Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Score 5.2 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics SL is one of the ERP products in the Dynamics family. This product was acquired from Solomon 2000. The product is typically used by SMBs, particularly in project-based businesses (e.g. construction). It has strong accounting and project management capabilities.N/A
Arena PLM and QMS
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Arena by PTC is a cloud-based PLM and QMS platform. Arena helps product companies that rely on distributed teams and global supply chains to develop products, ensure regulatory compliance, and respond to customer demands.N/A
QAD Adaptive ERP
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
QAD Adaptive ERP supports the core business processes and operations of global manufacturers, reducing the number of required add-ons and thereby lowering software costs. The platform is presented as ideal for medium to large-sized companies. QAD Adaptive ERP focuses on the six industries QAD serves: automotive, consumer products, food and beverage, industrial, high-tech and life…N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Dynamics SLArena PLM and QMSQAD Adaptive ERP
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Arena PLM Launch
Contact Sales
Arena PLM Enterprise
Contact Sales
Arena QMS
Contact Sales
Arena QMS Enterprise
Contact Sales
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Dynamics SLArena PLM and QMSQAD Adaptive ERP
Free Trial
NoYesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeRequiredNo setup fee
Additional DetailsArena's cloud-based PLM and QMS solutions include role-based subscriptions to meet diverse team needs. Their fixed-fee QuickStart™ implementations supports rapid deployment.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Dynamics SLArena PLM and QMSQAD Adaptive ERP
Considered Multiple Products
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
We started with QuickBooks Enterprise when our company was young. We quickly outgrew this program as it was not able to accommodate the financial reporting we needed to satisfy our investors. QuickBooks was also very limited in managing our revenue as we grew.
We did try Great …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
MIP is a more robust product with more comprehensive modules that is tailored toward a non-profit accounting environment. The reporting and GL analysis features on MIP is also a lot more robust than Dynamics SL and the interface within MIP is designed to tailor to user needs. …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
Different class. Microsoft Dynamics SL isn't modern in design or interface.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
Dynamics SL provides built in complex project accounting flexibility with the benefit to accommodate additional complexity with customization tools to enhance the system capabilities and fill requirement gaps either as to process, reporting, or controls.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
I have been on this product for 17 years. I have worked with Great Plains and have worked with products in the Health Care industry and believe this product pulls in all the main functionality into basic core modules and allows users to quickly grasp how to use the product. …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
Of the comparable mid-range ERP systems, Dynamics SL competes at the lower end based on price, but also above the high-end based on flexibility, data, and reporting. Being able to stay with the same core accounting from a $100 million dollar company to a $3 billion dollar …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
They were both pretty easy to use, but I started using Microsoft Dynamics SL so it was a matter of knowing and becoming familiar with this program first. I became very accustomed to the modules and how to navigate the program.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
I have used QuickBooks when I was in college and I did enjoy it mainly because that was my first experience with an accounting product like that. I did not switch to Microsoft Dynamics; it was the product used in the first company I received a job in. Although I did not select …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
QuickBooks is not a bad solution, but it is typically used by smaller companies since it is not a true, auditable accounting system. Dynamics is much more robust than QuickBooks and handles complex accounting much better.

FinancialForce may be a good option if you are looking …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
QuickBooks is a good entry point software. Dynamics is the next logical progression in a company's growth. Dynamics SL will allow for rapid growth and provide the necessary controls that QuickBooks is lacking.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
I have evaluated many competitive products in the past. Dynamics Nav, Mass90, Dynamics GP, Platinum and others. This product is ahead in TCO and flexibility. Since the customization uses standard Microsoft tools (VBA, Visual Studio, and MS SQLServer, Object Model) it is much …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
I would love to have the Quorum product for our company; it is what the future-focused players in the industry are using.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
SL is lacking in various places for a direct sales type of company plan. Currently, we are looking into other options and have decided on Microsoft Dynamics AX as a solution. The move to AX will allow us to keep ordering in one system instead of two (right now we are forcing SL …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
We used Connectwise, which did a good job costing function, but had to be periodically integrated and lacked some reporting capability.
We looked at GP but it does not have good project accounting, so it was not a good fit for our company.
We looked at NAV but there was too much …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
We selected Dynamics SL because our business lives and dies by the success of our projects. A product that can tell you that you have a problem before you invoice, helps you get your project back on track much better. It's also much easier to evaluate across projects, tasks and …
Arena PLM and QMS
Chose Arena PLM and QMS
Arena is very easy to use, well organized, budget friendly, Keep improvising, Always get help promptly.

Takes less time to get trained, user friendly, track everything in place by new homepage option.
Chose Arena PLM and QMS
No experience with other similar products.
Chose Arena PLM and QMS
Been a long time, and it was called Agile then, and I did not use it a LOT, but my recollection was the interface was FAAARRR better than Arena PLM and QMS. Simple things like 'where uses' was a graphic with lines to all items/places where an items was used, including REF DES, …
Chose Arena PLM and QMS
Arena is an easier to use solution.
Chose Arena PLM and QMS
QT9 we have used previously, and this system was much more bare bones in its offerings but was sufficient enough when we were smaller. Now, Arena PLM and QMS has far exceeded the capabilities we previously had with QT9 as it has been more seamless to integrate it with other …
Chose Arena PLM and QMS
Expandable is hard to use compared to Arena PLM and QMS. Arena PLM and QMS is great when it comes to following the trajectory/ life cycle of products. One thing I like about expandable is that it allows for the exportation of products and the BOM. This was a great feature that …
Chose Arena PLM and QMS
It is very easy to contact Arena and get response in the same day for any issue or question.
Chose Arena PLM and QMS
Arena PLM and QMS is significantly better than Mastercontrol in terms of usability. It is far more user friendly and less confusing.
Arena PLM and QMS and Agile are about the same for me in terms of general user friendliness.
Chose Arena PLM and QMS
Duro labs did not have the best functionality or connectivity like Arena PLM and QMS does. Some syncs may be missed and not everything was update to date. Other times, some parts in BOMs would not be present and a new sync had to be performed. Any small change that Onshape …
Chose Arena PLM and QMS
Arena had an easier BOM structure setup
Chose Arena PLM and QMS
This was provided by our customers.
Chose Arena PLM and QMS
Arena PLM and QMS has a lot of options to work with in hand with the current other systems use at our company.
Chose Arena PLM and QMS
We selected Arena because one of our suppliers uses it. I would say you are equal.
Chose Arena PLM and QMS
Arena PLM and QMS works as any other document control resource, but is simple enough to pick up and use efficiently
Chose Arena PLM and QMS
Arena seemed the easiest to use and the one that can best be configured to our own ways of working and set up in a way that integrates well with our company
Chose Arena PLM and QMS
No other electronic Arena PLM and QMS systems [are] used.
Chose Arena PLM and QMS
nOT WELL. eNOVIA HAD EXCELLENT INTERCONNECT FEATURES.
Chose Arena PLM and QMS
Oracle Agile was a lot more difficult and expensive to use
QAD Adaptive ERP
Chose QAD Adaptive ERP
QAD Adaptive ERP is different from the products I listed because it's an ERP system.
I think QAD Adaptive ERP matches up to other ERPs.
Chose QAD Adaptive ERP
QAD is very easy to use once it's set up. It's basically an Excel sheet that can handle a lot more data points and faster. It's nice that you can dump the data stored in QAD to a CSV file and analyze in Excel. Careful narrow down the data searches to a limited number of points …
Chose QAD Adaptive ERP
JDEdwards and now venturing into SAP
Chose QAD Adaptive ERP
The cost benefit, it is cheap to maintain and adjust than the other ERP
Chose QAD Adaptive ERP
I have used JD Edwards and Syteline.

JD Edwards is very expensive in terms of licensing cost , maintenance. QAD is very cheap.
Features
Microsoft Dynamics SLArena PLM and QMSQAD Adaptive ERP
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.5
Ratings
14% above category average
Arena PLM and QMS
-
Ratings
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
Ratings
30% above category average
Pay calculation9.60 Ratings00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Direct deposit files9.00 Ratings00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration00 Ratings00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
Ratings
23% below category average
Arena PLM and QMS
-
Ratings
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
Ratings
28% above category average
API for custom integration6.00 Ratings00 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Plug-ins6.00 Ratings00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.7
Ratings
4% above category average
Arena PLM and QMS
-
Ratings
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
Ratings
18% above category average
Single sign-on capability7.40 Ratings00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions10.00 Ratings00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.0
Ratings
7% above category average
Arena PLM and QMS
-
Ratings
QAD Adaptive ERP
8.3
Ratings
11% above category average
Dashboards8.00 Ratings00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Standard reports8.00 Ratings00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Custom reports8.00 Ratings00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
7.1
Ratings
8% below category average
Arena PLM and QMS
-
Ratings
QAD Adaptive ERP
8.8
Ratings
13% above category average
Accounts payable6.00 Ratings00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Accounts receivable6.00 Ratings00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Global Financial Support6.00 Ratings00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers6.60 Ratings00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations3.00 Ratings00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting8.00 Ratings00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Standardized Processes6.00 Ratings00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
5.7
Ratings
33% below category average
Arena PLM and QMS
-
Ratings
QAD Adaptive ERP
9.5
Ratings
17% above category average
Inventory tracking5.00 Ratings00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Location management6.00 Ratings00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Automatic reordering00 Ratings00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.2
Ratings
24% below category average
Arena PLM and QMS
-
Ratings
QAD Adaptive ERP
7.9
Ratings
0% below category average
Pricing6.00 Ratings00 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Order entry3.00 Ratings00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Credit card processing7.00 Ratings00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold7.00 Ratings00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Order Orchestration00 Ratings00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
5.7
Ratings
28% below category average
Arena PLM and QMS
-
Ratings
QAD Adaptive ERP
8.0
Ratings
6% above category average
Billing Management6.00 Ratings00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management7.30 Ratings00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management5.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting6.30 Ratings00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Period Close6.00 Ratings00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
4.7
Ratings
47% below category average
Arena PLM and QMS
-
Ratings
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting7.30 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Costing6.30 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost Capture2.10 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Capital Project Management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition2.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.3
Ratings
16% below category average
Arena PLM and QMS
-
Ratings
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management6.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
Ratings
22% below category average
Arena PLM and QMS
-
Ratings
QAD Adaptive ERP
8.8
Ratings
17% above category average
Production Management6.00 Ratings00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Production Process Design00 Ratings00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Configuration Management00 Ratings00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Work Execution00 Ratings00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs00 Ratings00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
Ratings
19% below category average
Arena PLM and QMS
-
Ratings
QAD Adaptive ERP
8.8
Ratings
19% above category average
Inventory Planning6.00 Ratings00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Forecasting00 Ratings00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring00 Ratings00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Arena PLM and QMS
-
Ratings
QAD Adaptive ERP
9.0
Ratings
24% above category average
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated00 Ratings00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Arena PLM and QMS
-
Ratings
QAD Adaptive ERP
9.0
Ratings
26% above category average
Trade and Customs Management00 Ratings00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management00 Ratings00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Arena PLM and QMS
-
Ratings
QAD Adaptive ERP
8.0
Ratings
8% above category average
Product Master Data Management00 Ratings00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics SLArena PLM and QMSQAD Adaptive ERP
Small Businesses
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 9.3 out of 10
monday dev
monday dev
Score 8.3 out of 10
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.3 out of 10
Teamcenter
Teamcenter
Score 9.3 out of 10
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.3 out of 10
Enterprises
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
Roadmunk
Roadmunk
Score 5.6 out of 10
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SLArena PLM and QMSQAD Adaptive ERP
Likelihood to Recommend
5.0
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
5.4
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
3.0
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.9
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
1.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.5
(0 ratings)
9.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
1.0
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
1.4
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Dynamics SLArena PLM and QMSQAD Adaptive ERP
Likelihood to Recommend
In the service series, there is a weakness in applying revenue recognition concepts which are a strong point of the project series. It is difficult to get a period sensitive WIP that could be recreated at any time for a point in time (fiscal period).
Read full review
Arena PLM is well suited for part number, BOM and file management. Processing changes (ECNs, ACOs, DCO's, etc.) in Arena is very easy to do and provides great visibility on the status of submitted requests. The ability to communicate with Suppliers and grant them access to files in Arena is extremely helpful. Arena does not appear to be the best suited system for managing software
Read full review
I think QAD Adaptive ERP is well suited for a company with many locations such as ours. I can view which part was purchased and which location it was shipped to. QAD Adaptive ERP can be less appropraite for smaller companies that don't have as much information.
Read full review
Pros
  • Ability to add companies, and sub-accounts on the fly allows for the growth of the system without conversions, and flexible reporting allows for the quick utilization of the data.
  • Multi-Company allows for easy and automated data entry and reporting across multiple legal entities and business segments.
  • Multi-Company also allows for easy centralization of business processes (AP check writing and Fixed Assets for example), while spreading data entry across the enterprise.
  • Ability to Copy/Paste into Dynamics SL has always been a strength- especially from Excel. The additional power of being able to use Excel for a myriad of calculations, including complex allocations, and formatting the result into a JE to paste directly into the Journal Entry Screen has saved countless hours in data-entry, and made re-use of complex items very easy.
Read full review
  • It provides easy, 'login-anywhere' internet cloud-based access to fundamental PLM functions.
  • It provides secure access control for employees & vendors (but you pay per person for access licenses).
  • Data is effectively 'always backed up' in the internet-cloud.
  • There is an option to attach thumbnail graphics representative of each item and create a Bill of Materials view that also displays the graphics to help provide item recognition for BOM readers.
Read full review
  • The QAD Enterprise application is great, we only started using this application a few years ago. The Master Scheduling Workbench has been a great improvement to our daily operations.
  • The Web-based QAD Supplier Portal has also been implemented recently in our company and has been a huge help to our purchasing and materials department.
  • The QAD support that we receive has helped our company grow and is a major asset in upcoming projects.
Read full review
Cons
  • When we have a lot of invoices rather than just a few large invoices, we can be frustrated by how long it takes Flexible Billings to generate a lot of invoices
  • It would be nice if Dynamics SL had an easy integration to some of the nicer salestax tools such as Avalara and CCH.
  • It would be nice if the fixed assets module and electronic banking were not third party.
Read full review
  • Arena lacks the capability to edit documents within its interface and requires users to upload new versions of documents when changes are made. This makes it a bit more challenging to collect and implement reviewer feedback
  • Arena's requirement tracking world does not have the proper functionality we need and was not useful for us.
Read full review
  • Needs more flexibility to add/configure new indexes (if using the Progress Database) as the current indexes on key tables like transaction history are not helpful
  • Need a better support system for the TMS/Precision interface
  • Need better KnowledgeBase articles to understand the innerds of Pricing functionality
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Unfortunately, Dynamics' lack of ability to smoothly integrate with our CRM system is causing us to look at other solutions. The efficiencies that we gain by using Dynamics for our day to day accounting are lost in the constant headaches of getting sales quotes to import properly into the system for invoicing. Another major issue for us has been budgeting and reporting. We currently do all of our budgeting and board reporting in Excel, which is too time consuming and inefficient, especially when a system as robust as Dynamics should easily be able to handle this relatively simple task.
Read full review
We have so much time and effort invested into Arena. The history of approvals, revisions, etc. are necessary for many of our customers. We also have entire device histories recorded. Having to re-create that on another platform would be a feat requiring years of effort. But mostly, Arena just works. It's transformed our business into a much more streamlined system, resulting in a massive cost and time savings.
Read full review
The cost / benefit of changing to a different ERP will create a high cost and low benefit that's why I believe that we'll continue renewing QAD for a long time.
Read full review
Usability
SL itself is relatively easy to use and most of the Help Files documentation is well kept and outstanding in the amount of information that is given. Most end users pick up the functions quickly and are off and running after some limited training. There will always be questions and research to be done, but overall SL is relatively easy to follow for a seasoned user
Read full review
The Arena interface is fairly intuitive, and has very complete functionality. Documents are easily accessed according to prescribed user permissions, and the navigation pane is clearly positioned and sensibly structured. Notifications are sometimes a minor distraction, and document organization and hierarchy display may be difficult to follow at first. After a brief learning curve, perceived usability quickly increases for the typical user.
Read full review
I don't use every function QAD Adaptive ERP has but the ones I do use are fairly simple and straight forward.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
We have had only one unplanned outage for 2 hours in the last 30 months. We shut down for 30 min to 1 hour once a month, but that is for Microsoft OS updates to the servers. Being a 24/7 world wide operation, the reliability is really important. We do get an 8 hour window on the weekend that we can be down for a short period to install Microsoft Dynamics SL updates, but we do not have many of those. On our last version upgrade, we shut the users out at 9:30 am and were fully operational in less than 6 hours. The upgrade was New SQL server, New SL server and 2 new Citrix servers.
Read full review
Seems like when I need to access our workspace for an emergency situation, this is when maintenance is scheduled, just the luck of the draw, I guess, and I just wait until the maintenance is complete, and then can proceed
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
No answers on this topic
We use a few other software or systems (Silicon expert) and it is seamless to us, pages load quickly and efficiently.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Many times support will tell you that your issue is an identified bug and will be scheduled in the future to be fixed in a future release. The knowledgebase has gotten worse in recent years and much more difficult to use. many times you can't find the error during the search
Read full review
Upon initial observation, Arena Solution appears to possess a rather intricate nature, yet this complexity was effectively navigated during the initial configuration phase with the invaluable assistance of an expert well-versed in Arena, a factor that greatly contributed to our comprehensive mastery and autonomous handling of Arena Solutions thereafter.
Read full review
I haven't contacted support for QAD yet.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
The On line training was easy to understand and was very efficient for most of our users. We used the training tools to make sure we use all of the features to their fullest and correctly! After a few weeks mos of our users were very proficient with ARENA PLM and were able to work on their own and use mos of the sections and PLM capablilities.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Just to let it take its course. The implementation for me once I became a part of my former organization was pretty seamless. Just get to know the basics and call the support team to ask questions if you need help on an issue, should they arise. They are ready, willing, and able to help!
Read full review
Pretty straightforward, from OOB
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
We started with QuickBooks Enterprise when our company was young. We quickly outgrew this program as it was not able to accommodate the financial reporting we needed to satisfy our investors. QuickBooks was also very limited in managing our revenue as we grew. We did try Great Plains and Peachtree (now Sage 50) and we discovered that they were rather complicated for our users. They were not as easy to maneuver and manipulate as SL and we felt that SL was much more "user friendly" and simplified, but still able to produce the same results.
Read full review
I've used SAP, Agile in the past, for PLM, and unless the server is in your office, you cannot configure anything, and should it crash, you as the client are stuck until the issues are resolved. In my 15 plus years using Arena, there has only been one instance where the server was down, and the support team quickly resolved the issue with no loss or data or breach of any kind. Both PLMs are very light on what you can configure for your own company, most of it is out of the box, and you are stuck with it, whereas Arena Solutions gives you much more freedom to really tailor it to your company's specifics and what works for you.
Read full review
QAD is very easy to use once it's set up. It's basically an Excel sheet that can handle a lot more data points and faster. It's nice that you can dump the data stored in QAD to a CSV file and analyze in Excel. Careful narrow down the data searches to a limited number of points or Excel will crash. QAD is much easier to set up than Arena and SAP. And the numbering systems you can create in QAD is more customizable.
Read full review
Scalability
Since the backbone of the database is MS SQLServer, the database can be easily scaled.
Read full review
Arena is easy to customize and therefore easy to scale. Different user groups with access restrictions can be easily created and new training plans can be created to support different user bases. Suppliers can also easily be added or items can be shared with them
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Dramatic improvement in our ability to judge the profitability of jobs.
  • Lots of improvements in delivering invoices and statements to customers.
  • Automated AP approvals and imaging made our last tax audit a breeze.
  • Ease of reporting data is a big plus. Financial statements with drill down capability are very useful.
  • One integrated system means less data moving around and more real time information.
  • EFT payments, email statements and live linked Excel charts have improved our efficency
  • Too many more to name.
Read full review
  • Arena PLM and QMS has allowed [...] to efficiently respond to Design Changes and process them effectively.
  • Arena PLM and QMS has completely automated our CAPA process, removing all paperwork and 99% of other electronic files.
  • Arena PLM and QMS has allowed our Contract Manufacturing Organizations (CMO) to upload current manufacturing data; this puts [...]'s finger on the pulse of a CMO thousands of miles away. No more surprises.
Read full review
  • ROI - very high with QAD.
  • Yearly maintenance cost is very low.
  • Support is very good from the QAD customer service team, knowledge base web site.
  • Very quick to implement the system.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Arena PLM and QMS Screenshots

Screenshot of Arena Bill of Materials (BOM) Management. Indented BOM displaying "in production" item status.Screenshot of Arena Engineering Change Management.  Engineering Change Order (ECO) approval with redlines.Screenshot of Arena Projects. Project schedule with status and progress.Screenshot of Arena Quality. Quality process showing a Corrective Action Report (CAR) with the issue details, affected items, and resolution progress/status.Screenshot of Arena Requirements. Tracks requirements and related product development issues for a complete product picture.Screenshot of Arena Analytics, Arena's business intelligence (BI) tool