Convert Experiences is an experimentation platform that offers features and support to run A/B tests across multiple growth channels. Its enterprise-ready advanced features include full stack experimentation, multi-page testing, post-segmentation, sequential testing, targeting with 40+ filters, triggering tests based on data in other apps (data sources), dynamic triggers, complex goal tracking, and a secure API. It includes 90+ out-of-the box integrations in a…
$399
per month up to 100k tested users per month
Oracle Marketing
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Oracle CX Marketing (formerly Oracle Marketing Cloud) is a solution designed to enable marketers to plan and execute automated marketing campaigns via email, display search, video advertising, and mobile while delivering a personalized customer experience for their prospects.
$2,000
per month
Pricing
Convert Experiences
Oracle Marketing
Editions & Modules
Growth
$399
per month 100k tested users per month
Pro
$5040
per year 1.5M tested users/year
Enterprise
Pricing available on request
From 1M tested users/mo (billed annually)
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Convert Experiences
Oracle Marketing
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Optional
Additional Details
1. Annual contract or monthly payments available
2. Pricing is not feature dependent. Some features like integrations, goals, Live Logs are necessary to test successfully. This is why Convert caps by unique tested users - basically visitors who have been bucketed to see a variation and are unique to that variation. As a result the app tested users are always </= the site's net traffic.
CX Marketing pricing is a function of usage.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Convert Experiences
Oracle Marketing
Features
Convert Experiences
Oracle Marketing
Testing and Experimentation
Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Product A and Product B
Convert Experiences
9.3
11 Ratings
10% above category average
Oracle Marketing
-
Ratings
a/b experiment testing
9.911 Ratings
00 Ratings
Split URL testing
10.010 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multivariate testing
9.811 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-page/funnel testing
9.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cross-browser testing
9.57 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile app testing
9.13 Ratings
00 Ratings
Test significance
10.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
Visual / WYSIWYG editor
9.89 Ratings
00 Ratings
Advanced code editor
9.910 Ratings
00 Ratings
Page surveys
9.11 Ratings
00 Ratings
Visitor recordings
9.11 Ratings
00 Ratings
Preview mode
10.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Test duration calculator
7.46 Ratings
00 Ratings
Experiment scheduler
6.95 Ratings
00 Ratings
Experiment workflow and approval
9.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Dynamic experiment activation
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Client-side tests
10.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Server-side tests
8.93 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mutually exclusive tests
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Product A and Product B
Convert Experiences
9.9
11 Ratings
12% above category average
Oracle Marketing
-
Ratings
Standard visitor segmentation
10.010 Ratings
00 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation
9.89 Ratings
00 Ratings
Traffic allocation control
10.010 Ratings
00 Ratings
Website personalization
9.89 Ratings
00 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Product A and Product B
Convert Experiences
9.4
11 Ratings
8% above category average
Oracle Marketing
-
Ratings
Heatmap tool
9.11 Ratings
00 Ratings
Click analytics
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Scroll maps
9.11 Ratings
00 Ratings
Form fill analysis
9.11 Ratings
00 Ratings
Conversion tracking
9.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Goal tracking
9.110 Ratings
00 Ratings
Test reporting
9.99 Ratings
00 Ratings
Results segmentation
9.88 Ratings
00 Ratings
CSV export
9.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
Experiments results dashboard
10.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email & Online Marketing
Comparison of Email & Online Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Convert Experiences
-
Ratings
Oracle Marketing
9.3
133 Ratings
20% above category average
WYSIWYG email editor
00 Ratings
10.0117 Ratings
Dynamic content
00 Ratings
9.0120 Ratings
Ability to test dynamic content
00 Ratings
9.0116 Ratings
Landing pages
00 Ratings
8.0124 Ratings
A/B testing
00 Ratings
10.0118 Ratings
Mobile optimization
00 Ratings
10.0113 Ratings
Email deliverability reporting
00 Ratings
10.0127 Ratings
List management
00 Ratings
9.0126 Ratings
Triggered drip sequences
00 Ratings
9.0108 Ratings
Lead Management
Comparison of Lead Management features of Product A and Product B
Convert Experiences
-
Ratings
Oracle Marketing
8.5
118 Ratings
8% above category average
Lead nurturing automation
00 Ratings
10.0110 Ratings
Lead scoring and grading
00 Ratings
8.0104 Ratings
Data quality management
00 Ratings
8.0109 Ratings
Automated sales alerts and tasks
00 Ratings
8.089 Ratings
Campaign Management
Comparison of Campaign Management features of Product A and Product B
Convert Experiences
-
Ratings
Oracle Marketing
9.5
109 Ratings
25% above category average
Calendaring
00 Ratings
9.094 Ratings
Event/webinar marketing
00 Ratings
10.099 Ratings
Social Media Marketing
Comparison of Social Media Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Convert Experiences
-
Ratings
Oracle Marketing
9.5
72 Ratings
25% above category average
Social sharing and campaigns
00 Ratings
10.070 Ratings
Social profile integration
00 Ratings
9.066 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Convert Experiences
-
Ratings
Oracle Marketing
8.3
123 Ratings
12% above category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
9.0122 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
8.0120 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
8.0113 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Definitely well suited for budget conscious companies that want a solid array of functionality but without having to pay an exorbitant amount. Great for marketing and analytics team members that need the ability to get in and set up tests w/o dev assistance. But, functionality is there for developers to get in and set up more complicated tests.
A duration of one and a half years is enough for us to recognize the capabilities of a tool and in my opinion, this one is just a great tool to manage marketing campaigns of even massive-sized firms. Its marketing automation tool and its way of managing campaign and the way it executes digital initiatives is enough to get an inkling of its abilities. Less favorable for the people who want to have something at a cheap price and are more dependent on the reports as its reports have nothing much in detail.
Over the top powerful Javascript enabled targeting. This feature is called DMP Profiling and is available in the Pro Plan, currently only +$100 more than the plus plan. An article explaining this feature is here for further reading: https://convert.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/206631623-Target-experiment-based-on-a-custom-Javascript-condition-that-evaluates-true-at-a-later-stage. I wrote up a much longer explanation but TR broke it up weirdly. The gist is that you can powerfully use JS to target. This allows me to target users in our SPA in incredibly advanced ways. I can walk their entire history model and assign them an audience value, or I can exclude them. It's MUCH more powerful than just a "Site Area" tool. We recently used it against 900K users to check if they had written a review of their apartment or not yet. This allowed me to only expose the user on the homepage to an experiment that prompted them to write a review while excluding users that couldn't write a review from the experiment (because they had already written one). The experiment converted 50% better than what we do now, generating 9k reviews in a matter of hours.
Audience targeting IN ADDITION to all that fancy DMP targeting. This means I can define demographics or other data as a qualifier AS WELL as the previously mentioned qualifier. This can be setup in so many ways: Traffic source, Visitor Data, Include / Exclude users part of a current experiment (!!), Date/Time, Device/Browser/OS, JS Conditon
Real-time reporting that makes sense to the whole company to view. Seriously, I can share a Convert Report to any level of intelligence on my team and they understand what's happening.
Audiences and Goals are saved as presets, so your entire team can use them. Using the example above, we have an audience called "Wrote a Review" that we exclude from the Review Prompt treatments.
Their customer support is seriously fast at answering questions. I've never had to wait more than a day.
We are aggressive testers and have demanding clients, and if there was any part of the Convert platform where I'd like to see improvement, it would be in the reporting section where I feel a vertical report could present in a more readable fashion to the users.
Integration options outside of auto-syncs. I am currently having an issue trying to find an adapter to use with Eloqua to API into our data warehouse but keep the functionality on the Eloqua side.
To provide more transparency and visual details of the syncs (integrations of outside data) from any other system that is feeding Eloqua, like what is being updated or changed, better explanations of errors, drill down to newly created records.
Custom Objects - Need to have a way to create CDOs outside of just form submissions and uploading of lists, like if you needed to import a file nightly to feed that CDO data but automate the import and make sure it maps to a contact record.
Import of data from a file on SFTP - There is no way to filter or create logic to control what is being fed into Eloqua. Currently, that manipulation has to be done by the IT side first. Less flexibility.
Better auditing capabilities within the canvas. meaning, sometimes if something is changed or not working the problem may not necessarily show up in immediately, the pattern could take a while to present itself. For example, the feeders into the program. If there is a problem, I don't know that maybe contacts are not entering the program until we do reporting that month and realize there was a lull of contacts going through. Then we have a whole month of missed records or other potential data issues. When you get do large and your Eloqua machine is very robust, the harder it is to see everything
Be able to add more than 250 custom contact records. That definitely inhibits my organization in how we need to use that record.
We have been able to automate so many marketing processes with Eloqua over the past 5 years that the only direction would be to adopt the latest and greatest features Eloqua adds. The alternative would be to go back to the marketing stone-age and start over again. And we would rather move forward with increased automation and efficiency.
To use the platform in the context of developing enhanced tests that stretch the platform there is as with most things a learning curve. However, if you're a casual user or have standard experiments that you wish to run you would be easily able to hit the ground running.
Personally, I find it quite easy to use. But for those members of our team who have little or no testing experience, it's been a bit more difficult. There's also training required for development teams in order to have your campaigns coded and set up in the most efficient way. Our developers have been able to do basic and intermediate tests with no difficulty, and they find the interface itself quite intuitive... it's just the extremely complex tests that require a bit more understanding.
There are occasional complaints about slowness to refresh a screen or build a report. However, this is as much a factor of network access speeds as the system itself, since often the complaints occur when someone is accessing on a wireless network.
We found that we often were telling support people how the system worked. Because we were on E9 that created a lot of support issues as well since few people on the support team seemed to know how E9 worked. That was mostly okay except when we had major system issues (like SSO preventing us from logging in after an update), it became really hard to get answers that weren't vague. It was always the issues that had the highest visibility within the organization (like with Sales) that seemed to take forever to resolve and didn't have a clear escalation path. When Oracle switched Eloqua over to the Oracle support portal it just got worse
They offer very basic classes which are required for master certification.
After having been through it, I would not consider anyone with a master certification any more qualified, unlike Salesforce.com certification which is a more difficult thing to acquire. For example, one of the classes towards certification was around social media. I would have expected examples of how to incorporate into campaigns in the product, with a demo and hands-on test. Instead, it was a powerpoint slideshow that went on way too long and covered really basic stuff like “what is Facebook, what is Twitter”
Ok, so, this sounds like it could be horrible because it was all remote, but we loved it... the Adobe training environment was easy to use, and the trainers were engaging. It was simple to switch back and forth between the meeting and the hands-on exercises in their training instances. We took the fundamentals training early in our implementation-- before the consultants came onsite-- and I know this made a big difference in our implementation, because we were able to ask informed questions throughout
I give it a 10 because the only issue we had was a result of not following the guidance we were given. Maxymiser provided a customized implementation guide for each site where we were adding the code. On our site implementations when we followed that guide to the letter, it was extremely fast and easy and has worked very well.
Convert was selected based on price point, feature set, and UI/UX. All three are very friendly to new testers and small to mid-market size companies. Their UI and tool workflow is the best out of all of the non-enterprise solutions that I have tried. There is some small room for improvement, but that only really affects power users or tests that require significant coding/development work to execute.
It was quite complex to generate segments with Adobe analytics and I wasn’t personally satisfied with the overall performance of Adobe Analytics and wasn’t enough flexible in any way. So we decided to switch to something else better than Adobe Analytics and is available in the market at a cheap rate and we ended up doing our research for the most suitable tool at Oracle Infinity and we don’t regret our decision.
Eloqua is definitely good for larger companies that have 100,000+ contacts and complex marketing workflows and data. Personalization is fairly robust with Eloqua for larger campaigns with smart content and features. Scaling across channels is also seamless - as the platform has great options for non-email channels like SMS, Direct Mail, Chat, etc.
Using Convert has allowed us to make quick decisions on site edits and price changes. Seeing and sharing quick results makes our operations much more profitable.
Connecting the tests with Shopify has produced very valuable and timely results that we can act upon as soon as we see statistically significant results.
We are able to use it to help our clients scale through testing
We have been able to measure the impact of our events and sales events so we can determine which events to continue in the future and determine future investment
Launch a new brand out of Eloqua and measure awareness