MailMeter vs. Mimecast Cloud Archive

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
MailMeter
Score 9.6 out of 10
N/A
Irish company Waterford Technologies offers MailMeter, an email archiving solution.N/A
Mimecast Cloud Archive
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
Mimecast Cloud Archive provides an archive storage solution for data retention, as well as search and retrieval of email, attachments and MS Teams conversations. The cloud archiving solution offers search capabilities for employees and automated tools for administrators that simplify management of mailboxes, e-discovery and litigation support.N/A
Pricing
MailMeterMimecast Cloud Archive
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
MailMeterMimecast Cloud Archive
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
MailMeterMimecast Cloud Archive
Considered Both Products
MailMeter
Chose MailMeter
Probably an unfair comparison, but Mimecast has some interesting features that MailMeter does not. First, Mimecast is cloud, MailMeter is on-premise. Mimecast has all the same eDiscovery features that MailMeter has, however is also able to offer seamless archive stubbing into …
Mimecast Cloud Archive

No answer on this topic

Best Alternatives
MailMeterMimecast Cloud Archive
Small Businesses
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.8 out of 10
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.8 out of 10
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Microsoft Exchange
Microsoft Exchange
Score 8.7 out of 10
Microsoft Exchange
Microsoft Exchange
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
MailMeterMimecast Cloud Archive
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(2 ratings)
9.4
(26 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.9
(16 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(16 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(16 ratings)
Support Rating
3.0
(1 ratings)
7.3
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
MailMeterMimecast Cloud Archive
Likelihood to Recommend
Waterford Technologies
If you are looking for an onsite solution, MailMeter does the job. Like any program, you will have problems on occasion, however the product is fairly stable. In my opinion, mail archiving is a service that's more suited towards cloud-based services rather than on premise. Much like a spam filter that runs on a Windows server, this product feels like it's from a bygone era.
Read full review
Mimecast
This is for any business that needs secure, tamper-resistant, long-term email storage. Mimecast cloud archive is the answer. Easy self-service user interface, Admin interface is generally pretty usable as well with a good level of granular permissions for delegation to support staff. It allows cost savings with email storage by implementing retention policies and offloading the storage to Mimecast.
Read full review
Pros
Waterford Technologies
  • The program is a beast and continues to chug away at emails.
  • The interface is simple and doesn't require reading a manual to understand.
  • MailMeter works fully with all versions of Exchange, including Office 365.
Read full review
Mimecast
  • Sync and Recover is a great tool for when you need to recover emails quickly or in bulk.
  • The archive is nested in the mail protection admin portal, so it is easy to navigate between the recent mail in the protection portal (limited window of time) and the archive when searching for emails during investigations or troubleshooting.
  • The additional protection feature allows scanning of emails that land in the archive. This helps with internal to internal emails that might have been malicious, for instance from a compromised account.
  • The Mimecast for Outlook add-in is nice, although you can access it from the web as well, for seeing your own archives. If users are missing an email, they can look there on their own without submitting an IT support ticket.
  • We do not allow end users to restore their own, but that is a feature that exists as well.
Read full review
Cons
Waterford Technologies
  • They can improve and work on GUI for sure
Read full review
Mimecast
  • The system runs slowly at times.
  • There are so many features, it can be difficult to find exactly how to perform some actions.
  • Emails are not automatically shown in their native format when searched you must click on the email and then request it be formatted in the proper format (HTML, plaintext, etc.).
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Waterford Technologies
No answers on this topic
Mimecast
The system does what we require of it and the support is good. No need to replace it at the moment.
Read full review
Usability
Waterford Technologies
No answers on this topic
Mimecast
The archive is easy to use and the searching is highly customizable. You can easily search based on timeframe, sender, recipient, words, phrases, and attachments. The ability to search keywords within attachments, body, and subject line is incredibly helpful. We're able to quickly and easily find what we're looking for.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Waterford Technologies
No answers on this topic
Mimecast
There is never an issue. Everytime I have needed to access my own personal search archive or globally search across the whole business it works each time. I cannot recall a time where the service was down when needed to be used and all our staff use it daily.
Read full review
Performance
Waterford Technologies
No answers on this topic
Mimecast
The stability of the tool is the biggest factor, it has a fantastic uptime and the loading speed is exceptional. Long gone are the days of waiting for Outlook to open up a traditional PST archive, I can simply click, find what I need and go, usually, before outlook has opened the archive. It is an exceptionally efficient tool.
Read full review
Support Rating
Waterford Technologies
Of the few times I've dealt with support, I felt like the people who were on the other end couldn't help me. Latest instance was with resolving a license renewal issue, they had to connect me to someone in Ireland and were on a tight schedule to help me during their shift. Come to find that I could not renew a license because their license server was down. In all it wasn't a good support experience, however unfortunately par for the course.
Read full review
Mimecast
It does a good job. The support team of the product was good and responsive and was also able to fix the issues I was experiencing at the time. It isn't perfect and takes some time to set up properly in the environment but once set up the product does what it is supposed to do which is what you are paying for.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Waterford Technologies
No answers on this topic
Mimecast
We used Mimecast professional services for the implementation and it was flawless as we were migrating from a competitor's product. The only downside was the amount of time required to ingest all the data as this was coming from a few different sources and in some cases it took months to migrate and index all the content. Apart from that the process was very well guided, with plenty of communication all throughout and without any major issues or downtime.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Waterford Technologies
Probably an unfair comparison, but Mimecast has some interesting features that MailMeter does not. First, Mimecast is cloud, MailMeter is on-premise. Mimecast has all the same eDiscovery features that MailMeter has, however is also able to offer seamless archive stubbing into Outlook. Since you don't have to suck up resources on your local network, you easily save money spent on disk/compute resources.
Read full review
Mimecast
One of the big features of Mimecast is the ability to send large files. We used to use CItrix Sharefile for this but switched over to Mimecast's LFS for one large reason...since we are archiving all of our mail in Mimeast anyway we would have wanted these attachments, even if large, also available to if we go back to look at old emails. However just for usability sake I think Citrix Sharefile's large file send is more polished and probably works a little better. We just choose to use the Mimecast so we had a one stop shop when it came to email archiving
Read full review
Return on Investment
Waterford Technologies
  • in terms of storage it has been awesome
Read full review
Mimecast
  • I can't put an exact dollar figure on it but Mimecast makes our company more efficient when it comes to email search and discovery.
  • Being heavily regulated it's great to have peace of mind when we're audited and I can just say we have Mimecast. Check that box off!
  • We were quite relieved when Mimecast stopped inbound attachments infected with WannaCry.
  • I enjoy the benefits of a cloud service so I don't have to manage hardware, deal with upgrades, or figure out complicated licensing schemes.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Mimecast Cloud Archive Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of