Coveo Qubit vs. IBM API Connect

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Coveo Qubit
Score 6.0 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Qubit, now from Coveo (acquired October 2021) uses visitor history data to understand different user segments and serve personalized messages to segments using JavaScript. It is available as either a managed or self-service model. Data is collected using Qubit's own Universal Variable data model, or by integrating the user's existing model via our API. It combines quantitative data with qualitative visitor feedback to give Qubit users the ability to detect areas for optimization. Using…N/A
IBM API Connect
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
IBM API Connect is a scalable API solution that helps organizations implement a robust API strategy by creating, exposing, managing and monetizing an entire API ecosystem across multiple clouds. As businesses embrace their digital transformation journey, APIs become critical to unlock the value of business data and assets. With increasing adoption of APIs, consistency and governance are needed across the enterprise. API Connect aims to help businesses…N/A
Pricing
Coveo QubitIBM API Connect
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Coveo QubitIBM API Connect
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Coveo QubitIBM API Connect
Considered Both Products
Coveo Qubit
Chose Coveo Qubit
In my previous company one of the brands was using Optimizely, while the brand I was working for was using Qubit. Qubit proved to be so much more than a multi-variant platform. It was much easier to use - we didn't have to rely on the tech team to implement tests. This way we …
Chose Coveo Qubit
Key points that keep us close to Qubit are its knowledgeable resources, presentation and UI, ease of getting trained, ease of use, low time to market, analytics and reports.
Chose Coveo Qubit
We're using Qubit as a fully managed testing platform, and their account management and level of service we've received from any other contact (technical, support, sales etc) was above any of their competitors. Integration and on-boarding was well done and we feel confident …
Chose Coveo Qubit
Having previously used Maxymiser around 3 years ago, I found their setup to be geared more away from faster moving retail. While tests would be thoroughly researched and built to a high standard, the length of time to turn around a single test was too long. Qubit has allowed us …
Chose Coveo Qubit
As alternatives to Qubit, we considered:
* Optimizely: more limited personalisation options, more expensive to be used across different sites.
* Maxymiser: more expensive.
Chose Coveo Qubit
Qubit definitely beats Optimizely in terms of segmentation and personzalization. Regarding AB testing, both tools are quite similar.
Chose Coveo Qubit
We've chosen Qubit because of the data driven approach, ease of use and the offered support. We like the ability to build some tests externally with the Qubit help.
Chose Coveo Qubit
At the time of taking the product, we found no comparable alternatives. Since then, the product has only grown from strength to strength, so it still does not have any comparable competitors that offer both the technical product and business knowledge that Qubit can. Google …
Chose Coveo Qubit
We previously used Monetate but that was before my time so it's tough to specifically compare. However, I think the fact that we're no longer with Monetate proves that Qubit has been a better partner overall.
Chose Coveo Qubit
Simple usability is a controlled group testing only. Qubit on the other hand allows you to run a test on a live site with traffic ranging from 5% to 95%
Chose Coveo Qubit
Qubit has a nicer UI than Google Tag Manager and offers the A/B testing that GTM doesn't - but for script management, there's not a lot to choose between them.
Chose Coveo Qubit
Qubit has stronger account management and business understanding
Chose Coveo Qubit
By far the most streamline of the programs.
Chose Coveo Qubit
Ability to deliver A/B tests via the UI which means that JavaScript development is not required.
Chose Coveo Qubit
Qubit is probably the most powerful tool that we reviewed. The challenge is that with the power comes a large responsibility to make sure you are doing it right and not having issues. With digital tools, power and complexity seem to go together so you have to make sure that you …
Chose Coveo Qubit
I was not directly involved in the decision-making process but understand that overall functionality, data integration, and UX testing weighed against the cost of the solution were the deciding factors.
Chose Coveo Qubit
Qubit was the first CRO tool we have used, and have stuck with it, even though we've tested other platforms on our other websites. I think it's a testament to Qubit and their staff that they are still implemented on our largest website.
Chose Coveo Qubit
I have not personally used anything similar to Qubit and I was not involved in the decision to use Qubit.
Chose Coveo Qubit
Primarily the strength of Qubit's data layer and therefore the ability to personalise and create seamless user journeys for our different customer segments.
Chose Coveo Qubit
The decision to use Qubit was made based on the capacity to run a 3 month test before committing for a longer term and down to a recommendation from a sister company.
Chose Coveo Qubit
We were not aware of some of the other offerings from Qubit so I think this is an area that could be improved upon. For us, Qubit is seen as an A/B testing tool more than anything else so I would say that the promotion of additional tools offered by Qubit is certainty something …
Chose Coveo Qubit
Our company decided to choose Qubit due to its perceived similarly to optimizely and promise infinite integrations through open tag. Sadly it didn't live up to its promise. The integrations were not integrations as most people would understand it. It was all very manual and you …
Chose Coveo Qubit
We opted for Qubit due to their personalisation features compared to the other market offering, as we felt their Visitor Cloud was a USP in the industry. The Visitor Cloud allows further personalisations, such as social proofs, to complement internal data we have gathered and …
IBM API Connect
Chose IBM API Connect
IBM API Connect can in some use cases, especially when customer requirements are highly security centric, provide a more robust approach to managing access, performance, and trust, in the IT estate. In many cases it boils down to customer preference and to some extent if the …
Chose IBM API Connect
I think it could be improved but overall it is very good.

Creo que podria mejorarse pero en general es muy bueno.
Chose IBM API Connect
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and Apigee Edge
Chose IBM API Connect
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
Chose IBM API Connect
In our organization, we chose IBM API Connect for the easy integration
Chose IBM API Connect
Our organization chose IBM API Connect because, in our experience, IBM is more resilient
Chose IBM API Connect
Apigee Edge and Kong Konnect
Chose IBM API Connect
Our decision to adopt IBM API Connect was driven by its comprehensive end-to-end API lifecycle management, which proved to be exceptionally well-suited to our B2B, Open Banking, and multi-fintech integration requirements. When compared with other solutions, API Connect stood …
Chose IBM API Connect
Ease of use of the product and pricing of the product.
Chose IBM API Connect
Prior to adopting IBM API Connect, there were two main competitors, MuleSoft. Although in the integration capabilities MuleSoft seemed to have an advantage, and regarding developer experience, IBM API Connect had a set of enterprise features for the API management.
Chose IBM API Connect
Mulesoft seemed to take a lot longer to implement and reach any real ROI attribution. For the other competitors, I'd say they are easier to administrate, but this isn't as important to us as a business user. It was easier to explore APIs with IBM than it was with others.
Chose IBM API Connect
From a cost perspective, IBM is more convenient and has a broader portfolio of features, which results in a better tool.
Chose IBM API Connect
There were multiple product we read and then shortlist were taken as POC against IBM API Connect.
-Google Apigee : is good but in cross cloud there are concerns. Also, feature of reading & identifying the target system certificate was not available there.
Chose IBM API Connect
It was organizational boundaries to use IBM API Connect but we have learnt so many think on this technology. Obviously, We have more experience on this it;s easy for us to configure and maintain the system.
Chose IBM API Connect
Its depend on the business use case. Sometime we have to got through the in deep to technologies so we can;t use such built-in kind of services.
Chose IBM API Connect
IBM API Connect have more feature compared to other solutions like from one platform we can create APIs on the API Manager, we can publish the APIs to the products/portal server, we can secure the APIs using IBM DataPower Gateway, we can socalize the APIs using developer …
Chose IBM API Connect
We choice IBM API Connect because Apigee is more manual when you create an API Proxy
Chose IBM API Connect
We use IBM Cloud, which works well with our hybrid cloud deployment. As a large firm, we are able to scale as required once the initial setup is complete.
Chose IBM API Connect
Never used any product of the IBM environment together.
Chose IBM API Connect
IBM API Connect is more flexible and easy to use. It has a lot of features that differ in the market like API monetization & analytics.
Features
Coveo QubitIBM API Connect
API Management
Comparison of API Management features of Product A and Product B
Coveo Qubit
-
Ratings
IBM API Connect
8.4
Ratings
0% below category average
API access control00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Rate limits and usage policies00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
API usage data00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
API user onboarding00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
API versioning00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Usage billing and payments00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
API monitoring and logging00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Coveo QubitIBM API Connect
Small Businesses
Bloomreach
Bloomreach
Score 9.2 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 9.0 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 9.0 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Coveo QubitIBM API Connect
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.1
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.1
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
6.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
7.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Coveo QubitIBM API Connect
Likelihood to Recommend
Coveo Qubit is a very helpful platform mainly for organizations that need to provide a solid business model before carrying out any implementation or new functionality. In addition, it is a very good tool to generate changes and show different content to different types of clients, with their personalization and segmentation criteria.It is ideal for simultaneous testing and customization, only one of these activities individually is not recommended.
Read full review
Overall, it can be stated that IBM API Connect has many benefits and can easily manage complicated integrations. The platform performs best in large environments, especially where microservices and processing of multiple API dependencies are required. On average, we have processed thousands of API calls within a second with good response time.
Read full review
Pros
  • The testing platform itself is continually evolving. This means that we are always able to try new ideas as well as quickly and efficiently put others into practice.
  • The beta programme and the additional functionality products are both exciting to see as well as ensuring we can cherry pick the functionality we need. This means that we don't end up paying for functionality we don't need
Read full review
  • API discovery feature is very helpful to allow us to scope the work required before diving into things.
  • The ability to set permissions and rulesets at a user level is essential to restrict access to specific datasets.
  • Ability for external users (those from outside our organisation) to leverage the API in more restrictive manner.
Read full review
Cons
  • Some of the reporting within Qubit has been overly simplified in the past, a point they are continually addressing.
  • At times the syntax of experience (test) creation can be specific to Qubit and so there is a slight learning curve for developers.
  • Unless developers have much time to allocate to creating tests in Qubit, marketers may potentially find simple tests limited. I would recommend having someone in-house as we do.
Read full review
  • That being stated, every thing you own will have both positive and negative aspects to its use. It can be perplexing at times, particularly when navigating between different functions.
  • However, based on my usage of this application up until this point, I've discovered that the only time it lags is when it's downloading updates. Otherwise, it's excellent to utilise for all other customs.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Qubit helps out immensely and lays out in plain English the profitability of each of our A-B tests. Say Qubit has provided us overall with a 5% profit increase this year (that is a completely arbitrary figure for illustration only), then if we didn't renew it could be seen as us taking a 5% loss as Qubit wouldn't be there. The results of our tests are showing no slowing down and as Qubit and Toast grow to understand each other better we can only see our performance getting better as the years go on.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Overall navigation on Qubit is very user friendly and requires a minimal training to be up and running. Be it reviewing existing experiences or setting up new experiences, the process is pretty simple for business user. Add some basic development skills to your kitty, you can do magic with Qubit and make your website do wonders!
Read full review
IBM API Connect may be less appropriate for small-scale projects with minimal API management requirements, where simpler and more cost-effective solutions suffice. Organizations lacking the necessary technical expertise or resources to harness its full potential may face implementation challenges. In static environments with infrequent API changes or limited developer engagement, the platform's comprehensive features may be excessive for the task at hand.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
I would say that the Qubit account managers are always available for any request. We have a lot of different promotions that could always do with last minute optimizing or changes and Qubit can be relied on to get this changes up and running in an impressive amount of time, so that we don't need to patch live or wait for the next IT sprint. Invaluable to our business.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
Technology is good for A/B testing and personalisation - allowing any team with a dedicated developer to create test relatively easily and to report/analyse them in a fair amount of details. Some advanced features, especially on the set up of test cells, are dearly missing. Unfortunately, new features are often not free of bugs... Also, support is sub-par, which means new features are realised without proper documentation, example or training (but of our Qubit counterparts and internally).
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Qubit are supportive and flexible in providing support. They are happy working out of usual hours, even on weekends and if I have any doubts about the set up of an experience they’re quick to respond and willing to check my work. On particularly big revenue days they monitor our account and they’re quick to identify and problem solve any issues.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
In-Person Training
The training was great, but would be great to have a script or PDF with some explanations of the qubit JS layer. Without the script you can just try to learn on your own, so the training is not as powerfull as it could be. On the other hand - would be great to have training related to reading statistics or personalisation.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Implementation couldn't be easier. All we needed to do was insert the tag. (easy) and set up the data layer. (dev required) This was pretty smooth in comparison to some of the other tools we use on our site, and was done in less than a day. Note : Data needs to be collected for a set period of time before you can accurately rely on the data that you are receiving. This is normal though with everyone else that we have used
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
We're using Qubit as a fully managed testing platform, and their account management and level of service we've received from any other contact (technical, support, sales etc) was above any of their competitors. Integration and on-boarding was well done and we feel confident that the campaigns are developed and tested thoroughly.
Read full review
Our decision to adopt IBM API Connect was driven by its comprehensive end-to-end API lifecycle management, which proved to be exceptionally well-suited to our B2B, Open Banking, and multi-fintech integration requirements. When compared with other solutions, API Connect stood out for its ability to externalize and govern APIs at scale, while offering enterprise-grade capabilities critical for our regulated environment. IBM App Connect serves as our internal integration middleware, focused on backend orchestration and data transformation. IBM watsonx acts as a complementary AI and data platform for exposing intelligent services especially with the code assistant functionality, it is API Connect that provides the crucial layer for external API exposure, management, and monetization. IBM DataPower is an incredibly secure and performant runtime, and lacks key enterprise features such as developer engagement, full API governance, and analytics. API Connect fills that gap seamlessly, offering a unified, secure, and scalable API management experience.
Read full review
Scalability
Our requirements change throughout the year like most E Commerce retailers. At Christmas and Peak we're dealing with around ten times the usual traffic on the site. Qubit had no problems with this at all, tests continued to fire, and stats were still reported accurately. I don't think that it is the most server intensive .js anyway, but we have seen no issues at all.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Faster recognition of customer needs - finding out exactly what customers are doing when they come on site.
  • Assessment of online assets for effectiveness and improvements - facilitated the analysis of 500 online feedback questionnaires for a campaign.
  • Mapping out lead conversion and helping identify opportunities to improve it.
Read full review
  • It has decreased the average development time of an API by 15%.
  • It has simplified the monitoring and tracking of development, keeping it simple and in one place.
  • It has reduced the time wasted looking for information; it has reduced the mail loop sharing status and questions.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Coveo Qubit Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Qubit Pro segments metrics page, showing the key metrics and activity for an audience segment.Screenshot of Segments overview page in Qubit Pro, showing a list of user-created audience segments.Screenshot of Selecting between the different types of experience in Qubit Pro to create a new personalization.Screenshot of Using a Qubit Pro template to create a Visitor Pulse Survey to gather user information.

IBM API Connect Screenshots

Screenshot of API tests and insightsScreenshot of API Manager customization interfaceScreenshot of the API designer