Google Jamboard is a collaborative whiteboard, available as an add-on to Google Workspaces.
$4,999
Miro
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Miro provides a visual workspace for innovation that enables distributed teams of any size to dream, design, and build the future together. Today, Miro counts more than 60 million users in 200,000 organizations who use Miro to improve product development collaboration, to speed up time to market, and to make sure that new products and services deliver on customer needs.
$8
per month per user
Pricing
Google Jamboard
Miro
Editions & Modules
Google Jamboard
4,999
1. Free - To discover what Miro can do. Always free
$0
2. Starter - Unlimited and private boards with essential features
$8
per month per user
3. Business - Scales collaboration with advanced features and security
$16
per month per user
4. Enterprise - For work across the entire organization, with support, security and control, to scale
Google Jamboard is a much simpler tool. This is not necessarily a bad thing e.g. if I just want to set up a warm-up exercise for students before we start the session using Miro would be flash over substance. Do not get me wrong, everyone who knows me knows I love Miro but I …
Miro is more user friendly, and interactive as compared to Google Jamboard. Advantages of using jamboard would be that since it's a part of the Google suite, individuals are more comfortable using the tool and tracking changes/updates. Both can be used for collaboration, and …
When comparing Google Jamboard and Miro, one major difference is the canvas size. While Jamboard has a fixed-size canvas, Miro's canvas is infinite, allowing for more flexibility and creativity. Additionally, Miro offers a wide variety of objects that can be placed on the …
FigJam is a strong competitor, and the integration with Figma (which we use for prototyping) is a huge selling point. The template library is not great, so I find in our workplace there is a bit of a mix with a skew towards Miro for its applications in workshops, but a skew …
I couldn't add Teams Whiteboard to the list, but among the three (Mural, Google Jamboard, and Teams Whiteboard) Miro blows them out of the water. I had to use Mural recently for a separate engagement, after having not used for a while, and was really surprised by how little it …
I like Miro's keyboard shortcuts a lot more than Mural. Mural and Google Jamboard have much more limited space than Mural. I like the look of Mural's post it's, they look more like basic shapes in Mural. I like that the background style is different than the frame making it …
Miro seems more user-friendly and encourages collaboration in a more relaxed way. It also offers more explanation and help than other platforms similar in nature when it comes to tool tips. The platform seems more universal than any other similar programs. The feedback feature …
Miro feels so much more expansive than Jamboard, which only seemed to allow a small, fixed area. Miro's features and templates seemed to be on a completely different level. Trello is a rather different product: well suited to a very set format, but it's not nearly as good for …
Miro is for anyone who is looking for great and powerful collaborative and creative tool that enables team to collaborate both asynchronous and synchronous. Also it enables us to effectively communicate with our clients work on different projects together despite the location …
Verified User
Manager
Chose Miro
Miro is much better. It offers the best of these tools and much more. As a direct comparison, it's significantly better than Mural.
As a tool, it's pretty unique and the powerful integrations put in a league of its own. Miro is my go to tool in this regard.
Google is actually decommissioning Jamboard and I think it's because they know other people are doing it much better. Teams also has a whiteboard feature that I find uninspired and I'm unlikely to use it unless it's out of bare necessity. I've never tried Mural so I can't speak …
We still have tutors who prefer how they used to do things. The fact that I am able to convince most (not all) of these often stodgy academics to switch to Miro after one demonstration is a testament to how its simple to use interface is truly unique in the market.
Jamboard felt very clunky compared to Miro. It was also very difficult to make your Jamboards look inviting. Conversely, Miro allows you to layer as much as you want/need. It allows you to easily create boards that work for the needs of your team - whether internal or …
The others are more clunky in my opinion but potentially have a lower barrier to entry. Miro can be smooth and refined but there are a lot of different buttons and functions and dragging techniques and zooming in and out that can be a lot to some.
I prefer Miro over all, but then will use certain tools for specific use cases: Lucid - process work Menti - interactive polling and facilitated sessions UserVoice - crowdsourcing Trello - kanban boards (although Miro is pretty good with this too) Slido - live polling and …
Miro, to me, is the better product hands down. It's easy to learn and teach. As well as creating fun and dynamic collaborative spaces for my teams to use. I found the other products lacking in features or clunky to use. Miro has depth without complexity, and simplicity with …
MSFT Whiteboard is missing features and feels clunky. My company doesnt use Google products so Jamboard doesnt work for large projects, and Canva is a direct competitor to my company. Miro makes financial and experiential sense for us. It feels intuitive, including all of the …
All over both the products are same while using, but when we tried Miro and we felt comfortable and user friendly and like by many staff, so we continued with this. And the design is good, and it's work is like realistic
I believe that Miro is much superior to Jamboard, it has much more functionality and is a more complete tool. Confluence is very good for documenting, but it doesn't work well for designing product flows as it is limited to text. I would say that Miro and Confluence are …
For my part, I really have a user preference for Miro. It allows me to do many of the functions of these other tools more easily. It allows me to create visual compositions, it allows me to do follow-ups and online ideation. I really prefer the responsiveness of the team and …
There are some areas where I really prefer lucidchart - particularly around complex ERDs, process engineering, and impact assessments. lucidchart's integration options and exporting options are all more thorough than Miro. However, Miro is a far superior tool when comparing it …
Miro is the more general use one. We use FigJam for internal projects where it's just designers on the project. But for internal projects with other roles involved Miro quickly becomes the more accessible option. The simplicity is the main driver why we opt for using Miro for …
MURAL is very similar; while MURAL is easier to onboard new users to, Miro's functionality is better in fit for what I do and workshops I run. Jamboard is too limiting - better UX for the small use case it fits, and easier to use with low (technology) maturity users.