Crunchbase vs PitchBook

• Funding news - Huge strength to know immediately when a funding round is available.
• UX/UI super easy to navigate making it a simple tool to use for early sales reps.

Read full review

• Extremely well-researched data, critical to any M&A decision.
• Customer support: real humans respond, and follow-up diligently.
• High trust resource: provides private company information too, which is far more valuable/ harder to access than public.

Read full review

• Timely data. We also use Owler for company funding alerts. Since Owler scans the web for press releases from the set of companies you follow, it is often more "on time" when it comes to major funding rounds. Crunchbase usually catches up within the month.
• There are data discrepancies sometimes between a company profile on Crunchbase vs that company's profile on LinkedIn. It could be that Crunchbase is more accurate, but we just don't know.

Read full review

• Missing functionality: At times the ability to drill down further by transaction type and/or security was not available, and necessitated further data manipulation in Excel to arrive at the desired result.

Read full review

• Crunchbase has been great and given us a lot of new companies to go after that have received funding and turned into great meetings. We do not pay a ton, so the ROI is great.
• We have nothing but positive results using Crunchbase and rely on it heavily for prospecting.
• It might add more value if we get a more expensive or advanced version.

Read full review

• Undetermined-- we just didn't see a big enough ROI as a small firm to justify a continued subscription.

Read full review