Microsoft Teams combines video conferencing software with team collaboration tools. The communications platform allows MS Office users to conduct conference calls and share files via SharePoint, and join or initiate a group chat.
$4.80
per month per user
OpenText Web CMS
Score 5.0 out of 10
N/A
OpenText
Web CMS (TeamSite) accelerates and simplifies the end-to-end digital content and campaign
lifecycle, from content creation and rich media management to omnichannel
publication, optimization, automation, commerce, and community. According to the vendor, with
TeamSite, users can:
Capture diverse digital
audiences with amazing brand experiences – Give customers and prospects consistent, high-quality brand
experiences across devices and channels, and foster closer…
N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Teams
OpenText Web CMS
Editions & Modules
Microsoft Teams Essentials
$4.80
per month per user
Microsoft Teams Enterprise
$5.25
per month (paid yearly) per user
Microsoft Teams Enterprise
$5.25
per month per user
Microsoft 365 Business Basic
$7.20
per month per user
Microsoft 365 Business Standard
$15
per month per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Teams
OpenText Web CMS
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Discounts are available for non profit organizations.
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Teams
OpenText Web CMS
Features
Microsoft Teams
OpenText Web CMS
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
8.0
237 Ratings
3% above category average
OpenText Web CMS
-
Ratings
Task Management
8.0176 Ratings
00 Ratings
Gantt Charts
7.893 Ratings
00 Ratings
Scheduling
8.1204 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow Automation
8.2123 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile Access
8.2225 Ratings
00 Ratings
Search
7.5208 Ratings
00 Ratings
Visual planning tools
8.5139 Ratings
00 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
8.0
246 Ratings
0% below category average
OpenText Web CMS
-
Ratings
Chat
9.0245 Ratings
00 Ratings
Notifications
8.3244 Ratings
00 Ratings
Discussions
8.6231 Ratings
00 Ratings
Surveys
8.1142 Ratings
00 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase
8.6153 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting
6.547 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts
5.743 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook
9.1155 Ratings
00 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
8.1
231 Ratings
1% above category average
OpenText Web CMS
-
Ratings
Versioning
8.5163 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video files
8.3198 Ratings
00 Ratings
Audio files
8.7196 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document collaboration
8.8211 Ratings
00 Ratings
Access control
8.5193 Ratings
00 Ratings
Advanced security features
8.3152 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrates with Google Drive
5.353 Ratings
00 Ratings
Device sync
8.5166 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
OpenText Web CMS
8.6
7 Ratings
5% above category average
Role-based user permissions
00 Ratings
8.67 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
OpenText Web CMS
7.9
7 Ratings
2% above category average
API
00 Ratings
8.76 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language
00 Ratings
7.26 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
OpenText Web CMS
8.0
7 Ratings
3% above category average
WYSIWYG editor
00 Ratings
7.87 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness
00 Ratings
7.76 Ratings
Admin section
00 Ratings
8.17 Ratings
Page templates
00 Ratings
7.46 Ratings
Library of website themes
00 Ratings
8.36 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design
00 Ratings
8.37 Ratings
Publishing workflow
00 Ratings
8.17 Ratings
Form generator
00 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
It's amazing as a daily driver for team communication, and document search/store. Also, if you're doing a lot of LONG meetings and have trouble remembering details, the AI summarization is amazing and convenient. It just works. I'm not saying I always do this, of course, but if I need to 'skim' instead of really digging into every detail from a meeting, the AI-generated summary is generally good enough that I can get away with it.
OpenText TeamSite is well-suited to large, enterprise-wide implementations where customization, content governance, and dynamic content distribution is needed or prioritized. It is probably not ideal for smaller sites with simple architecture and few resources to manage custom implementation.
The webinars feature has some missing functionally such as the ability for all users to use the Q&A feature (only those with a Microsoft Teams account can use it now), the ability to upload documents for attendees to easily access and download, and the ability for presenters and organizers to easily chat amongst themselves throughout the webinar.
The "Channels" organization hierarchy could be more clear. If you have several channels set up, it can get clunky and hard to find the specific channel you are looking for.
The MS Planner tool lacks functionality and organization. You cannot assign more than one person to a task and it's confusing when you try to share tasks with people - it would be nice if they were automatically added to someone's calendar.
Microsoft Teams is included with our Office 365 subscription and we have no intention of migrating off of Office 365 and Microsoft products. Since Microsoft Teams is included for free with our Office 365 subscription, and since we enjoy all the features, benefits, and functionality, there is no question that our team will continue to use the product
If you have the full Microsoft Office suite, it works really well because it's integrated well within its ecosystem, but if not, it can be annoying because it tries to open a shared file in the web versions of the file equivalents. The web version is also a bit slow, and the login is very difficult to handle if you have multiple Microsoft or Outlook accounts.
Overall, it's a solid package with the potential to offer much functionality with appropriate resources applied. There are a few issues with the authoring interface that OpenText should address before its a top shelf authoring experience.
The overall support provided by Microsoft for Microsoft Teams has been quite good but there is still some room for improvements. Microsoft needs to proactively work on fixing the open bugs in order to provide a seamless experience to the users. But over the service and experience provided by the Microsoft team have been quite satisfactory.
Our technical resources engage with OpenText TeamSite so I don't have direct experience. However, critical issues that we need help with seem to get the attention they deserve without issue. However, training and user resources for business owner roles are a bit lacking and some annoying issues with the authoring interface should be addressed sooner.
Microsoft Teams offers a much more integrated experience between their chat and video call function compared to Google Chat and Slack. Both other tools are much better for internal communications are they have simpler UI without other features. Whereas Microsoft Teams can be used for more critical conversations, particularly between external companies, and has been very useful in sales conversations which is what we chose it for when speaking to companies that work exclusively through Microsoft.
It offers more content editing features at a relatively low cost thus overall deployment is lower in cost. It has great customer support who are always there to support and answer to our needs thus making the process of deployment seamless at every stage and offering training for working with their product.
Honestly, this tool is worth every penny. Yes, it's not free and you pay for the quality of services and the license. But the ROI and the benefits are all there. Also, the renewal, negotiation, and contract terms are all very well explained by our Microsoft account manager, and she's a charm.
I used Skype for Business to take calls, hold conferences, and provide remote assistance to users. Microsoft Teams, on the other hand, is superior to Skype for Business in my opinion. My job entails a lot of screen sharing.
Personally, I would say that by using Microsoft Teams, it upped my collaboration with my colleagues by around 50% or around more than half of what I usually did prior to using it.
I had 100% show rate and attendance on all of my meetings in the past 6 months.
If I may add, I also have been chattier & collaborative towards my colleagues in past 3 months particularly the month of December when we had huge traffic at work. I would estimate this behavior to have been increased by around 60% than what I usually incur during normal operating days.
We integrated with google analytics, now we have the proper comprehension of our audience data reception and behaviors - we've greatly improved on personalized marketing.
Quick publication of content across the main digital channels.
We run our digital campaigns swiftly.
We've maintained our brand consistency for three years.