FileHold Document Management vs. PandaDoc
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FileHold Document Management | Score7.7 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | FileHold is a document and records management software. FileHold is integrated with both Microsoft Office and Microsoft Teams and provides secure single log in to both FileHold and Office 365. FileHold can be deployed on a customers own servers or private cloud or hosted by FileHold on the Azure Cloud Standard features include; document scanning, version control, search, tagging, full user audit trail, archiving and scheduled disposition. Out of the box, users can search the FileHold… | $30 per month per seat |
PandaDoc | Score8.5 out of 10 | N/A | PandaDoc headquartered in San Francisco offers their eponymous electronic signature platform for sales teams, containing sales proposal automation and CPQ (configure, price, quote) features, and integration with CRMs. | $35 per month per seat |
| FileHold Document Management | PandaDoc | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | In all cases the price per user will decrease as more users are added to the system. FileHold has many optional and custom features that can be chosen and will change the price. For outright purchase of a license there is an optional 20% per year support and upgrade fee. | PandaDoc offers a free eSign plan and 3 paid packages for eSigning and document automation. All plans include unlimited documents and eSignatures. Evaluations start with a free 14-day trial. Up to a 46% discount for annual pricing. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| FileHold Document Management | PandaDoc | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 96% Would buy again 222 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 97% Delivers good value for the price 204 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 96% Happy with the feature set 221 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 97% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 174 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 97% Implementation went as expected 182 Answers | |
| FileHold Document Management | PandaDoc | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | M‑Files Score8.9 out of 10 | BoldSign, by Syncfusion Score10 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Esker Score7.4 out of 10 | OneSpan Sign Score9.6 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Tungsten Capture Score9.5 out of 10 | DocuSign Score8.7 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| FileHold Document Management | PandaDoc | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.0 | 8.5 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 9.1 |
| Usability | 6.0 | 8.3 |
| Availability | - | 9.1 |
| Performance | 7.0 | 9.6 |
| Support Rating | - | 6.1 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 6.3 |
| Configurability | - | 2.8 |
| Ease of integration | 6.0 | 9.0 |
| Product Scalability | - | 8.6 |
| Vendor post-sale | - | 9.7 |
| Vendor pre-sale | - | 6.7 |
| FileHold Document Management | PandaDoc | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Performance |
|
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Scalability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | FileHold Document Management Screenshots | PandaDoc Screenshots |












