Microsoft Dynamics 365 for Finance and Operations (or Dynamics AX) was an ERP product in the Dynamics family. It has been split into separate Dynamics 365 products and is no longer available.
N/A
Oracle CPQ
Score5.5 out of 10
N/A
Oracle CPQ is a cloud-based application that helps sellers configure the right mix of products or services and create accurate, professional quotes to quickly meet their customers’ pricing needs.
$240
per month per user
Pricing
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Oracle CPQ
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
CPQ Pricing
$240.00
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Oracle CPQ
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Oracle CPQ
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and Oracle CPQ
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.8
8 Ratings
16% above category average
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
9.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
9.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
8.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and Oracle CPQ
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
7.0
13 Ratings
8% below category average
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
API for custom integration
5.013 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plug-ins
8.912 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and Oracle CPQ
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
6.0
14 Ratings
34% below category average
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability
5.013 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
7.014 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and Oracle CPQ
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.3
14 Ratings
9% above category average
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Dashboards
9.012 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
7.014 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
9.014 Ratings
00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and Oracle CPQ
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.2
15 Ratings
6% above category average
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Accounts payable
7.015 Ratings
00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
7.014 Ratings
00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
8.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
9.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
7.010 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
9.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
8.99 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and Oracle CPQ
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.7
13 Ratings
9% above category average
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking
8.013 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automatic reordering
9.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
Location management
9.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and Oracle CPQ
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
7.6
13 Ratings
4% below category average
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Pricing
8.012 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order entry
9.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
Credit card processing
3.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
8.010 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Orchestration
9.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and Oracle CPQ
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.7
10 Ratings
14% above category average
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Billing Management
8.99 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
8.010 Ratings
00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
8.97 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
8.97 Ratings
00 Ratings
Period Close
8.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and Oracle CPQ
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.9
7 Ratings
16% above category average
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting
9.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Costing
8.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost Capture
8.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
9.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
8.95 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and Oracle CPQ
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.8
5 Ratings
22% above category average
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling
8.95 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
6.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and Oracle CPQ
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.7
4 Ratings
15% above category average
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and Oracle CPQ
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.7
7 Ratings
20% above category average
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared
9.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Authoring
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Repository
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
8.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supplier Management
8.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and Oracle CPQ
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.8
2 Ratings
26% above category average
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Risk Repository
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Management
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue Detection
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and Oracle CPQ
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.5
6 Ratings
19% above category average
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization
8.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
8.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
8.95 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
10.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and Oracle CPQ
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
7.7
6 Ratings
3% above category average
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Production Process Design
9.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Production Management
8.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configuration Management
7.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Work Execution
8.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
9.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and Oracle CPQ
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
9.2
6 Ratings
23% above category average
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Forecasting
9.95 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Planning
9.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and Oracle CPQ
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
9.0
3 Ratings
20% above category average
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Proposal Management
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
CPQ
Comparison of CPQ features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and Oracle CPQ
It integrates fully with the other Microsoft software we use daily, and this coordination speeds up our work and gives us the agility to run easily. For example, in a purchase inquiry, the customer, after submitting a request, identifies the teams that should work on the project, and if they need further review by other people, they are added to the process, and everything is managed seamlessly rather than the sales process. Get the result as fast as possible.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I think CPQ had worked so well for our company because of the widespread nature of our associates and tracking orders that were being placed in multiple time zones. My team specifically needed a way of analyzing these orders to track our progress in real time and sort out any supply orders before they became an issue. If you are in a centralized location with a smaller team then this may not yield much use to you.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Microsoft Dynamics AX's scalability to meet our regional office needs provide flexibility to the team's requirements.
Combined with Citrix Xenapp, the application offers seamless access for users on high latency unreliable network connection to the application.
Application maintenance and updates are easy which makes it possible for us to manage remotely considering the servers are located in a remote Asia site.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
MRP can be slow to adapt to changes in actual production or supply chain transactions.
Setting up number sequences seems a trivial matter, but these numbers ID transactions once they are in the ledger and are key--easy to miss this point in the implementation process.
Bank rec being easily automated and able to quickly plug into a bank back end to get data is not the best.
Payment processing can be 'clunky' based on checks, ACH, Wires...as some of these items are not triggered out of the box in AX, bur are easily added --talking ACH and Wires specifically.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Significant setup time, cost, and maintenance. We have to use an implementation partner
Does not always play well with other software, even Oracle software. While this is improved and being further improved, that it was a third party acquisition means things sometimes require a little extra care
Additional setup documentation and first walkthroughs would be helpful, especially if it was all in one place
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Microsoft Dynamics continues to evolve by bringing more functionality to the customer. Also there are several independent software providers that offer a wide range of solutions for vertical markets.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
So far it is all good with BigMachines, looking for new features since Oracle acquisition has created a lot of expectations. We have outlined our limitations (out of box functionality) in our periodic customer successor advice meetings for a while, hope we get a resolution soon. Also, the BigMachines user license fee has increased a lot in the last three years.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Overall the product does what we need it to do in order for us to function as a company. While there are some concerns over ongoing costs, the belief is, once we have it fully acclimated to our business the cost should settle into alignment with our original expectations. The new features that are consistently being added do add value to the product as they are usually customer request directed.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
The software UI can be as complex or as simple as you need it to be (depending on the business). It does require training others on quote configuration and the order in which to build out order positions prior to configuring a quote. Once users are trained;however, it is fairly straight-forward. The UI is still more static than other new wizard/drag-and-drop models, but it get's the job done
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Some integration and high volume ramping challenges, particularly with BizTalk and SQL Server, but getting sorted out. Outages over time appeared to be more dependent on integration complexity than AX MES.
Some integration and high volume ramping challenges, particularly with BizTalk and SQL Server, but getting sorted out. Outages over time appeared to be more dependent on integration complexity than AX MES.
It depends upon the day however there are so many failure points with online services, including our internet service, that this is probably closer to 9 with the latest version
We use a 3rd-party Microsoft Partner for the system. They are responsive and very knowledgeable. While costs have been mentioned several times in this review they are very aware of costs and have developers who are more economical they use to help offset the level of work required to meet our changes and fix our issues.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Some specific support personal was good and fixed some problems fast using proper solutions. But when one of them went to sleep when we had critical issues and they do unreported commits to our production environment which caused issues and they were hiding it?? you can not give more than a two (maybe even that is too much). They also failed to add a feature for us which also bring the grade down.
It took a lot of work, but Microsoft ultimately did a good job with in-person training, including being onsite in multiple global locations for extended periods.
They have pretty good training. Our business analysts have been able to go to entry and advanced level training. They have a train the trainer model. Our business analyst attended training, then trained the rest of our staff.
Our solution deviated from a number of key out-of-the-box standards that were included in Online training. We just used that for introduction to the general functionality.
Some rough spots, but ultimately worked out. The contract didn't appear to be structured to support the level of overlapping facility deployments required to meet timeline commitments. Merging cultures on the program was also challenging. Overall, not an easy implementation by any stretch. Everyone did the best they could.
It was a much more technical implementation than we thought. It involved much more code.
Future releases have made and will make administering the tool easier.
EDL consulting had one good developer, but when he was moved off, they were horrible to work with.
The BMI sales team does a “BOA” or a “Business Operation Assessment” which is extremely valuable, not only for them to scope an implementation and get more reach within the organization, but it is also a documentation of business process that most organizations don’t have. It highlights inefficiencies and allows for correction during implementation.
Having a dedicated team (in-house) for implementation is key
I was not part of the decision making process to select Microsoft Dynamics AX, however, I do know that an exhaustive search was done and many options were considered alongside Microsoft Dynamics AX and I feel that the right decision was made in choosing this solution.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Oracle engagement is ahead. They are active in the development of the tool and provide great support after implementation. They also listen to their customers and offer opportunities to feedback and provide input through activities like the customer advisory board forum.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Increased Sales Rep efficiency. Being able to create multiple quotes ACCURATELY and quickly was a game changer.
Large implementation time. It's a little difficult to fit BMI into a SCRUM style build, with multiple working models and prototypes of all 3 simultaneously.
A larger fee for licensing and implementation cost. ROI wouldn't be realized in the first year.