Google Jamboard vs. Miro

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Google Jamboard
Score 6.7 out of 10
N/A
Google Jamboard is a collaborative whiteboard, available as an add-on to Google Workspaces.
$4,999
Miro
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Miro provides a visual workspace for innovation that enables distributed teams of any size to dream, design, and build the future together. Today, Miro counts more than 60 million users in 200,000 organizations who use Miro to improve product development collaboration, to speed up time to market, and to make sure that new products and services deliver on customer needs.
$8
per month per user
Pricing
Google JamboardMiro
Editions & Modules
Google Jamboard
4,999
1. Free - To discover what Miro can do. Always free
$0
2. Starter - Unlimited and private boards with essential features
$8
per month per user
3. Business - Scales collaboration with advanced features and security
$16
per month per user
4. Enterprise - For work across the entire organization, with support, security and control, to scale
contact sales
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Google JamboardMiro
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Google JamboardMiro
Considered Both Products
Google Jamboard
Chose Google Jamboard
Google Jamboard is a much simpler tool. This is not necessarily a bad thing e.g. if I just want to set up a warm-up exercise for students before we start the session using Miro would be flash over substance. Do not get me wrong, everyone who knows me knows I love Miro but I …
Chose Google Jamboard
Miro is more user friendly, and interactive as compared to Google Jamboard. Advantages of using jamboard would be that since it's a part of the Google suite, individuals are more comfortable using the tool and tracking changes/updates. Both can be used for collaboration, and …
Miro
Chose Miro
When comparing Google Jamboard and Miro, one major difference is the canvas size. While Jamboard has a fixed-size canvas, Miro's canvas is infinite, allowing for more flexibility and creativity. Additionally, Miro offers a wide variety of objects that can be placed on the …
Chose Miro
FigJam is a strong competitor, and the integration with Figma (which we use for prototyping) is a huge selling point. The template library is not great, so I find in our workplace there is a bit of a mix with a skew towards Miro for its applications in workshops, but a skew …
Chose Miro
I couldn't add Teams Whiteboard to the list, but among the three (Mural, Google Jamboard, and Teams Whiteboard) Miro blows them out of the water. I had to use Mural recently for a separate engagement, after having not used for a while, and was really surprised by how little it …
Chose Miro
Miro seems more user-friendly and encourages collaboration in a more relaxed way. It also offers more explanation and help than other platforms similar in nature when it comes to tool tips. The platform seems more universal than any other similar programs. The feedback feature …
Chose Miro
Miro feels so much more expansive than Jamboard, which only seemed to allow a small, fixed area. Miro's features and templates seemed to be on a completely different level. Trello is a rather different product: well suited to a very set format, but it's not nearly as good for …
Chose Miro
Miro is for anyone who is looking for great and powerful collaborative and creative tool that enables team to collaborate both asynchronous and synchronous. Also it enables us to effectively communicate with our clients work on different projects together despite the location …
Chose Miro
Miro is much better. It offers the best of these tools and much more. As a direct comparison, it's significantly better than Mural.

As a tool, it's pretty unique and the powerful integrations put in a league of its own. Miro is my go to tool in this regard.
Chose Miro
Google is actually decommissioning Jamboard and I think it's because they know other people are doing it much better. Teams also has a whiteboard feature that I find uninspired and I'm unlikely to use it unless it's out of bare necessity. I've never tried Mural so I can't speak …
Chose Miro
We still have tutors who prefer how they used to do things. The fact that I am able to convince most (not all) of these often stodgy academics to switch to Miro after one demonstration is a testament to how its simple to use interface is truly unique in the market.
Chose Miro
Jamboard felt very clunky compared to Miro. It was also very difficult to make your Jamboards look inviting. Conversely, Miro allows you to layer as much as you want/need. It allows you to easily create boards that work for the needs of your team - whether internal or …
Chose Miro
Miro has many more features than Jamboard. The Jamboard is very limited for collaboration.
Chose Miro
The others are more clunky in my opinion but potentially have a lower barrier to entry. Miro can be smooth and refined but there are a lot of different buttons and functions and dragging techniques and zooming in and out that can be a lot to some.
Chose Miro
I prefer Miro over all, but then will use certain tools for specific use cases: Lucid - process work Menti - interactive polling and facilitated sessions UserVoice - crowdsourcing Trello - kanban boards (although Miro is pretty good with this too) Slido - live polling and …
Chose Miro
Miro, to me, is the better product hands down. It's easy to learn and teach. As well as creating fun and dynamic collaborative spaces for my teams to use. I found the other products lacking in features or clunky to use. Miro has depth without complexity, and simplicity with …
Chose Miro
MSFT Whiteboard is missing features and feels clunky. My company doesnt use Google products so Jamboard doesnt work for large projects, and Canva is a direct competitor to my company. Miro makes financial and experiential sense for us. It feels intuitive, including all of the …
Chose Miro
All over both the products are same while using, but when we tried Miro and we felt comfortable and user friendly and like by many staff, so we continued with this. And the design is good, and it's work is like realistic
Chose Miro
Miro is by far my preference. It's so much easier to get a clean result out of quickly, and the collaboration tools are the best.

In addition to the tools listed, I've also used Excalidraw, and TLdraw, While I love these two in particular, they're not things I'd introduce to a …
Chose Miro
I believe that Miro is much superior to Jamboard, it has much more functionality and is a more complete tool. Confluence is very good for documenting, but it doesn't work well for designing product flows as it is limited to text. I would say that Miro and Confluence are …
Chose Miro
For my part, I really have a user preference for Miro. It allows me to do many of the functions of these other tools more easily. It allows me to create visual compositions, it allows me to do follow-ups and online ideation. I really prefer the responsiveness of the team and …
Chose Miro
There are some areas where I really prefer lucidchart - particularly around complex ERDs, process engineering, and impact assessments. lucidchart's integration options and exporting options are all more thorough than Miro. However, Miro is a far superior tool when comparing it …
Chose Miro
Miro is the more general use one. We use FigJam for internal projects where it's just designers on the project. But for internal projects with other roles involved Miro quickly becomes the more accessible option. The simplicity is the main driver why we opt for using Miro for …
Chose Miro
MURAL is very similar; while MURAL is easier to onboard new users to, Miro's functionality is better in fit for what I do and workshops I run. Jamboard is too limiting - better UX for the small use case it fits, and easier to use with low (technology) maturity users.
Chose Miro
I think Miro is friendly. It also has more features, is easier to use and promotes more interaction.
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
Google JamboardMiro
Small Businesses
Canva
Canva
Score 9.2 out of 10
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Canva
Canva
Score 9.2 out of 10
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Miro
Miro
Score 9.0 out of 10
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Google JamboardMiro
Likelihood to Recommend
6.7
(5 ratings)
9.0
(4543 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(98 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(72 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(8 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(7 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(27 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.7
(4 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(3291 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
9.8
(3 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
7.4
(3633 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(8 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Google JamboardMiro
Likelihood to Recommend
Google
Google Jamboard is ideal for live, synchronous sessions to support collaboration and engagement. It can be used for the entire class, small group, or independent work. Create a Jamboard for a simple student knowledge check, or annotation exercise, or sorting activity. Insert a Google document, spreadsheet, or presentation, and have students annotate the file. There are many types of active learning activities you can do with a Google Jamboard!
Read full review
Miro
Miro is perfect if you need to either present an idea, or workshop ways of getting to alignment. It's pretty magic for all of that. Miro is less perfect than FigJam if you're just interrogating a Figma UI and you want to make direct edits.
Read full review
Pros
Google
  • Colorful and engaging designs and layout
  • Freeform format
  • Real-time collaboration without lagging or download wait-time
  • Can be used for many different purposes-- business, education, personal, etc.
Read full review
Miro
  • Exceptional templates help me get started quickly with almost any type of whiteboarding, creating consistency where needed and extreme variety when also needed.
  • Having multiple active users on the same board happens so smoothly. It's easy to get people on the board and updating objects simultaneously without weird conflicts is amazing.
  • The amount of objects & tools Miro provides allows us to create very specific and detailed artifacts.
Read full review
Cons
Google
  • Changing font
  • Changing sizes of items
  • More user friendly
  • More features
  • Different than a slide view
Read full review
Miro
  • Sometimes the text inside sticky notes is very small, it's hard to read.
  • It would be great to preserve the board layout and functionality when offline, such as when taking a flight. Load the board before the flight, keep working during the flight, then update it when the connection gets restored, instead of losing sync and functionality when internet connectivity is not available.
  • It would be helpful to denote progress on a board with some sort of recommended flow. Instead of having to depend on the user adding new inputs to the right of previous work, if Miro detects inputs to the board happening to the left or above existing work, ask if you'd like to add it to the right.
  • Also, it could be that you could replay a "video" or animation of the board (zoomed out) showing the order in which content has been added to the board over time.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Google
No answers on this topic
Miro
There is no other tool like Miro for process Mapping in particular. I've tried PowerPoint, Word, and other programs, but when collaborating virtually on how to improve a process, Miro has all of the tools and more to enable successful mapping. The colors, different types of shapes and text books, along with the ability to integrate different documents and other functionality, make it ideal for this purpose. In a virtual world, it's a must-have.
Read full review
Usability
Google
No answers on this topic
Miro
It's pretty easy to use. My gripes are with some small idiosyncrasies with selection behavior with objects and editing text. When I move an object, it automatically de-selects it when I am not done with it. I have to click to select again. Text control is challenging and could be improved. It could use a little more styling capability. It's also weird that it behaves differently in a shape then when using the text tool.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Google
No answers on this topic
Miro
I only give a 9/10 because of the speed at which it loads. I have never experienced issues with Miro logging me out early, or some other technical issue causing the program to crash, or even it just loading in perpetuity without ever actually coming up (unlike other programs such as SFDC). It take a minute for all of my boards to come up after I click on it in my favorites, but besides that, it's all good.
Read full review
Performance
Google
No answers on this topic
Miro
I took the loading quickly to be related to availability which I commented on before, so ditto with those comment on load time here. Although to reemphasize, Miro doesn't crash or just refuse to load like some other programs. The weak point of Miro for me is integration of files like Word, Excel, or PowerPoint (especially the later two). When you embed these, it gets slow, and complicated to bring them up while you're in the application.
Read full review
Support Rating
Google
No answers on this topic
Miro
The support staff at Miro are fantastic. Whenever I have had an issue, they have been timely and helpful with their response. They are also very knowledgeable and go out of their way to not only help, but offer proactive training sessions on different topics and new functionality so everyone can try it out.
Read full review
In-Person Training
Google
No answers on this topic
Miro
Not applicable as never had in person training
Read full review
Online Training
Google
No answers on this topic
Miro
Superb. very well explained videos. Really helps get the knowledge up on the product. The slides are divided into the topics of usage. I have enjoyed following and implementing all of these slides. The videos are well explained and it is easy to follow. There are tutorials that you can take yourself later. It would be nice however if more training modules were added.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Google
No answers on this topic
Miro
It was and still is a challenge to get our IT folks at 3M to support the tool. Single sign on still not implemented. I now have Miro on my personal computer. I had a few hardware issues, but nothing major.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Google
Google Jamboard is a much simpler tool. This is not necessarily a bad thing e.g. if I just want to set up a warm-up exercise for students before we start the session using Miro would be flash over substance. Do not get me wrong, everyone who knows me knows I love Miro but I also appreciate the simplicity and a variety of tools I can use. Another product that TrustRadius does not take into consideration is Padlet or MS Whiteboard. Another argument supporting the choice of Google Jamboard, especially for Google users, is that is kind of part of the package. Non-Google users are also welcome!
Read full review
Miro
In many cases the other tools did a single thing better than Miro but overall Miro better solved all our needs. In some cases, like FigJam the hurdle was licensing. Teams just doesn't have an awesome set of features. MindMap is good for what it is but not so good for other uses. Mural is excellent...just not as good.
Read full review
Scalability
Google
No answers on this topic
Miro
Miro is great for scaling. In every department and subdivision across my entire organization, there is someone using it. From Sales to marketing, to manufacturing and operations; and even in legal and finance, there isn't a process or a department that is not using Miro, and if they aren't, they're missing out! Even at the highest to the lowest levels of the organization, it is essential for virtual collaboration.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Google
  • Faculty love having an active learning tool that's easy to use in synchronous sessions.
  • Not as well known as other Google apps like Docs, Sheets, or Slides.
  • Can be used synchronously (for live engagement) or asynchronously (for self-paced learning).
  • Easy to miss in the Google Suite or forget it's available to use.
Read full review
Miro
  • Simplicity- it’s simplified our communication
  • It’s taken away the stress of manually documenting research with pen and paper in live design thinking sessions
  • Remote - we can host our diverse teams from all over the world in quick productive meetings without paying for travel
  • Miro has helped me design for over 8 enterprise product teams
Read full review
ScreenShots

Miro Screenshots

Screenshot of Miro's design sprint templates, used to solve big challenges, create new products or improve existing ones.Screenshot of the Sprint Planning features in Miro, that assists Development Teams in creating a transparent understanding of what can be built and how. Users can run sprints and turn a team into creative and active participants. Today, many organizations use Agile tools to manage software development and other non-IT projects.Screenshot of the PI Planning Template that brings teams toward one vision of what stories to develop. Used to manage a backlog, increase productivity, and build the foundation for a successful PI Planning event. Miro’s PI Planning Template helps to get an overview of any PI Planning event, with step-by-step frames to guide the process.Screenshot of diagrams, concept maps, and system mapping templates used to communicate complex flows and create a shared understanding. Users can check off all the essential steps of the diagramming process and gain a complete overview of operations with Miro's diagramming templates collection.