Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Score 5.4 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics GP is an ERP software with accounting capabilities. It includes various packs for customizability and features tailored to specific industries’ needs. GP is offered as a perpetual license or subscription.N/A
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
Oracle Cloud Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) is a core suite of Oracle Cloud software-as-a-service (SaaS) applications. Oracle Expense Management and Oracle Risk Management are part of this solution. Other apps include Financials, Revenue Management, Accounting Hub, PPM, and Procurement. The single cloud platform offers built-in industry standards and modern best practices. ERP software is the backbone of many organizations and Oracle aims to offer a modern, connected…N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeRequired
Additional DetailsPricing per user varies by component within the Oracle ERP Cloud solution.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Considered Both Products
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Microsoft Dynamics GP is obviously superior to the other platforms I’ve used simply in its robustness and GAAP compliance features, but with far less usability and even in someways less usable reporting.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Business Central wasn't out then. Nav, the predecessor, was out, but its user interface was dated until 2009, when the role-tailored client came out; it was much better afterwards. If your company has manufacturing, then Business Central is the way to go. It's unfortunate that …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
It is more powerful in features and ease of use as Microsoft GP provides an intuitive user interface leading to quicker adoption.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Xero is easier to use, closer to Quickbooks. Most of the background GL is automated, where as in GP it is not.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Due to the size of our company Microsoft Dynamics GP works better for us than Quickbooks because of the reporting capabilities. However, the NetSuite demo proved to be much more user-friendly with more reporting capabilities.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Because GP doesn't do CRM we have looked at D365 Customer Engagement for our field service, and F&O as a replacement. Vaporware, no direct upgrade path, and if you want to continue with GP for your back office and just use Field Service it's an insanely complex integration …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Quickbooks, SAP, and Netsuite. We are a small-sized business so Dynamics GP is better for our business.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
There are more features and products overall in the Microsoft package at a better price point. Overall, Salesforce has a much sleeker and more user-friendly design.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
We moved from Epicor Eagle N Series to Dynamics GP as an accounting solution for our new POS system. I believe Dynamics GP has more options to create and present financial statements for a large company with many regions and districts. However, because of the weakness of our …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
They both accomplish the same thing, I think Oracle was what I first learned and thus making the change to Microsoft Dynamics GP just took a little bit of time to learn the technology. After you get the hang of it, it becomes much easier and I taught my coworkers how to use it.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
I did not pick Dynamics over Salesforce, my company was using it and eventually switched over to Salesforce. I would say that Dynamics is user-friendly and the interface is quite easy to understand. I really like the reporting capabilities as well. Once again, the aesthetic …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
GP is more robust than QuickBooks bar none.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
At the time of purchase, Microsoft Dynamics GP seemed more appropriate and more in sync with the needs of our company. The software was more responsive, user-friendly and it allowed for more flexibility with the way it was intended to be used. We were also promised better …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
My recollection of Quickbooks pro isn't great, and it was over 10 years ago. Obviously many things have changed in that time frame, so any comparison would likely not be relevant.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
The only product with have shopped was Sage Intacct. It is somewhat unfair to compare the two solutions, because Sage Intacct is a cloud-based solution. That said, Intacct appears to advertise better reporting/business intelligence capabilities. MS Dynamics GP should be aware …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Microsoft Dynamics GP is one of the best ERP's for a medium or small business in the market today. When we were looking for the right software, it had already a connection developed with our 3rd party logistics system, so the decision was pretty easy since the logistic / supply …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Dynamics GP is much more flexible and enterprise-oriented than Quickbooks Pro or similar software. It can support many more users and scenarios. However it requires more dedicated infrastructure (such as servers and databases) and more dedicated IT resources to maintain and …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
I love Dayforce for payroll. It has been configured to meet all our needs, is user-friendly and the customer support is fantastic. We originally moved from MDGP payroll to Ceridian Insync payroll due to the issues we had. We upgraded to Dayforce and are very happy with the …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Learning GP with so many resources from the GP community has been easy. Someone always has the answer or suggestions to point me in the right direction. I've had very few instances where the systems caused an error that required research in order to fix the glitch.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
We looked at several general ledger software packages. We had excellent customer service and implementation guidance through a third party. Having a knowledgeable consultant is critical to a successful implementation.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Quickbooks Pro and GP are not on the same playing field. GP is a full account system adhering to GAAP, while QuickBooks is designed for the small business market. While starting out with QuickBooks is easy, if you plan to grow, you will soon outgrow it.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Microsoft Dynamics is a good, easy to use product for entities that do not have advanced manufacturing.
If I were to go into a distribution or service type business I would highly recommend it.
If I were to go into an advanced manufacturing environment I would not consider GP.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
More user friendly in certain areas and much more cost effective to manage and support
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
TechSoup had great privcing, I had experince with GP in previous companys and there are a lot of staff accountants who have relevant experience.
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Oracle Fusion Cloud saved the company on server and data warehousing expenses. Oracle Fusion Cloud also allowed for better integration with modules and other software. Our address database is helpful with assets, accounts payable and tax purposes.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Ease of use, no system shock as the previous system was Oracle ERP and no extensive training was required for business users or back end analysts.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Infor M3 (formerly Lawson Intentia), o9 Solutions, Oracle Agile PLM and Oracle E-Business Suite Procurement Contracts
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Oracle Cloud ERP excels in providing solutions at an affordable range and of high quality. It stacks up well against the competitors but I daresay that the fluency can be improved of the solution. The solutions are great value for money and if you are in the market for that …
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
The biggest strength of Oracle Cloud ERP is the integrated nature of the applications and the functionality of cloud ppm.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Good value for money. Progress tracking is great. Reports are advanced. All platform availability. On-premise deployment.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
SAP Ariba Procurement
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure and Oracle Cloud Platform
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Chosen due to finance modules
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Oracle is more reliable than other immature products in the market. Oracle has multifold resources available in the market for each and every technology. Oracle support has made available many solutions to the existing problems and their fixes. The database is of high …
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Prior to Oracle ERP Cloud, we were using Microsoft Dynamics GP, the tool was overall good but it was too slow in processing and the price range was much more than
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Those are different group companies parallelly we're using several products but in the future, we'll give a common decision.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Oracle Cloud ERP is a good way to go - software for a business to manage its operations.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Google Cloud BigTable
Features
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.4
Ratings
17% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
9.0
Ratings
20% above category average
Pay calculation6.20 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Benefit plan administration5.90 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Direct deposit files7.50 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management6.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Reimbursement management6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
4.3
Ratings
55% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
6.5
Ratings
14% below category average
API for custom integration2.50 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Plug-ins6.00 Ratings5.50 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.9
Ratings
17% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
8.4
Ratings
0% above category average
Single sign-on capability5.70 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Role-based user permissions8.20 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.4
Ratings
37% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
6.5
Ratings
13% below category average
Dashboards3.40 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Standard reports6.20 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Custom reports6.40 Ratings6.10 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.0
Ratings
42% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
8.6
Ratings
11% above category average
Accounts payable6.30 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Accounts receivable5.80 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Cash management6.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Bank reconciliation5.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Expense management4.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Time tracking8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Fixed asset management4.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-currency support2.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-division support3.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Regulations compliance3.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Electronic tax filing9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-service portal7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Global Financial Support6.00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers4.70 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting3.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Localizations4.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations4.60 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Enterprise Accounting2.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting3.80 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework3.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Standardized Processes6.20 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
4.4
Ratings
50% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
7.5
Ratings
6% below category average
Inventory tracking5.90 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Automatic reordering1.00 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Location management4.00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Manufacturing module4.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
3.6
Ratings
70% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
7.5
Ratings
5% below category average
Pricing3.60 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Order entry3.60 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Credit card processing1.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold5.10 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Order Orchestration5.10 Ratings7.00 Ratings
End-to-end order visibility3.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Order exception Resolution3.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
7.7
Ratings
3% above category average
Billing Management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Period Close00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
8.2
Ratings
8% above category average
Budgeting and Forecasting00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Project Costing00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Cost Capture00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Capital Project Management00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
7.8
Ratings
11% above category average
Project Planning and Scheduling00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
8.0
Ratings
7% above category average
Award Lifecycle Management00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
7.9
Ratings
11% above category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Contract Authoring00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Contract Repository00 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Supplier Management00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
6.8
Ratings
2% above category average
Risk Repository00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Control Management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Issue Detection00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
7.3
Ratings
5% above category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
7.1
Ratings
5% below category average
Production Process Design00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Production Management00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Configuration Management00 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Work Execution00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
7.7
Ratings
5% above category average
Forecasting00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Inventory Planning00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Performance Monitoring00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
7.1
Ratings
3% below category average
Proposal Management00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management00 Ratings5.50 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Small Businesses
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
Score 5.1 out of 10
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Zoho Books
Zoho Books
Score 9.0 out of 10
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.3 out of 10
Enterprises
SAP Cloud ERP
SAP Cloud ERP
Score 8.6 out of 10
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Likelihood to Recommend
4.1
(0 ratings)
7.7
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.9
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
5.4
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
10.0
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
7.0
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.4
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.2
(0 ratings)
2.0
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.1
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft Dynamics GP is well-suited for our environment, as we pay a diverse group of employees, including on-the-road drivers, shop employees (some in other locations), and office employees. It easily tracks time off, taxes, pay, etc. The reporting allows us to verify with our drivers how they are paid each week, whether it be through mileage or stop-offs.
Read full review
Oracle Fusion Cloud is best suited if a customer moves from Oracle eBusiness Suite (on-prem) to a SaaS offering. The transition is comparatively manageable to implement. However, the customer must understand that we cannot have too many customizations in the SaaS model, so many heavily customized on-prem applications would need to be incorporated in the Cloud by using Cloud tools like Oracle Integration Cloud, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Autonomous Database, Oracle APEX provisioned on OCI, etc.
Read full review
Pros
  • User friendly interface
  • Able to be extended into multiple areas of your business
  • One feature we have been using for a few years is EFT for payables - it has significantly reduced the time spent paying vendors and reduced our check printing and mailing costs. It is very easy to setup and use.
Read full review
  • By utilizing technology, we were able to maintain our efficiency ratio which gives us a huge advantage over our competitors.
  • It offers us sets of dependable apps to increase productivity, enhance control
  • and lower operating costs.
  • Oracle has been an amazing, reliable, and powerful analytical tool that has streamlined budgeting financials planning, and data infrastructure across the entire enterprise.
Read full review
Cons
  • Supply chain management is adequate but not exceptional, and there are challenges tying the product to a website front end. These features are present and work fine in many environments but are often lacking for customers who need more robust systems.
  • Reporting tools often require consulting expertise or an internal business analyst to develop. Many smaller companies don't have this skill set, so it can be costly to upgrade to GP from a smaller packages like QuickBooks.
  • Some features that are available in competing products are still not present in GP, such as full copy-paste functionality and more intelligent workflow/batch processing functions.
Read full review
  • Wide localization process.
  • Automated (without a human) business operations, better rpa solutions, scanning, mobile app, etc
  • Central systems for the company re using more than one erp systems.
  • Better reporting tools
  • Developer source also not such enough maybe to support them in each (in their market) countries.
  • Price policy also
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Due the economic challenges that Puerto Rico is having, the company has had to merge some companies in order to be more efficient. It has been easy in GP to process those merges, even thought we had to spend days to accomplish that the process was smooth and accurate. In addition we were able to streamline the purchasing and sales process and the organization is confident to keep renewing GP for the future versions.
Read full review
This is the product we have chosen to standardize the ERP system throughout our European subsidiaries. We had been operating blindly with each location using their own ERP system. We relied on them to accurately report to us in the US. But now that we are beginning to roll out ERP Cloud, we have much better visibility into day-to-day operations.
Read full review
Usability
Menus are generally quite difficult to navigate, user-friendliness is lacking, platform can at times be unstable (crashes, etc), reports tha would seem to report one thing do not actually return that data. Usability is probably the biggest weakness of Microsoft Dynamics GP.
Read full review
Depending on the menu, some items are easy to navigate, however other areas seem like have too many menu selections resulting in many clicks to get what needs to get done. The more you use it the easier getting things done becomes; it is not difficult to learn.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
Yes availability was initially an issue but like I said it has evolved and stabilized a lot better these days. We get hardly 1 or two unplanned outages in a year. That too during off peak hours and would get resolved before we even realize it. If Oracle could resolve even the sporadic unplanned outages then it would be awesome and highly reliable for customers.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
The performance of the application is good. Incase of any issues, one has to work with Oracle support. We enabled auditing on certain tables and experienced performance issues. We immediately raised with Oracle support and they helped in improving the performance.One has to proactively work with oracle support to identify the issues.
Read full review
Support Rating
The rating is directed to the thrid party serive provider that we use. I do not now how good the Microsoft direct support is.
Read full review
Support is always providing step by step details to resolve any issue we encounter. If the issue is currently not a functionality or feature of the application they are supportive in offering guidance on submitting an enhancement request. Currently there is an enhancement that will be rolled out by Oracle that was designed for our organization.
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
The inperson trainings from Oracle University are effective. The trainers have vast experience and teached thousands of students. In person training will make people sit in a class and do the exercises. One can also learn from other students, who come with different background, industry etc. In person training will be an immersive experience and helps learn more in a short period of time.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
We bought online training subscription from Oracle University. The subscription allowed our team to learn the nuts and bolts of the application.The subscription model helps access to all the modules as opposed to buying training for one module. We also leveraged guided learning subscription from Oracle. Guided learning is a state of the art learning application from Oracle. It resides within the application and guides the users on each and every step. This is learning by doing and is very effective. Once you buy guided learning, oracle keeps updating it with the release of new functionality in the quarterly upgrades.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Basically the challenge with this implementation was the Business Portal, too many errors and even the aplication is up and running the users are still having issues. We will start planning the migraton to GP 2015 soon.
Read full review
Try to use the system as true to generic form as possible and cut over quickly. Parallel implementation is not recommended. If the numbers are accurate and materially similar to prior period - cut over. A small accounting adjustment is much better than millions in project overruns or dual system maintenance.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Because GP doesn't do CRM we have looked at D365 Customer Engagement for our field service, and F&O as a replacement. Vaporware, no direct upgrade path, and if you want to continue with GP for your back office and just use Field Service it's an insanely complex integration import/export. D365 F&O is a huge implementation cost, and without a direct migration path every bit of data has to be custom imported. There really is no straightforward way to stack up GP against these programs currently. Again, the future of GP is in some doubt.
Read full review
Oracle is more reliable than other immature products in the market. Oracle has multifold resources available in the market for each and every technology. Oracle support has made available many solutions to the existing problems and their fixes. The database is of high performance and quality as compared to the other products in the market. Oracle solutions for finance and supply chain are compared to none.
Read full review
Scalability
The functionality that GP and related ISV solutions offer and the ease of integration of GP to other systems makes it an extremely scalable solution
Read full review
Orcle ERP Cloud transformed and stabilized in this past 2 years since it was implemented. We have past the auditor reviews and 24 month end closes and 8 quarter closes and 2 FY closes. Above all we do have SEC reporting with all this data. Having said that our ERP subscription is a worthy investment and highly reliable source of information for our organization's needs
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We have never missed a payroll using Great Plains. We have the ability to fix any issues that come up quickly.
  • It streamlines our departments that handle money into one unified system. This gives accounting and finance the overall picture in one system.
  • With Integration Manager we have to worry less about taking time to hand key transactions. This cuts down on entry time and increase efficiency for our clerks.
Read full review
  • A tool that has made us able to get much ROI by the bank account integration, management of cash, and controlling business unit.
  • Project management is made easy with its module and tracking with the exact time and issuance makes it more convenient and compatible for the return.
  • Automation in pay and expenses improve the company’s visibility in the market.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP Screenshots

Screenshot of Critical information is available at a glance with comprehensive details a click away.Screenshot of Social collaboration meets the modern communication needs of today's employees and breaks down barriers between teams.Screenshot of A simple, modern interface provides easy access to information across areas, personalized for each user.Screenshot of Critical information is available at a glance with comprehensive details a click away.Screenshot of Analytics provide insight to understand what is happening across your business today and to predict future events by analyzing trends.Screenshot of Social collaboration meets the modern communication needs of today's employees and breaks down barriers between teams.