Microsoft Dynamics SL is one of the ERP products in the Dynamics family.
This product was acquired from Solomon 2000.
The product is typically used by SMBs, particularly in project-based businesses (e.g. construction). It has strong accounting and project management capabilities.
N/A
Workday Adaptive Planning
Score7.8 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Workday Adaptive Planning streamlines planning workflows, using AI and real-time data integration to improve collaboration and provide predictive forecasts for better strategic analysis.
N/A
Workday Financial Management
Score8.5 out of 10
N/A
Workday Financial Management is a cloud-based financial software platform built on an in-memory architecture and an object-oriented data model. The system unifies transaction processing, multidimensional reporting, and consolidation into a single environment accessible via web and mobile interfaces. Financial Operations and Automation The platform employs Artificial Intelligence (AI) models and specialized financial agents to manage core business cycles. These…
Senior Workday Analyst in Finance and Accounting at Altru Health System (Hospital & Health Care, 1001-5000 employees)
Chose Workday Adaptive Planning
Like I said in a previous question, the fact that there was downtime that was needed to update all the data that was entered in a day was not ideal. This caused for hours lost on the data update and didn't allow our leaders to see the affects immediately like Workday Adaptive …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose Workday Adaptive Planning
Workday Adaptive Planning is less expensive than Oracle, and the integration is continuous.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose Workday Adaptive Planning
Our previous platform was patchwork tools and unintegrated. We were clunky and poorly organized. The system was slow and
difficult to use, and it was either overhaul it or start over. We evaluated our
options holistically and went with Workday. It works better and faster, and …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose Workday Adaptive Planning
I haven't used a separate planning tool in great depth like Adaptive. Our company used Host Analytics prior to Adaptive but I didn't have a lot of experience with it. The other software I've used for planning is Excel. Excel is obviously capable of a lot of complex lookups and …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose Workday Adaptive Planning
I prefer Adaptive Planning in comparison to Planful and Data Rails. It feels like is has been easier to use with a quicker learning curve. The other systems were more intimidating for the nonfinance users, like the budget owners who would only need it for reporting or inputting …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose Workday Adaptive Planning
We evaluated Host along with Adaptive, and chose Adaptive. We felt Adaptive was a better solution for our needs, which was primarily forecasting, and we thought Adaptive better handled our significant dimensionality all while maintaining a more user friendly interface. Our …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Regional Controller in Finance and Accounting at Acrisure (Insurance, 5001-10,000 employees)
Chose Workday Financial Management
We are still using Applied Epic for our end AMS system to record client and policy info for our agencies. Workday is a great add on tool we use for our consolidated financials.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Workday Adaptive Planning and Workday Financial Management
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.5
2 Ratings
12% above category average
Workday Adaptive Planning
-
Ratings
Workday Financial Management
8.1
23 Ratings
8% above category average
Pay calculation
9.62 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.323 Ratings
Direct deposit files
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.220 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.020 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Workday Adaptive Planning and Workday Financial Management
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
6 Ratings
22% below category average
Workday Adaptive Planning
-
Ratings
Workday Financial Management
8.2
20 Ratings
9% above category average
API for custom integration
6.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.417 Ratings
Plug-ins
6.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.919 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Workday Adaptive Planning and Workday Financial Management
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.7
10 Ratings
4% above category average
Workday Adaptive Planning
-
Ratings
Workday Financial Management
9.0
25 Ratings
7% above category average
Single sign-on capability
7.49 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.225 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
10.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.823 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Workday Adaptive Planning and Workday Financial Management
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.0
10 Ratings
6% above category average
Workday Adaptive Planning
-
Ratings
Workday Financial Management
8.0
27 Ratings
6% above category average
Dashboards
8.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.227 Ratings
Standard reports
8.010 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.924 Ratings
Custom reports
8.010 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.122 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Workday Adaptive Planning and Workday Financial Management
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics SL
7.1
11 Ratings
8% below category average
Workday Adaptive Planning
-
Ratings
Workday Financial Management
7.7
23 Ratings
0% below category average
Accounts payable
6.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.618 Ratings
Accounts receivable
6.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
6.918 Ratings
Global Financial Support
6.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.519 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
6.63 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.419 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
3.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.716 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.719 Ratings
Standardized Processes
6.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.920 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Workday Adaptive Planning and Workday Financial Management
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics SL
5.7
6 Ratings
33% below category average
Workday Adaptive Planning
-
Ratings
Workday Financial Management
7.2
11 Ratings
10% below category average
Inventory tracking
5.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.611 Ratings
Location management
6.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
6.810 Ratings
Automatic reordering
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.311 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Workday Adaptive Planning and Workday Financial Management
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.2
4 Ratings
24% below category average
Workday Adaptive Planning
-
Ratings
Workday Financial Management
7.3
11 Ratings
8% below category average
Pricing
6.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order entry
3.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Credit card processing
7.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.311 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Workday Adaptive Planning and Workday Financial Management
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics SL
5.7
4 Ratings
28% below category average
Workday Adaptive Planning
-
Ratings
Workday Financial Management
-
Ratings
Billing Management
6.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
7.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
6.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Period Close
6.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Workday Adaptive Planning and Workday Financial Management
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics SL
4.7
3 Ratings
47% below category average
Workday Adaptive Planning
-
Ratings
Workday Financial Management
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting
7.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Costing
6.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost Capture
2.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Workday Adaptive Planning and Workday Financial Management
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.3
1 Ratings
17% below category average
Workday Adaptive Planning
-
Ratings
Workday Financial Management
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Workday Adaptive Planning and Workday Financial Management
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
1 Ratings
22% below category average
Workday Adaptive Planning
-
Ratings
Workday Financial Management
-
Ratings
Production Management
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Workday Adaptive Planning and Workday Financial Management
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
1 Ratings
20% below category average
Workday Adaptive Planning
-
Ratings
Workday Financial Management
-
Ratings
Inventory Planning
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Workday Adaptive Planning and Workday Financial Management
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Workday Adaptive Planning
8.1
4 Ratings
7% above category average
Workday Financial Management
-
Ratings
Pixel Perfect reports
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customizable dashboards
00 Ratings
7.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates
00 Ratings
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Workday Adaptive Planning and Workday Financial Management
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Workday Adaptive Planning
8.1
4 Ratings
5% above category average
Workday Financial Management
-
Ratings
Drill-down analysis
00 Ratings
8.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Formatting capabilities
00 Ratings
7.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration
00 Ratings
8.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Workday Adaptive Planning and Workday Financial Management
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Workday Adaptive Planning
8.0
1 Ratings
1% above category average
Workday Financial Management
-
Ratings
Publish to PDF
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Report Versioning
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Workday Adaptive Planning and Workday Financial Management
For a small to mid-size business, MS Dynamics SL is effective. We are capable of managing our finances with a very low risk of error. We have worked with MS Dynamics for almost 15 years and have more than doubled the size of our business in that time with very few issues from the program. We have exponentially increased our revenue and reporting demands and have found SL to be very dependable and stable. The program does have the occasional glitch and those are sometimes outside of the realm of expertise of our IT department. SL support is excellent, but their timeliness is not as urgent as ours.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It's well suited to any business where you have defined inputs, a layer of structured calculations and a defined output. In other words, any business situation! We use it in a law firm setting where it enables us to import staff plans, assign targets to each individual, thereby generating a revenue forecast linked to business capacity. From there, global assumptions determine staff and direct costs, with the user overlaying discretionary costs to arrive at a final P&L forecast. This is then summarised using the reporting and dashboarding layer to provide outputs to senior leaders for sign off.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Workday is well suited for managing employees throughout their full life cycle. It excels at housing employee data from the start of their time with the company through their departure. Workday is less suited to payroll functions, which could be more robust.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Provides flexibility for complex project based cost accounting
Strong and flexible allocation processer for cost allocations, markups, and pricing
A "Flexible Billing" module under the project controller series that allows for multiple billing formats ranging from fixed price schedule of values, T&M or Cost Plus, and scheduled billing.
Flexible reporting with options using Crystal Reports, SSRS, a Quick Query tool, and ability to tie into MS Office tools such as MS Access and MS Excel
Tight integration with Financials, but also the ability to integrate with modules such as Sales Order, Inventory, and Field Service
Customization abilities ranging from a VBA (visual basic for application) foundation to allow customizing existing forms to the ability to use the SDK (Software Development Kit) to build more complex customizations that integrate with Dynamics SL.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It helps create dynamic plans for finances, operations and various functional units in an organization all under one platform
It helps in scenario modeling to help analyze various business events and report by any number of business dimensions including channel, customer or product
It can be integrated with any system including ERP, BI or CRM
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
The flexibility of going beyond handling the accounts, where we can handle cash, assets, and accounting simultaneously for the customer.
The single platform offers grants management where you can organize the lifecycle of the grants and synchronize it with any criteria of grant closing out scheme.
I personally liked Project billing with the essence of evaluating project revenue and nice reporting templates that can be shared with the customer at any stage of the project while having the flexibility of auditing the reported cost.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Reporting in the Project module is lacking functionality. I understand that most companies have specific needs when it comes to tracking project information but the standard reports are not good.
I would recommend a product like Management Reporter that is for Projects only. Project Reporter should allow users to pull in all Project related data into reports.
Fixing suspended batches. Obviously all of us users have experienced this mess. SL knows what needs to be corrected and there could be some step by step fixes in a separate repair module to do the steps we do in Query Analyzer.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Expense reporting aspects are repetitive and hard to fully optimize.
Finance tracking is limited to basic reports with multiple levels or drill-down...hard to fully grasp without exporting data and massaging in something else (like Excel).
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Unfortunately, Dynamics' lack of ability to smoothly integrate with our CRM system is causing us to look at other solutions. The efficiencies that we gain by using Dynamics for our day to day accounting are lost in the constant headaches of getting sales quotes to import properly into the system for invoicing. Another major issue for us has been budgeting and reporting. We currently do all of our budgeting and board reporting in Excel, which is too time consuming and inefficient, especially when a system as robust as Dynamics should easily be able to handle this relatively simple task.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
For one we're in way too deep to not move forward with Adaptive. We're integrated with Workday, we do a ton of reporting with Adaptive, and it's working very well for planning and forecasting. No reason to look back or change course.
I rate it a 10 because we have removed the fields we don't need so users can really crank the data into the system. The software was designed for the professional services firm in mind but does a tremendous job for construction firms and "blended" companies that are both distribution firms but project centric as well. Perhaps they drop ship inventory to a project where their employees or subs need to work on a project for example.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It is an easy transition for Excel users, with more built-in analytical tools and no need to build formulas. It also has built-in reporting and integration with Microsoft Office products such as Excel and PowerPoint. For non-Finance users, there's an initial learning curve to get used to the tool.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Workday is easy enough navigate, as long as it is properly set up. With that said, it can be put together in a modular fashion as well, allowing for a very high degree of flexibility in terms of design and process delegation. Finally, it makes consolidation achievable in times previously unthinkable.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We have had only one unplanned outage for 2 hours in the last 30 months. We shut down for 30 min to 1 hour once a month, but that is for Microsoft OS updates to the servers. Being a 24/7 world wide operation, the reliability is really important. We do get an 8 hour window on the weekend that we can be down for a short period to install Microsoft Dynamics SL updates, but we do not have many of those. On our last version upgrade, we shut the users out at 9:30 am and were fully operational in less than 6 hours. The upgrade was New SQL server, New SL server and 2 new Citrix servers.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
There haven't been any lately. The only one issue I can think of is when there was an update in Adaptive that altered our reports. Before I realized there was an issue, Adaptive reached out to let me know, so that it could be fixed.
All aspects of Adaptive Insights perform well. One area that I wish was quicker was integration. When importing data from Intacct our accounting ERP platform, it can sometimes take 4 hours for the import to process. The earlier imports are done, the quicker they complete. My estimate for a quick upload is about two hours.
Support is only used when needed, so unfortunately ,they get all the odd issues. It's a difficult business, but Microsoft and our firm do a great job of meeting customer needs. We get routine feedback that our support services are very good.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Whenever we have had any questions, issues, or concerns, the support has been quick and thorough. [This] allow[s] us to be able to fully resolve any issues, or be connected with the right group quickly to attain the result we were after; be it from simple formatting to adding new detailed reporting.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Our support team has been awesome. They are extremely knowledgeable and have been able to guide us through all of the challenges we have faced. Workday's community online is also extremely helpful with many trainings and help topics that can be reviewed at your convenience.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
This was extremely helpful so that they could walk you through the model and teach you more about the complexity of various areas. It is most helpful when it is specific to your organization's model. The larger in-person trainings were helpful but they tended to be more generic and entry level. The trainings that are more tailored to your specific needs are the most helpful.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
They often times tended to be way too generic or entry level. They would also become sales pitches to upgrade or get new Adaptive Planning products. The questions in the training would be very niche and specific to other organizations. They were rarely helpful to the group at large.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Just to let it take its course. The implementation for me once I became a part of my former organization was pretty seamless. Just get to know the basics and call the support team to ask questions if you need help on an issue, should they arise. They are ready, willing, and able to help!
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Trust the expertise of very strong 3rd party implementers. Having deployed Adaptive at a separate company before, I thought I knew it all (hubris, I know). Fortunately, I began to (very quickly) trust the judgment of our Carlson implementation team, and they provided invaluable insights and best-in-class processes that have benefitted me and my team greatly.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Of the comparable mid-range ERP systems, Dynamics SL competes at the lower end based on price, but also above the high-end based on flexibility, data, and reporting. Being able to stay with the same core accounting from a $100 million dollar company to a $3 billion dollar company shows the range of capabilities.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Workday became our choice because it is fully web-based and easily integrates with other systems. The learning curve for Workday was shorter than that of Dynamics. The reporting tools in Workday are more user-friendly than that of Dynamics. However Workday did not have Check Printing tools which are available in Dynamics. The organization started a project to digitize all financial transactions so it was not a priority feature. When it comes to scaling up the functionalities of Workday it was much easier than Dynamics.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Despite Airtable also being easier to use one thing that differentiates and put forth Workday Financial Management tool above is it's key features and better suited functionality for handling confidential data. The other positive note where Workday Financial Management performs high is it key analytics tool that's easier to use and representation of information into insightful dashboards.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We went from 2 users to 70+ users over a 2 year period of time. The application scaled wonderfully. 65 of those users were non-finance users so they were able to quickly learn the software and prepare budgets quickly and efficiently. That is the power of Adaptive and its ability to scale
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It's facilitated a better financial literacy and management by the non-financial managers in the company, giving them a much better ability to see what they're spending, control it, and plan better in the future.
It's hard to quantify the ease of model and version management, but we could never do what we're doing now with our current staff. It would take a small army to replicate anything close to what Adaptive pulls off using Excel, if it's even possible.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We were able to combine 4 different HR modules into one system.
We reduced data breach incidents by 95% after shifting to Workday. One of our legacy softwares had vulnerabilities.
The initial learning curve was higher than projected. We spent about a week to 10 days extra time deploying it, which affected the profit center that year.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info