TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    JMP

    Score9.8 out of 10
    N/AJMP® is statistical analysis software with capabilities that span from data access to advanced statistical techniques, with click of a button sharing. The software is interactive and visual, and statistically deep enough to allow users to see and explore data.

    $1,320

    per year per user

    Logi Info

    Score3 out of 10
    Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
    Logi Info (or the Logi Analytics Platform) is a developer-grade analytics platform designed for application teams needing to rapidly build, deploy, and maintain mission-critical applications. Logi serves the embedded model, so companies increase the likelihood of building valuable, long lasting applications. The vendor focuses on enriching embedded analytics capabilities so that their customers' applications become more valuable, faster. According to the vendor, Logi allows customers to…N/A

    Looker

    Score8.1 out of 10
    N/ALooker is a BI application with an analytics-oriented application server that sits on top of relational data stores. It includes an end-user interface for exploring data, a reusable development paradigm for data discovery, and an API for supporting data in other systems.N/A
    Pricing
    JMPLogi InfoLooker
    Editions & Modules
    JMP
    $1320
    per year per user
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    JMPLogi InfoLooker
    Free Trial
    YesYesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYesYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeRequired
    Additional DetailsBulk discounts available.Logi's pricing was developed with software vendors in mind and as such, we offer flexible, custom pricing aligned with your go-to-market approach and long-term growth plans. Our pricing objective is to ensure our partners can rapidly scale their analytics.Must contact sales team for pricing.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    JMPLogi InfoLooker
    Considered Multiple Products
    JMP Statistical Discovery
    No answer on this topic
    Insightsoftware, Inc
    No answer on this topic
    Google
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    9 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    98%
    Would buy again
    85 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    9 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    99%
    Delivers good value for the price
    75 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    89%
    Happy with the feature set
    8 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    87 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    6 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    98%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    55 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    6 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    97%
    Implementation went as expected
    69 Answers
    Features
    JMPLogi InfoLooker
    BI Standard Reporting
    Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of JMP and Logi Info and Looker
    Feature
    JMP
    -
    Ratings
    Logi Info
    3.0
    25 Ratings
    93% below category average
    Looker
    7.4
    134 Ratings
    10% below category average
    Pixel Perfect reports00 Ratings5.01 Ratings6.5110 Ratings
    Customizable dashboards00 Ratings3.025 Ratings8.2133 Ratings
    Report Formatting Templates00 Ratings1.023 Ratings7.5115 Ratings
    Ad-hoc Reporting
    Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of JMP and Logi Info and Looker
    Feature
    JMP
    -
    Ratings
    Logi Info
    1.8
    24 Ratings
    127% below category average
    Looker
    6.8
    132 Ratings
    16% below category average
    Drill-down analysis00 Ratings2.023 Ratings6.3128 Ratings
    Formatting capabilities00 Ratings3.024 Ratings6.6130 Ratings
    Integration with R or other statistical packages00 Ratings1.01 Ratings5.655 Ratings
    Report sharing and collaboration00 Ratings1.023 Ratings8.8131 Ratings
    Report Output and Scheduling
    Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of JMP and Logi Info and Looker
    Feature
    JMP
    -
    Ratings
    Logi Info
    4.5
    23 Ratings
    58% below category average
    Looker
    7.9
    128 Ratings
    4% below category average
    Publish to Web00 Ratings8.419 Ratings7.7105 Ratings
    Publish to PDF00 Ratings4.020 Ratings7.8113 Ratings
    Report Delivery Scheduling00 Ratings1.018 Ratings8.2110 Ratings
    Report Versioning00 Ratings00 Ratings7.984 Ratings
    Data Discovery and Visualization
    Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of JMP and Logi Info and Looker
    Feature
    JMP
    -
    Ratings
    Logi Info
    4.8
    22 Ratings
    50% below category average
    Looker
    6.6
    128 Ratings
    19% below category average
    Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings5.022 Ratings7.7124 Ratings
    Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization00 Ratings2.017 Ratings7.5110 Ratings
    Predictive Analytics00 Ratings7.56 Ratings4.66 Ratings
    Access Control and Security
    Comparison of Access Control and Security features of JMP and Logi Info and Looker
    Feature
    JMP
    -
    Ratings
    Logi Info
    2.0
    19 Ratings
    124% below category average
    Looker
    7.3
    128 Ratings
    15% below category average
    Multi-User Support (named login)00 Ratings2.019 Ratings7.5120 Ratings
    Role-Based Security Model00 Ratings2.018 Ratings7.2105 Ratings
    Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings2.016 Ratings7.2122 Ratings
    Report-Level Access Control00 Ratings2.01 Ratings7.360 Ratings
    Mobile Capabilities
    Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of JMP and Logi Info and Looker
    Feature
    JMP
    -
    Ratings
    Logi Info
    2.0
    20 Ratings
    117% below category average
    Looker
    5.2
    95 Ratings
    39% below category average
    Responsive Design for Web Access00 Ratings2.020 Ratings4.991 Ratings
    Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile00 Ratings2.016 Ratings5.885 Ratings
    Mobile Application00 Ratings00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
    Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding
    Comparison of Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding features of JMP and Logi Info and Looker
    Feature
    JMP
    -
    Ratings
    Logi Info
    5.2
    15 Ratings
    39% below category average
    Looker
    -
    Ratings
    REST API00 Ratings8.56 Ratings00 Ratings
    Javascript API00 Ratings8.48 Ratings00 Ratings
    iFrames00 Ratings2.09 Ratings00 Ratings
    Themeable User Interface (UI)00 Ratings2.015 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    JMPLogi InfoLooker
    Small Businesses
    IBM SPSS Statistics
    Score8 out of 10
    Cyfe
    Score4 out of 10
    Cyfe
    Score4 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Alteryx Platform
    Score9 out of 10
    Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
    Score8.1 out of 10
    Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
    Score8.1 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Alteryx Platform
    Score9 out of 10
    Jaspersoft Community Edition
    Score7 out of 10
    Jaspersoft Community Edition
    Score7 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    JMPLogi InfoLooker
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.8
    (30 ratings)
    3.0
    (26 ratings)
    8.0
    (134 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (16 ratings)
    1.0
    (2 ratings)
    9.2
    (8 ratings)
    Usability
    8.8
    (7 ratings)
    2.0
    (3 ratings)
    8.8
    (12 ratings)
    Availability
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.2
    (7 ratings)
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    8.8
    (14 ratings)
    Online Training
    7.9
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    9.6
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Data Sharing and Collaboration
    4.0
    (1 ratings)
    6.5
    (8 ratings)
    8.5
    (51 ratings)
    Data Sources
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.6
    (8 ratings)
    7.3
    (51 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Professional Services
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    JMPLogi InfoLooker
    Likelihood to Recommend
    JMP Statistical Discovery
    It is perfectly suited for statistical analyses, but I would not recommend JMP for users who do not have a statistical background. As previously stated, the learning curve is exceptionally steep, and I think that it would prove to be too steep for those without statistical background/knowledge
    Read full review
    Insightsoftware, Inc
    Logi Composer is the best of the product range that Logi Analytics offers; Logi Info is, in my mind, a terrible experience and should be discontinued. Logi Info is not a BI tool and many CEOs and product managers believe it is. Instead, it is a tool for web developers to create IIS apps with a library of BI-type components, and with everything else having to be hand-coded in JavaScript and CSS. Maybe this was cool back in the early 2000s when Logi Info came about, but today I'd recommend using Visual Studio, C#, .NET, and finding a NuGet package for your visualisations if you wanted to go the route of making your own web app. This said, where it is suited is if you have a burning desire to make a stand-alone IIS-based web application and you don't need or want to leverage any existing skills in .NET or PHP or other frameworks/languages. Instead, you want to use the Logi Info XML-based BI widgets and you're happy to make something quick without needing it to look really awesome.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    When data drives potential for new orders, Looker earns its place in our tech stack. If, on the other hand, we are hoping for pipeline generation, Looker is useful if you are willing to repeatedly go check customer utilizations .... it is not appropriate if you are hoping to automate data analysis for this purpose.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    JMP Statistical Discovery
    • JMP is designed from the ground-up to be a tool for analysts who do not have PhDs in Statistics without in anyway "dumbing down" the level of statistical analysis applied. In fact, JMP operationalizes the most advanced statistical methods. JMP's design is centred on the JMP data table and dialog boxes. It is data focused not jargon-focussed. So, unlike other software where you must choose the correct statistical method (eg. contingency, ANOVA, linear regression, etc.), with JMP you simply assign the columns in a dialog into roles in the analysis and it chooses the correct statistical method. It's a small thing but it reflects the thinking of the developers: analysts know their data and should only have to think about their data. Analyses should flow from there.
    • JMP makes most things interactive and visual. This makes analyses dynamic and engaging and obviates the complete dependence on understanding p-values and other statistical concepts(though they are all there) that are often found to be foreign or intimidating.
    • One of the best examples of this is JMP's profiler. Rather than looking at static figures in a spreadsheet, or a series of formulas, JMP profiles the formulas interactively. You can monitor the effect of changing factors (Xs) and see how they interact with other factors and the responses. You can also specify desirability (maximize, maximize, match-target) and their relative importances to find factor settings that are optimal. I have spent many lengthy meetings working with the profiler to review design and process options with never a dull moment.
    • The design of experiments (DOE) platform is simply outstanding and, in fact, the principal developers of it have won several awards. Over the last 15 years, using methods broadly known as an "exchange algorithm," JMP can create designs that are far more flexible than conventional designs. This means, for example, that you can create a design with just the interactions that are of interest; you can selectively choose those interactions that are not of interest and drop collecting their associated combinations.
    • Classical designs are rigid. For example, a Box-Benhken or other response surface design can have only continuous factors. What if you want to investigate these continuous factors along with other categorical factors such as different categorical variables such as materials or different furnace designs and look at the interaction among all factors? This common scenario cannot be handled with conventional designs but are easily accommodated with JMP's Custom DOE platform.
    • The whole point of DOE is to be able to look at multiple effects comprehensively but determine each one's influence in near or complete isolation. The custom design platform, because it produces uniques designs, provides the means to evaluate just how isolated the effects are. This can be done before collecting data because this important property of the DOE is a function of the design, not the data. By evaluating these graphical reports of the quality of the design, the analyst can make adjustments, adding or reducing runs, to optimize cost, effort and expected learnings.
    • Over the last number of releases of JMP, which appear about every 18 months now, they have skipped the dialog boxes to direct, drag-and-drop analyses for building graphs and tables as well as Statistical Process Control Charts. Interactivity such as this allows analysts to "be in the moment." As with all aspects of JMP, they are thinking of their subject matter without the cumbersomeness associated with having to think about statistical methods. It's rather like a CEO thinking about growing the business without having to think about every nuance and intricacy of accounting. The statistical thinking is burned into the design of JMP.
    • Without data analysis is not possible. Getting data into a situation where it can be analyzed can be a major hassle. JMP can pull data from a variety of sources including Excel spreadsheets, CSV, direct data feeds and databases via ODBC. Once the data is in JMP it has all the expected data manipulation capabilities to form it for analysis.
    • Back in 2000 JMP added a scripting language (JMP Scripting Language or JSL for short) to JMP. With JSL you can automate routine analyses without any coding, you can add specific analyses that JMP does not do out of the box and you can create entire analytical systems and workflows. We have done all three. For example, one consumer products company we are working with now has a need for a variant of a popular non-parametric analysis that they have employed for years. This method will be found in one of the menus and appear as if it were part of JMP to begin with. As for large systems, we have written some that are tens of thousands of lines that take the form of virtual labs and process control systems among others.
    • JSL applications can be bundled and distributed as JMP Add-ins which make it really easy for users to add to their JMP installation. All they need to do is double-click on the add-in file and it's installed. Pharmaceutical companies and others who are regulated or simply want to control the JMP environment can lock-down JMP's installation and prevent users from adding or changing functionality. Here, add-ins can be distributed from a central location that is authorized and protected to users world-wide.
    • JMP's technical support is second to none. They take questions by phone and email. I usually send email knowing that I'll get an informed response within 24 hours and if they cannot resolve a problem they proactively keep you informed about what is being done to resolve the issue or answer your question.
    Read full review
    Insightsoftware, Inc
    • Clear/Concise view of data. Easily intuitive, amazing drill down capability, fully user configurable panels and dashboards.
    • Self-Service is such a powerful tool for facilities that want to create/design their own reports/dashboards, it's instantly recognized as being very powerful and agile.
    • Logi software makes the designer realize that they should think outside the box and not stick with "it's how we have always done it limitation". It allows you to be very creative.
    Read full review
    Google
    • Show visited pages - sessions, pageviews - which programs are viewed the most.
    • Displays session source/medium views to see where users are coming from.
    • It shows the video titles, URLs, and event counts so we can monitor the performance of our videos.
    • It gives a graphic face to the numbers, such as using bar charts, pie graphs, and other charts to show user trends or which channels are driving engagement.
    • Our clients like to see the top pages visited for a month.
    • I like the drop-and-drag approach, and building charts is a little easier than it was before.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    JMP Statistical Discovery
    • In general JMP is much better fit for a general "data mining" type application. If you want a specific statistics based toolbox, (meaning you just want to run some predetermined test, like testing for a different proportion) then JMP works, but is not the best. JMP is much more suited to taking a data set and starting from "square 1" and exploring it through a range of analytics.
    • The CPK (process capability) module output is shockingly poor in JMP. This sticks out because, while as a rule everything in JMP is very visual and presentable, the CPK graph is a single-line-on-grey-background drawing. It is not intuitive, and really doesn't tell the story. (This is in contrast with a capability graph in Minitab, which is intuitive and tells a story right off.) This is also the case with the "guage study" output, used for mulivary analysis in a Six Sigma project. It is not intuitive and you need to do a lot of tweaking to make the graph tell you the story right off. I have given this feedback to JMP, and it is possible that it will be addressed in future versions.
    • I've never heard of JMP allowing floating licenses in a company. This will ALWAYS be a huge sticking point for small to middle size companies, that don't have teams people dedicated to analytics all day. If every person that would do problem solving needs his/her own seat, the cost can be prohibitive. (It gets cheaper by the seat as you add licenses, but for a small company that might get no more than 5 users, it is still a hard sell.)
    Read full review
    Insightsoftware, Inc
    • It is not always intuitive to incorporate JavaScript into Logi Info. The tools are all available, but the process requires multiple resource in translating between Logi and JavaScript.
    • The toolbox is too vast for Logi to provide a 'quick implementation' or 'quick start guide'. There are so many tools that Logi expects the client to determine which fit their use case. There are purchasable 'Professional Services' options for implementation, but without these, the toolset is almost too big.
    Read full review
    Google
    • Documentation is scarce, and very difficult to find when you need it.
    • Pricing is unclear, particularly as you look to scale your reports across the business.
    • Data from other sources is not represented in the system as well as first party Google services.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    JMP Statistical Discovery
    JMP has been good at releasing updates and adding new features and their support is good. Analytics is quick and you don't need scripting/programming experience. It has been used organization wide, and works well in that respect. Open source means that there are concerns regarding timely support. Cheap licensing and easy to maintain.
    Read full review
    Insightsoftware, Inc
    Logi Info is a very outdated, archaic product that tries to build .NET / Java web apps using an obscure XML-based markup language to implement BI widgets, with a lot of extra CSS/JavaScript needed on your own to make it do the best things. There are many other better tools. It is not a BI tool, and as a web development tool it's not great either. I'd recommend getting some good third-party .NET BI library if you want your web devs to make the reports, otherwise use a proper BI tool like Power BI or Tableau, or even Logi Composer (formerly ZoomData before Logi acquired it.)
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    I give it this rating because it deems as effective, I am able to complete majority of my tasks using this app. It is very helpful when analyzing the data provided and shown in the app and it's just overall a great app for Operational use, despite the small hiccups it has (live data).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    JMP Statistical Discovery
    The GUI interface makes it easier to generate plots and find statistics without having to write code. The JSL scripting is a bit of a steep learning curve but does give you more ability to customize your analysis. Overall, I would recommend JMP as a good product for overall usability.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Insightsoftware, Inc
    I am giving 9 rating because the Logi Info still needs to improve on the tutorials part and make it easy for the beginners. Otherwise, it's a very good analytics tool which offers more than 20 types of visualization. It's predictive analysis feature and easy to embed with technologies make it stand out in the market.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    Looker is relatively easy to use, even as it is set up. The customers for the front-end only have issues with the initial setup for looker ml creations. Other "looks" are relatively easy to set up, depending on the ETL and the data which is coming into Looker on a regular basis.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    JMP Statistical Discovery
    No answers on this topic
    Insightsoftware, Inc
    No answers on this topic
    Google
    No objections
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    JMP Statistical Discovery
    No answers on this topic
    Insightsoftware, Inc
    No answers on this topic
    Google
    Somehow resources heavy, both on server and client. I recommned at least 50Mbs data rate and high performance desktop comouter to be abke to run comolex tasks and configure larger amount of data. On the other hand, the client does not need to worry when viewing, the performance is usually ok
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    JMP Statistical Discovery
    Support is great and give ease of contact, rapid response, and willingness to 'stick to the task' until resolution or acknowledgement that the problem would have to be resolved in a future build. Basically, one gets the very real sense that another human being is sensitive to your problems - great or small.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Insightsoftware, Inc
    The support process is bit slow and has a good scope improvement but overall it's good as team is very supportive. They generally take 1-2 days time to respond emails sent to them but some times a delay is also expected. Overall, I did not face any major issues using the service.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    Never had to work with support for issues. Any questions we had, they would respond promptly and clearly. The one-time setup was easy, by reading documentation. If the feature is not supported, they will add a feature request. In this case, LDAP support was requested over OKTA. They are looking into it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Online Training
    JMP Statistical Discovery
    I have not used your online training. I use JMP manuals and SAS direct help.
    Read full review
    Insightsoftware, Inc
    No answers on this topic
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    JMP Statistical Discovery
    No answers on this topic
    Insightsoftware, Inc
    No answers on this topic
    Google
    Very satisfied, easy to implement
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    JMP Statistical Discovery
    MS Excel with AnalysisToolPak provides a home-grown solution, but requires a high degree of upkeep and is difficult to hand off. Minitab is the closes competitor, but JMP is better suited to the production environment, roughly equivalent in price, and has superior support.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Insightsoftware, Inc
    Logi gave us the flexibility we needed to meet the configurable nature of our product and for the need to create custom reports. Other products did not allow flexbility to generate reports via script as was one of our primary requirements.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    Looker Studio, you can easily report on data from various sources without programming. Looker Studio is available at no charge for creators and report viewers. Enterprise customers who upgrade to Looker Studio Pro will receive support and expanded administrative features, including team content management. So it's good.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    JMP Statistical Discovery
    No answers on this topic
    Insightsoftware, Inc
    No answers on this topic
    Google
    Perfect price to performance
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    JMP Statistical Discovery
    • ROI: Even if the cost can be high, the insights you get out of the tool would definitely be much more valuable than the actual cost of the software. In my case, most of the results of your analysis were shown to the client, who was blown away, making the money spent well worth for us.
    • Potential negative: If you are not sure your team will use it, there's a chance you will just waste money. Sometimes the IT department (usually) tries to deploy a better tool for the entire organization but they keep using the old tool they are used too (most likely MS Excel).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Insightsoftware, Inc
    • By embedding Logi in our solution and using the Logi Self-Service Module we can provide this flexibility to our users without requiring custom development work for each new request.
    • We succeeded in developing embedded self-service analytics at scale with a combination of Logi analytics as front-end and a Cassandra data lake with Spark aggregation algorithms as back-end.
    • We analyze the insurance industry and need to replicate different data formats across hundreds of databases to support multi-tenant (customer) BI reports and "ad hoc" data review on millions or hundreds of millions of records per customer.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    • Looker has a poignant impact on our business's ROI objectives. As an advertising exchange we have specific goals for daily requests and fill, and having premade Looks to monitor this is an integral piece of our operational capability
    • To facilitate an efficient monthly billing cycle in our organization, Looker is essential to track estimated revenue and impression delivery by publisher. Without the Looks we have set up, we would spend considerably more time and effort segmenting revenue by vertical.
    • Looker's unique value proposition is making analytical tools more digestible to people without conventional analytical experience. Other competing tools like Tableau require considerably more training and context to successfully use, and the ability to easily plot different visualizations is one of its greatest selling points.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    JMP Screenshots

    Screenshot of in JMP, how all graphical displays and the data table are linked.Screenshot of a few designed experiments, for more understanding and maximum impact. Users can understand cause and effect using statistically designed experiments — even with limited resources.Screenshot of an example of Predictive Modeling in JMP Pro's Prediction Profiler, used to build better models for more confident decision making.Screenshot of example outputs, built with tools designed for quality and reliability.

    Logi Info Screenshots

    Screenshot of Logi Info Discovery ModuleScreenshot of A customized Logi dashboardScreenshot of Logi powered application showing a completely unique UI/InterfaceScreenshot of Another unique display of dataScreenshot of Logi leveraging D3 charts via its robust extensibility

    Looker Screenshots

    Screenshot of a Looker dashboard with a geo chart.