OpenText MBPM vs. ProcessMaker

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OpenText MBPM
Score 7.2 out of 10
N/A
OpenText acquired BPM solution Metastorm in 2011, and has rebranded the product as OpenText MBPM. It is an alternative BPM solution to OpenText's primary BPM offering called OpenText Cordys Business Process Management.N/A
ProcessMaker
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
ProcessMaker is a business process management and workflow automation platform. It uses a drag-and-drop interface to build workflows to drive automation.N/A
Pricing
OpenText MBPMProcessMaker
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenText MBPMProcessMaker
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Features
OpenText MBPMProcessMaker
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
OpenText MBPM
7.0
3 Ratings
15% below category average
ProcessMaker
9.3
6 Ratings
13% above category average
Dashboards7.93 Ratings10.06 Ratings
Standard reports9.02 Ratings9.06 Ratings
Custom reports4.03 Ratings9.06 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
OpenText MBPM
7.3
3 Ratings
14% below category average
ProcessMaker
9.2
6 Ratings
9% above category average
Process designer8.13 Ratings10.06 Ratings
Process simulation7.13 Ratings10.05 Ratings
Business rules engine9.02 Ratings8.06 Ratings
SOA support6.02 Ratings9.06 Ratings
Process player7.02 Ratings9.05 Ratings
Support for modeling languages8.02 Ratings9.04 Ratings
Form builder6.93 Ratings9.75 Ratings
Model execution6.13 Ratings9.05 Ratings
Collaboration
Comparison of Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
OpenText MBPM
7.6
3 Ratings
7% below category average
ProcessMaker
7.5
4 Ratings
9% below category average
Social collaboration tools7.63 Ratings7.54 Ratings
Content Management Capabilties
Comparison of Content Management Capabilties features of Product A and Product B
OpenText MBPM
6.0
2 Ratings
30% below category average
ProcessMaker
9.0
6 Ratings
10% above category average
Content management6.02 Ratings9.06 Ratings
Best Alternatives
OpenText MBPMProcessMaker
Small Businesses
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
Score 9.0 out of 10
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OpenText MBPMProcessMaker
Likelihood to Recommend
7.1
(5 ratings)
9.0
(6 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenText MBPMProcessMaker
Likelihood to Recommend
OpenText
Metastorm is well-suited for scenarios in which internal stress testing an application is needed in a hurry before showcasing it to potential customers. It supports different views of the process from Swimlane perspective, so different methodologies can be handled. It is an Enterprise level tool and handles both small and large projects quite well, although smaller companies may be stressed out by the amount of time it takes to properly maintain the application.
Read full review
ProcessMaker Inc.
I loved it. You will not get an easier interface. You can develop workflow processes in a simple way, one which allows anyone to understand what you are trying to accomplish; however, you will get into some issues if your employees are scared of coding (when you get to the advanced features). For some, this will never be an issue as the knowledge you need is very basic. But for the school I was working with, it would have stopped them cold
Read full review
Pros
OpenText
  • Complex routing of tasks based on calculated criteria
  • Linking between tasks and accessing relevant information
  • Organising, scheduling and prioritising
  • Different views for different people
Read full review
ProcessMaker Inc.
  • We can write PHP and Javascript code to handle the way the ProcessMaker does. It makes the ProcessMaker more flexible to meet our requests on our workflow.
  • The Processmaker provides a What-You-See-Is-What-You-Get flowchart design tool, we can draw our process very easy like Visio. And, We can use the flowchart to implement our workflow.
  • Also, the Dynaform, the electronic form function of Processmaker, is WYSIWYG form design tool, help us design forms participated in the process.
Read full review
Cons
OpenText
  • The Metastorm process engine is based on an older version of .NET. Updating to a newer version would resolve several known issues with .NET email functionality.
  • Metastorm builds web pages at run time. While the UI presented to the end user is fine, the Document Object Model is convoluted and subject to change with new releases. Providing a more simplified DOM or at very least a custom function to replace document.getElementById() would make client-side scripting a much more powerful tool.
  • One function that I've seen Metastorm competitors do well, is email wizards. Having a WYSIWYG email editor would be really nice.
Read full review
ProcessMaker Inc.
  • I am still not able to achieve complicated workflows. May be a developer to create a plugin is required.
  • The UI can be more attractive and colourful.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
OpenText
There are other products that seem to be a better fit for future initiatives.
Read full review
ProcessMaker Inc.
No answers on this topic
Usability
OpenText
Although it is intuitive to use it does require training
Read full review
ProcessMaker Inc.
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
OpenText
Great customer service for an API support related query
Read full review
ProcessMaker Inc.
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
OpenText
We found that OpenText MBPM held its own quite well against IBM BPM. We ended up choosing OpenText MBPM due to the analytics, complex routing, and the ease of SOA service integration. Furthermore, the ability to quickly develop simple User interfaces make this tool a daily component of our most-used toolbox components.
Read full review
ProcessMaker Inc.
Before making the decision to get ProcessMaker, we assessed different and best options in the market, which are also quite competitive. KiSSFLOW, Blueworks Live, and Bizagi, being the most relevant and ADONIS, to mention the ones we consider the most relevant and capable of meeting our needs. In the end, we went for ProcessMaker because of mainly three things as described before: 1. Real-time process status tracking. 2. Metrics and dashboards. 3. Ease of use for constructing diagrams.
Read full review
Return on Investment
OpenText
  • The development of the ticketing system has enabled us to greatly improve customer relationships
  • The scheduling and allocation of the tasks has reduced both the number of open tickets and the turnaround time to resolution
  • Management information from the system has improved decision making
Read full review
ProcessMaker Inc.
  • This would have been the easiest program to implement. It would have been the quickest, and the one that most of the employees would have been able to master. That alone would have saved countless dollars in time investment.
  • Unfortunately, the environment doesn't support knowledge of coding. So, they would never be able to advance further than a certain degree before having to bring someone else in again. It would have saved money at first, but then would have ended up costing in the long run.
Read full review
ScreenShots