Attribution in Google Analytics vs. JAGGAER

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Attribution in Google Analytics
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
Attribution in Analytics is Google's free cross-channel, multi-touch attribution solution. It's currently released as a beta feature and is based on the former Adometry, a cross-channel marketing analytics and attribution platform that was acquired by Google in May 2014.N/A
JAGGAER
Score 6.6 out of 10
N/A
JAGGAER is a procure-to-pay provider in the higher education and government sectors. JAGGAER eProcurement and strategic sourcing customers gain access to suppliers on a scalable, customizable platform. The JAGGAER SaaS-based, source-to-settle solution provides unparalleled visibility, insights and recommendations to procurement leaders and suppliers. The result is a fluid supply chain driven by spend analysis, contract management, and an accounts payable solutions.N/A
Pricing
Attribution in Google AnalyticsJAGGAER
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Attribution in Google AnalyticsJAGGAER
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Attribution in Google AnalyticsJAGGAER
Best Alternatives
Attribution in Google AnalyticsJAGGAER
Small Businesses
Branch
Branch
Score 7.4 out of 10
MIP Fund Accounting
MIP Fund Accounting
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Piano Analytics
Piano Analytics
Score 7.4 out of 10
Precoro
Precoro
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Piano Analytics
Piano Analytics
Score 7.4 out of 10
SAP Cloud ERP
SAP Cloud ERP
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Attribution in Google AnalyticsJAGGAER
Likelihood to Recommend
6.3
(4 ratings)
9.0
(35 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
7.4
(17 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(5 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(3 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(9 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(1 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(3 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(3 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Attribution in Google AnalyticsJAGGAER
Likelihood to Recommend
Google
This is a key tool when working between clients & their advertising. We provide amazing value when these reports are set up properly (tagging, sound analysis, & QA'ing the data). It isn't a report we would trust to send directly to clients, as we need to do frequent data cleansing.
Read full review
JAGGAER
As a purchasing app, it is excellent. I cannot speak to its usefulness in the AP area. it may be less useful in a different environment, such as manufacturing. For research and healthcare use, it is excellent. Also, we use Banner as our ERP. SciQuest is well versed with integrating with Banner. Users with a different ERP may experience less pleasant results.
Read full review
Pros
Google
  • Traffic Analytics
  • Geo Analytics
  • Campaign Analytics
Read full review
JAGGAER
  • Source to settle: Although we did not purchase all the new applications in the suite SciQuest made, what we did use, worked and worked nicely. With SciQuest you can get a turn-key system.
  • I love the way SciQuest rolls out changes, measuring customer feedback, and rolling out major changes 3 times a year. Like clockwork you know what to expect ahead of time, deciding whether or not you need a particular enhancement (if optional), having plenty of time to make adjustments in business processes if needed, and/or user-base announcements.
  • I was always astonished to see both clients and potential clients come to the conferences. SciQuest would allow the "mixing" of clients and potential clients, apparently unafraid of any negative commentaries the potential clients might get. That has always been impressive to me as a techie myself.
Read full review
Cons
Google
  • Actual customer service agents that can help and answer questions.
  • Better explanation of each and every datapoint.
  • More user-friendly interface and experience.
Read full review
JAGGAER
  • Their existing pricing model for the number of Suppliers onboarded or removed has been a little disappointing as there are times when suppliers do have to be switched out.
  • They have greatly helped in making UNSPSC updating easier, but I would like to be able to get an extract with a delta that would make it easier for us to update our ERP as this information needs to be stored on both sides.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Google
No answers on this topic
JAGGAER
Simplified and user friendly system that has been implemented across our entire institute and with all of our vendors. We really like this program and it works well for us. Changing to another program would be a significant time investment and hassle
Read full review
Usability
Google
No answers on this topic
JAGGAER
There is a 3 month learning curve and then the features are easy to use. My AP team processes 400 invoices daily through the system. The things to watch for are vendor billing mistakes (no/incorrect PO number, information discrepancies) and buyer purchase request inconsistencies. Those are part of AP anyway so maybe it is what it is. The Sciquest AP software performs as designed some improvements needed. In our system I have documented a list of 60 improvements that could increase throughput up to 50%. Those improvements include making the AP records GUI format more customized for AP purposes, and improving the QC tolerance functionality, which can be laborious to sync (Match).
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Google
No answers on this topic
JAGGAER
They have had only a couple of very quick occasions where they were down for 1-2 minutes. One time they had a problem adding attachments. Very Reliable!
Read full review
Performance
Google
No answers on this topic
JAGGAER
Having used SciQuest for over five years and having their competitors, SciQuest offers the best user experience and integration between vendors and ERP.
Read full review
Support Rating
Google
No answers on this topic
JAGGAER
They usually respond to medium-to-low priority issues very quickly, and high priority issues almost instantly. Their support team is knowledgeable and responsive. Their Supplier Enablement team is very good and is a feature that most of their competitors don't have. The company makes a serious effort to maintain good relationships with their customers.
Read full review
Online Training
Google
No answers on this topic
JAGGAER
SciQuest has changed its name to Jaggaer.https://www.jaggaer.com/
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Google
No answers on this topic
JAGGAER
We had an internal project manager who was well versed in PMI methodologies. I think the implementation would have gone far less successfully, or may even have failed entirely, without her. She was able to do all the things a project manager is supposed to do, and in an ordered and organized manner.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Google
Better reporting options and integration with our website AdRoll is great to create campaigns but i like the reporting that Google provides and the ability to add users to our account so different depts can see the data and reporting AdRoll is starting to do more reporting related to attribution though, which is good
Read full review
JAGGAER
Again, our SciQuest system integrates with Banner. Banner does have a way to create, approve and report on POs. However, the SciQuest product is so much more user friendly, so the learning curve is very steep. Also, SciQuest gives us a lot more detail in our reporting and PO history, which is helpful when trying to remember what happened 6 month ago
Read full review
Scalability
Google
No answers on this topic
JAGGAER
Highly reliable remotely hosted PTP solution that interfaces with our remote OCR vendor and with university sited operational servers. Twice a year over the last 3 years a SciQuest/OCR system file handling or network problem occurs that gets fixed within a day.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Google
  • It's not necessarily providing ROI directly, but it's providing insight into how to identify ROI from advertising efforts.
Read full review
JAGGAER
  • Customers seem to be fine with selecting requisition items and having them pushed back via carts to a legacy system.
  • Converting one's legacy ERP system to a SaaS solution may prove to be too much of an overhaul in regards to converting to a new set of rules which do not fit exactly with current business processes. The inability to enhance in great detail is also a drawback for customers coming from a highly modifiable system.
Read full review
ScreenShots