TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Microsoft Teams

    Score8.3 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft Teams combines video conferencing software with team collaboration tools. The communications platform allows MS Office users to conduct conference calls and share files via SharePoint, and join or initiate a group chat.

    $4.80

    per month per user

    Oracle WebCenter Content

    Score9.4 out of 10
    N/AOracle WebCenter Content is Oracle's ECM Suite. This product is tightly integrated to other Oracle products and provides ECM functionality to Siebel CRM and PeopleSoft. The WebCenter product family also includes Oracle's CMS (WebCenter Sites) which they acquired from FatWire.N/A
    Pricing
    Microsoft TeamsOracle WebCenter Content
    Editions & Modules
    Microsoft Teams Essentials
    $4.80
    per month per user
    Microsoft Teams Enterprise
    $5.25
    per month (paid yearly) per user
    Microsoft Teams Enterprise
    $5.25
    per month per user
    Microsoft 365 Business Basic
    $7.20
    per month per user
    Microsoft 365 Business Standard
    $15
    per month per user
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Microsoft TeamsOracle WebCenter Content
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsDiscounts are available for non profit organizations.—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Microsoft TeamsOracle WebCenter Content
    Considered Both Products
    Microsoft
    No answer on this topic
    Oracle
    Chose Oracle WebCenter Content
    If you are strictly looking for an imaging solution for scanning, indexing, categorizing, etc., you may have better luck looking at alternate products such as Box. But if you already have a large Oracle footprint as we do, Oracle WebCenter Content integrates nicely with the …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    90%
    Would buy again
    255 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    95%
    Delivers good value for the price
    225 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    90%
    Happy with the feature set
    255 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    92%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    144 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    93%
    Implementation went as expected
    174 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Microsoft TeamsOracle WebCenter Content
    Project Management
    Comparison of Project Management features of Microsoft Teams and Oracle WebCenter Content
    Feature
    Microsoft Teams
    8.2
    241 Ratings
    6% above category average
    Oracle WebCenter Content
    -
    Ratings
    Task Management8.1179 Ratings00 Ratings
    Gantt Charts8.196 Ratings00 Ratings
    Scheduling8.3208 Ratings00 Ratings
    Workflow Automation8.4126 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile Access8.2229 Ratings00 Ratings
    Search7.6212 Ratings00 Ratings
    Visual planning tools8.4143 Ratings00 Ratings
    Communication
    Comparison of Communication features of Microsoft Teams and Oracle WebCenter Content
    Feature
    Microsoft Teams
    8.0
    251 Ratings
    0% above category average
    Oracle WebCenter Content
    -
    Ratings
    Chat9.0250 Ratings00 Ratings
    Notifications8.4249 Ratings00 Ratings
    Discussions8.7235 Ratings00 Ratings
    Surveys8.2146 Ratings00 Ratings
    Internal knowledgebase8.6157 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integrates with GoToMeeting6.547 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts5.743 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integrates with Outlook9.1155 Ratings00 Ratings
    File Sharing & Management
    Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Microsoft Teams and Oracle WebCenter Content
    Feature
    Microsoft Teams
    8.2
    236 Ratings
    2% above category average
    Oracle WebCenter Content
    -
    Ratings
    Versioning8.6168 Ratings00 Ratings
    Video files8.4202 Ratings00 Ratings
    Audio files8.8200 Ratings00 Ratings
    Document collaboration8.9216 Ratings00 Ratings
    Access control8.6198 Ratings00 Ratings
    Advanced security features8.5158 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integrates with Google Drive5.353 Ratings00 Ratings
    Device sync8.6172 Ratings00 Ratings
    Enterprise Content Management
    Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Microsoft Teams and Oracle WebCenter Content
    Feature
    Microsoft Teams
    -
    Ratings
    Oracle WebCenter Content
    7.6
    4 Ratings
    6% below category average
    Content capture & imaging00 Ratings7.94 Ratings
    File sync, storage & archiving00 Ratings8.04 Ratings
    Document management00 Ratings8.64 Ratings
    Records management00 Ratings7.24 Ratings
    Content search & retrieval00 Ratings8.04 Ratings
    Enterprise content collaboration00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
    Content publishing & creation00 Ratings6.93 Ratings
    Security, risk management & information governance00 Ratings7.03 Ratings
    Contract lifecycle management00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Automated workflows00 Ratings7.12 Ratings
    Artificial intelligence00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
    Integration00 Ratings8.72 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Microsoft TeamsOracle WebCenter Content
    Small Businesses
    Flock
    Score9.5 out of 10
    Egnyte
    Score9.3 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Troop Messenger
    Score9.8 out of 10
    Epicor ECM
    Score7.7 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Cisco Business Edition 7000 (discontinued)
    Score9 out of 10
    Dashpivot - By Sitemate
    Score10 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Microsoft TeamsOracle WebCenter Content
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.6
    (329 ratings)
    7.2
    (6 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.0
    (12 ratings)
    7.9
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    8.7
    (114 ratings)
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    Availability
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.0
    (114 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    6.3
    (7 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Professional Services
    7.0
    (7 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Microsoft TeamsOracle WebCenter Content
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Microsoft
    It's amazing as a daily driver for team communication, and document search/store. Also, if you're doing a lot of LONG meetings and have trouble remembering details, the AI summarization is amazing and convenient. It just works. I'm not saying I always do this, of course, but if I need to 'skim' instead of really digging into every detail from a meeting, the AI-generated summary is generally good enough that I can get away with it.
    Read full review
    Oracle
    WebCenter Content is suitable for payables invoice processing for companies with a huge volume of paper invoices. 80% of data entry effort can be reduced. For small companies with less volume, WebCenter may not make sense. WebCenter is not perfect. It has some issues. We raised enhancement requests with Oracle, hopefully, Oracle will resolve them soon.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Microsoft
    • All in one communication for Teams.
    • High quality and reliable both audio and video meetings.
    • Well organized and clear instant chat.
    • Excellent security features.
    • Beautiful integration with 3rd party tools and systems.
    • Perfect compatibility with windows ,android and iOS.
    • Allow meetings recordings for later us or sharing with teams that missed the live.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • It provided one single repository with a URL link to access each AP invoice.
    • It gives a life cycle to each invoice where a business user can perform some additional indexing as per their needs.
    • It also provides a reporting feature and a front-end for users to view invoices with ease and very helpful for auditing purpose.
    • It uses the BPEL engine to customize the life cycle and also it can automate the auto entry of supplier invoices in your EBS system.
    • Reduce a lot of manual efforts, manual errors and workforce.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Microsoft
    • The webinars feature has some missing functionally such as the ability for all users to use the Q&A feature (only those with a Microsoft Teams account can use it now), the ability to upload documents for attendees to easily access and download, and the ability for presenters and organizers to easily chat amongst themselves throughout the webinar.
    • The "Channels" organization hierarchy could be more clear. If you have several channels set up, it can get clunky and hard to find the specific channel you are looking for.
    • The MS Planner tool lacks functionality and organization. You cannot assign more than one person to a task and it's confusing when you try to share tasks with people - it would be nice if they were automatically added to someone's calendar.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • Some functionality you would expect to be built-in (such as reporting for compliance) is not and requires other Oracle products to be integrated.
    • Separating an invoice with multiple lines for different departments is not an easy task.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Microsoft
    Microsoft Teams is included with our Office 365 subscription and we have no intention of migrating off of Office 365 and Microsoft products. Since Microsoft Teams is included for free with our Office 365 subscription, and since we enjoy all the features, benefits, and functionality, there is no question that our team will continue to use the product
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    The challenges with converting to a completely new system create quite a barrier to switching to anything else. If we find another system that offers guaranteed improvements to the user interface -- as well as as a more coherent set of options for data interchanges with current and future enterprise data sources -- we would be more interested in swithing to that new product. Of course, the expense in purchasing competitor system, along with the costs of migrating all current content, along with retooling all existing workflows in place, would be carefully weighed against the benefits incurred from a switch-over.
    Read full review
    Usability
    Microsoft
    If you have the full Microsoft Office suite, it works really well because it's integrated well within its ecosystem, but if not, it can be annoying because it tries to open a shared file in the web versions of the file equivalents. The web version is also a bit slow, and the login is very difficult to handle if you have multiple Microsoft or Outlook accounts.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    It meets all required functionality requirements -- but handles none of them in an exceptional manner
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Microsoft
    Rare, but outages do happen
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    Microsoft
    Sometimes about once a week I get a message that says "Sorry, there seems to be something wrong". But it goes away in a few minutes.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Microsoft
    The overall support provided by Microsoft for Microsoft Teams has been quite good but there is still some room for improvements. Microsoft needs to proactively work on fixing the open bugs in order to provide a seamless experience to the users. But over the service and experience provided by the Microsoft team have been quite satisfactory.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    Microsoft
    I find everything I need for my day-to-day work.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Microsoft
    Microsoft Teams offers a much more integrated experience between their chat and video call function compared to Google Chat and Slack. Both other tools are much better for internal communications are they have simpler UI without other features. Whereas Microsoft Teams can be used for more critical conversations, particularly between external companies, and has been very useful in sales conversations which is what we chose it for when speaking to companies that work exclusively through Microsoft.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    I can't really provide an answer for this question because I think the basic premise is flawed. Which system an organization selects is based (or should be based) on their unique business and organizational requirements, not the features of the system. We do not recommend a particular solution to a client based on subjective preference for one system over another but rather for its appropriateness to achieve a particular goal or collection of goals.
    Read full review
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    Microsoft
    Honestly, this tool is worth every penny. Yes, it's not free and you pay for the quality of services and the license. But the ROI and the benefits are all there. Also, the renewal, negotiation, and contract terms are all very well explained by our Microsoft account manager, and she's a charm.
    Read full review
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Scalability
    Microsoft
    It does not appear to have a limit to how many teams and employees we can have using it
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Professional Services
    Microsoft
    I used Skype for Business to take calls, hold conferences, and provide remote assistance to users. Microsoft Teams, on the other hand, is superior to Skype for Business in my opinion. My job entails a lot of screen sharing.
    Read full review
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Microsoft
    • Personally, I would say that by using Microsoft Teams, it upped my collaboration with my colleagues by around 50% or around more than half of what I usually did prior to using it.
    • I had 100% show rate and attendance on all of my meetings in the past 6 months.
    • If I may add, I also have been chattier & collaborative towards my colleagues in past 3 months particularly the month of December when we had huge traffic at work. I would estimate this behavior to have been increased by around 60% than what I usually incur during normal operating days.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • We were looking for a scalable solution for invoice processing needs. WebCenter did fit the bill. It reduced manual data entry effort by 80%.
    • WebCenter saved our storage costs. We do not need to store the physical paper copies anymore in our expensive offices.
    • WebCenter increased the employee engagement and reduced monotonous data entry work. Employees now have time to spend on value-added work rather than data entry.
    • Auditors were happy with the tool, as they can retrieve any document with the click of a button as opposed to search and find a physical document.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots