Intergy offers ambulatory practices a specialty-focused EHR and practice management solution. With Intergy’s tools, users can manage chronic conditions, capture payer incentives, and thrive in the world of value-based care. The ONC-certified solution has consolidated functionality that simplifies notation, automates tasks, and streamlines workflows. The Intergy ecosystem of products also includes telehealth, remote patient monitoring, chronic care management, patient portal, patient…
N/A
Practice Fusion
Score 4.5 out of 10
N/A
N/A
$149
per month per provider with a required annual commitment
I do really like the easy-to-navigate design of Intergy. I also love the support tickets and the really quick responses. I also, again, love the customizable features each user can set to benefit them specifically. This has been really helpful to set up and onboard our new …
Intergy is definitely not at the same level as Epic or Cerner. In Epic if you dream it - you can build it. It is definitely not something I can do within Intergy.
Other systems we have reviewed had some fancier features, but lacked the reporting needs of practices we have worked with. Being able to dig into all of the financial and clinical data to a very deep level was what made Intergy the best choice. The financial flexibility could …
My doctors liked Intergy better. Athena is great for the front staff and the nurses. In Intergy, those staff members have more to do, and it's less automated. That being said, I would rather the doctors be happy and the staff do more tasks.
One of the most compelling features of Athena, in my opinion, is the investment and commitment to pushing boundaries with product development. This presents a downfall, however, in that constant changes to the software can frustrate users and waste time relearning the platform. …
Medical Manager as a product was tried and true. It did not provide an easy interface. When a user who is not tech savvy started to use it was a big learning curve. One thing about Intergy was that it has a more intuitive interface, you get to use the mouse and make selections …
As a clinic, we briefly looked at switching to the Athena suite, but ultimately decided against it because of the relationship we have with our billing department. While Athena, from the surface, appears to be a no-brainer, as a clinic we were not ready to take on the whole …
I am not the office manager so I cannot tell why she chose to use Intergy EHR. I personally like Intergy EHR because it allows me to use it with Intergy EMR and track patients very fast and it saves the office a lot of time. If something goes wrong, someone can just call …
We moved from Intergy to athenaCollector and athenaClinicals. Athena is cloud-based, meaning we can access it from any location that has internet. My staff misses the ease of scheduling in Intergy, but the accountability of users' productivity is amazing. We had more control …
Intergy was already selected when I became employed with the office. I much prefer EPIC, but I also realize EPIC is geared towards a much larger facility then what we have.
The only other EMR I have used is EPIC. I worked as a scribe for PAMF, where I spent 50 hours a week in front of EPIC. I got to know it really well, and have used PF much less, so it is difficult to make a comparison. EPIC came with so many more options to view test results, …
It wasn't really a choice for me- I used the chiropractic specific when working for chiropractors and then used Practice Fusion while I was working for an alternative healthcare doctor. The doctors all had chosen the software before signing me on, there wasn't really an option …
NextGen is hard to use as far as medical records. Practice Fusion is user friendly. There is a great knowledge base for questions asked. Practice Fusion takes all the guess work out of the day.
Practice fusion is much more user friendly than the other programs that we have used. The more costly EMR's were definitely no better and the ones we have used were not nearly as easy to use. I would highly recommend practice fusion over Athena or Allscripts.
It worked quite well in the dermatology/plastic surgery clinic. In fact, until I moved into the administrative/finance department of this neurosurgery clinic, I had no complaints whatsoever about Intergy. The process for end users is very intuitive and free-flowing. On the management side of things, however, it's difficult to track or prove audit trails.
I think this is a great tool for a smaller practice, and I really like that it is not practice-specific. It seems like any type of doctor could use the site. I also think this is really great for remote workers because you are able to log on via the internet. I think that this tool would not be good for those looking to have a specific practice software. I've worked for other doctors alongside the one I used practice fusion for, and the other doctors used specialty specific software because of the customization to their job and charting.
Health Reminders- for different patient needs or preventive care/screenings. For example patients who have a diagnosis of Diabetes- their health reminders will show if they need an A1c, foot exam, eye exam, etc. and when it was last performed
Orders Tracking- This helps nursing staff make notes on referrals or orders and they are able to look at the order tracking section for all patients and filter it by provider, order type, status, etc. to know what needs to be followed up on or what has been completed and so forth...
Tasks- This is a nice feature that has many different options for use. It can be used internally to send a quick message to another user, a phone message, billing message, and any task gives you the option to make it "patient related" if necessary. It can be used by the providers when they make an order they can then send it to the nurse to complete. Lots of different ways for Tasks to be used
One of the biggest frustrations is that PF only imports PDFs of lab results, but does nothing to allow manipulation of the numbers within these PDFs. I can pull up lab results but can't look at a graph, for example, of trends in serum sodium or hematocrit.
Like EPIC, it would be nice to have an option like scrolling to all the "***"s using F2, which I always try to do on PF until I realize it does not work.
I wish PF had more dot phrases to pull in things like lab results, etc., into the note. Since I cannot copy and paste lab results (which are stored in PDF) or blow them in with a dot phrase, I have to manually re-write them, which leaves our notes more vulnerable to human error. If this feature DOES exist, it isn't obvious to me or anyone in our clinic.
It would be really nice to hear from PF support to see if we had any unmet needs in the clinic so that they could educate us on how to better use this EMR to support those needs.
Usually they are very helpful. I would prefer they do some of the actual changes I am requesting instead of having me do the work. I feel that they could walk you through it, instead of letting you figure out the desired results on your own.
We always get a return call within the time stated. There are many available topics on the forum and it is often easy to find the issue you are seeking more information on. When we have tried the live chat feature we have been satisfied with the timeliness and response.
I am not the office manager so I cannot tell why she chose to use Intergy EHR. I personally like Intergy EHR because it allows me to use it with Intergy EMR and track patients very fast and it saves the office a lot of time. If something goes wrong, someone can just call customer service and they are glad to help.
The only other EMR I have used is EPIC. I worked as a scribe for PAMF, where I spent 50 hours a week in front of EPIC. I got to know it really well, and have used PF much less, so it is difficult to make a comparison. EPIC came with so many more options to view test results, visits to other health facilities, and past notes. It also had so many more ways you could format your notes, blow in data, and statistically analyze data. While EPIC is a much more comprehensive and well-supported EMR, it also would be too heavy and unnecessary for the small scale clinic work I do at a community clinic. I feel that each EMR has the environment they are well-suited for, and I am glad to be using PF now.