Microsoft Teams vs. OnSIP

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Teams
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Teams combines video conferencing software with team collaboration tools. The communications platform allows MS Office users to conduct conference calls and share files via SharePoint, and join or initiate a group chat.
$4.80
per month per user
OnSIP
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
OnSIP's range of hosted VoIP solutions are described by the vendor as simple to set up and easy to use, so users can get on with the business of connecting with customers. OnSIP was an Intrado solution, and then acquired by Ooma in 2022.N/A
Pricing
Microsoft TeamsOnSIP
Editions & Modules
Microsoft Teams Essentials
$4.80
per month per user
Microsoft Teams Enterprise
$5.25
per month (paid yearly) per user
Microsoft Teams Enterprise
$5.25
per month per user
Microsoft 365 Business Basic
$7.20
per month per user
Microsoft 365 Business Standard
$15
per month per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft TeamsOnSIP
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsDiscounts are available for non profit organizations.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft TeamsOnSIP
Features
Microsoft TeamsOnSIP
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
7.2
196 Ratings
6% below category average
OnSIP
-
Ratings
Task Management7.4149 Ratings00 Ratings
Gantt Charts6.576 Ratings00 Ratings
Scheduling7.1167 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow Automation7.0102 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Access8.1187 Ratings00 Ratings
Search6.9171 Ratings00 Ratings
Visual planning tools7.6118 Ratings00 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
7.7
205 Ratings
4% below category average
OnSIP
-
Ratings
Chat8.8204 Ratings00 Ratings
Notifications7.6203 Ratings00 Ratings
Discussions8.2190 Ratings00 Ratings
Surveys7.8113 Ratings00 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase8.2124 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting6.547 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts5.743 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook9.1155 Ratings00 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
7.6
190 Ratings
5% below category average
OnSIP
-
Ratings
Versioning7.8133 Ratings00 Ratings
Video files7.5161 Ratings00 Ratings
Audio files7.9163 Ratings00 Ratings
Document collaboration8.6176 Ratings00 Ratings
Access control8.3159 Ratings00 Ratings
Advanced security features7.7121 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Google Drive5.353 Ratings00 Ratings
Device sync7.7135 Ratings00 Ratings
Call Management
Comparison of Call Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
OnSIP
9.5
1 Ratings
13% above category average
Answering rules00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Call park00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Call screening00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Message alerts00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft TeamsOnSIP
Small Businesses
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.0 out of 10
CloudTalk
CloudTalk
Score 7.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.8 out of 10
CloudTalk
CloudTalk
Score 7.6 out of 10
Enterprises
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10
Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft TeamsOnSIP
Likelihood to Recommend
8.3
(282 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
3.7
(9 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.7
(67 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.3
(113 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
6.3
(7 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Professional Services
7.0
(7 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft TeamsOnSIP
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Positive: The virtual workspace created for a work team within the same company, for the resemblance of information and communications in one place.Negative: The access for members of a non-profit organization who have external emails from the host but need the same access as an internal person since their volunteer work is part of the very core of the federation.
Read full review
Ooma, Inc.
I think OnSIP is well suited to be used in any organization that has a stable, reliable internet connection. The service is top notch and I haven't found a competitor that can beat the service. I've recommended the service to other manufacturing businesses and churches. The organizations that have switched have been extremely pleased with the service.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Virtual meetings - ease of set up and execution
  • File sharing! We build channels for projects, and being able to invite only project members is huge!
  • Peer-to-peer communications - being able to "ping" one of my colleagues, either text, video or call-only, on-demand, is what runs our business.
Read full review
Ooma, Inc.
  • Customer service
  • Value pricing
  • Ease of use
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • The feature of notifications in the mobile application could be improved. Sometimes notifications of different teams are not visible and are only visible when the application is opened.
  • It uses lots of computational resources while running and thus, slows down the system sometimes.
  • It allows a few channels per team. The number of channels could be increased for better productivity.
Read full review
Ooma, Inc.
  • Accept more phone brands/models
  • Make your website easier to use
  • Make provisioning a new phone easier
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
Microsoft Teams is included with our Office 365 subscription and we have no intention of migrating off of Office 365 and Microsoft products. Since Microsoft Teams is included for free with our Office 365 subscription, and since we enjoy all the features, benefits, and functionality, there is no question that our team will continue to use the product
Read full review
Ooma, Inc.
No answers on this topic
Usability
Microsoft
User experience has been much better than the previous Skype for Business app. It has an easy-to-use interface with persistent chats. The search feature is very fast and useful. MS Teams has mostly focused on Collaboration and team building features which are very useful for organizational communications. Since Teams is accessible from multiple platforms like Laptop, Desktop, Mobile phones, etc it has been very convenient from a Mobility perspective.
Read full review
Ooma, Inc.
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
Microsoft
Rare, but outages do happen
Read full review
Ooma, Inc.
No answers on this topic
Performance
Microsoft
Sometimes about once a week I get a message that says "Sorry, there seems to be something wrong". But it goes away in a few minutes.
Read full review
Ooma, Inc.
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Microsoft
Using Microsoft Teams has resulted in much faster business communications with both co-workers and consultants. There has been little need for support with this software as the interface is very intuitive and the product is overall very well designed. We did encounter an issue with the built-in phone service, however, this was quickly resolved by the support team.
Read full review
Ooma, Inc.
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
I find everything I need for my day-to-day work.
Read full review
Ooma, Inc.
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
Our company and IT department previously used Skype for our communication needs. Skype was not dependable in my opinion, because it seems each time I used it during a call and/or a meeting, I and several other team members would get disconnected more than once. This caused a great interruption of our meeting, caused team members to have to ask others to repeat themselves and caused a general lack of interest in employee attendance during meetings.
Read full review
Ooma, Inc.
We have found OnSIP to be just as good if not better than any of the other services we have researched or used. Once again, the value of OnSIP is unbelievable. Our rates at this organization are less than half of what the competitors were charging. I don't see us changing anytime soon.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
Microsoft
Honestly, this tool is worth every penny. Yes, it's not free and you pay for the quality of services and the license. But the ROI and the benefits are all there. Also, the renewal, negotiation, and contract terms are all very well explained by our Microsoft account manager, and she's a charm.
Read full review
Ooma, Inc.
No answers on this topic
Scalability
Microsoft
It does not appear to have a limit to how many teams and employees we can have using it
Read full review
Ooma, Inc.
No answers on this topic
Professional Services
Microsoft
I used Skype for Business to take calls, hold conferences, and provide remote assistance to users. Microsoft Teams, on the other hand, is superior to Skype for Business in my opinion. My job entails a lot of screen sharing.
Read full review
Ooma, Inc.
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • I'm not sure I can point to a specific ROI, but it has improved our ability to communicate and work more effectively together.
  • It's also nice to have records of every interaction, photo, and document that has been shared. Less chance of something completely disappearing.
Read full review
Ooma, Inc.
  • It has reduced our telecom expenses drastically.
Read full review
ScreenShots