Power Apps vs. SAP Business Technology Platform

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Power Apps
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
PowerApps is a low code / rapid application development product from Microsoft that allows users to quickly build apps.
$20
per month per user
SAP Business Technology Platform
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
SAP Business Technology Platform (SAP BTP) is the company's Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) offering, that brings together intelligent enterprise applications with database and data management, analytics, integration and extension capabilities into one platform for both cloud and hybrid environments, including hundreds of pre-built integrations for SAP and third-party applications.N/A
Pricing
Power AppsSAP Business Technology Platform
Editions & Modules
Power Apps Premium
$20
per month per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Power AppsSAP Business Technology Platform
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Power AppsSAP Business Technology Platform
Considered Both Products
Power Apps

No answer on this topic

SAP Business Technology Platform
Chose SAP Business Technology Platform
Our current PowerApps license doesn’t include the premium connectors yet; PowerApps is costly when it includes the use of premium connectors such as Rest API and SAP Connectors (which mainly is the integration points for most of the applications developed in our company). SAP …
Features
Power AppsSAP Business Technology Platform
Low-Code Development
Comparison of Low-Code Development features of Product A and Product B
Power Apps
8.0
24 Ratings
5% below category average
SAP Business Technology Platform
-
Ratings
Visual Modeling8.122 Ratings00 Ratings
Drag-and-drop Interfaces7.923 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform Security8.723 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform User Management8.123 Ratings00 Ratings
Reusability7.423 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform Scalability7.622 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
Power Apps
-
Ratings
SAP Business Technology Platform
7.5
790 Ratings
3% below category average
Ease of building user interfaces00 Ratings7.9756 Ratings
Scalability00 Ratings7.9752 Ratings
Platform management overhead00 Ratings7.3711 Ratings
Workflow engine capability00 Ratings7.5633 Ratings
Platform access control00 Ratings7.5723 Ratings
Services-enabled integration00 Ratings7.9709 Ratings
Development environment creation00 Ratings7.8698 Ratings
Development environment replication00 Ratings7.5612 Ratings
Issue monitoring and notification00 Ratings7.0690 Ratings
Issue recovery00 Ratings6.8611 Ratings
Upgrades and platform fixes00 Ratings7.4657 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Power AppsSAP Business Technology Platform
Small Businesses
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.1 out of 10
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.1 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Power AppsSAP Business Technology Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
9.2
(23 ratings)
8.4
(676 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(24 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(4 ratings)
7.8
(661 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
7.8
(3 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
5.2
(3 ratings)
Support Rating
9.7
(6 ratings)
7.4
(456 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.5
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.4
(11 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
5.7
(3 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(3 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(3 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
6.1
(3 ratings)
Professional Services
-
(0 ratings)
3.9
(2 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
3.4
(2 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
3.9
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Power AppsSAP Business Technology Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Power Apps is ideal for scenarios that are neither too complex nor too large. It is easy to begin development in Power Apps, as it is one of the best tools for low-code development. Power Apps can be implemented for complex scenarios as well, provided there is strong knowledge of the tool and ample time for planning. Our applications benefit from Power Apps' cross-platform support, making it easy to use on any device, including desktops, laptops, and mobile devices.
Read full review
SAP
SAP Business Technology Platform is highly suitable for AI agentic development, particularly when workflows require dynamic orchestration, modular service integration, and real-time decisioning. However, it may be less effective in environments where backend services are fully encapsulated and do not expose interfaces or events that SAP Business Technology Platform can interact with—limiting its ability to orchestrate or extend those services meaningfully.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Power Apps has formats that are pre-built that don't require any coding which makes it easier to achieve your vision. This does become a challenge if your App needs don't fit into that format.
  • We deal with a ton of data so the fact that you can connect to any data source in addition to their pre-stablished data connections makes the process a breeze.
  • The online learning resources and tutorials are helpful as well for those who are tech savvy.
Read full review
SAP
  • Services are operated by SAP with outstanding support, always giving a helping hand even if it is custom code or solution provided on the platform
  • Services are easily connectable via standard approach to our backend SAP systems in SAP Rise/HEC
  • Secure access using identities from our existing identity management helping us to safeguard data security from within SAP systems up to custom frontend applications
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Sometimes the cost of solutions is greater than the benefit. Licensing is expensive relative to the scope of some business user-created personal or team-level solutions.
  • While there is a starter-kit for Governance, it is complicated to stand up and requires dedicated resources to provide on-going governance operations. Many organizations are not going to be able to dedicate resources to governance and this causes the sprawl, solution duplication, silos, unneeded and unplanned licensing expenses, and a general "wild wild west" environment.
  • There needs to be better direction and best practices given around Power Platform Environment utilization and optimization.
  • The accessibility to the platform and ease for business partners to independantly create solutions is both a benefit and a negative. When the business outcome needed is a good fit for PowerApps it is a quick win, but when not a good fit it becomes a frustration for the business partner attempting to make the platform do something it is not well-suited for. The business partner entangles tech teams in the effort which drains resources and provides a lack-luster solution. All of this to say, it would be beneficial to have some tools that business partners could leverage to determine\understand if the type of business outcome they need is well suited to PowerApps or not.
Read full review
SAP
  • For IAG, if there are multiple roles it can be overwhelming from an UX standpoint.
  • Controlling and identifying shadow user creation is not as intuitive.
  • Unlocking admin rights to an environment seems very easy if having elevated permissions, this seems like something that should have more controls rather than being able to unlock admin rights yourself.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
SAP
Seamless integration with external system and dashboard to monitor the data flow and analysis are very essential for the business. The way the product is designed and modelled lead to minimum business disruptions. Adopting to the new and modern technology was easy. Keeping the central system as clean and adopting project bases development are advantages.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
PowerApps is a great solution and I have spent the last year familiarizing myself with the platform and building custom applications to complete a whole range of tasks such as asset management, custom invoice generation, and item restriction tracking. We as a company have barely begun to scratch the surface of what can be achieved with PowerApps.
Read full review
SAP
Okay, so the content that we have built on the platform is limited to specific testing on the iFlows within integration suite. The visualization layer is nice to use and helps with the design elements, however with developers that are more used to markup languages, it doesn't have the same CLI type feel when you want it. Perhaps the majority of users are that deep, but other platforms have a better CLI type developer experience.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
SAP
Services are generally available
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
The community forums are extremely responsive to questions asked, there is a good body of online documentation and many community posts to draw from. Although the platform has changed, which means some of the posts are out of date and the solutions provided aren't relevant. Of relevance, I read over 400 articles plus documentation to get this first app built in SharePoint, move it to SQL and make it work exactly the way it should.
Read full review
SAP
The biggest problem we ran into was communication between SAP Business Technology Platform and onsite resources. Unfortunately our SAP Business Technology Platform and Cloud systems are under different customer numbers. I constantly had to open tickets under each customer number because I was unsure of where the issue lied. And having to create a dummy ticket for our ECC systems to open the ECC connections for another ticket under the Cloud customer is a pain.
Read full review
Online Training
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
SAP
Training material in Developers Community or from Learning hub are really good... also most of the time we route through Discovery center... so materials provided by SAP is really good.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
SAP
Having a full cloud native environment for devlopment of microservices and digitals solutions while having standardized access to our core data on SAP via cloud connector is one of the main benefits of using BTP over others hypervisors. BTP is the standard hyperscaler as soon as something relies on data from SAP systems in our company now
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
1. PowerApps functionality comes with E1 over E3 License without adding extra costs 2. For Nintex you pay (at the beginning) for each workflow, so my intention would be, to do no workflows to prevent additional costs, but I want a platform with a fair price that allows me to create workflows without thinking about the price for each workflow and we use only some workflow and relative easy workflows and forms as a medium-sized company. 3. PowerApps provides a lot of functionality without needing to invest in premium features directly.
Read full review
SAP
Initially, SAP Business Technology Platform works hand in hand with S/4 HANA and the SAP product suite, but also can go and extra mile and integrate with other non-SAP products and services at hand. It's capable enough to understand the ERP use cases component and develop intelligent applications to satisfy the users.
Read full review
Scalability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
SAP
It's scalable
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Automation of manual processes brings an ROI on labor costs.
  • Intake of data provides clean database design.
  • Connectivity to data-lake provides insights and trends into the data.
  • Able to scale operations with efficiencies provided by the app.
  • Can mature the process and workflows to do more.
Read full review
SAP
  • Still using traditional devops instead of using build. Very high cost in development.
  • Still using Node.js instead of REST ABAP. Additional cost of resources. Migration of current CAP to RAP will be costly and do not have a business case yet. Continue with multi-language is costly.
  • Integration suite is power but the migration from PIPO to IS has been more challenging than being advertised.
Read full review
ScreenShots

SAP Business Technology Platform Screenshots

Screenshot of SAP Build Process Automation, an SAP BTP service