Google Cloud Dialogflow vs. IBM watsonx Orchestrate

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Google Cloud Dialogflow
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
Dialogflow (formerly Api.ai) is a chatbot building tool, designed to give users new ways to interact with digital products by building engaging voice and text-based conversational interfaces powered by AI. Dialogflow was acquired by Google in 2019.N/A
IBM watsonx Orchestrate
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
IBM® watsonx™ Orchestrate® leverages AI to automate complex workflows. The solution helps build, deploy, and manage AI assistants and agents. It offers a catalogue of pre-built agents and tools, low-code agent builder, multi-agent collaboration capabilities, and integrations with enterprise apps.
$500
per month
Pricing
Google Cloud DialogflowIBM watsonx Orchestrate
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Essential
$500
per month per subscription
Essentials
$500
per month Per subscription
Standard
Enterprise
Standard
Enterprise
per month Per subscription
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Google Cloud DialogflowIBM watsonx Orchestrate
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional DetailsIBM watsonx Orchestrate can be deployed and run on IBM Cloud, AWS, or on-premises. Prices shown are indicative, may vary by country, exclude any applicable taxes and duties, and are subject to product offering availability in a locale.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Google Cloud DialogflowIBM watsonx Orchestrate
Considered Both Products
Google Cloud Dialogflow

No answer on this topic

IBM watsonx Orchestrate
Chose IBM watsonx Orchestrate
Similar positions for similar purposes include Google Cloud Dialogflow and Azure AI Bot Service that I have considered. As opposed to Dialogflow, IBM watsonx Assistant is more tightly linked to comprehensive analytical units that provide clearer and more comprehensive data …
Chose IBM watsonx Orchestrate
It focus on enterprise level flexibility and it also provides us cloud and on prem both support which helps in integrating with legacy and modern systems. It has better compliance standards than other competitors. Better data governance and cost effective AI model which is very …
Chose IBM watsonx Orchestrate
My experience working with Microsoft Bot Framework and Dialogflow has shown that Watson Assistant features an intuitive interface combined with powerful analytics. We selected Watson Assistant because it strikes an excellent balance between providing powerful capabilities while …
Chose IBM watsonx Orchestrate
Watson proved to be better and easier to use than Dialogflow. As for Twilio, we used it as an orchestrator in conjunction with Watson.
Chose IBM watsonx Orchestrate
IBM watsonx Assistant more simple and IBM support team very Professional
Chose IBM watsonx Orchestrate
IBM watsonx is clearly superior to yellow.ai. Compared to Google Dialogflow is a tight comparison.
Chose IBM watsonx Orchestrate
Mainly the UI of DialogFlow is not at all developer friendly which will definitely move you to IBM Watson [Assistant] which has the clear UI with multiple options arranged in [a] usable manner.
Chose IBM watsonx Orchestrate
Microsoft NLP approaches are interesting and powerful, but they don't have an easy way to model the interaction between actions like Watson, and they don't have a powerful way to test your virtual agent while you build them. Salesforce Einstein is a basic platform and doesn't …
Chose IBM watsonx Orchestrate
Microsoft's NLP approaches are interesting and powerful, but they don't have an easy way to model the interaction between actions like watsonx, and they don't have a powerful way to test your virtual agents while you build them. Salesforce Einstein is a basic platform and …
Chose IBM watsonx Orchestrate
This part of the review might be not as comprehensive as we haven't done a deep comparison. For our internal use cases, we are already using IBM Watson APIs for speech, text, and image recognition in our products. So it kind of makes sense to continue using the IBM Watson suite …
Chose IBM watsonx Orchestrate
similarly powerful, but not a match in terms of entity definition intended for simpler workflows and problems
Chose IBM watsonx Orchestrate
IBM Watson Assistant is much more complex than all the other products mentioned as it uses AI and NLP from the beginning of the conversation which therefore translates into a better customer experience whereas the others are easier to set up and deploy in the beginning.
Best Alternatives
Google Cloud DialogflowIBM watsonx Orchestrate
Small Businesses
LocaliQ
LocaliQ
Score 8.8 out of 10
Jasper
Jasper
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Piper the AI SDR by Qualified
Piper the AI SDR by Qualified
Score 9.2 out of 10
UiPath Automation Platform
UiPath Automation Platform
Score 8.4 out of 10
Enterprises
Conversica
Conversica
Score 4.1 out of 10
UiPath Automation Platform
UiPath Automation Platform
Score 8.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Google Cloud DialogflowIBM watsonx Orchestrate
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(6 ratings)
7.5
(120 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.4
(4 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(6 ratings)
7.6
(78 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
8.3
(5 ratings)
9.1
(9 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(2 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Professional Services
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Google Cloud DialogflowIBM watsonx Orchestrate
Likelihood to Recommend
Google
Indicated for those who have good knowledge of programming and coding in HTML and JSON, that is, it is not suitable for beginners or users without much technical knowledge. It is suitable for those who want to integrate with various platforms, such as Telegram, Webhat, Facebook Messenger, among others. I also recommend it to anyone who needs to create a chatbot in several languages (it is not automatic translation). Recommended to create new projects in CX environment and not in ES.
Read full review
IBM
In our case, it is well-suited for workday integration, which allows us to automate the entire workflow. However, we are still working on the O9 platform integration, which we feel is less appropriate, and integrating the workflow into the platform.
Read full review
Pros
Google
  • Great at back-and-forth dialogue with the caller
  • Integration with existing contact center plattforms
  • Using the same flow for voice and chat seamlessly
  • Very customizable
Read full review
IBM
  • New and improved natural language processing yielding better results helps the assistants understand the intention behind the query.
  • Preserves context of communication, allowing the customers to establish inquiries on the website and continue on the mobile app without having extra informational input.
  • Intelligent conversations mean that complex paths that are branched based on the user's inputs allow for a much more natural flow of the conversation than fixed scripts.
Read full review
Cons
Google
  • Some of the features are still in beta phase.
  • The languages available are still limited.
  • The advanced features may not be accessible to new users.
Read full review
IBM
  • I think that it needs to be able to integrate better with the knowledge catalogs. It currently provides a default database, which isn't quite large enough for enterprise use. We can connect that then to an external source, but it'd be nice if we could able just to instantiate one straight away.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Google
No answers on this topic
IBM
Currently we are using to develop chatbots based on client provided flow what kind chatbot required for client either button or free text chatbots. we will decided accordingly flow and develop chatbot using IBM Watson. We will integrated custom components if required which is not present in library. Action flow and dialog flow we are currently in chatbot.
Read full review
Usability
Google
Users benefit from Dialogflow's best User Interface and seamless User Experience. It's very scalable, and there are a lot of customization options to make it even more so. Dialogflow makes it simple to deploy, manage, and maintain chatbots. Artificial Intelligence algorithms make chatbots interactive, making it easier for users and chatbots to communicate and understand each other. Overall, it's a good option for those with little programming experience who want to learn Natural Language Processing.
Read full review
IBM
With the growing use of AI and chatbots, it's very easy to use, and the conversational language makes it easier than keyword searches in a document. The contextual language processing is impressive. It's easy to integrate into our internal portal. The use of this tool would depend on each company's security and data sensitivity.
Read full review
Performance
Google
No answers on this topic
IBM
To develop chatbots based on client provided flow what kind chatbot required for client either button or free text chatbots. we will decided accordingly flow and develop chatbot using IBM Watson. We will integrated custom components if required which is not present in library. IBM Watson library anyone can easily learn and develop chatbots.
Read full review
Support Rating
Google
Dialogflow is a wonderful tool that is helping to design customized chatbots. I personally recommend if you wanna know how it's works give it a try with a free APIs call, you'll love this tool
Read full review
IBM
We've rarely had to engage support, but they've always been prompt in responding and very attentive. Support experiences have been extremely positive (but we're mostly happy that we just don't have any cause to routinely need support in the first place!).
Read full review
Online Training
Google
No answers on this topic
IBM
Excellent course material.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Google
No answers on this topic
IBM
Overall the implementation was simple.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Google
There is always use cases for both. We still use the other plattforms but each has its own strengths and weaknesses. We, as a contact center implementation partner always use multiple solutions both for ourselves but also for our customers to meet their needs. In the cases we choose Google Cloud Dialogflow is when we need to be able to handle specific follow-up questions from the customer. And for more complicated issues we also use a combination of this and other 3rd party plattforms. We always meet the need of our customers and as specialist and consultants we give expert advice on how to use all these different solutions in the best way possible.
Read full review
IBM
Make has more community of workflows to follow that have been redeveloped and are available for download. Selecting WxO is based on our trust level with IBM and the propositions of the Granite model being less biased, more business trained, and the ecosystem allowing for expansion with Assistant and Discovery.
Read full review
Scalability
Google
No answers on this topic
IBM
From past 3+ years I am using IBM Watson in our current project easily can implement and manage and monitor user how their using. Is there and update also just update dialog is just enough to change no need to touch any other templates. Multiple language will support, and action and dialog speak recognize chatbot we can create as per client requirement. Overall, as of now good experience with IBM Watson.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Google
  • As a partner to multiple contact center plattforms we have always been able to offer Google Cloud Dialogflow along with them because it integrates well with all.
  • Many businesses want to implement smart ways to have call deflection. Bots that can handle full dialogues with the customer is very intriguing to them because it can fulfill customers requests without using up as many resources
Read full review
IBM
  • By automating tasks that would otherwise require human intervention, organizations may achieve cost savings in terms of labor, especially for handling large volumes of routine inquiries.
  • Virtual assistants can handle a large number of simultaneous interactions, making them scalable to accommodate growing customer bases and increasing workloads without a linear increase in staffing.
Read full review
ScreenShots