lists
Cons
- When uploading additional contacts, CC wants to see how they actively subscribed. This can be problematic when uploading an older email list (i.e. you may just have a spreadsheet of the list and they want to see more evidence).
- It is a little pricey compared to competitors such as MailChimp.
- It would be great to be able to export email campaigns as HTML.
- Great in getting out press releases.
- Great for managing a large contact database.
Much better in managing your contact database and ensuring that the same email is not sent to the same contact more than one time. Also gives a more thorough report of open rates, times, etc. than MailChimp. Allows for more formatting options than MailChimpp and other competitors. A bit more pricey, but worth it for the analytics.
Constant Contact Feature Ratings
Using Constant Contact
3 - President, communications, public policy
3 - Basic HTML and Excel
- Sending press releases
- Sending updates to colleagues
- Sending quarterly updates for fundraising
- Manage contact database
- Segmenting email list.
Evaluating Constant Contact and Competitors
- Product Features
- Product Usability
- Analyst Reports
Email campaign analytics is really what sets Constant Contact apart from its competitors.
Constant Contact Implementation
- Implemented in-house
Change management was minimal - Was already implemented when I started at the organization.
Constant Contact Training
- Self-taught
Yes. Also, they have some great videos and send emails with recommendations.
Configuring Constant Contact
Not specifically. It is pretty straightforward.
No - there is no facility to customize the interface
Some - we have added small pieces of custom code - The HTML editor can be a bit glitchy, but it is often not needed in template design.
Not specifically.
Constant Contact Support
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Kept well informed Quick Initial Response | Slow Resolution Poor followup Less knowledgeable Problems left unsolved Escalation required Difficult to get immediate help Need to explain problems multiple times Support doesn't seem to care |
Yes - No -- it look them two months.
Using Constant Contact
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Like to use Relatively simple Easy to use Technical support not required Well integrated Consistent Quick to learn Convenient Feel confident using Familiar | None |
- File/list uploads
- Integrations
- Database management
- HTML editor is glitchy
- Drag-and-drop interface limits formatting options
- Template customization
Yes - Not very well because it really only allows you to enter new contacts (manually) for your list.
Constant Contact Reliability
Upgrading Constant Contact
- Upgraded to a plan that allowed us to email a larger contact list
- List management
- Contact management
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation