Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. Planful

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Score 5.4 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics GP is an ERP software with accounting capabilities. It includes various packs for customizability and features tailored to specific industries’ needs. GP is offered as a perpetual license or subscription.N/A
Planful
Score 8.1 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Planful is a cloud-based enterprise performance management (EPM) suite. It includes financial applications for modeling, planning, consolidation, reporting and analytics.N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Dynamics GPPlanful
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Dynamics GPPlanful
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeRequired
Additional DetailsPricing is highly dependent on the complexity and scope of the implementation.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Dynamics GPPlanful
Considered Both Products
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Microsoft Dynamics GP is obviously superior to the other platforms I’ve used simply in its robustness and GAAP compliance features, but with far less usability and even in someways less usable reporting.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Business Central wasn't out then. Nav, the predecessor, was out, but its user interface was dated until 2009, when the role-tailored client came out; it was much better afterwards. If your company has manufacturing, then Business Central is the way to go. It's unfortunate that …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
It is more powerful in features and ease of use as Microsoft GP provides an intuitive user interface leading to quicker adoption.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Xero is easier to use, closer to Quickbooks. Most of the background GL is automated, where as in GP it is not.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Due to the size of our company Microsoft Dynamics GP works better for us than Quickbooks because of the reporting capabilities. However, the NetSuite demo proved to be much more user-friendly with more reporting capabilities.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Because GP doesn't do CRM we have looked at D365 Customer Engagement for our field service, and F&O as a replacement. Vaporware, no direct upgrade path, and if you want to continue with GP for your back office and just use Field Service it's an insanely complex integration …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Quickbooks, SAP, and Netsuite. We are a small-sized business so Dynamics GP is better for our business.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
There are more features and products overall in the Microsoft package at a better price point. Overall, Salesforce has a much sleeker and more user-friendly design.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
We moved from Epicor Eagle N Series to Dynamics GP as an accounting solution for our new POS system. I believe Dynamics GP has more options to create and present financial statements for a large company with many regions and districts. However, because of the weakness of our …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
They both accomplish the same thing, I think Oracle was what I first learned and thus making the change to Microsoft Dynamics GP just took a little bit of time to learn the technology. After you get the hang of it, it becomes much easier and I taught my coworkers how to use it.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
I did not pick Dynamics over Salesforce, my company was using it and eventually switched over to Salesforce. I would say that Dynamics is user-friendly and the interface is quite easy to understand. I really like the reporting capabilities as well. Once again, the aesthetic …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
GP is more robust than QuickBooks bar none.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
At the time of purchase, Microsoft Dynamics GP seemed more appropriate and more in sync with the needs of our company. The software was more responsive, user-friendly and it allowed for more flexibility with the way it was intended to be used. We were also promised better …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
My recollection of Quickbooks pro isn't great, and it was over 10 years ago. Obviously many things have changed in that time frame, so any comparison would likely not be relevant.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
The only product with have shopped was Sage Intacct. It is somewhat unfair to compare the two solutions, because Sage Intacct is a cloud-based solution. That said, Intacct appears to advertise better reporting/business intelligence capabilities. MS Dynamics GP should be aware …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Microsoft Dynamics GP is one of the best ERP's for a medium or small business in the market today. When we were looking for the right software, it had already a connection developed with our 3rd party logistics system, so the decision was pretty easy since the logistic / supply …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Dynamics GP is much more flexible and enterprise-oriented than Quickbooks Pro or similar software. It can support many more users and scenarios. However it requires more dedicated infrastructure (such as servers and databases) and more dedicated IT resources to maintain and …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
I love Dayforce for payroll. It has been configured to meet all our needs, is user-friendly and the customer support is fantastic. We originally moved from MDGP payroll to Ceridian Insync payroll due to the issues we had. We upgraded to Dayforce and are very happy with the …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Learning GP with so many resources from the GP community has been easy. Someone always has the answer or suggestions to point me in the right direction. I've had very few instances where the systems caused an error that required research in order to fix the glitch.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
We looked at several general ledger software packages. We had excellent customer service and implementation guidance through a third party. Having a knowledgeable consultant is critical to a successful implementation.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Quickbooks Pro and GP are not on the same playing field. GP is a full account system adhering to GAAP, while QuickBooks is designed for the small business market. While starting out with QuickBooks is easy, if you plan to grow, you will soon outgrow it.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Microsoft Dynamics is a good, easy to use product for entities that do not have advanced manufacturing.
If I were to go into a distribution or service type business I would highly recommend it.
If I were to go into an advanced manufacturing environment I would not consider GP.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
More user friendly in certain areas and much more cost effective to manage and support
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
TechSoup had great privcing, I had experince with GP in previous companys and there are a lot of staff accountants who have relevant experience.
Planful
Chose Planful
We evaluated these 2, along w/ Planful, back in 2022.
I honestly can't remember the primary reason we ultimately went with Planful at this point.
Chose Planful
Mosaic was very rigid and not flexible for our needs. It was difficult to manage and not user friendly. Planful allows us to customize various fields that allows for more robust and efficient reporting. The user interface is easy to digest and use. The Planful team is also a …
Chose Planful
We were recommended Planful and it was an easy decision!
Chose Planful
Planful is one of the best solutions because of its easy of reporting capabilities that a business user can develop without consulting assistance. The other tools I have used require a more technical base knowledge.
Chose Planful
This was the most cost effective for the features our business needed. Centage and Microsoft's PowerBI did not offer everything we wanted. One Stream was a good alternative but very expensive for what our business needed.
Chose Planful
EPM tools are all pretty close in general functionality in that they are tables of your data with a finance focused UI stacked on top. The last 5% is what the difference. Planful has a very modern UI and does a great job of updating the system over time, including things like …
Chose Planful
OneStream and Workday Workforce Management
Chose Planful
Planful was great for its price point. Although workday and hyperion are the more popular bunch, our use case is mostly met through Planful's functionality.
Chose Planful
Personally I have only used essbase in my work. Planful has a much easier platform to use both to put together results and to load data compared to the financial reporting platforms that I have used. Planful also has better dedicated tools to create reports and build in a …
Chose Planful
This is the first company we’ve used and it’s been a good experience. I would recommend to others
Chose Planful
Planful is next-gen compared to Hyperion. A lot more user-friendly and more potent than Anaplan.
Chose Planful
Oracle Hyperion and Microsoft Power BI
Chose Planful
We enjoy planful and have preferred it compared to similar products because of the personability, helpfulness form customer service, easy sign on, ability to customize reports, and run easy consolidation process.
Chose Planful
The price for Planful was amazing and it was exactly what we needed. OneStream was overkill for our immediate needs.
Chose Planful
We selected Planful because we preferred the service to the competitors we reviewed and also due to the implementation process and timeline.
Chose Planful
Most financial folks user-friendly less technical support needed; most efficient and automated; data host in US; most automated with both the core application and excel spotlight in sync, you can view and sync in web or excel. Process time is fast.
Chose Planful
Planful was able to show us how we could benefit for our business in the demo better than the other companies
Chose Planful
Prior to joining the company, we tried to implement Vena but were unsuccessful. There we're a few reasons it didn't work out, but a lot of it related to the implementation team they provided. In just the first week with Planful, we achieved more progress than we did in several …
Chose Planful
Planful's user interface is much more user-friendly than OneSteam. I wasn't as heavy of a Onestream user as Planful so can't fully compare. I am Power User and building system for Planful whereas I was purely end user for Onestream.
Chose Planful
We liked the Excel-based interface and Planful's reporting capabilities. The dashboarding feature also offers a visual look at KPIs without purchasing another software, saving the company money.
Features
Microsoft Dynamics GPPlanful
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.4
Ratings
17% below category average
Planful
-
Ratings
Pay calculation6.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration5.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Direct deposit files7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management6.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Reimbursement management6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
4.3
Ratings
55% below category average
Planful
-
Ratings
API for custom integration2.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Plug-ins6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.9
Ratings
17% below category average
Planful
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability5.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.4
Ratings
37% below category average
Planful
-
Ratings
Dashboards3.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports6.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports6.40 Ratings00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.0
Ratings
42% below category average
Planful
-
Ratings
Accounts payable6.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Accounts receivable5.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Cash management6.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Bank reconciliation5.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Expense management4.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Time tracking8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Fixed asset management4.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-currency support2.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-division support3.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Regulations compliance3.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Electronic tax filing9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-service portal7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Global Financial Support6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers4.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting3.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Localizations4.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations4.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Enterprise Accounting2.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting3.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework3.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Standardized Processes6.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
4.4
Ratings
50% below category average
Planful
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking5.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic reordering1.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Location management4.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing module4.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
3.6
Ratings
70% below category average
Planful
-
Ratings
Pricing3.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Order entry3.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Credit card processing1.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold5.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Orchestration5.10 Ratings00 Ratings
End-to-end order visibility3.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Order exception Resolution3.40 Ratings00 Ratings
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Planful
6.2
Ratings
20% below category average
Pixel Perfect reports00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Customizable dashboards00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates00 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Planful
7.6
Ratings
2% below category average
Drill-down analysis00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Formatting capabilities00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Planful
7.5
Ratings
7% below category average
Publish to Web00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Publish to PDF00 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Report Versioning00 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Planful
6.7
Ratings
10% below category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Predictive Analytics00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Planful
8.9
Ratings
6% above category average
Multi-User Support (named login)00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Planful
2.3
Ratings
106% below category average
Responsive Design for Web Access00 Ratings2.50 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile00 Ratings2.20 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Planful
8.7
Ratings
7% above category average
Long-term financial planning00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Financial budgeting00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Forecasting00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Scenario modeling00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Management reporting00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Planful
8.0
Ratings
3% above category average
Financial data consolidation00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Journal entries and reports00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Multi-currency management00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Minority Ownership00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Planful
7.7
Ratings
2% below category average
Financial Statement Reporting00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Management Reporting00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting00 Ratings6.50 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Planful
5.4
Ratings
40% below category average
Personalized dashboards00 Ratings5.10 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards00 Ratings2.70 Ratings
KPIs00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data00 Ratings3.10 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Planful
8.9
Ratings
9% above category average
Flat file integration00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Excel data integration00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics GPPlanful
Small Businesses
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
Score 5.1 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Zoho Books
Zoho Books
Score 9.0 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Score 7.4 out of 10
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GPPlanful
Likelihood to Recommend
4.1
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.9
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Usability
5.4
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Availability
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Performance
7.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.2
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
5.5
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.1
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.4
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Dynamics GPPlanful
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft Dynamics GP is well-suited for our environment, as we pay a diverse group of employees, including on-the-road drivers, shop employees (some in other locations), and office employees. It easily tracks time off, taxes, pay, etc. The reporting allows us to verify with our drivers how they are paid each week, whether it be through mileage or stop-offs.
Read full review
There are still times that I find myself thinking that "I would have been done with this already" in Excel. Most (possibly all) the colleagues I know in our industry haven't outgrown using Excel yet... Overall, now that I feel I (mostly) "know what I'm doing" and am thru the learning stage the system I'm seeing benefit...however also feel like I haven't 'scratched the surface' of what it's capable of. Dynamic Planning, Predict/Signals, AI ...I feel we have a huge learning curve still ahead. I've explored Signals and AI Analyst and haven't been able to get reliable results to drive me to use it more...which leads me to believe we have core implementation related issues.
Read full review
Pros
  • User friendly interface
  • Able to be extended into multiple areas of your business
  • One feature we have been using for a few years is EFT for payables - it has significantly reduced the time spent paying vendors and reduced our check printing and mailing costs. It is very easy to setup and use.
Read full review
  • Creating forecasts for the month, quarter, and year
  • Creating new variables by using variables pre-defined and that are new in the system
  • Having a very simple setup in the reports section - not straying away from the old Excel model which most people are used to. I can speak for a lot of people when I say that tools that look new can easily be frightening! 😅
Read full review
Cons
  • Supply chain management is adequate but not exceptional, and there are challenges tying the product to a website front end. These features are present and work fine in many environments but are often lacking for customers who need more robust systems.
  • Reporting tools often require consulting expertise or an internal business analyst to develop. Many smaller companies don't have this skill set, so it can be costly to upgrade to GP from a smaller packages like QuickBooks.
  • Some features that are available in competing products are still not present in GP, such as full copy-paste functionality and more intelligent workflow/batch processing functions.
Read full review
  • Dashboarding could be more flexible and easier to use.
  • Dynamic Reporting has room for flexibility with nesting, dimension names showing up instead of “All,” and overall flexibility.
  • Make Analyze view in Spotlight more intuitive.
  • A high-level onboarding guide to understanding the different components of Planful, data flows, and tips & tricks.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Due the economic challenges that Puerto Rico is having, the company has had to merge some companies in order to be more efficient. It has been easy in GP to process those merges, even thought we had to spend days to accomplish that the process was smooth and accurate. In addition we were able to streamline the purchasing and sales process and the organization is confident to keep renewing GP for the future versions.
Read full review
Our new Comptroller understands the value of Planful, and we plan to utilize it further in the organization to enhance external reporting. Strangely enough, Planful had not previously been embraced by the former CFO, who argued that we were running two sets of books (of course, we were not). Fortunately, the before mentioned reconciliation of EBITDA to Net Income demonstrated that to the banks.
Read full review
Usability
Menus are generally quite difficult to navigate, user-friendliness is lacking, platform can at times be unstable (crashes, etc), reports tha would seem to report one thing do not actually return that data. Usability is probably the biggest weakness of Microsoft Dynamics GP.
Read full review
The tool is extremely adaptable, and it enables very quick querying to give us opportunity to gain live insights into the business. Given its adaptability, we are also able to create scenario analyses very quickly in rapidly changing environments. The formatting also enables us to provide this information in a very consumable manner.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
I only give a 9 rating rather than a 10 rating because it seems that every day around 2pm we see a slowdown in the use of Planful. I have requested our internal IT department verify that it is not an internal issue and have been assured it is the tool. We have not yet reached out to Planful to do extensive research to solve this issue.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
Again, the system is very reliable and, for the most part, runs very quick and smooth. When running larger queries, it does take some time, and during budgeting season our users experienced slower loading times, but nothing that raises concerns outside of normal network issues. Occasionally, as with any software we use, it will crash and you have to restart, but that does not happen very often.
Read full review
Support Rating
The rating is directed to the thrid party serive provider that we use. I do not now how good the Microsoft direct support is.
Read full review
Sometimes we get great help when using Planful's support team and other times we don't. In particular, there is one person that often responds to our support tickets who is less than helpful, hence the reason for the 5 out of 10 rating. As a result, most of the time we reach out to our Planful consulting group as they provide faster and better support
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
My team has attended training offered several times before/during the Planful Perform conference. This training has been extremely useful and we always learn something we didn't know prior to the training. The trainers are always very knowledgeable and more than willing to help each and every user after the training with specific questions regarding their environment. Planful also offers training and certifications on their training hub. I have completed a couple of the certifications. The courses are easy to follow along with and very informative. Additionally, Planful schedules webinars pretty regularly. They'll email their customers and allow you to register to participate live. They also record these sessions so you can refer back to them at a later date or if you are unable to attend at the time the webinar is offered, you can register anyway and get access to the recording. Their training has improved year over year!
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
Planful provides a lot of online training support. There's so many options for training. Admin Learning Courses, User Learning Courses. Plus they have several webinars devoted to the tool and the new features they release. New Releases can be practiced in a Sandbox Environment prior to going live in Production
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Basically the challenge with this implementation was the Business Portal, too many errors and even the aplication is up and running the users are still having issues. We will start planning the migraton to GP 2015 soon.
Read full review
Most of the issues in the implementation were self inflicted, the team at Top Down was great and did a good job managing hours and teaching our team how to best handle the system. The implementation went longer than expected as they always do but the GL and erp link was up and running quickly so we could build reporting
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Because GP doesn't do CRM we have looked at D365 Customer Engagement for our field service, and F&O as a replacement. Vaporware, no direct upgrade path, and if you want to continue with GP for your back office and just use Field Service it's an insanely complex integration import/export. D365 F&O is a huge implementation cost, and without a direct migration path every bit of data has to be custom imported. There really is no straightforward way to stack up GP against these programs currently. Again, the future of GP is in some doubt.
Read full review
Personally I have only used essbase in my work. Planful has a much easier platform to use both to put together results and to load data compared to the financial reporting platforms that I have used. Planful also has better dedicated tools to create reports and build in a dedicated software that is built to report on rather than building from scratch in an excel environment
Read full review
Scalability
The functionality that GP and related ISV solutions offer and the ease of integration of GP to other systems makes it an extremely scalable solution
Read full review
From our experience, Planful is only used in 2 overhead departments in our organization. We easily added another overhead department, but they decided against using Planful for their workforce and financial planning. Removing them from our environment was extremely easy.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We have never missed a payroll using Great Plains. We have the ability to fix any issues that come up quickly.
  • It streamlines our departments that handle money into one unified system. This gives accounting and finance the overall picture in one system.
  • With Integration Manager we have to worry less about taking time to hand key transactions. This cuts down on entry time and increase efficiency for our clerks.
Read full review
  • Has allowed users to view a real-time P&L in a way they weren't able to do with Qlik.
  • Budget to Actual analysis has become much more streamlined and actionable
  • Long-range plan process has been significantly streamlined and a lot of time has been cut out of the process.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Planful Screenshots

Screenshot of the Planful Planform DashboardScreenshot of Planful for FinanceScreenshot of Planful for MarketingScreenshot of ReportsScreenshot of a Capacity Planning TemplateScreenshot of Integrations