FrontSpin vs. Reply

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
FrontSpin
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
FrontSpin headquartered in San Mateo offers their automated outbound sales dialer, featuring CRM integration with automated call logging and syncing.N/A
Reply
Score 7.2 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
Reply.io helps sales teams book more meetings by automating outreach with smart AI. It finds leads, writes personalized messages, handles replies, and books meetings, so you can focus on closing deals. Reply.io's AI SDR learns the product, targets its potential users, and engages across email, LinkedIn, SMS, WhatsApp, and calls. Additionally it: Handles replies, books meetings, and works in multiple languages Has access to 1B+ leads with…
$50
per month
Pricing
FrontSpinReply
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
AI Chat
$50
per month
Email Volume
$59
per month per user
Multichannel
$99
per month per user
Agency
$166 (starts at)
per month (billed annually) per account
AI SDR Starter
starting with $800
per month 1000 active contacts
AI SDR Growth
Starts from $2500
per month 5000 active contacts
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FrontSpinReply
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional DetailsDiscount available for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
FrontSpinReply
Considered Both Products
FrontSpin
Chose FrontSpin
Works much better than Xant - I would avoid that one at all costs. Is easier to use than Groove and Outreach but does lack some of the more advanced features.
Chose FrontSpin
It is good for basic calling but it isn't made for email templates and setting up a cadence as Outreach does.

Outreach has a better format for seeing who has called what lead and being able to see who you have called that day.
Chose FrontSpin
Based purely on cost - the other two were more robust and did more, but we had a limited budget and FrontSpin more than covered our needs.
Chose FrontSpin
The cost of ConnectLeader far outweighed the benefits in our specific case and didn't have most of the functions of Frontspin.
Salesforce's and Hubspot's dialer aren't power dialers so you can't load a list and go. That is a HUGE benefit of FrontSpin.
Reply
Chose Reply
Reply is simpler and faster for reps. Sequencing, task queues, and basic A/B testing are easy to run, so ramp time and admin overhead stay low. Salesloft is stronger for enterprise governance, dialer ecosystem, and deeper analytics. HubSpot offers the widest footprint with CRM, …
Chose Reply
I’ve used Apollo.io alongside Reply, and while Apollo offers broader data enrichment and prospecting tools, Reply shines in its simplicity and focus on outreach automation. Reply’s interface feels lighter and more intuitive, making it easier to manage campaigns without …
Chose Reply
Reply is a decent alternative, but in my opinion, not much better than the selected platform alternatives
Chose Reply
We use Reply for our outbound sales initiatives, and the system performs excellently for us, outperforming any other platform. This is a fantastic
Chose Reply
Reply is a very good and widely known platform. I find it to be a lot more sophisticated and composed. I believe this tool works great for both large and small companies, which makes it stand out. There are so many other tools that work great, but they are restricted to the …
Chose Reply
Its customer service is very professional. They respond to my messages within a few minutes. I recently had a hard time creating templates, and their representative gives me the right workable solution, which makes me more comfortable using the platform on the next step. It …
Chose Reply
These tools are great, but they aren't built for what we use Reply for. Reply is perfect for doing these outbound campaigns at scale, whereas with ActiveCampaign and Vitally we were trying to turn the tools into something they are not.
Chose Reply
Reply is more user-friendly and has more features than the other tools I’ve used. It doesn’t have every feature we need, but it works better than the others that exist in the important aspects (connects to Gmail, accurate results, customization, etc.)
Chose Reply
Outreach did not cater to the Indian audience, hence went with my second best choice :)
Chose Reply
Reply is a great tool, but it is not as sophisticated as Outreach. I think Outreach works best for larger companies, while Reply works great for smaller ones. The two tools have a lot of similarities. Outreach has also built a culture around their product, whereas Reply has not …
Chose Reply
We've used MailChimp's email chain automation but they don't work as well as Reply.io when you need a plain text email to write to your contact. Our Business Development Managers are happier with Reply.io and say it has met their needs a lot better than the instruments that …
Chose Reply
I terms of outbound emails, I would say Reply.io is very similar to SalesLoft Cadence. I haven't used Cadence since last year, so there may be upgrades that I'm unaware of. But I prefer the interface for Reply and it's significantly cheaper. For teams smaller than 4 you can't …
Chose Reply
I think Reply.io has the most features for the price and the ability for me to insert dynamic images was the real winner. I have found that this is usually an enterprise feature in most of the platforms I have evaluated. I also like that this is accessible to the every day …
Features
FrontSpinReply
Preview Dialer
Comparison of Preview Dialer features of Product A and Product B
FrontSpin
9.8
Ratings
29% above category average
Reply
-
Ratings
Contact preview10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Dialer-CRM integration9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Call notes & tags10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic call logging10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Core Dialer
Comparison of Core Dialer features of Product A and Product B
FrontSpin
8.9
Ratings
14% above category average
Reply
-
Ratings
Outbound dialing10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Inbound routing5.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom caller ID10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Click-to-call10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Recorded voicemail drop9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Dialer contact import10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Campaign & list management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Call Follow-up and Quality Assurance
Comparison of Call Follow-up and Quality Assurance features of Product A and Product B
FrontSpin
9.0
Ratings
16% above category average
Reply
-
Ratings
Follow-up calls10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Dialer reporting & analytics7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Dialer compliance10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
FrontSpinReply
Small Businesses
Salesmate
Salesmate
Score 10.0 out of 10
Salesmate
Salesmate
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CloudTalk
CloudTalk
Score 7.4 out of 10
HubSpot Sales Hub
HubSpot Sales Hub
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Dialpad Sell
Dialpad Sell
Score 8.8 out of 10
Outreach
Outreach
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
FrontSpinReply
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
6.3
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
6.3
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
6.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
FrontSpinReply
Likelihood to Recommend
Works extremely well for an SDR/BDR team whose main focus is outreach through phone calls. Less appropriate for organizations looking for email cadence or a Salesforce add-on to work within Salesforce.
Read full review
The
reply is an excellent sales management solution. If any company wants
to save time and keep their sales team flexible, they should try it first. It
is a fantastic tool for delivering multiple emails to any target audience. This
is also the best deal for firms who looking for an all-in-one solution, as it
provides virtually unlimited email addresses along with CRM and outreach
automation.
Read full review
Pros
  • Recording of calls and attaching to SFDC records
  • Campaign lists
  • Cost
Read full review
  • This product gives me the liberty to very easily and freely navigate all things on my own, which does not require many skills to start working.
  • This product gives us the leverage of creating our own tailored and personalized templates for our teams in just a matter of minutes.
  • This program is so automated that it performs everything on its own from LinkedIn to email search, to even booking meetings.
  • I found the onboarding process pretty great and efficient. I am really happy with the overall customer support. They are some of the nicest people I have met who are there to willingly help me at any time of need and problem.
  • Their usability is also hands down very good. However, I find their user interface to be slightly less user-friendly, so there is some degree of scope in the improvement of their user intuitiveness and user-friendliness.
Read full review
Cons
  • Ability to see Salesforce 'Event' types in the lead record.
  • Make column edits sticky
  • Keep doing a great job guys, love your product!
Read full review
  • Syncing to other programs. You cannot interrelate Reply with other software in a simple way. Zapier is required and even then it’s not perfect.
  • Similar to syncing, there’s no way to export results of particular campaigns. This is awful. If I send out a campaign to a group, I’d like to export the results to enter into a CRM since I can’t sync the contacts. One of these features must be added ASAP.
  • Organization. While Reply itself is user-friendly, keeping campaigns and contacts and results organized is not. You cannot organize campaigns or file them away when they are done. Therefore you have to delete campaigns to stay organized and lose results, which you cannot even export.
Read full review
Usability
Trained a new recruit on FrontSpin in one session. It's very intuitive.
Read full review
Reply’s overall usability is strong. The interface is intuitive, and most features are easy to navigate without much training. Creating and managing sequences is straightforward, and the automation flow saves a lot of manual effort. Occasionally, the dashboard can feel a bit cluttered, and reporting could be more flexible. But overall, it’s a user-friendly tool that allows teams to get started quickly and operate efficiently day to day
Read full review
Support Rating
They do well with their support. Wait times are low, and they are eager to help.
Read full review
I generally receive a reply in no time at all and found not only the support org. but the sales team to be extremely helpful. Additionally I found a great onboarding process with plenty of resources to consume.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
The cost of ConnectLeader far outweighed the benefits in our specific case and didn't have most of the functions of Frontspin. Salesforce's and HubSpot's dialer aren't power dialers so you can't load a list and go. That is a HUGE benefit of FrontSpin.
Read full review
Reply is simpler and faster for reps. Sequencing, task queues, and basic A/B testing are easy to run, so ramp time and admin overhead stay low. Salesloft is stronger for enterprise governance, dialer ecosystem, and deeper analytics. HubSpot offers the widest footprint with CRM, marketing automation, and complex workflows, but it’s heavier and pricier. We chose Reply for speed, cleaner UX, and cost efficiency. Tradeoff: it lacks some HubSpot extras like advanced workflows, ticketing, and multi-touch attribution.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It has helped us make a lot more calls and keep track of activities done throughout the day.
  • It helps us keep a certain number of calls for each day.
Read full review
  • Reply.io has been a lot more effective than MailChimp in terms of the follow-ups for the email chains. We use them to contact the people who said they wanted to do business with us and MailChimp's emails usually went to Promotions on Gmail. With Reply.io, we overcame this problem and the open rate improved 30%.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Reply Screenshots

Screenshot of an overview of Reply's multichannel outreach toolScreenshot of Reply's multichannel cold outreachScreenshot of an overview of Reply's AI PersonalizationScreenshot of the email deliverability kitScreenshot of Reply's B2B databaseScreenshot of the AI SDR Agent