IBM Planning Analytics vs. Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Planning Analytics
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
IBM Planning Analytics, powered by IBM TM1®, is an integrated planning solution designed to promote collaboration across the organization and help keep pace with the speed of modern business. With its calculation engine, this enterprise performance management solution is designed to help users move beyond the limits of spreadsheets, automating the planning process to drive faster, more accurate results. Use it to unify data sources into one single repository, enabling users to build…
$825
per month 5 users
Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Qlik Sense® is a self-service BI platform for data discovery and visualization. It supports a full range of analytics use cases—data governance, pixel-perfect reporting, and collaboration. Its Associative Engine indexes and connects relationships between data points for creating actionable insights.
$200
per month
Pricing
IBM Planning AnalyticsQlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
Editions & Modules
Essentials
$825
per month 5 users
Standard
$1,650
per month 10 users
Starter
$200
per month
Standard
$825
per month
Premium
$2750
per month
Qlik Sense (On-Premise)
Contact Sales
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Planning AnalyticsQlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Planning AnalyticsQlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
Considered Both Products
IBM Planning Analytics
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
If compared to Excel, it eliminates version control issues and manual consolidation, which saves time and reduces errors.
On the other hand, if we compared with Hyperion, IBM Planning Analytics is more agile and user-friendly, especially with the Excel integration (PAx) and the …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
IBM Planning Analytics was far more robust and worked well with our existing tools and processes.
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
The overall tool is robust and complete in its capabilities.
It has an edge over other competitors and state of art technology.
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
For strong technical teams and flexibility IBM Planning Analytics is the way to go. For quicker adoption and less technical teams Anaplan is the best option. If consolidation, financials, and moving from legacy tools are main focus than OneStream will be a really good choice. …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
It is truly hard to compare both products. I like both products and would suggest choosing one but trying both. Some things are better through IBM Planning Analytics and some things are better through the IBM Analytics engine. Ultimately I believe that IBM Planning Analytics …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
instead several, manual maintained excel spreadsheets, we have now implemented a save repeatable process to get data in and out to the users
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
We chose IBM Planning Analytics because we find that it still uniquely positions with OLAP engine
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
IBM Planning Analytics is my primary focus
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
IBM watsonx.ai and IBM Cognos Analytics
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
In our organization, we chose IBM Planning Analytics because, in our opinion, IBM Planning Analytics has more features
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
IBM Planning Analytics flexibility is what makes it stand out between the others. Generally in other platforms you are restricted to predefined flows. Although it sounds good in the beginning, when you start using those systems you face some challenges when trying to adapt new …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Workday Adaptive Planning is really tough to set up and use as a fresher. So I have always faced difficulties helping new joinees to set up and use it. But with IBM Planning Analytics, it is more straightforward and easier to use with a good interface.
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
As it is related to MS Excel, IBM Planning Analytics is a much more robust and complete solution for the CFO or COO in mind. Oracle Hyperion stacks up nicely against IBM Planning Analytics. However, IBM's investment in AI allows Planning Analytics users more options and speed.
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
It includes Oracle Cloud EPM Planning, Anaplan, and Adaptive Insight before deciding to choose IBM Planning Analytics. We selected Planning Analytics because of its work with complicated and many area models, the capability to work with big amounts of data, and compatibility …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Other options, namely Anaplan, Oracle EPM Cloud, and SAP Analytics Cloud, were also considered. Anaplan's interface lacked analytical depth. For product design metrics, flexibility was not as good in Oracle EPM Cloud. The final choice was moved by the fact that it was driven …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Prior to making the decision to go with IBM Planning Analytics, we had considered such options as Anaplan, Oracle Hyperion, and SAP Analytics Cloud. Despite the collaborative solutions offered by Anaplan and the good connection with other systems by SAP, the superb set of tool …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
In this case, Vena and Planful are considered as other products that can be compared with IBM Planning Analytics, but among them, IBM Planning Analytics is more optimal in terms of user interface and integration. Its preconfigure risk assessment model and its format and …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
This was an older verions that was also very good, but the new IBM Planning Analytics is a far better tool that enables better scenario planning or what-if analysis.
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
IBM PA is like having pivot tables on steroids. Possibilities are endless.
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Ability to plan more products, locations, customers
Less expensive
Client already had IBM PA for FP&A
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Sandboxing,Integration and Flexibility
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
IBM Planning Analytics is easier to use and setup for me. Easier to make reports. Works fast
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
We have been using IBM Planning Analytics and haven't explored other products that could cover our business needs.
Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
Chose Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
The main difference between Qlik and power bi is related to the integration of the tool into the Microsoft world, which can be useful for big companies already equipped with several ms systems. On the other hands, Qlik is simpler, more straightforward and easier to use with a …
Chose Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
Microsoft Power BI and IBM Cognos Analytics
Chose Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
We use both Qlik Sense and QlikView. Both bring valué. However, due to simpler development Qlik Sense is the main tool.
Chose Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
Qlik Sense cost of licensing is cheaper compared with other tools which always gives an upper edge in analytics industry with good functionality. More enhanced level of security with better user community group available to discuss about new updates. Understanding of Qlik Sense …
Chose Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
We use Microsoft Power BI too as a BI tool, in my point of view, Qlik Sense's ETL is much better than PowerBi. In another side, PowerBI learning curve is small than Qlik Sense, especially the PowerBI Desktop.
Chose Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
Kibana is data visualization tool in Elastic Stack to visualize and analyze Real Time Logs Capture.
It captures Live Streaming data and helps to detect any anomalies, error and bugs, monitoring aspects of any service/ IOT Device.
Chose Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
Sometimes as competing solutions, other times as completing one another.
Chose Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
The customization of the platform opens up plenty of other options depending on the use cases. The API layer is incredibly rich and makes integration of Qlik based visualization into web pages a simple and effective pattern. It's been very easy to use with a great community …
Chose Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
Both are good data visualisation platforms; with certain applications where one is better than the other
Chose Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
Qlik Sense offers a broad variety of functions that are not easily achievable using PowerBi. However, I was not involved with the selection.
Chose Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
Qlik Sense is a fast tool to implement; you can have a functional dashboard in a few days, and the ETL processes are quite easy to build it. You can have the ROI in a short period of time.
Chose Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
Qlik Sense comes out as a superior product as well as more cost efficient than some of the other products we evaluated as a part of our Enterprise Business Intelligence stack. It offers unified view of our data and extensibility. Qlik Sense being the most interactive …
Chose Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
Qlik Sense is relatively cheaper and more futuristic
Chose Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
Qlik Sense is one of the best reporting systems. It is stronger than PBI and Tableau when speaking about complex KPIs. It is really similar to Microstrategy Analytics when you speak about obtained results, but it is easier to use, especially as it is more code-based. But is it …
Chose Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
Microsoft Power BI
Chose Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
Qlik Sense can easily integrate multiple data models to visualize customer data. Tableau is easy to use—perhaps more manageable than Qlik—but expensive. Microsoft BI was chosen because it was similar to previously used
Chose Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
We originally went with Qlik Sense because the desktop version used to be free for single users and was a very good proposition for us (we are a non-profit with a limited budget). However, from what I see, the functionality is comparable, and Qlik Sense stacks up well.
Chose Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
On the long run we will not stay with Qlik as the management chose to switch to the Microsoft suite. We think that this will not impact us as a team as both tools are worthy competitors
Chose Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
As soon as you want to pull data from two or more separate tables, Qlik Sense leaves the rest in the dust, since it does not require joins or complex transformations. Zoho CRM analytics are limited to the data located in the product itself. No external tables can be combined.
Chose Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
Other tools were not able to handle complex business requirements and performance was not too good with very huge volume data. we were required to maintain history, time-based data backups, and snapshots. Also, some of the tools were too costly compare to Qlik [Sense] solutions.
Chose Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
QlikView is still KING.
Chose Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
We had a QlikView deployment and it made sense to utilize what was existing for our Qlik Sense use.
Chose Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
When it comes to working with large datasets out of the box, Qlik in my opinion is unrivaled amongst the competitor. However, the overall user experience and customization options available to developers require a lot of work. When compared to other options on the market, …
Features
IBM Planning AnalyticsQlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
7.5
Ratings
1% below category average
Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
7.9
Ratings
4% below category average
Pixel Perfect reports7.30 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Customizable dashboards7.30 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates7.70 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
7.6
Ratings
2% below category average
Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
7.0
Ratings
14% below category average
Drill-down analysis7.90 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Formatting capabilities7.40 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages7.40 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration7.80 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.0
Ratings
0% below category average
Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
7.7
Ratings
6% below category average
Publish to Web7.90 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Publish to PDF7.90 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Report Versioning8.30 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling7.90 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Delivery to Remote Servers00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
7.3
Ratings
2% below category average
Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
6.7
Ratings
17% below category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)7.70 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization6.80 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Predictive Analytics7.80 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining6.80 Ratings5.70 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
7.8
Ratings
7% below category average
Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
7.7
Ratings
10% below category average
Multi-User Support (named login)7.80 Ratings6.60 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model7.50 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)8.00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control7.50 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)8.40 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
7.1
Ratings
5% below category average
Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
7.5
Ratings
3% below category average
Responsive Design for Web Access7.50 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Mobile Application6.70 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile6.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.7
Ratings
7% above category average
Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
-
Ratings
Long-term financial planning8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Financial budgeting8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Forecasting9.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Scenario modeling9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Management reporting8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.4
Ratings
8% above category average
Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
-
Ratings
Financial data consolidation9.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Journal entries and reports9.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-currency management8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Minority Ownership8.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting7.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.4
Ratings
7% above category average
Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
-
Ratings
Financial Statement Reporting8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Management Reporting8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting9.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting9.20 Ratings00 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing6.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.3
Ratings
3% above category average
Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
-
Ratings
Personalized dashboards8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
KPIs8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.7
Ratings
7% above category average
Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
-
Ratings
Flat file integration8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Excel data integration9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources8.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding
Comparison of Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
-
Ratings
Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
8.4
Ratings
8% above category average
REST API00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Javascript API00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
iFrames00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Java API00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Themeable User Interface (UI)00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Customizable Platform (Open Source)00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Planning AnalyticsQlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Yellowfin
Yellowfin
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Reveal
Reveal
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Planning AnalyticsQlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.8
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.3
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Planning AnalyticsQlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
Likelihood to Recommend
For a CFO or a COO to do budgeting and planning, IBM Planning Analytics would be essential. It is a tool that can take in multiple data sources and showcase them in a multidimensional way. If you are looking just for a BI or reporting tool, Planning Analytics would be considered "overkill".
Read full review
Qlik Sense is a program whose purpose is to greatly improve all your operations and use of all data in an organic way. The mission will always be to increase the economic and commercial processes of the company in a short time. I recommended it for its high technology, which was Created for this area, the results are successful. We have noticed how it has increased relationships with our clients thanks to the credibility and security that we provide.
Read full review
Pros
  • Handle very large data volumes.
  • Scale to a large number of users.
  • Not having to compromise on business complexity.
  • It can be run by business users.
  • Availability of highly qualified consultants to support businesses.
  • REST API allows for an open eco system and a variety of solutions to extend the product.
  • Vast integration possibilities.
  • AI-infused engine with IBM Watson.
Read full review
  • Self-Service Visualization and Discovery
  • Fullstack BI from ETL to Visualization, its built-in ETL engine can transform disparate data sets into a common data structure
  • Uses HTML5 based responsive design which visualization automatically adapt to the screen size and orientation of the users device
  • Actively engaged community and resources to help you learn this software in the best possible manner
Read full review
Cons
  • sometimes it is hard to produce pixel perfect reports from the Web UI. I know it is not made for this, but still, it'll be great
  • getting in e.g. an Excel file just by drag and drop, and the AI should "understand" what the data is all around
Read full review
  • Not a lot of room for customization as we were used to in QlikView
  • UI and default navigation can be very clunky and not user friendly
  • Although the backend is fantastic, the front end experience leaves a lot to be desired. As a developer you don't have a lot of options to customized your app unless you turn to Javascript, CSS and HTML. This is not a common stack you would find in most BI developers
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Since IBM Cognos Express is suitable only for medium data warehouse environment, we are not sure if this tool solves the long term need as the business keeps growing rapidly. So its a 50/50 ratio to renew Express license. But having said that, the components of IBM Cognos Express are also available in other Cognos BI suites like Cognos 10.x version. So we will probably upgrade our environment to IBM Cognos 10.x which comes with more new features.
Read full review
Qlik Sense is a constantly improving it's software and working with its' users to make it better. They are great at keeping their users informed of progress and care about delivering a quality product
Read full review
Usability
IBM Planning Analytics is generally good in terms of functionalities. It can be used reduce time for budget planning, resource planning, demand forecasting, etc. The performance of IBM Planning Analytics is acceptable, but user interface can be improved. It would be good to see new features that allow users to customise the dashboard.
Read full review
Qlik Sense has a better and easy to learn user interface compared with other analytics tool which always help us to create regular and adhoc reports within the stipulated time frame and can be easily refreshed at a scheduled time and sent to multiple stakeholders for timely update regarding the Key metrics indicator.
Read full review
Support Rating
Although I find the IBM Planning analytics documentation quite time consuming, their support with email and call is something i can term as very considerate and patient, I have had few calls about the features and how i would want to implement them within my projects, and the teams have been super helpful to resolve my issues
Read full review
Qlik is great for companies with lots of business domains and departments because it scales well, especially if data that is reported is saved in SQL and similar structures. Its ease of use and good UI enables business units to create and manage their own reports. That removes a great burden of creating and managing/modifying these pages from the IT team. Overall, it's a win-win for both IT and business units.
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
The instructor was very knowledgeable.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
The online instructor was very knowledgeable.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Hire Qlik consultants. It's better done by them or with their aid.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
For strong technical teams and flexibility IBM Planning Analytics is the way to go. For quicker adoption and less technical teams Anaplan is the best option. If consolidation, financials, and moving from legacy tools are main focus than OneStream will be a really good choice. If deeply invested into SAP already than the SAP BPC will be the best fit to maintain the investment.
Read full review
The customization of the platform opens up plenty of other options depending on the use cases. The API layer is incredibly rich and makes integration of Qlik based visualization into web pages a simple and effective pattern. It's been very easy to use with a great community made up of professionals. Qlik Sense has introduces artificial Intelligence into my data visualization and reporting activity.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Much higher degree of accuracy in forecasting with the use of predictive analysis from historical data
  • Dozens of man hours saved in routine processes that are now handled with minimal human interaction
  • One system that holds the "source of truth," consolidating multiple systems together that were only accessible individually before
Read full review
  • The impact has undoubtedly been positive, it is difficult to quantify it, however in terms of effectiveness or efficiency I give it a 90%.
  • I don't give it 100% because to use the complete package you have to pay, and it's not that cheap and on the other hand because it has some deficiencies, such as technical support and some issues like windows that are not so friendly and easy to work with.
  • Still, I can't stop using it.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM Planning Analytics Screenshots

Screenshot of Workflow managementScreenshot of Income statementScreenshot of Margin analysisScreenshot of Metrics managementScreenshot of Income statementScreenshot of Expense analysis

Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense) Screenshots

Screenshot of Qlik Sense Cash Flow DashboardScreenshot of Qlik Sense Global Smart SearchScreenshot of Qlik Sense Smart Data Compression - Get immediate insight on large dataScreenshot of Extend, mix and mash-up with our APIsScreenshot of Add "External data" with Qlik DataMarket - Data as a ServiceScreenshot of Visualization Bundle