Deltek Talent Management is a suite of modules for talent management. Modules include Talent Acquisition, Performance, Development, Compensation, and Learning. These modules enable employee hiring, onboarding, training, and performance management.
N/A
Hire by Google (discontinued)
Score8.5 out of 10
N/A
Hire, by Google, was a recruiting app for G suite customers. The product includes functionality for applicant tracking, candidate relationship management, and candidate sourcing. Google sunsetted the product in late 2020.
N/A
Pricing
Deltek Talent Management
Hire by Google (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Deltek Talent Management
Hire by Google (discontinued)
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Deltek Talent Management
Hire by Google (discontinued)
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Deltek Talent Management and Hire by Google (discontinued)
Feature
Deltek Talent Management
8.4
7 Ratings
15% above category average
Hire by Google (discontinued)
-
Ratings
New hire portal
9.15 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
7.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Compliance tracking and reporting
9.14 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Deltek Talent Management and Hire by Google (discontinued)
Feature
Deltek Talent Management
8.7
4 Ratings
17% above category average
Hire by Google (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Corporate goal setting
9.14 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subordinate goal setting
9.14 Ratings
00 Ratings
Individual goal setting
8.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
8.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance tracking
9.14 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Deltek Talent Management and Hire by Google (discontinued)
Feature
Deltek Talent Management
8.6
4 Ratings
23% above category average
Hire by Google (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Performance plans
9.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plan weighting
7.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manager note taking
9.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
9.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Review status tracking
9.14 Ratings
00 Ratings
Rater nomination workflow
7.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Review reminders
9.14 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow restrictions
8.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
9.13 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting
9.14 Ratings
00 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Deltek Talent Management and Hire by Google (discontinued)
Feature
Deltek Talent Management
8.4
3 Ratings
21% above category average
Hire by Google (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Create succession plans/pools
8.22 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate ranking
7.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate search
9.13 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate development
9.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Deltek Talent Management and Hire by Google (discontinued)
Feature
Deltek Talent Management
8.3
5 Ratings
15% above category average
Hire by Google (discontinued)
8.1
1 Ratings
2% above category average
Job Requisition Management
8.05 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Company Website Posting
9.14 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Publish to Social Media
7.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting
9.14 Ratings
1.01 Ratings
Customized Application Form
9.14 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Resume Management
9.14 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention
6.43 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate Search
9.14 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Applicant Tracking
7.34 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Collaboration
9.14 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Task Creation and Delegation
7.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email Templates
8.24 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
User Permissions
9.14 Ratings
00 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts
9.14 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Reporting
7.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Learning Management
Comparison of Learning Management features of Deltek Talent Management and Hire by Google (discontinued)
Once you know how to utilize the filters, it is very handy when looking for something specific. However, it requires a bit of handholding to get to that point. Also, adjusting hours for artists is pretty quick which is useful when needing to do something right away, especially on a meeting call.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Google Hire is very good at doing the basics well. I believe for most internal HR departments at small companies, this is all you need. It also works well for small to medium-sized staffing companies that just want something reliable and easy to use. What Google Hire doesn't do very well is be flexible. They don't have custom options, they don't have a ton of settings, and their development cycle is slow. As a result, it's pretty much what you see is what you get.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It is very easy to know which employees have a detachment in the activities they carry out. What I like the most about Deltek is that it allows me to visualize in real time, the performance that each employee has had depending on the assignments fulfilled in the labor sector. The real-time reports are very detailed, it offers information on work time, the activities carried out, assignments fulfilled and not fulfilled, and it also performs an automated process to know how effective each of the assignments fulfilled has brought to the company.
It has excellent integration with our workforce management software. This integration is what has allowed us to obtain these great results, since it allows us to transfer all the data collected about the work of each employee, and automates the analysis of the data collected, providing us with a detailed report on the performance and prominence of the various employees.
The support and technical assistance Deltek provides is second to none. When I started using this software in my Marketing sector, I had several questions about the compensation system and how I could apply it to my employees. The doubts were answered in a live chat, with precise answers.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Google does search well so when I search through our database for candidates, I'm confident that I'm pulling up all the right people from what we have.
They have a modern and nice user interface - this is one of the biggest reasons to use it over other systems, as most ATS' are pretty ancient looking and not very pleasant to use.
Their support is very good at answering and addressing questions.
Their pricing is incredible. I'm sure at some point it will change, but for small companies paying 100+ per user for other ATS' - it's incredible to pay 100/month for the whole company.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The user interface is crammed with stuff and it's sometimes hard to find where you need to be at any given time. For example, you can't just use the search bar to find all people in the system named "Maria". You need to know whether she is a "resume", a "candidate" or an "employee", or use one of the menus to search in a different window.
It's not very Canadian-friendly. The options for cross posting are mostly American or Spanish.
The onboarding isn't the greatest. They have lots of options for creating e-signable documents, but some of the most necessary information (like tax forms) are not able to be e-signed, so candidates were having to do some forms online and print some off and they were getting very confused and we had to scrap the whole endeavour.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Despite many many months of requests, Google still hasn't implemented ANY custom fields. This makes it tough for an external recruiting firm to track what they want (most importantly: desired salary).
The job board integration is not great for external recruiters, mostly at the fault of Indeed. Indeed flagged us as a recruiting firm and so none of our jobs actually go live. While I know this is an Indeed problem (we had the same problem when using Bullhorn), Breezy ATS never has that problem for us so I don't know what they're doing differently.
Their development cycles are quite frankly very slow. I've requested some features, and while support is great about telling me it's coming or in the pipeline, I honestly don't really see a difference in the product since we started using it. It's still great to use, and we still love the software, but there haven't been too many visible improvements that make any difference to our work.
Being Google, it can sometimes be frustrating that one arm doesn't talk to the other. For example, they announced a Gmail for Works App/Extension integration, but for some reason when they launched it, admins of a domain couldn't install it. Google Hire pointed to the Google for Works team, and it took literally months to fix. Not the end of the world, but just very silly considering they're the same company.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
HRSmart would actually be my last choice of these (lynda.com isn't an ATS so it would come in ahead, but the training on lynda.com is excellent). We are actually switching over to BirdDogHR based on functionality, price, usage and ease of use. HRSmart is an ok system, but there are better and more affordable options out there.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I picked Google Hire after spending about 3 months on Bullhorn. I found Bullhorn to be terrible. It's WAY more customizable and theoretically powerful, but it's also a pain to set up and maintain. Even just getting your job page set up on your own site required tech support. Getting it eventually to what you want could be a great benefit, but Google Hire does great right out of the box and is a lot cheaper. Breezy HR is a great system. It's a bit more expensive than Google Hire for multiple job postings, but their system is equally easy to use and straight forward. However, we are all in on Google Products, so it was just a no brainer to go with Hire for a better price and most likely a better search function.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Absolutely improved our candidate managemenr capability. Before we simply had three piles of resumes on our desk for each position (yes, no, and not yet reviewed). HRSmart changed all of that.
Our cost per hire was positively affected. We were hiring at a high volume and this soltion facilitated us doing that very efficiently.
Our ability to share candidates across open positions turned out to be a huge plus.
Not having to copy or scan resumes and send them via interoffice mail was HUGE in terms of efficiency gain.
HRSmart made it easier for candidates to apply for openings and that increased our applicant flow for open/posted positions. This translates into better hires in the end.
Google Hire makes, unfortunately, a very little impact on our ROI, but I think in the ATS world that's a good thing. It simply acts as a record that we can put everything in and easily reference, and the fact that it works overall makes it a positive software product in the long run.
While the search works great, I don't know that I've ever specifically found a candidate and placed them due to it. That could be a result of our job reqs though.
The biggest most obvious impact is really just the price. We needed a tool that does what Google Hire does, reliably. Most other companies charge at least 150 or so for 2 people, whereas Google Hire is 100/month for many users. It gives us flexibility for the future and helps minimize what could be a big expense. That definitely helps our bottom line.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info