Sincerely, I have used both of those platforms before. The portal interface (UI) is much better than LF's, but the quality of the information Lead Forensics provides is higher. Data mining is quite similar, but I had the impression that LF gave us more valuable information, …
Lead Forensics is strong for identifying which companies are visiting your website and turning anonymous traffic into sales opportunities. Webeo is more focused on personalising the website experience in real time to increase conversions. Google Analytics provides broader …
Completely different system as Mediahawk tracks the user journey and our calls. Our business is very call-dependent. We don't publicise prices because they are dynamic, so many of our existing and new customers call us for quotes. Mediahawk has allowed me to track the journey …
We use both of these products in unison and they complement each other well. ZoomInfo allows us to proactively target sectors we see a lot of visitirs from via the Lead Forensics portal.
Provides a more details breakdown of visits, by page, duration and previous history. The reporting allows for a more clearer view of visit history, allowing our consultants to build a more complete picture of buyer behaviour
ZoomInfo is able to pull more details about the potential client but lacks the visibility to identifying traffic to the site. It has "intent" but lacks the reporting capabilities to tell us what facility visited the website, and their industry. Not enough details from ZoomInfo …
While we looked at ZoomInfo, we never actually used it because it didn’t appear to provide the level of website visitor insight we were looking for. We currently use HubSpot for tracking website visits, but Lead Forensics stacks up a thousand times better when it comes to …
We actually contracted with Klarity and Lead Forensics, as the are combined stronger together. It is all about Martech Stacks and we felt Lead Forensics provided a strong overall of our website, but Klarity brought more depth into companies, along with intent data from the …
This was a customer decision (we are a marketing agency), but Lead Forensics stacks up well against the competitors. As an agency, we like more data, but for what the sales team needed in Lead analysis from the website, this is a powerful tool.
I’ve used SalesIntel primarily for contact data, but I haven’t explored its web tracking features. What sets Lead Forensics apart is how quickly it delivers actionable insights from site visits. It helps me identify engaged accounts and prioritize follow-up without extra …
I personally use sales intel in tandem with Lead Forensics. They provide different set of data. Lead Forensics is a great tool for helping open up to new markets that you might not have realized existed. It’s an excellent tool for anyone in any facet of sales, worth the money …
Vice President of Product Development and Senior Consultant
Chose StatCounter
StatCounter is a more basic tool than Google Analytics, but in many ways, it is more robust. It provides more detail by visitor. It also allows me to check Google Analytics stats to see if my data matches.
Statcounter excels with the simplicity and efficiency of the analytics. You can see exactly what's going on on your sites without the need to dig into complex google analytics data.
Wish StatCounter had a more comprehensive report feature comparable to Google Analytics. I feel StatCounter is easier to use and to understand when compared to Google. Some people prefer Google Analytics, but it provides so much more information that the average person really …
Nothing compares with Google Analytics, but then again many people don't need or understand the complexity of Google Analytics (GA). If you set up GA incorrectly you can get information that is complete gibberish. StatCounter has a simple setup, so less chance of false …
Again, these are two, different animals. I have used others but that was many years ago. The fact that I cannot recall the others, and have stayed loyal to StatCounter is a testament to StatCounter's long term value to me and my clients.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose StatCounter
I have used Google Analytics as well as internal server statistics (can't recall the internal app name). StatCounter definitely has the ease of use and simplicity factors on its side. That being said, I still recommend using a combination of StatCounter plus another external …
Features
Lead Forensics
StatCounter
Web Analytics
Comparison of Web Analytics features of Product A and Product B
It's a great system. As I said, I had never used it, but I feel that if I do move on, I would definitely take this with me - everyone I introduce it to via my network is amazed by it. As a small company, for our sales and marketing, it is a brilliant platform; in fact, I'll go as far as to say that our logistics and supply chain look at it daily as well. Reports are fantastic, and the fact that you can jump on and see data in real time is brilliant.
Free services provide a wonderful resource for people on tight budgets. If willing to put forth work in data managing/analysis and If basic high traffic information or drilling down specific users in low traffic situations is needed, then StatCounter may fit your needs. If automation and low overhead are a high priority then some more expensive packages can provide the same and more information with less hassle. Because StatCounter is free, there is low risk to see if StatCounter works in your specific usage scenario.
Lead Forensics helps us see which companies are visiting our site, even if they don’t fill out a form. This gives us a chance to reach out to businesses that are already showing interest but might not have contacted us yet.
Instead of cold-calling random prospects, we can see which pages a company has viewed and how often they return. This helps us tailor our conversations based on what they’re actually interested in.
The Lead Forensics support team has been great whenever we’ve had questions. They’re quick to respond and always ready to help, whether it’s troubleshooting an issue or offering advice on how to get the most out of the platform.
Better updates on companies' current names. Often if a company was a different company years ago it still says the old company name which is confusing.
Better identifying the correct location. Sometimes it seems like that the location coming up is the wrong location.
Giving a better understanding of how they got to the website would help too. Often is says "direct" but I would like to know if it was via a link from an email or what
For the free version data logging is limited to two weeks, which requires manual pulling of the data (CSV or excel formats) on a regular basis which can become tedious.
For offline graphing/presentations, data must be re synthesized/visualized. This typical requires someone manual manipulation the data or develop scripts or coding to improve the collection of the data for offline presentation and records.
Lacks some of the pretty visuals that can be seen in competitors such as Google Analytics.
Lacks user specific in depth tracking across multiple services (mailchimp, google etc), like more fully featured platforms (Kissmetrics) are able to provide.
I have not had any issues with malfunctions when using statcounter, so that would lead me to continue using the program. I would like to see more social media measuring tools, but again, we don't use the program to dig really deep. We're just looking to figure out who is reading what articles on our website are the most liked. And it helps lead our editorial team in the right direction.
Lead Forensics is usable and has clear videos scattered around the platform, encouraging users to level up. The CSM team is great at supporting and providing training for sales and marketing. Dashboards are a bit clunky, and the UI isn't the best. From memory, it hasn't really changed since we've been using it. These factors hold the platform back, as something as simple as filtering can be hidden behind a few clicks, which some salespeople are unaware of.
Top support from the Lead Forensics team. They take time to understand your business specifications, they make sure your needs are fulfilled, they show the new assets of the platform. The rythm for the business review is very flexible. You can access a live chat at any time. A lot of tutorials help you to deepen your skills in using the platform for your busines.
Sincerely, I have used both of those platforms before. The portal interface (UI) is much better than LF's, but the quality of the information Lead Forensics provides is higher. Data mining is quite similar, but I had the impression that LF gave us more valuable information, even though other platforms were sometimes better from that perspective. Anyway, in the end, we preferred to go to the market leader about this type of tool, LF is the Coca-Cola of this market.
Statcounter excels with the simplicity and efficiency of the analytics. You can see exactly what's going on on your sites without the need to dig into complex google analytics data.
We are still in the very early stages of using Lead Forensics for our agency, but I can see that it could already be very useful to us as we haven't had insights like this previously.
Our very first use case with Lead Forensics was with a brand-new client and I would say it went exceptionally well. We were running a large media campaign for them, and it was very insightful to see how those specific businesses were getting to the site and what page they were going to. Like mentioned previously, this helped their very small sales team to go after businesses they know were interested in them.