Infor LN vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Infor LN
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
The Infor LN ERP software is focused on product manufacturing with both on-premise and cloud deployment and a robust analytics and dashboard interface.N/A
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics GP is an ERP software with accounting capabilities. It includes various packs for customizability and features tailored to specific industries’ needs. GP is offered as a perpetual license or subscription.N/A
Pricing
Infor LNMicrosoft Dynamics GP
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Infor LNMicrosoft Dynamics GP
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Infor LNMicrosoft Dynamics GP
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Infor LNMicrosoft Dynamics GP
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Infor LN
8.0
1 Ratings
10% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
7.0
25 Ratings
2% above category average
API for custom integration8.01 Ratings7.024 Ratings
Plug-ins8.01 Ratings7.019 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Infor LN
7.5
1 Ratings
8% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.6
36 Ratings
17% below category average
Single sign-on capability7.01 Ratings6.129 Ratings
Role-based user permissions8.01 Ratings7.136 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Infor LN
7.0
1 Ratings
0% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.7
37 Ratings
10% below category average
Dashboards7.01 Ratings7.025 Ratings
Standard reports7.01 Ratings7.035 Ratings
Custom reports7.01 Ratings6.035 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Infor LN
8.5
1 Ratings
11% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.7
44 Ratings
7% below category average
Accounts payable9.01 Ratings6.041 Ratings
Accounts receivable9.01 Ratings7.032 Ratings
Cash management00 Ratings6.032 Ratings
Bank reconciliation00 Ratings6.037 Ratings
Expense management00 Ratings7.027 Ratings
Time tracking00 Ratings7.013 Ratings
Fixed asset management00 Ratings6.025 Ratings
Multi-currency support00 Ratings8.017 Ratings
Multi-division support00 Ratings7.025 Ratings
Regulations compliance00 Ratings6.111 Ratings
Electronic tax filing00 Ratings7.011 Ratings
Self-service portal00 Ratings7.012 Ratings
Global Financial Support00 Ratings6.07 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers00 Ratings7.018 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting00 Ratings6.016 Ratings
Localizations00 Ratings8.011 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations00 Ratings7.022 Ratings
Enterprise Accounting00 Ratings6.114 Ratings
Configurable Accounting00 Ratings7.014 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework00 Ratings6.012 Ratings
Standardized Processes00 Ratings7.015 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Infor LN
9.0
1 Ratings
14% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.8
24 Ratings
1% above category average
Inventory tracking9.01 Ratings7.022 Ratings
Automatic reordering9.01 Ratings6.012 Ratings
Location management9.01 Ratings8.017 Ratings
Manufacturing module00 Ratings6.013 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Infor LN
9.0
1 Ratings
15% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.7
22 Ratings
6% below category average
Pricing9.01 Ratings6.016 Ratings
Order entry9.01 Ratings7.019 Ratings
Cost of goods sold9.01 Ratings6.022 Ratings
Credit card processing00 Ratings7.011 Ratings
Order Orchestration00 Ratings8.07 Ratings
End-to-end order visibility00 Ratings7.09 Ratings
Order exception Resolution00 Ratings6.05 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Infor LN
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.6
17 Ratings
8% below category average
Pay calculation00 Ratings6.116 Ratings
Benefit plan administration00 Ratings7.012 Ratings
Direct deposit files00 Ratings7.016 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management00 Ratings7.015 Ratings
Reimbursement management00 Ratings6.014 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Infor LNMicrosoft Dynamics GP
Small Businesses
Acumatica
Acumatica
Score 8.8 out of 10
QuickBooks Self-Employed
QuickBooks Self-Employed
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.1 out of 10
Accounting Seed
Accounting Seed
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises
SAP Business ByDesign
SAP Business ByDesign
Score 7.4 out of 10
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Score 8.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Infor LNMicrosoft Dynamics GP
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
7.0
(50 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.9
(7 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(6 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(5 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(3 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Infor LNMicrosoft Dynamics GP
Likelihood to Recommend
Infor
Infor ERP LN supports all discrete manufacturing processes including engineer-to-order, configure-to-order, project-based, make-to-order, and make-to-stock. If your company is a process manufacturing company, it may not be the best ERP for you.
Read full review
Microsoft
A large company where users have one function- for instance, where someone only receives or works in payables. That minimizes the number of windows they need. A smaller company where one user does multiple functions will require a lot more training and user knowledge to navigate, and it makes it harder to secure users. You also have to understand that GP started life as Great Plains, designed for accountants. The other modules were added on after Microsoft bought Great Plains, which means that modules like Manufacturing are red-headed step children with much smaller support ecosystems. So, if you're starting fresh, you may want to look at something built for the mobile world. D365 and Business Central are a lot more money, buggy, and hard to customize and essentially still vaporware. Microsoft is heavily investing there, leading to the previously mentioned question about the future of GP. If I was starting today I would be hard pressed to justify jumping into GP in a world where Salesforce ties in with so many programs. GP has MRP but it is limited so it's hard to justify a manufacturer starting with GP today.
Read full review
Pros
Infor
  • As a global organization, we deal with many languages and some software localizations. Infor ERP LN has 21 language packs and a software localization for the countries where Bray operates that need one (Argentina, Colombia, Chile, Peru, Poland, Russia, and India).
  • We need flexibility, versatility, and visibility in our operations and financials. Infor ERP LN delivers most of what Bray needs in a standard ERP system, allowing us to operate without the need for complex software functionality customizations and/or personalizations.
  • Infor ERP LN has an easy-to-learn, easy-to-use, user-friendly GUI.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • User friendly interface
  • Able to be extended into multiple areas of your business
  • One feature we have been using for a few years is EFT for payables - it has significantly reduced the time spent paying vendors and reduced our check printing and mailing costs. It is very easy to setup and use.
Read full review
Cons
Infor
  • Infor ERP LN could have a better way of handling single sign-on (SSO) capabilities.
  • Infor ERP LN could improve its GUI by not using Java as its platform, using HTML5 instead. I know Infor is already working on it.
  • Infor ERP LN could improve the way you can "kill" a user license (needed when trying to disconnect a user without leaving in the background "defunct" processes).
Read full review
Microsoft
  • With respect to the allocations, once the expense is entered into the allocation account, you lose the ability to run any detail on just the total of the expense. It would be nice if you could run a trial balance on the allocation accounts the same way you can with regular accounts.
  • I've always thought security set up could be a bit simpler. It actually has gotten better through the years. Specifically, with eight separate entities, it would be nice to have a "master" setup where you could call up one group entity, assign the users rights, and then be finished. Currently, whenever I have a new user, I have to call up each individual entity and select all of the features I want the user to have. That means I have to do eight steps for each user.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Infor
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
Due the economic challenges that Puerto Rico is having, the company has had to merge some companies in order to be more efficient. It has been easy in GP to process those merges, even thought we had to spend days to accomplish that the process was smooth and accurate. In addition we were able to streamline the purchasing and sales process and the organization is confident to keep renewing GP for the future versions.
Read full review
Usability
Infor
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
Though it is a basic accounting package, I believe some users do not find the old style menus and navigation options intuitive. There is also a great lack of training resources in the market, so users have to learn the product without guidance a lot, resulting in inefficient workflows and misuse or misunderstanding of many features.
Read full review
Support Rating
Infor
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
The rating is directed to the thrid party serive provider that we use. I do not now how good the Microsoft direct support is.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Infor
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
Basically the challenge with this implementation was the Business Portal, too many errors and even the aplication is up and running the users are still having issues. We will start planning the migraton to GP 2015 soon.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Infor
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
I come from a strong background of using SAP. SAP doesn't have the flexibility of GP, an example would be SAP doesn't allow core mods, if they catch you, you lose support. Microsoft doesn't really care about mods, but they will be quick to have the vendor you used support your issue if it is caused by those mods. With SAP your company adapts to the software, where with GP you adapt the software to you.
Read full review
Scalability
Infor
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
The functionality that GP and related ISV solutions offer and the ease of integration of GP to other systems makes it an extremely scalable solution
Read full review
Return on Investment
Infor
  • Quick migration from different ERP systems and legacy systems to Infor ERP LN.
  • Increased employee efficiency.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Microsoft Dynamics GP allows my clients to move from a paper or spreadsheet based company to an integrated, electronic, streamlined business. I love being able to help clients gain efficiencies through the use of Microsoft Dynamics GP.
  • Microsoft Dynamics GP allows for better customer service because everything is at our fingertips. If someone calls questioning an invoice, we can easily look it up. If someone calls stating they paid an invoice with a certain check number, we can quickly run a query to find that particular check number to see where it was applied.
  • Having everything on a single platform provides ease of use for upgrades, backups and end user training. There is only one software to learn!
Read full review
ScreenShots