Webroot Endpoint Protection

Webroot Endpoint Protection

Webroot Endpoint Protection

71 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Webroot Endpoint Protection	Score 7.2 out of 10	N/A	Webroot Endpoint Protection is the OpenText company's business class multi-vector endpoint protection application, providing centralized endpoint management, deep learning intelligence, and advanced behavioral analytics. For SMBs, Webroot Smarter Cybersecurity solutions were designed from the ground up to stop advanced threats like ransomware and phishing. For MSPs, the company offers the Webroot® Business Endpoint Protection + MDR security solution.	$150 per 5 seats

Pricing

Webroot Endpoint Protection

Editions & Modules

Business Endpoint Protection: $150.00
per 5 seats
Business Endpoint Protection: $690.00
per 25 seats
Business Endpoint Protection: Contact sales team
per 50+ seats

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Webroot Endpoint Protection
Free Trial
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Webroot Endpoint Protection
Considered Both Products	Webroot Endpoint Protection Verified User C-Level Executive Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection Webroot Endpoint Protection is not as feature rich as the other products, but it is a great entry level product. Helpful? BS Brandon Schmidt Infrastructure Engineer Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection We found other products to be able to detect malware and malicious URL's better than Webroot Endpoint Protection. Thus, we moved away from Webroot Endpoint Protection. Also, over the years, there were at least 2 big mistakes by Webroot, where our business applications were … Incentivized Helpful? DM Doug Marchand IT Manager Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection Microsoft Defender is very different from Webroot Endpoint Protection. To explain, Webroot Endpoint Protection must be installed locally for all devices. Microsoft has a local installation for Defender for Windows PCs. What is different is how Microsoft Defender runs on the Mic… Incentivized Helpful? Patrick Doutre Director of Information Technology Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection Less system intensive than Symantec, with a much better management setup on the backend. More robust than Microsoft Defender, though a little heavier on the resources required, but the feature comparison is night and day between the two. Defender does nicely integrate with the … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User C-Level Executive Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection We would consider Webroot in the top 5 when you factor in ease of use, level of protection, and cost. Probably not as comprehensive as other end-point security solutions but the proper level of functionality and support for our needs. Question what impact the acquisition by … Incentivized Helpful? MS Mike Smith SR. IT Engineer Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection Webroot Endpoint is just Virus Protect and a good one. Incentivized Helpful? EM Eric Milles Help Desk Manager Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection Webroot Business Endpoint Protection does not hog system resources like Norton and other products do. You don't even know it's running. A look in the task manager will show it's very low on the resource list. Incentivized Helpful? Teri McMullen IT Solution Specialist and Sr. Account Executive Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection Both Avast and Norton have caused issues with their impact on system performance. Avast recently caused a major lag on a client-server, and Symantec slows down our systems so much that we ended up recommending more memory than was generally needed. Incentivized Helpful? Yvonne Graber President, Owner Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection Webroot is very lightweight to install and does not slow up your computer. Incentivized Helpful? MC Michael Cattano Sr. Systems Engineer Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection Webroot Endpoint Protection compares well to the other products listed. Viper, GFI and Symantec are a lot more intrusive and bloated compared to Webroot. The installation is more streamlined as well. The interface is streamlined and not full of fluff as to compared with … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Manager Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection Some of the other options available to us were less expensive than Webroot Endpoint Protection. Still, either required too much management on our end didn't offer multi-platform protection or didn't have all of the features we were looking for. Incentivized Helpful? Adam Friedli Level 2 Network Technician Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection With Webroot, installation is quick and doesn't require a reboot, definitions are always up-to-date without lengthy definition downloads, and the footprint makes it unnoticeable to clients. This can't be said about the other products I have used. Something would inevitably … Incentivized Helpful? Paul Li Senior Associate Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection Webroot Endpoint Protection beats the competition in various aspects. Webroot provides an easy web portal management of protected devices. Installation occurs very easily on all devices. Furthermore, the price to protect a workstation vs a server is one and the same. Incentivized Helpful? CR chuck rogers Owner, CTO & Managing Operator Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection I can tell you that the Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is much better than the competition in three primary areas. Number one; they are the smallest footprint so as not to decrease the performance of the endpoint. Number two; Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is very … Incentivized Helpful? Hunter Bonner Technology Consultant Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection Way better, and frankly, no Russian involvement. Incentivized Helpful? James Buchholz Service Manager Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection Webroot is extremely light on the system resources and incredibly quick to install. From what I've seen it's just as good for malware as Kaspersky and ESET. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Director Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection Way too heavy of an application. Webroot is a lot lighter and easier to use. Kaspersky overloads the system and pops up at the worst possible time, while Webroot just runs in the background doing its thing. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Technician Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection Webroot has been a much better asset both financially and in overall general use. Compared to Avast and Kaspersky, its been a much better decision that fits into our budget, and compared to Norton, it definitely uses a lot less resources on the endpoint. Norton tended to make … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Engineer Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection I think that the AV clients are more light weight than the others which makes running on older slower computers more manageable. Also Cloud manamgenet is a huge, huge plus. Incentivized Helpful? Ron Fenili Systems Administrator II Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection We looked at Kaspersky, Bitdefender, Norton. Webroot is usually No.1 or 2 based on ratings and user reviews/feedback. Easy to deploy and managability were also key to choosing Webroot. Incentivized Helpful?
Top Pros	Pro Easy to deploy Pro Cloud based Pro Small footprint
Top Cons	Minus Ongoing issue Minus Locked down Minus Web portal

Features

Webroot Endpoint Protection

Endpoint Security

Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
	Webroot Endpoint Protection 7.6 18 Ratings 11% below category average
Anti-Exploit Technology	8.916 Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)	9.013 Ratings
Centralized Management	7.018 Ratings
Hybrid Deployment Support	7.111 Ratings
Infection Remediation	7.018 Ratings
Vulnerability Management	7.015 Ratings
Malware Detection	7.018 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	Webroot Endpoint Protection
Small Businesses	SentinelOne Singularity Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	SentinelOne Singularity Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises	BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management Score 8.7 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Webroot Endpoint Protection
Likelihood to Recommend	7.5 (23 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	10.0 (1 ratings)
Usability	9.0 (2 ratings)
Support Rating	9.5 (8 ratings)
Implementation Rating	7.7 (7 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Webroot Endpoint Protection
Likelihood to Recommend	Webroot, an OpenText company The software tends to do a good job of basic protection but is not the best for larger clients and is not as powerful as some others offered on the market today. The support is not the best either, have had a hard time getting assistance in the past trying to resolve issues. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	Webroot, an OpenText company It is very light weight and does not tax the computers resources Has a quick scan and does not take forevere when scanning It's central management on the web makes it easy to use and gives tons of control for Admins Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	Webroot, an OpenText company There are several configuration options for both end-point and DNS protection. Would like a more simple way to understand and validate settings. Support is heavily video or FAQ based although you can submit a Support Ticket. Would like more availability to an actual support engineer. Overtime you can forget how to change setting - a refresher course would be nice, especially as new features are added to the solution. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Likelihood to Renew	Webroot, an OpenText company It has proven successful so far in our environment for controlling malware/virus outbreaks. Incentivized Ron Fenili Systems Administrator II Read full review
Usability	Webroot, an OpenText company Like I said before, sometimes I can't find what I need to change a setting. Incentivized Yvonne Graber President, Owner Read full review
Support Rating	Webroot, an OpenText company Support has been reliable up to this point. A request can easily be generated via the console and support responding in a reasonable time. We have not had any major issues other than the basic agents not communicating with the console and the like. Incentivized MC Michael Cattano Sr. Systems Engineer Read full review
Implementation Rating	Webroot, an OpenText company I had some difficulties with remote users. I ended up needing to open a remote tech support session and finish the process. Other than a few speed bumps, I was impressed with the engineering of the install. Because of time differences, I was done installing in two days. The cost, per license, could be less. Incentivized DM Doug Marchand IT Manager Read full review
Alternatives Considered	Webroot, an OpenText company We found other products to be able to detect malware and malicious URL's better than Webroot Endpoint Protection. Thus, we moved away from Webroot Endpoint Protection. Also, over the years, there were at least 2 big mistakes by Webroot, where our business applications were flagged as malicious as a false positive. Webroot did a public apology, but those mistakes were highly disruptive. Incentivized BS Brandon Schmidt Infrastructure Engineer Read full review
Return on Investment	Webroot, an OpenText company The licenses are pretty expensive but less costly than an actual malware infestation. We have tremendous peace of mind knowing that our machines and communications are secure. Our IT consultants are a little more involved in day-to-day management than they were before deploying Webroot Endpoint Protection, which means an increase in cost, but again this is a fair price to pay for protection against Internet threats. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots