Epicor Eclipse vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Epicor Eclipse
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
Epicor Eclipse is an end-to-end business system for wholesale distributors, as well as electrical, HVAC, plumbing and PVF businesses. Eclipse simplifies complex distribution processes found in today’s dynamic supply chains.N/A
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Score 5.4 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics GP is an ERP software with accounting capabilities. It includes various packs for customizability and features tailored to specific industries’ needs. GP is offered as a perpetual license or subscription.N/A
Pricing
Epicor EclipseMicrosoft Dynamics GP
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Epicor EclipseMicrosoft Dynamics GP
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Epicor EclipseMicrosoft Dynamics GP
Considered Both Products
Epicor Eclipse
Chose Epicor Eclipse
I wasn't involved in this process. We don't consider changing ERPs because our user base is too large, and it would take too many resources.
Chose Epicor Eclipse
I have not finished my comparison
Chose Epicor Eclipse
NetSuite ERP and Oracle Cloud Functions
Chose Epicor Eclipse
Most of my experience has been with Epicor's Prophet 21. For most distribution verticals, Prophet 21 is the only way to go. The comparison I've drawn is this: Prophet 21 is like a ferrari. Epicor Eclipse is like a reliable donkey. Both get you from point A to point B but …
Chose Epicor Eclipse
There aren't any better industry specific ones, but I have looked at Dynamics 365, SAP, Odoo, and others to see if a more robust, configurable, ERP could be customized to suit our industry. Not yet, but the balance is tipping away from Eclipse.
Chose Epicor Eclipse
The first company that I worked for in the wholesale industry had an in house ERP. This ERP, I thought at the time was really great. When I started using e-term, I realized that my first experience of an ERP was not as strong as it could have been.
Chose Epicor Eclipse
Since we have been on Eclipse for 13 years, our only comparison to other business systems is when training new employees and ask those new users their opinions during training. In general, nearly all new users of Solar Eclipse are impressed by the ease of use, ease of …
Chose Epicor Eclipse
Been using Eclipse for almost 20 years. It would take something major to make us look elsewhere.
Chose Epicor Eclipse
Epicor Eclipse was here when I started 2 years ago. SAP and Great Plains were used at previous employers. Epicor Eclipse versus the others, I would say that Eclipse has the edge in terms of the learning curve for new employees because of how easy it is to use. However, it is …
Chose Epicor Eclipse
Eclipse is more user friendly
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Microsoft Dynamics GP is obviously superior to the other platforms I’ve used simply in its robustness and GAAP compliance features, but with far less usability and even in someways less usable reporting.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Business Central wasn't out then. Nav, the predecessor, was out, but its user interface was dated until 2009, when the role-tailored client came out; it was much better afterwards. If your company has manufacturing, then Business Central is the way to go. It's unfortunate that …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
It is more powerful in features and ease of use as Microsoft GP provides an intuitive user interface leading to quicker adoption.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Xero is easier to use, closer to Quickbooks. Most of the background GL is automated, where as in GP it is not.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Due to the size of our company Microsoft Dynamics GP works better for us than Quickbooks because of the reporting capabilities. However, the NetSuite demo proved to be much more user-friendly with more reporting capabilities.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Because GP doesn't do CRM we have looked at D365 Customer Engagement for our field service, and F&O as a replacement. Vaporware, no direct upgrade path, and if you want to continue with GP for your back office and just use Field Service it's an insanely complex integration …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Quickbooks, SAP, and Netsuite. We are a small-sized business so Dynamics GP is better for our business.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
There are more features and products overall in the Microsoft package at a better price point. Overall, Salesforce has a much sleeker and more user-friendly design.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
We moved from Epicor Eagle N Series to Dynamics GP as an accounting solution for our new POS system. I believe Dynamics GP has more options to create and present financial statements for a large company with many regions and districts. However, because of the weakness of our …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
They both accomplish the same thing, I think Oracle was what I first learned and thus making the change to Microsoft Dynamics GP just took a little bit of time to learn the technology. After you get the hang of it, it becomes much easier and I taught my coworkers how to use it.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
I did not pick Dynamics over Salesforce, my company was using it and eventually switched over to Salesforce. I would say that Dynamics is user-friendly and the interface is quite easy to understand. I really like the reporting capabilities as well. Once again, the aesthetic …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
GP is more robust than QuickBooks bar none.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
At the time of purchase, Microsoft Dynamics GP seemed more appropriate and more in sync with the needs of our company. The software was more responsive, user-friendly and it allowed for more flexibility with the way it was intended to be used. We were also promised better …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
My recollection of Quickbooks pro isn't great, and it was over 10 years ago. Obviously many things have changed in that time frame, so any comparison would likely not be relevant.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
The only product with have shopped was Sage Intacct. It is somewhat unfair to compare the two solutions, because Sage Intacct is a cloud-based solution. That said, Intacct appears to advertise better reporting/business intelligence capabilities. MS Dynamics GP should be aware …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Microsoft Dynamics GP is one of the best ERP's for a medium or small business in the market today. When we were looking for the right software, it had already a connection developed with our 3rd party logistics system, so the decision was pretty easy since the logistic / supply …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Dynamics GP is much more flexible and enterprise-oriented than Quickbooks Pro or similar software. It can support many more users and scenarios. However it requires more dedicated infrastructure (such as servers and databases) and more dedicated IT resources to maintain and …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
I love Dayforce for payroll. It has been configured to meet all our needs, is user-friendly and the customer support is fantastic. We originally moved from MDGP payroll to Ceridian Insync payroll due to the issues we had. We upgraded to Dayforce and are very happy with the …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Learning GP with so many resources from the GP community has been easy. Someone always has the answer or suggestions to point me in the right direction. I've had very few instances where the systems caused an error that required research in order to fix the glitch.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
We looked at several general ledger software packages. We had excellent customer service and implementation guidance through a third party. Having a knowledgeable consultant is critical to a successful implementation.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Quickbooks Pro and GP are not on the same playing field. GP is a full account system adhering to GAAP, while QuickBooks is designed for the small business market. While starting out with QuickBooks is easy, if you plan to grow, you will soon outgrow it.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Microsoft Dynamics is a good, easy to use product for entities that do not have advanced manufacturing.
If I were to go into a distribution or service type business I would highly recommend it.
If I were to go into an advanced manufacturing environment I would not consider GP.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
More user friendly in certain areas and much more cost effective to manage and support
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
TechSoup had great privcing, I had experince with GP in previous companys and there are a lot of staff accountants who have relevant experience.
Features
Epicor EclipseMicrosoft Dynamics GP
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
7.8
Ratings
5% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.4
Ratings
17% below category average
Pay calculation8.10 Ratings6.20 Ratings
Benefit plan administration8.10 Ratings5.80 Ratings
Direct deposit files8.10 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management00 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Reimbursement management00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
6.5
Ratings
15% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
4.3
Ratings
55% below category average
API for custom integration6.10 Ratings2.50 Ratings
Plug-ins6.80 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
6.1
Ratings
32% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.9
Ratings
17% below category average
Single sign-on capability5.60 Ratings5.70 Ratings
Role-based user permissions6.70 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
5.2
Ratings
36% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.4
Ratings
37% below category average
Dashboards5.40 Ratings3.40 Ratings
Standard reports5.40 Ratings6.20 Ratings
Custom reports4.70 Ratings6.40 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
7.2
Ratings
7% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.0
Ratings
42% below category average
Accounts payable7.30 Ratings6.30 Ratings
Accounts receivable7.40 Ratings5.80 Ratings
Global Financial Support7.30 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers7.40 Ratings4.70 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations7.10 Ratings4.60 Ratings
Configurable Accounting7.00 Ratings3.80 Ratings
Standardized Processes7.00 Ratings6.20 Ratings
Cash management00 Ratings6.30 Ratings
Bank reconciliation00 Ratings5.60 Ratings
Expense management00 Ratings4.40 Ratings
Time tracking00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Fixed asset management00 Ratings4.50 Ratings
Multi-currency support00 Ratings2.80 Ratings
Multi-division support00 Ratings3.00 Ratings
Regulations compliance00 Ratings3.20 Ratings
Electronic tax filing00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Self-service portal00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting00 Ratings3.80 Ratings
Localizations00 Ratings4.50 Ratings
Enterprise Accounting00 Ratings2.80 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework00 Ratings3.50 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
6.5
Ratings
21% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
4.4
Ratings
50% below category average
Inventory tracking6.70 Ratings5.90 Ratings
Automatic reordering6.20 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Location management6.40 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Manufacturing module00 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
7.1
Ratings
11% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
3.6
Ratings
70% below category average
Pricing7.00 Ratings3.60 Ratings
Order entry8.30 Ratings3.60 Ratings
Credit card processing6.90 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold6.70 Ratings5.10 Ratings
Order Orchestration7.40 Ratings5.10 Ratings
End-to-end order visibility00 Ratings3.60 Ratings
Order exception Resolution00 Ratings3.40 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
7.0
Ratings
7% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Billing Management7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management7.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management5.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting5.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Period Close7.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
5.7
Ratings
28% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting6.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Costing7.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost Capture6.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Capital Project Management6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
6.7
Ratings
5% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling6.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers7.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
7.5
Ratings
1% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management6.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
6.3
Ratings
11% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Authoring7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Repository6.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Supplier Management7.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
5.9
Ratings
12% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Risk Repository6.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Control Management7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments6.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue Detection7.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification6.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
5.3
Ratings
27% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization5.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management6.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management6.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management6.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
6.3
Ratings
17% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Production Process Design7.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Production Management7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Configuration Management7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Work Execution8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
6.1
Ratings
18% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Forecasting7.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Planning7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring6.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
6.7
Ratings
9% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Proposal Management7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Epicor EclipseMicrosoft Dynamics GP
Small Businesses
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 9.3 out of 10
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
Score 5.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.3 out of 10
Zoho Books
Zoho Books
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Score 7.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Epicor EclipseMicrosoft Dynamics GP
Likelihood to Recommend
7.3
(0 ratings)
4.1
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
4.3
(0 ratings)
9.9
(0 ratings)
Usability
6.7
(0 ratings)
5.4
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.1
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.1
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.5
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
4.5
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Configurability
4.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
4.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
4.5
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Epicor EclipseMicrosoft Dynamics GP
Likelihood to Recommend
The capabilities, when combined with some of the integration offerings, make for a really nice platform. Coming from another company where we had several systems for processing inbound, outbound, e-commerce, sales, etc., it is nice to have everything contained in one system. makes communication within the company easier and teaching easier.
Read full review
Microsoft Dynamics GP is well-suited for our environment, as we pay a diverse group of employees, including on-the-road drivers, shop employees (some in other locations), and office employees. It easily tracks time off, taxes, pay, etc. The reporting allows us to verify with our drivers how they are paid each week, whether it be through mileage or stop-offs.
Read full review
Pros
  • Great for retail sales and it works well with ipads, scanners, credit card machines and was easy to implement.
  • Initial support, setting up Eclipse and ensuring that everything works correctly was a huge benefit. We were off running from the start.
  • Epicor has continuing education on its products and offers alternatives for things they cant do.
Read full review
  • User friendly interface
  • Able to be extended into multiple areas of your business
  • One feature we have been using for a few years is EFT for payables - it has significantly reduced the time spent paying vendors and reduced our check printing and mailing costs. It is very easy to setup and use.
Read full review
Cons
  • In my opinion, Epicor seems to want to sell add-on products constantly. They don't provide pricing at the beginning, but then rely on sticker shock and hidden costs (e.g. APIs)
  • There are times when we cannot figure out where numbers are coming from, especially costs. It would be nice if there was a way to see, in plain English, where a cost is coming from.
  • It seems unconscionable that we are unable to print financial statements to a pdf file.
  • In our experience, Support, which had been going well for a while, has become much less reliable and not very timely.
Read full review
  • Supply chain management is adequate but not exceptional, and there are challenges tying the product to a website front end. These features are present and work fine in many environments but are often lacking for customers who need more robust systems.
  • Reporting tools often require consulting expertise or an internal business analyst to develop. Many smaller companies don't have this skill set, so it can be costly to upgrade to GP from a smaller packages like QuickBooks.
  • Some features that are available in competing products are still not present in GP, such as full copy-paste functionality and more intelligent workflow/batch processing functions.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
I use it every day and can't see a reason why I would stop unless I started a new job. If I were to leave my present position, the new job would be much more attractive if they were Eclipse users.
Read full review
Due the economic challenges that Puerto Rico is having, the company has had to merge some companies in order to be more efficient. It has been easy in GP to process those merges, even thought we had to spend days to accomplish that the process was smooth and accurate. In addition we were able to streamline the purchasing and sales process and the organization is confident to keep renewing GP for the future versions.
Read full review
Usability
Epicor Eclipse has saved our organization from financial mismanagement, which could lead to operational inefficiencies. It has streamlined purchase orders and invoice processing, reducing instances of underpayment and overpayment. It has enhanced the segmentation of financial statements by store and by day, making it easier to track profitability.
Read full review
Menus are generally quite difficult to navigate, user-friendliness is lacking, platform can at times be unstable (crashes, etc), reports tha would seem to report one thing do not actually return that data. Usability is probably the biggest weakness of Microsoft Dynamics GP.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
I haven't experienced any outages in the two years I have been using the system. It is always available as long as the computer is up. The only time I have seen it not be available was on occasions where we lost internet, or power and then we lost access to everything, not just Epicor Eclipse.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
Everything in this system moves fairly quickly, that may be in part because we are a small company with only 21 users on the system at a time, or it may just be a the way the Epicor Eclipse works for any size company with any number of users. I can only speak for what I know and say that it is fast for our purposes.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
The tier 1 support is trying, and sometimes they are successful. Sometimes they aren't. This topic isn't as black and white as the questions might suggest. Currently their Tier 1 support team is over seas, all items automatically go to Tier 1 and then when they can't help they either escalate it or tell me they need to check with someone else and they will get back to me. If they escalate me to Tier 2, then the issue comes back to the States and the support is usually at a higher knowledge/experience level and it can get resolved fairly quickly. If they don't escalate, then it might take weeks and multiple follow ups on my part before I either get a satisfactory resolution or finally get escalated.
Read full review
The rating is directed to the thrid party serive provider that we use. I do not now how good the Microsoft direct support is.
Read full review
In-Person Training
The training classes that I have attended have been top notch. The presenters are extremely knowledgeable on their subject matter, including real-world application of the system. They aren't just software techs training end users, they seem to be end users that have become experts in the over functionality and capabilities of the system.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
The on-line training is very good, and it is taught by the same people that do the live in-person training sessions. The difficult part of it is, asking questions about your specific company's nuances or special circumstances. I don't remember if you can access the on-line training sessions after you have taken them for reminders purposes, but if so that is a great asset.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
I don't really know about the implementation, it was back in 1998 and I didn't start here until 2016. By the time I started here they had been running it for a number of years and most of the people that were here when it was implemented are no longer here, and the ones that are don't really have much to say about how the implementation went either bad or good.
Read full review
Basically the challenge with this implementation was the Business Portal, too many errors and even the aplication is up and running the users are still having issues. We will start planning the migraton to GP 2015 soon.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Most of my experience has been with Epicor's Prophet 21. For most distribution verticals, Prophet 21 is the only way to go. The comparison I've drawn is this: Prophet 21 is like a ferrari. Epicor Eclipse is like a reliable donkey. Both get you from point A to point B but Prophet 21 is going to get you there much quicker and with the kind of insight into your business that will help you thrive.
Read full review
Because GP doesn't do CRM we have looked at D365 Customer Engagement for our field service, and F&O as a replacement. Vaporware, no direct upgrade path, and if you want to continue with GP for your back office and just use Field Service it's an insanely complex integration import/export. D365 F&O is a huge implementation cost, and without a direct migration path every bit of data has to be custom imported. There really is no straightforward way to stack up GP against these programs currently. Again, the future of GP is in some doubt.
Read full review
Scalability
I don't really know about the scalability. It's the same as it was when I started, I do know that you can buy more user licenses, but I think they come in packs of 5, which can be a problem if you only need 1 and will never use the other 4. But, again I'm not sure on that.
Read full review
The functionality that GP and related ISV solutions offer and the ease of integration of GP to other systems makes it an extremely scalable solution
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Reporting features allow tracking items trending downward which can glut inventory space and dollars if not adjusted
  • GMROI reports help analyze turn ratios and adjusted dollar values and margins of product lines.
  • Suggested Purchase Order features allowed controlled inventory purchases which avoid lost sales while managing overall dollars invested in an acquired product with the lowest freight costs possible.
Read full review
  • We have never missed a payroll using Great Plains. We have the ability to fix any issues that come up quickly.
  • It streamlines our departments that handle money into one unified system. This gives accounting and finance the overall picture in one system.
  • With Integration Manager we have to worry less about taking time to hand key transactions. This cuts down on entry time and increase efficiency for our clerks.
Read full review
ScreenShots